commit to user i
when it is converted into alphabet mark. So, the researcher wanted to get better achievement in the next cycle.
Based on the result of post-test, the mean score of each indicator could be seen as follows:
Table 10 Mean score of each indicator of post-test cycle 1
Ba sed on the table above, it could be seen that the mean score of main idea
indicator was 77.6. The mean score of pronoun reference indicator was 60.8. The mean score of word meaning indicator was 66. The mean score
of detail information indicator was 59.3. The mean score of inference indicator was 67.6.
e. Interviewing and giving questionnaire to the students after
treatment
Based on the result of interview, it could be concluded that CRG technique could make them enjoy following teaching learning
process. The students were also easier to find main idea of the text, find pronoun reference, recognize word meaning in context, find detail
information of the text, and make the inference.
There were also some difficulties that they found during teaching learning process using CRG technique, there were some students
that still had difficulty to work in group, they prefer working individually, some students also said that the different opinion made them difficult to
work together. The students also expected to get more practices and more difficult texts for the materials in the next step.
Indicator Mean score
Main idea 77
Pronoun reference 60
Word meaning 66
Detail information 59
Inferences 67
commit to user i
According the result of the questionnaire, there were 16 students who answered agree and 4 students answered strongly agree that
Cooperative Reading group technique made the classroom’s atmosphere more interesting. 14 students answered agree and 6 students answered
strongly agree that Cooperative Reading group technique created an enjoyable situation in the classroom. 13 students answered agree and 7
students answered strongly agree that Cooperative Reading group technique made students more active in the teaching and learning process.
1 student answered disagree, 16 students answered agree, and 3 students answered strongly agree that Cooperative Reading group technique gave
more opportunities to the students to participate in discussing a reading text. 18 students answered agree and 2 students answered strongly agree
that Cooperative Reading group technique made the students easy to identify main idea of the text. 2 students answered disagree, 12 students
answered agree, and 6 students answered strongly agree that Cooperative Reading group technique made the students easy to find the pronoun
reference. 2 students answered disagree, 12 students answered agree, and 6 students answered strongly agree Cooperative Reading group technique
made the students easy to recognize word meaning in context.
18 students answered agree and 2 students answered strongly agree that Cooperative
Reading group technique made the students easy to find detail information of the text. 2 students answered disagree, 14 answered agree, and 4
students answered strongly agree that
Cooperative Reading group technique made the students easy to answer inference question. 3 students
answered disagree, 14 students answered agree, and 3 students answered strongly agree that Cooperative Reading group technique could give better
understanding for the students in comprehending the text after finishing all the steps in Cooperative Reading group technique. 2 students answered
disagree, 7 students answered agree, and 11 students answered strongly agree that Cooperative Reading group technique could help the students
enjoying the process of understanding a reading text.
3. Observation
