Theoretical Framework 9 LITERATURE REVIEW 9

2.1.4. Cooperative Learning Model 12 2.1.4.1. Characteristics of Cooperative Learning 13 2.1.4.2. Goals of Cooperative Learning Model 14 2.1.4.3. Syntax For Cooperative Learning Model 14 2.1.4.4. Theoretical and Empirical Support Cooperative Learning 15 2.1.4.4.1. The Concept of Democratic Classrooms 15 2.1.4.4.2. Intergroup Relations 16 2.1.4.4.3. Experiential Learning 16 2.1.4.5. Advantages And Disadvantages of Cooperative Learning 16 2.1.4.6. Various Cooperative Learning Model 19 2.1.4.7. Cooperative Learning Group Investigation GI 21 2.1.5. Conventional Learning 22 2.1.6. Learning Media 23

2.1.6.1. Objectives of Media 24

2.1.6.2. Macromedia Flash 24 2.1.6.3. Function of Media 25 2.2. Literature of Subject Matter 26 2.2.1. Dynamics Electricity 26 2.2.1.1.Electric Current 26 2.2.1.1.1. Measuring the Electric Current 28 2.2.1.1.2. Switch and Fuse 29 2.2.1.2. Potential Difference 30 2.2.1.3. Ohm’s Law 32 2.2.1.4. Resistance and Resistancity 34 2.2.1.4.1. Resistor Types 34 2.2.1.4.1.1. Fixed resistor 34 2.2.1.4.1.2. Variable Resistor 35 2.2.1.5. Series Circuit 38 2.2.1.6. Paralel Circuit 39 2.2.1.7. Kirchhoff’s First Law 41 2.2.1.8. Kirchhoff’s Second Law 42 2.2.1.9. Electrical Power and Energy 44 2.3. Preceding Research 47 2.4. Conceptual Framework 49 2.5. Research Hypothesis 51

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD 52

3.1. Place and Time of Research 52 3.2. Population and Sample of Research 52 3.2.1. Population of Research 52 3.2.2. Sample of Research 52 3.3. Variable of Research 52 3.4. Type and Research Design 53 3.4.1. Type of Research 53 3.4.2. Design of Research 53 3.5. Instrument of Research 54 3.5.1. Cognitive Instrument 54 3.5.2. Content Validity 54 3.5.3. Prediction Validity 55 3.5.4. Reliability of Test 56 3.5.5. Level of Difficulty Test 56

3.5.6. Test Distinguishing Features 57

3.6. Techniques of Collecting Data Procedure of Research 57 3.7. Techniques Of Data Analysis 60 3.7.1. Determine Data 60 3.7.2. Determine Deviation Standard 60 3.7.3. Data Conditional Test 61 3.7.3.1. Normality Test 61 3.7.3.2. Homogeneity Test 61 3.7.4. Hypothesis Test 62

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 64

4.1 Research Result 64 4.1.1. Description of Research Data 64

4.1.1.1. Research Data of Pretest and Posttest 64

4.1.1.1.1. Pretest Data 64 4.1.1.1.2. Posttest Data 66 4.1.2 Testing Analysis of Data 67 4.1.2.1 Normality Test 67 4.1.2.2 Homogeneity Test of Data 67 4.1.3 Hypothesis Test of Research 68 4.2. Discussion 69

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 74

5.1. Conclusion 74 5.2. Suggestion 74 REFERENCE 75

Dokumen yang terkait

THE EFFECT OF ROUNDTABLE MODEL IN COOPERATIVE LEARNING ON THE WRITING ACHIEVEMENT OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 1 ARJASA IN THE 2005 / 2006 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 4 92

THE EFFECT OF SMALL GROUP WORKING TECHNIQUE ON READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN I NGADIROJO, PACITAN IN THE 2004/2005 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 4 12

THE EFFECT OF USING FLASH CARDS IN ENGLISH TEACHING ON VOCABULARY MASTERY OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SLTPN 1 CANDIPURO LUMAJANG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2000 / 2001

0 6 83

THE EFFECT OF USING JIGSAW TYPE II IN COOPERATIVE LEARNING ON THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT AT SMPN 2 TANGGUL JEMBER

0 2 15

THE EFFECT OF USING JIGSAW TYPE II TECHNIQUE ON THE READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT OF THE SEVENTH YEAR STUDENTS AT SMPN 6 JEMBER

1 4 15

THE EFFECT OF USING ROUNDTABLE TECHNIQUE IN COOPERATIVE LANGUAGE LEARNING ON TENSE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE EIGHTH YEAR STUDENTS AT SMPN 1 JENGGAWAH IN THE 2012/2013 ACADEMIC YEAR YEAR STUDENTS AT SMPN 1 JENGGAWAH IN THE 2012/2013 ACADEMIC YEAR YEAR STUDENTS AT

0 4 16

THE EFFECT OF ANIMATION VIDEO TOWARD STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY AT FIRST GRADE STUDENTS OF SMAN 2 KALIANDA LAMPUNG SELATAN 2012

0 9 53

APPLYING COOPERATIVE LEARNING METHOD, GROUP INVESTIGATION TYPE IN BEDANA DANCE LEARNING OF JHS WIRATAMA KOTAGAJAH PENERAPAN METODE COOPERATIVE LEARNING TIPE GROUP INVESTIGASI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN TARI BEDANA DI SMP WIRATAMA KOTAGAJAH

1 23 61

THE DIFFERENCE OF STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL ACHIEVEMENT BY USING GUIDED-DISCOVERY AND COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL JIGSAW TYPE

0 0 10

THE EFFECT OF PROCESS ORIENTED GUIDED INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL BASED ON VIRTUAL LABORAORY TOWARD PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITIES OF PHYSICS STUDENT

0 0 5