CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
A. Conclusion
After analyzing the data, it was concluded that use of peer review significantly effect
s the students’ achievement in writing descriptive paragraph, since t-observedt-table 43.552.042;df=28,
α=0.05. The used of peer review strategy in writing descriptive paragraph, the students to explore their ideas with
their own words and as a stimulus to increase their creativity in writing include the level of vocabulary development and able to gave suggestions and comments
in teaching process. It can help the students more be active. It means the null hypothesis Ho was rejected and alternative hypothesis Ha was accepted
because there was significant effect of using peer review on the students’
achievement in writing descriptive paragraph.
B. Suggestions
Based on the conclusion above, the researcher gives suggestion as following:
1. The English teacher was suggested to apply peer review strategyin
teaching descriptive paragraph as an essential part of thewriting process. 2.
The students was suggeted to be more active, confidance, and enjoyable and exploring their writing ability by peer review strategy.
3. Other researchers, it is expected to the readers who are interested in
dealing with this study so that they have a good understanding to support
their study especially in writing descriptive paragraph.
REFERENCES
Brix, J., Grainger, P., Hill, A. 2014. Investigating Mandatory Peer Review of Teaching In Schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 394.
Brown, H. Douglas.2001. Teaching by principles, an Interactive Approach to language Pedagody.
2
nd
.ed.new York; Longman Dirgayasa Wayan I. 2012. A Genre Based Approach. Maritime English
Writing,Unimed Press Harmer, Jeremy. 2004. How to Teach Writing. London: Longman
Harmer, Jeremy. 1899. Writing English Language Tests. London and New York Heaton. J. 1988. Writing English Language Tests. London: Longman
Knapp, Peter Watknis, Megan. 2005. Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies for
Teaching and Assessing Writing. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Ltd.
Mayers, Alan.005. Gateway to Academic Writing. United States of America:Addison Wesley Longman.Inc
Min Hui-Tzu. 2006. The Effect of Trained Peer review on EFL students’ revision
types and writing quality . Journal of Second language Writing.
Taiwan:University Road Mittan, R. 1989. The peer review process: Harnessing students communicative
power. In D. M. Johnson D. H. Roen Eds..Richness in Writing: Empowering ESLStudents
pp.207-219. White Plains, NY: Longman. Pardiono.2007. PastiBisaTeaching Genre-Based Writing. Yogyakarta: Andi
Reid, Joy M. 1993. Teaching ESL Writing. New York: Prentice Hall Regents Wishon and Burks. 2005. Research-Based Unit and Lesson Planning:
Maximizing student Achievment. USA: Littlefield Education. White, C. 1989. Writer’s Art. A Practical Rethoric and Handbook.
California:Wars-Worth Publishing Wyrick, Jean. 1996. Steps to Writing Well, a Conscise Guide to Composition. 6
th
ed. New York: Harcout Brace College Publishers
Kategori