a I
4
t
n
4
V t
t e
The r achievement
It could be s
4.2.2 Trea
The tr the experim
19 Semaran narrative usi
4.2.3 Trea
The VIII D as th
taught by u teacher usua
explanation.
59 59.5
60 60.5
61 61.5
62 62.5
63 62.
result show t between th
seen on the c
T
atment on th
eatment was ental group.
ng. This cla ing DR-TA m
atment on th
treatment w he control gr
using conven ally does wh
67
60.
wed that th he experim
en chart 4.1.
The Averag
he Experim
s conducted . The treatm
ass consists method to im
he Control G
was conducte roup. This c
ntional meth hen teaches t
53
here was n ntal group an
Chart 4.1 e Score of t
mental Group
on Decemb ments were h
s of 30 stu mprove their
Group
ed on Decem class consiste
hod. I expl this material
no significa nd the contro
he Pre-test
p
er 3 and 14 held in the C
udents. The r reading nar
mber 2 and ed of 30 stu
ained about l. The studen
ant differen ol group on
for the clas Class VIII E
students w rrative text.
13, 2010 fo udents. This
t narrative t nts only liste
Experimenta Control
Grou
48
nce in the the pretest.
s VIII E as at SMP N
were taught
or the class group was
text as the ened to my
al Group
up
49
4.2.4 Posttest Finding
The posttest was conducted on December 16, 2010 for class VIII E as the experimental group and also for class VIII D as the control group. The purpose of
this test was to know the students’ achievement in reading narrative text after the writer gave the treatment. The writer analyzed the result of the post-test conducted
in both of the classes. In this part, the writer wanted to show whether there was a significant difference the experimental group and control groups.
4.2.4.1 Post-test Analyzed of the Experimental Group After conducting the pre-test, the writer did treatment to the experimental
group. The writer taught about narrative and the procedure of DRTA method. After conducting the treatment, the writer administrated a post –test. The post-test
was done to know about the experimental students’ improvement after getting treatment.
The mean of the post-test for the experimental group students was calculated using the following formula:
∑
Where: : The mean of post-test score for experimental group students
∑ : The sum of post-test score for experimental group students
: The number of experimental group students The computation was as follows:
,
50
The mean pre-test score for experimental group students in doing the pre test was 75, 78. The post-test achieved by the experimental group students were higher
than the pre-test. 4.2.4.1 Post-test Analysis of the Control Group
After conducting the pre-test, the writer did not teach about narrative and the procedure of DRTA method. The post-test was conducted on the same day the
experimental group had the test. The mean of the post-test for the control group students was calculated
using the following formula: ∑
Where: : The mean of post-test score for control group students
∑ : The sum of post-test score for control group students
: The number of control group students The computation was as follows:
, The mean post-test score of control group students was 68, 56. From the
computation above, the writer concluded that the mean of the post-test achieved by the control group students was higher than that of the pre-test.
On the other hand, the average scores of the post-test were analyzed in the experimental group was 75, 78 and the control group was 68, 56. The writer
c t
a b
4
n p
concluded th than the con
achievement be seen on th
4.2.5 Leve
Kategori