The Meaning of English Language Learning The Purpose of English Language Teaching and Learning

2 If the learners feels save, they will be more able to take part in the lesson. 3 Learners are motivated if the lessons are interesting. 4 Learners should be told new things. 5 Learners need new things and how to do new things. 6 Learners need guidance. 7 Learners should be encouraged Edge, 2001: 9.

b. The Meaning of English Language Learning

The most obvious characteristics in language learning is that students use the language a great deal through communicative activities such as games, role play, and problem solving tasks Larsen and Freeman, 2000: 129. Learning a language is not just matter of mastering the structure of a language. Language is for communication. The students have to interact a great deal with one another. They do this in various configurations: pairs, triads, small groups, and whole group. Richards 2001: 161 gives three elements in language learning. The first element is communication principle. The activities that involve real communication promote learning. A second element is the task principle. Activities in which language is used for carrying out meaningful tasks promote learning. The third element is the meaningfulness principle: language that is meaningful to the learner supports the learning process. Learning activities are consequently selected according to how well they engage the learner in meaningful and authentic language use rather than merely mechanical practice of language pattern.

c. The Purpose of English Language Teaching and Learning

The main function of language teaching is for communication. All English instructions enable their students to communicate in the target language. Richards 2001: 36 states that communicative language teaching as a broad approach to teaching that resulted from a focus of communication as the organizing principle rather than a focus on mastery of the grammatical system of the language. While Brown 2001: 42 explains Beyond grammatical and discourse elements in communication, we are probing the nature of social, cultural, and pragmatic features of language. We are exploring pedagogical means for “real life’ communication in the classroom. We are trying to get our learners to develop linguistic fluency, not just accuracy that so consumed our historical journey. Based on the explanation above, it can be concluded that the language teaching is not focused on grammatical system but focused on communication The objective of English instruction at school is to enable the learners to reach communicative competence. The term “communicative competence” was first coined by Hymes 1972 as a reaction against the concept of Language competence proposed by Chomsky 1965. If Communicative competence is higher than linguistics competence, how do we develop this? Can we give students structure drills or pattern practice?. Structure drills may be useful in developing linguistic competence i.e., producing grammatical sentence; but it is not effective to develop communicative competence. In Hymes’ view, the communicative competence refers to the knowledge and the use of language with respect to 1 Whether and to what degree something is formally possible. 2 Whether and to what degree something is feasible in virtue of the means of implementation available. 3 Whether and to what degree something is appropriate adequate, happy, successful in relation to context in which it is used and evaluated. 4 Whether and to what degree something is in fact done, actually performed, and what its doing entails. Some characteristics of communicative language teaching are stated by Richards and Rogers 2001: 160-161. They state that 1 Language is a system for the expression of meaning 2 The primary function of language is to allow interaction and communication. 3 The structure of language reflects its functional and communicative uses. 4 The primary units of language are not merely its grammatical and structural features, but categories of functional and communicative meaning as exemplified in discourse. The more comprehensive characteristics of communicative language teaching are given by Brown 2001: 43. The characteristics of CLT according Brown are as follows: 1 Classroom goals are focused on all the components grammatical, discourse, functional, sociolinguistic, and strategic of communicative competence. Goals therefore must intertwine the organizational aspects of language with the pragmatic. 2 Language techniques are designed to engage learners in the pragmatic, authentic, functional use of language for meaningful purposes. Organizational language forms are meaningful purposes. Organizational language forms are not the central focus, but rather aspects of language that enable the learner to accomplish those purposes. 3 Fluency and accuracy are seen as complementary principles underlying communicative techniques. At time fluency may have to take on more importance than accuracy in order to keep learners meaningfully engaged in language use. 4 Students in a communicative class ultimately have to use the language, productively and respectively, in unrehearsed context outside the classroom. Classroom tasks must therefore equip students with skill necessary for communication in those contexts. 5 Students are given opportunities to focus on their own learning process through an understanding of their own styles of learning and through the development of the appropriate strategies for autonomous learning. 6 The role of the teacher is that of facilitators and guide, not all knowing bestowed of knowledge. Students are therefore encouraged to construct meaning through genuine linguistic interaction with others.

d. The Elements of English Language Teaching

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving students' writing ability through clustering technique (A classroom action research in the second year of SMP al-hasra Bojongsari- Depok)

4 11 109

Improving Students' Ability in Using Conditional Sentence Type 2 Through Contextual Teaching and Learning

0 4 131

Improving Students’ English Vocabulary Through Cluster Technique ( A Classroom Action Research At The Second Grade Of Smp Al-Kautsar Bkui Jakarta)

2 9 62

Improvingstudents’ Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text Through Jigsaw Technique (A Classroomaction Researchin The Second Grade Students Of Smp Ash-Sholihin Kebon Jeruk)

0 11 99

Improving the students’ Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text through Story Mapping

3 28 105

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH INQUIRY- BASED TEACHING (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH INQUIRY- BASED TEACHING (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE FOURTH YEAR OF SD NEGERI NGABEAN 3 KART

0 0 15

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY IN LEARNING ENGLISH USING CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL): IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY IN LEARNING ENGLISH USING CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL): A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH OF THE FOURTH

0 1 16

IMPROVING CIVICS EDUCATION QUALITY THROUGH TWO STAY TWO STRAY TECHNIQUE: CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH Improving Civics Education Quality Through Two Stay Two Stray Technique: Classroom Action Research At Smk Negeri 2 Purbalingga 2010 – 2011.

0 0 9

ACTION RESEARCH ON IMPROVING STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION IN SPEAKING THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING LEARNING.

0 0 27

PDF ini IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ENGLISH SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH PORTOFOLIO CONFERENCE (A Classroom Action Research at Politeknik Madiun) | Mulyani | ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN INDONESIA 1 SM

0 1 20