G6PD deficiency Regional anaemia prevalence data

12 Figure 1.1 Determinants of anaemia Adapted from USAID. Conceptual Frameworks. Multisectoral Anemia Partners Meeting, hosted by the USAID Anemia Task Force held on 18 October 2013. Washington DC, USA. https:www.spring- nutrition.orgsitesdefaultfileseventsmultisectoral_anemia_meeting_diagrams . pdf Iron deficien cy Inadequate access or intake of nutrient- rich diets Inadequate maternal child care practices Poor supply or demand of curative preventive health services Excess blood loss High number inadequate spacing of births: Unsafe water, poor hygiene and sanitation Socio-cultural and economic conditions and policies, basic healthcare infrastructure, inequitable distribution of services, inadequate local evidence on etiology Other micro nutrien t deficien cies Malaria, helminths causing increased blood loss Inflammation due to multiple causes including malaria, helminths, chronic infections; tuberculosis, HIV, and caused by other toxins Genetic disorders; hemoglob inopathie

s, G6PD deficiency

Immediate causes Intermediate causes Basic causes 13

1.2 Regional anaemia prevalence data

Estimates of the prevalence of anaemia across countries is provided in Table 1. 1 Country data from different national surveys is given in Annex 1. Table 1.1 Anaemia prevalence Public Health Significance in countries of SEAR- National estimates for 2011 Children aged 6 –59 months Women 15 –49 years - Non-pregnant Women 15 –49 years - Pregnant Country Anaemic children b and mean Hb 95 CI Severely anaemic c Public Health Significanc e Anaemic non- pregnant d mean Hb 95 CI Severely anaemic e Public Health Significance Anaemic pregnant 18 mean Hb 95 CI Severely anaemic 19 Public Health Significanc e Banglades h 56 107102-112 1.1 Severe 43 122 119 – 124 0.7 Severe 48 110 107 - 113 0.5 Severe Bhutan 55 107 107 -119 2.3 Severe 44 121 112- 129 2.2 Severe 46 110 104 – 118 1.2 Severe DPR Korea 34 114105-122 0.5 Moderate 25 127121- 133 0.6 Moderate 27 118 111 – 124 0.4 Moderate India 59 106 101-112 1.8 Severe 48 119 113- 125 2.5 Severe 54 108 104- 113 1.3 Severe Indonesia 32 114 111 to 119 0.3 Moderate 22 128 123- 131 0.6 Moderate 30 117 109 – 123 0.5 Moderate Maldives 30 115 107 to 122 0.4 Moderate 37 124 119 – 128 0.6 Moderate 39 113 105 – 119 0.6 Moderate Myanmar 40 112 104 to 120 0.7 Severe 30 125 118- 132 1.0 Moderate 33 115 108 – 122 0.7 Moderate Nepal 51 109103 to 114 0.9 Severe 36 125 122 – 127 0.8 Moderate 36 111 108 – 115 0.6 Severe Sri Lanka 36 113 107 to 120 0.2 Moderate 26 127 120 – 132 0.7 Moderate 25 118 112 – 124 0.4 Moderate Thailand 29 116 107 to 123 0.5 Moderate 24 127 115 – 132 0.9 Moderate 30 117 104 – 126 0.6 Moderate Timor Leste 45 111 107 to 115 0.2 Severe 22 128 124- 132 0.7 Moderate 24 119 115 – 123 0.6 Moderate b Percentage with blood haemoglobin concentration 110 gL for children 6-59 months and pregnant women c Percentage with blood haemoglobin concentration 70 gL for children 6-59 months and pregnant women d Percentage of non-pregnant women with blood haemoglobin concentration 120 gL e Percentage of non-pregnant women with blood haemoglobin concentration 80 gL WHO classifies countries by degree of public health significance of the problem, based on blood haemoglobin concentration: 5 = no public health problem; 5 –19.9 = mild public health problem; 20–39.9 = moderate public health problem maroon in the Table ; ≥ = se e e pu li health p o le red in the table. WHO. Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993–2005: WHO global database on anaemia. WHO, Geneva, 2008. De Benoist B, McLean E, Egli I, Cogswell M, editors. 14

2. KEY CONSIDERATIONS AND DISCUSSION POINTS LEADING TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS