and request ask for something politely. In using a directive, the speakers intends to elicit some future course of action on the part of the addressee, thus making the
world match the words via the addressee.
65
For example: i I asked them to close the window.
ii Fight me iii Turn the TV down.
iv Hurry up. v
Could you please get that lid off for me? 3.
Commissive Commissive is the kinds of speech act that commit the speaker to some
future course of action. They express the speaker‟s intention to do something.
66
Paradigmatic cases include offers, pledges, promises, refusals, and threats. In the case of a commissive, the world is adapted to the words via the speaker him
or herself.
67
For example, i I‟ll be back in five minutes. ii I‟ll never buy you another computer game.
4. Expressive
Expressive is the kinds of speech act that express a psychological attitude or state in the speaker such as joy, sorrow, and like or dislike.
68
Paradigmatic cases include apologizing, blaming, congratulating, praising, and thanking.
69
For example, i Well done, Elizabeth ii I‟m so happy. iii
Wow, great
65
Yan Huang, Op.Cit., p. 106
66
Ibid.
67
Ibid.
68
Ibid.
5. Declaration
Declaration is the kinds of speech act that effect immediate changes in some current state of affairs just via utterance. Usually, they will rely on
elaborating extralinguistics institutions for successful performance; they may be called institutionalized performatives.
70
Paradigmatic cases include bidding in bridge, declaring war, excommunicating, firing from employment, and nominating a candidate.
71
For example, i President: I declare a state of national emergency. ii Chairman: The
meeting is adjourned. Moreover, this research uses Searle‟s theory in finding classification of
directive illocutionary act as the main theory in this movie transcription. It is aware that there is almost no difference between Austin‟s theory and Searle‟s
theory. According to the researcher, Searle‟s theory about classifying of illocutionary act is good and significant because he grouped it into five categories
based o n the aim of speech. Austin‟s theory is not like that. He divided the
illocutionary act into five criteria based on the explicit meaning of performative sentence.
F. Direct and Indirect Speech Act
Direct speech acts are directly cooperative in nature. The obvious answer to the question discussed earlier,
where’s my chocolates?, would be I don’t know, or
you’ve eaten them. Both are immediately relevant and perform the act of
69
Ibid.
70
Ibid., p. 108.
71
Ibid.
information. But a view of language which saw it simply as the performance of direct acts of this sort would be greatly impoverished.
72
Much of what we communicate is done through indirect speech acts.
Indirect acts are indirectly cooperative. They depend on us being able to pick up the relevant clues from intonational and thematic force, together with the
context of utterance, in order to arrive at a correct interpretation of the speaker‟s meaning.
73
Not surprisingly, indirect speech acts often involve deviations from the cooperative principle.
A different approach to distinguishing types of speech acts can be made on the basis of structure. When an interrogative speech act such as
Did you…?, Are they
…?, or Can we…? is used with the function of a question, it is described as a direct speech act. For example, when we don‟t know something and we ask
someone to provide the information, we usually produce a direct speech such as Can you ride a bicycle?
74
Compare that utterance with Can you pass the salt?, we are not really asking a question about someone‟s ability. In fact, we don‟t normally use this
structure as a question at all. We normally use it to make a request. That is, we are using a syntactic structure associated with the function of a question, but in this
case with the function of a request. The utterance above is an example of an indirect speech act.
75
72
Geoffrey Finch, How to Study Linguistics, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, p. 161.
73
Ibid. p. 162.
74
George Yule, Op.Cit., p. 118.
75
Ibid.
25
CHAPTER III RESEARCH FINDINGS
A. Data Description
In conducting this research the writer uses qualitative method and data collecting technique used by me is bibliography technique. The research is using written
sources to get the data. The steps to collect the data are: 1.
Downloading the movie script at www.imsdb.com
; 2.
Reading the whole dialogue script of How to Train Your Dragon 1 and 2 movie carefully;
3. Marking √ to the dialogues that assumed contained a directives illocutionary
act. 4.
Compiling those dialogues into data card, so, the data card contains the dialogues and page that refer to the script. The data card also numbered. Until
this stage, the writer obtained 30 data from How to Train Your Dragon 1 movie script and 29 data from How to Train Your Dragon 2 movie script. The
details are shown in this table. Table 1: The Types of Directives Illocutionary Act on How to Train Your Dragon
1 and 2 Movie Script. No.
The types of Directives Illocutionary Act
Total Movie HTTYD 1
Total Movie HTTYD 2
1. Ask
6 2
2. Challenge
2 1
3. Command
17 22
4. Insist
1 5.
Request 4
4 Total
30 29
5. After the data have been collected, the next step is collecting the data.
In this phase, the amount of samples will be specified. The writer uses random sampling technique to specify the samples. Then, the writer uses raffle
technique with these steps: 1.
Each member of population compiled into list and numbered. 2.
Each of numbered lists of population‟s member is written on a small piece of paper.
3. The paper is rolled up and inserted in the box.
4. After shake the box, the rolls of paper is taken in accordance with the amounts
of wanted sample.
76
Through that process, 31 corpus data have been selected. They are 15 data from How to Train Your Dragon
1 movie script and 16 data from How to Train Your Dragon
2 movie script. The last step is to classify the data. As the writer said earlier, in this data description, the writer focuses on form of directive
illocutionary act ask, challenge, command, insist, and request as proposed by John R. Searle. The details of the data can be seen in the following table:
76
Ibid., p. 54.
