Validity and reliability METHODS

3.6. Procedure

The procedure of this research was explained as follow: 1. Constructing instrument for pre-test and post test and materials for teaching. 2. Selecting the population and samples of the research. The population used in this research were the students in the second grade of SMAN 1 Kalirejo and the sample were class XI IPS 1 and class XI IPS 2. 3. Trying out the instrument test of vocabulary, the try out test was done in class XI IPS 3. 4. Giving a pre-test for students in order to identify the level of vocabulary achievement. 5. Conducting a treatment. The reasercher taught vocabulary for the subject of the research using these two technique. One class used clustering technique and one another used derivational exercises. 6. After giving a treatment, the students were given a post test to identify whether the techniques give an improvement for students’ vocabulary achievement. 7. The last, after getting all the data, the researcher analyzed the data by using SPSS to know the result.

3.7. Data Treatment

After collecting the data, the researcher analyzed the data by using Independent Group T-Test in SPSS Statistical Program for Social Science. The researcher collected the data by looking at the result of pre-test and post test of vocabulary to find out the result of the students’ vocabulary achievement. The result of the test was in form of score or interval data. After getting the result the researcher analyzed how far the impr ovement of students’ vocabulary achievement after given a treatment and which one is better between clustering techniques and derivational exercises for teaching vocabulary. Therefore, the writer used homogeinity and normality test to treat the data taken from result of pretest. The results of the treatment were as follows. A. Homogeinity test The homogeinity test was used to know whether the data in both experimental classes were homogenous or not. The data which were analyzed were the score from pre-test. From the result of the analysis, the data were not homogenous based on the criteria for t he hypothesis if pα by using level of significant 0.05. In this test level of significancy of the test was 0.003. B. Normality test Normality test was used to know whether the data in both experimental classes were normally distributed or not. Based on the analysis using SPSS 16.0 the data showed that there were distributed normally. In this research, the criteria for the hypothesis are H 1 is accepted if pα by using level of significant 0.05.

3.8. Hypothesis Testing

After collecting the data, the researcher tried to analyze them in order to find out how far clustering technique and derivational exercises improve students’ vocabulary achievement and which technique gave better improvement for the students vocabulary achievement. The hypothesis were as follow: H : There is no significant difference between the students’ vocabulary achievement taught through clustering technique and derivational exercises. H 1 : There is significant difference between the students’ vocabulary achievement taught through clustering technique and derivational exercises. After all the data had been collected, the writer used statistical analysis using Independent Group T-Test to test the hypothesis. Based on the result of the analysis, the data showed that both technique gave an improvement in students’ vocabulary achievement. But, there was a difference result gave by the techniques. Clustering Technique gave more significance improvement to the students’ vocabulary achievement than Derivational Exercises.

V. CONCLUSION

5.1. Conclusion

Based on the result of the analysis, the writer concludes that: 1. T he techniques used in this research can improve students’ vocabulary achievement. Eventhough there were different result provided from the techniques. It showed that Clustering Technique gave more significant improvement than Derivational Exercises. 2. Clustering Technique was better to teach vocabulary because it was very simple. So, it could be used to all grades of learners starting from the beginner level until advanced level. The students who learned using Clustering Technique produced the words by their own creative thinking but do not really concern to grammatical rules. Therefore, they produced simple sentences easily, but made many mistakes in construsting the sentences. The aspects of vocabulary increased using this technique were adverb, noun, and adjective. 3. Derivational Exercises provided more complicated rules to be understood by the students. It made the students should have an extra effort to learn vocabulary using this technique. The students who learn using Derivational Exercises understood the pattern of grammatical construction by doing the exerxises. When the students did the exercises, they internalized the pattern of sentence construction. The aspects of vocabulary increased using this technique were adjective, adverb, and noun.

5.2. Implication

The research finding that has been mentioned by the writer hopefully can be applied in some practical uses such as; 1. As an alternative for the teacher to choose an appropriate technique in teaching learning process for the students in order to make them easy to memorize vocabulary. Clustering technique and Derivational Exercises can be an alternative techniques to teach vocabulary with their advantage. Clustering technique can be very interesting in teaching learning process while Derivational Excercises makes the students learn both vocabulary and grammatical rules in one ocassion. 2. As consideration for the teacher to choose the appropriate technique related to the objectve of teaching vocabulary. Clustering Technique is good for developing a number of active vocabulary for the students and Derivational Exercises is good for comprehending active vocabulary and understanding the use of vocabulary based on grammatical construction. Meanwhile, different level of the students may make the teacher choose different technique to make the students increase their understanding. Furthrmore, Clusteing Technique is better to teach the students in the beginning level. On the other hand, Derivational Exercises is better to teach advanced level of students for comprehension.

Dokumen yang terkait

IMPROVING THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS’ WRITING ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH THE USE OF CLUSTERING TECHNIQUE AT SMAN 1 PAITON IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2012/2013

0 4 15

Comparing The Effectiveness Of Using Jigsaw Technique And Students Team Achievement Divisions Technique In Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Research At Second Grade Students Of Mts Salafiyah Depok)

2 44 148

INCREASING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH DERIVATIONAL APPROACH AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 3 BANDAR LAMPUNG

1 8 65

INCREASING STUDENTS` VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH DERIVATIONAL APPROACH AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 3 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 10 77

THE EFFECT OF TEACHING DERIVATIONAL AFFIXES THROUGH DERIVATIONAL PRACTICES ON STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT AT THE FIRST GRADE OF SMA NEGERI 1 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 10 55

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

0 10 61

IMPLEMENTING CLUSTERING TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING VOCABULARY AT THE FIRST GRADE OF SMAN 1 NATAR

7 20 57

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

2 14 60

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE IN NARRATIVE TEXT TO INCREASE THE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KALIREJO

0 5 67

THE USE OF VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES AND VOCABULARY SIZE OF THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS AT MAN 1 BANDAR LAMPUNG

2 10 54