CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion
After analyzing the data, it is concluded that the using of Think – Pair –
Share Strategy significantly affects the students’ achievement in reading comprehension, since the t-test t-table 5,8
2,00; df=58, α=0,05. The applying of Think
– Pair – Share Strategy in teaching reading comprehension enables the students to explore their ideas with their own words by thinking and to remember
the information of the text in long term memory. It means the null hypothesis Ho is rejected and alternative hypothesis Ha is accepted because there is
significant effect of applying Think – Pair – Share Strategy on students’ reading
comprehension.
B. Suggestion
Based on the finding, it is suggested that: a.
English teacher should use Think – Pair – Share Strategy in teaching reading comprehension because it enables the students to remember the
information of the text in long term memory. b.
English teachers should be able to make some variations in teaching reading comprehension which is appropriate with the ability of the students so that
they can explore their ideas totally by thinking and have ability to pair and share also give and accept any comments or information from the whole
class.
Students are advised to have more practice in reading and applying Think – Pair – Share Strategy.
REFERENCES
Ariani. 2013. The effect of cooperative learning techniques NHT TPS on students’ reading comprehension viewed from different text types in SMA
Negeri 2 Singaraja. Thesis summary. Postgraduate Program Ganesha University of Education Singaraja
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik edisi revisi VI. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Brown, H. Doughlas. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York:Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Brown, H. Doughlas. 2004. Language Assessment. Principles and Classroom Practices.New York: Longman. Pearson education.
Burns, et al. 1984. Teaching in Today’s elementary school. New York.
Cain, K. And Oakhill, J.2006.Assessment Matters: Issues in the Measurement of Reading Comprehension.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76,
697-708. http:www.psych.lanch.ac-ukpeopleuploadskatecain.pdf
acsessed on May 2, 2013. David. 2013. The Effect of Think Pair Share on the Students in Reading
Comprehension Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 5 Medan. Thesis summary. Universitas Negeri Medan.
Grabe and Stoller.2002. Teaching and researching reading. England: Pearson Education Limited.
Heilman. 1981. Principles and practices of teaching reading. Colombus: Charles E. Merrill Pub. Longman
Klinger, J. 2007. Teaching Reading Comprehension To Students With Learning Difficulties. London: The Guilford Press
Lyman, F. 1981. The Responsive Classroom Discussion. MD: University of Maryland College of Education
Reading. http:en.m.wikipedia.orgwikiReading_ process March 11, 2013 Wendy. 2007. The effects of using think-pair-share during guided reading
lessons. Thesis summary. University of Waikato
Kategori