Organisation of audit findings

Performance audit on Conservation and Ecological restoration of Lakes under the jurisdiction of Lake Development Authority and Urban Local Bodies 7

Chapter III Effectiveness of institutional mechanism and legal framework

in conservation and restoration of lakes

3.1 Entities involved in conservation and restoration of lakes

The responsibility of conservation and restoration of lakes in Urban Local Bodies ULBs including Bengaluru, vests with a number of Government departments and agencies. The powers and functions of these entities are elaborated in this Chapter. The entities involved and a gist of their roles are given in Chart 1 below: Chart 1: Entities responsible for conservation and restoration of lakes Government of Karnataka Forest, Ecology and Environment Department Responsible for afforestation works in the lakes and also the custodian of many lakes. Fisheries Department Responsible for regulating fishing activities in the lakes. Revenue Department Owner of all Government lands including lakes and responsible for survey, demarcation and removal of encroachments. Urban Development Department Responsible for monitoring, restoration and maintenance of lakes by BBMP, BDA Deputy Commissioner Responsible for survey of lakes and restoration works in CCs Karnataka State Pollution Control Board Regulation of discharge of industrial effluents and domestic sewage as per the Water Prevention Control of Pollution Act, Lake Development Authority Responsible for overall monitoring of lakes and supervision of works undertaken for restoration of lakes in ULBs Bengaluru Water Supply and Sewerage Board Responsible for treatment of sewage before it goes into the lakes in Bengaluru. BBMP and BDA Responsible for implementation of works and maintenance of the lakes for which they are the custodian in Bengaluru. Performance audit on Conservation and Ecological restoration of Lakes under the jurisdiction of Lake Development Authority and Urban Local Bodies 8

3.1.1 Lake Development Authority

As per the Memorandum of Association and Bye-laws of Association of LDA Bye-laws, LDA was established to exercise regulatory authority for all the lakes and act as planning and policy body to protect, conserve, reclaim, rejuvenate and restore lakes and its jurisdiction extended over the metropolitan area of Bengaluru including the green belt of Bengaluru and areas of CCs and City Municipal Councils CMCs in the State. LDA was required to restore the lakes by creating habitat for aquatic biodiversity including water birds and wild plants, monitor and manage water quality, create public awareness and involve community participation for lake conservation. LDA has a Governing Council, headed by the Chief Secretary, Government of Karnataka and an Executive Committee headed by the Principal Secretary, Forest, Ecology and Environment Department. The Executive Committee functions as the Empowered Committee which provides technical guidance to LDA and scrutinises and approves Detailed Project Reports DPRs on lake conservation and maintenance. Audit observed the following: ¾ The office of LDA is situated at Bengaluru and it does not have any branch offices though its jurisdiction is spread over other areas of CCs and CMCs in the State. ¾ It operates with skeletal staff which has not been reviewed by the State Government since its inception in 2002. ¾ LDA does not have any statutory powers. As a result, laxity in exercise of powers conferred as per Bye-law was observed. ¾ Environmental Planning was one of the objectives for which LDA had been constituted. LDA had not undertaken any integrated planning in association with all the entities involved in restoration of lakes. While responding, LDA stated December 2014 that because of these constraints, they only performed the role of a mediator between the public and the custodians of lakes. The State Government UDD admitted March 2015 that the development of lakes was taken up based on fund availability and not based on any comprehensive planning. This indicated that the works were taken up in lakes in an ad hoc manner without prioritisation. The LDA subsequently replied April 2015 that a proposal had been sent to the Government for sanctioning additional 60 posts and region-wise branches would be operated shortly. Performance audit on Conservation and Ecological restoration of Lakes under the jurisdiction of Lake Development Authority and Urban Local Bodies 9

3.1.2 Karnataka State Pollution Control Board

The KSPCB was required to assess the quality of water in the lakes periodically and report to the concerned agencies for taking follow up action. The agency was to levy penalties on the polluters of lakes. ¾ Audit observed that KSPCB monitored pollution levels in only 120 lakes out of 36,568 in the entire State which included 48 lakes in Bengaluru City. ¾ With regard to levy of penalties and action taken against polluters, KSPCB replied May 2014 that they had filed a criminal case against BWSSB. However, no action was taken against the polluters of the lakes such as residential apartments which were pumping sewage directly into lakes like Horamavu-Agara Lake. KSPCB stated May 2014 that due to shortage of manpower and funds, the quality of water was not assessed in all lakes. The reply is not acceptable as it was the duty of KSPCB to perform its job properly and ensure adequate manpower by taking up the matter with the State Government. Recommendation 1: In view of the fact that the KSPCB is unable to monitor pollution in all lakes due to shortage of manpower, it may consider taking inputs from other agencies carrying out assessment of pollution levels and water quality in lakes.

3.2 Revenue Department

Revenue Department is the owner of Government lands including water bodies. It is responsible for survey, demarcation of lake area and removal of encroachments in lake bed area. Audit observed that the department failed to carry out its responsibilities relating to conducting surveys and removing encroachments in lakes despite having mandate for the same. The department stated January 2015 that action is being initiated to create a separate cell with dedicated surveyors to complete the survey of lakes. Inadequacies in survey, demarcation of lake area and ineffectiveness in removal of encroachments in lake beds are discussed in Chapter IV of this report.

3.3 Urban Development

Department The department is responsible for monitoring the development works of the lakes carried out by the implementing agencies such as BBMP, BDA and other ULBs under its jurisdiction. The lakes in the urban areas which were originally with the Minor Irrigation MI Department were transferred to agencies under UDD.