Examination Institutional policy governing teachers’ professional practice
4.3.2.2 Examination
The two main examinations administered by teachers are the mid-term and final tests. Therefore, all teachers usually coordinate to conduct the mid-term and final test during the same week. In addition to the two tests, teachers are allowed to administer other tests or quizzes on their own. Before conducting the mid-term or final test the teachers should check the attendance records of the students. Students must attend at least 75 of the lectures in order to participate in the mid-term or final test. If they have attended less than 75 then they are given additional duties as a condition for participating in the mid-term or final test.The procedure for conducting the mid-term or final test is shown in Chart 9 below: Chart 9: Procedure for conducting mid-termfinal test Source: document of quality control unit of KUM YES SSS Teachers administer the test NO Teacher announces the schedule of the test Students individually prepare for the examination An instruction letter from university management for teachers to conduct the test. For mid-term test, teachers must have taught a minimum of 7 lessons and a minimum of 12 lessons in order to conduct a final-test. Teacher fulfills the requirement Teacher conducts lessons until they fulfill the minimum teaching requirement Start 94 The above chart indicates that mid-term or final test examination is conducted through a series of steps. In other words, to continue engaging in the game, KUM teachers, as the actors in the field, should follow the rulespolicies made by KUM leaders. If the teachers are able to follow the rules, they might attain forms of cultural capital that enable them to perform well as the KUM teachers as Nolan 2012, p. 204 mentions that, “the relative smoothness of the gamefield often depends upon the players blindly accepting and following these rules, regardless of how arbitrary they might seem.” As a teacher continues to engage in the game, heshe willingly follows the rules so that heshe will be able to feel the game Bourdieu, 1990. The next section of this chapter describes the School of English Education that acts many of the rules teachers are required to follow. This is the school that has the largest enrolment of students at KUM.4.4 School of English Education of Kanjuruhan University of Malang
Parts
» Teacher self-evaluation as a mediational activity
» Teacher self-evaluation and teachers’ habitus
» Research questions Research aims
» The practice of teacher evaluation
» Teacher self-evaluation – key elements
» Research on teacher self-evaluation
» Sociocultural theory and teacher professional development
» Affordances of teacher self-evaluation instruments
» Mediation and internalization Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory
» The Zone of Proximal Development ZPD
» Research on sociocultural theory in teacher professional development
» Teacher professional identity Literature Review and Theoretical Framework
» Possible-selves theory Literature Review and Theoretical Framework
» Reproduction and transformation of habitus
» Research on Bourdieu’s sociological theory in education
» Research on Bourdieu’s sociological theory in teacher professional development
» Summary Literature Review and Theoretical Framework
» Epistemology Theory Research design
» Classroom observationslesson video recordings
» Information about participants Sampling
» Selection principles for case study teachers
» Data collection process Research procedures
» Teacher self-evaluation activity Research procedures
» Introduction Research ethics Research Methodology
» Introduction The Context: Field of Teaching in Indonesia
» Public vs. private higher education institution in Indonesia
» Accreditation in the Indonesian higher education system
» General information about Kanjuruhan University of Malang
» Teaching and learning process
» Examination Institutional policy governing teachers’ professional practice
» Curriculum School of English Education of Kanjuruhan University of Malang
» Classroom The nature and availability of facilities and materials
» Language laboratory The nature and availability of facilities and materials
» Teachers School of English Education of Kanjuruhan University of Malang
» Students School of English Education of Kanjuruhan University of Malang
» Summary The Context: Field of Teaching in Indonesia
» Maya’s background Case 1: Maya
» Manifestations of Maya’s pedagogic disposition to dominance in her practice
» Manifestations of Maya’s pedagogic disposition to formalitydistance in her practice
» Manifestations of Maya’s pedagogic disposition to accuracyperfectionism in her practice
» Change in pedagogic disposition to dominance
» Changes in pedagogic disposition to formalitydistance
» Andi’s background Case 2: Andi
» Manifestations of Andi’s pedagogic disposition to informalityfun in his practice
» Manifestations of Andi’s pedagogic disposition to dominance in his practice
» Productive disruptions resulting from teacher self-evaluation as a mediational activity
» Durability in pedagogic disposition to informalityfun
» Introduction Joko’s background
» Manifestations of Joko’s pedagogic disposition to dominance in his practice
» Manifestations of Joko’s pedagogic dispositions to informality in his practice
» Introduction Comparison of teachers’ initial pedagogic habitus
» Comparison of productive disruptions of teacher self-evaluation of each case
» Self-reflection Awareness of the need for change
» Commitment to change Action to change
» Teacher self-reflection questions Lesson video recording
» Student feedback Collegial dialogue
» Key findings Discussions and Conclusions
Show more