26 techniques. Then, the data from both instruments were mixed in the discussion to
get deeper understanding about the research problems.
B. Research Setting
The  research  was  done  in  Sanata  Dharma  University.  To  test  the  self- monitoring  sheets  for  weekly  meetings,  the  researcher  distributed  the  sheets  two
times, once in two weeks. The distributions of the sheets were done on Thursday, 2  March  2017  and  Thursday,  16  March  2017,  both  were  at  K.12.  Then,  the
distribution of self-monitoring sheets for  progress test in  a form  of  presentations was done on Thursday, 30 March 2017 at E-Corner.
This  opportunity  was  also  used  by  the  researcher  to  distribute questionnaires.  Then,  the  researcher  chose  five  students  to  be  interviewed  based
on  their  responses  to  the  questionnaires.  Then,  the  interviews  with  the  students were  conducted  on  Monday,  10  April  2017  in  the  side  park  of  the  campus.  The
interviews started from 11.00 a.m. and finished at 11.30 a.m.
C. Research Participants
The participants of this research were the students of Critical Listening and Speaking  II  class,  Class  A,  semester  4,  batch  2015.  Actually,  there  were  29
students  in  the  class.  However,  in  the  first  and  second  meetings,  there  was  one student in each meeting who was not present. Therefore, even though they filled
27 the self-monitoring sheets, the researcher could not compare their data. Thus, their
data were not valid and there were only 27 students whose data were valid. Then,  the  researcher  distributed  the  self-monitoring  for  progress  test  in  a
form  of  presentations  in  the  same  class.  However,  the  same  case  happened,  two students  did  not come to the meeting. Hence, there were 27 students  whose data
were used in the data analysis. Since the researcher distributed the questionnaires in  the  same  day,  the  participants  for  the  questionnaires  were  also  27  students  in
the class. Then, the researcher chose 5 out of 27 students to be interviewed. The students  of Critical  Listening  and Speaking  II  were chosen to  be the
participants  of  this  research  because  they  had  already  taken  basic  courses  for speaking skills. In this class, they were required to apply what they had learned in
presenting their ideas i.e. doing  impromptu speeches and doing  presentations.  In hope,  by  doing  these  activities,  they  would  be  able  to  enhance  their  speaking
skills. Also, through the activities given in the class, the aspects in speaking skills that  were  researched  i.e.  grammar,  pronunciation,  vocabulary  items  and  fluency
could  be  clearly  seen  by  the  researcher.  Those  aspects  could  also  be  easily observed by the participants to find out their strengths and weaknesses, as well as
to set their goals for the next meeting.