The Party System Institutionalization and Legislative Behavior.

7 experienced by Russia and Ukraine, for good institutional management will significantly influence the political system strong impact on the party and the state system.

3. The Party System Institutionalization and Legislative Behavior.

Parliament legislature is one of the arena of political contestation that give effect to the institutional party, with the assumption that the presence of legislators because of the election and is the focus of the relationship between legislators and their party from the standpoint of the election. If the agency considers that the weakness of the party due to external factors that lead to differences in the relationship between the party and cadre Partain, then the example of legislators in the United States can be a reference and referral that is if you want to increase the chances of re-election of candidates for the legislature have to qualify the party leadership. In addition, political parties have to be disciplined in controlling the resources of cadres, label or party ideology, committee assignments, control the agenda and the partys program and others 9 , because in addition to legislators should improve the sound is also a potential resource that parties must be maintained. Results hypothesis in empirical research 10 , the study of the effect on the party discipline institutionalization of the party in the legislature. First, basically people would expect that candidates who get the higher sound will be more disciplined stints in parliament, because the vote reflects their electoral strength. This is indicated by the hypothesis H1: Party discipline in the legislature increase the total stock of sound. Expectations at the beginning of the vote a party that is a measure of the institutionalization of the party, but it is limited, because of the vote in the party made possible the existence of a strong correlation between the candidates with the people and organizations that fund. Thus, the following hypothesis is proposed H2; Discipline is a direct factor and the argument of institutionalization and the vote. Heres a little hypothesis could answer to the phenomenon posed above. In contrast to the argument Mainwaring 11 , which indicates if the two aspects of the weaker party discipline and sound acquisition as a factor of institutional weakness, then it can be traced in terms of how the ability to maintain party discipline in the legislature. In addition, the ability of maintaining ties at the grassroots level will be value-added for political parties, and 9 Thames,C. Frank;2007, Aldrich, 1995; Cox dan McCubbins, 1993; Kiewiet dan McCubbins, 1991, Thames, T. Frank, “ Dicipline and Party Institutionalization Post Soviet Legislatures ”, Vol 3 no 4, Sage Publication, 2007, pp. 459 10 Thames, C. Frank, 460 11 Mainwaring, 124 8 establish strong ties with social groups. As such, these parties will be better able to help the candidates to win the election. Hypothesis Frank and Mainwaring was an experience outside of the State of Indonesia, which of course can vary from several aspects such as the condition of society, the diversity of cultures, customs and habits that can provide color spectrum of its own in building democratic consolidation in society, political parties, parliament and government, but did not rule out the face and the model will be the same party to study outside.

4. The impossibility of services in two Functions