Compared to South Africa, both Indonesia and Malaysia have much stronger and well- Indonesia has also introduced an innovative system of community-level planning, Both Malaysia and Indonesia have legislation underlying the planning, budg

DPMEPSPPD ix There is annual reporting by ministries, both quantitative and qualitative in nature. Qualitative reporting allows the Treasury to engage in strategic conversations and review performance measures. Outcomes progress is published by the Ministry of Finance in a magazine, SPOR. As in RSA, Singapore has budget dialogues between the Ministry of Finance and other ministries and agencies, which creates a feedback loop on performance. There are also cluster level dialogues as well as sector specific committees. Much of their budget interrogation revolves around projects dealing with construction of infrastructure, spatial development and attracting investment. Public servants repeatedly talk about the „whole of government‟ approach which seems to be well instilled in the civil service, where the public can enter the system through any ministry. 5 Lessons emerging for South Africa Roles and coordination of key players at national level in the planning, budgeting and PME system

17. Compared to South Africa, both Indonesia and Malaysia have much stronger and well-

defined planning functions and institutions. BAPPENAS in Indonesia integrates the planning and business as usual ME into one organisation. In Malaysia they both fall into the Prime Minister‟s Office, but with separate structures to take responsibility for planning and ME of the outcomes PEMANDU, ME of other projects ICU, and overall planning EPU. 18. The Malaysian system is much more centralised and so cross-institution and cross- sphere working can be driven more easily from the centre. In its more decentralised system, South Africa must find ways to build more effective and cooperative cross- institution and cross-sphere working. Malaysia was explicit about using a situational leadership approach, directive in the beginning, but more consensual as transformation happened. The emerging work on evaluation in South Africa is demonstrating this. An idea that emerged during the visit is that a high level Director General DG Forum, through which DG DPME meets with the DGs of Provinces would help in building a consensus and in driving PME as a mechanism for improving delivery.

19. Indonesia has also introduced an innovative system of community-level planning,

budgeting and ME called PNPM which is applied at scale and is having major impacts, and the transparency is leading to very low levels of corruption. A similar proposal was commissioned by DCOG but at the moment is languishing. This could be a good model for South Africa.

20. Both Malaysia and Indonesia have legislation underlying the planning, budget and ME

systems. A more formalized, systematic and predictable system in South Africa would be helpful and legislation would assist with this. Operation of the Planning, ME and Budget system 21. Indonesia, but not Malaysia, has a long-term 20 year plan, as South Africa will have, and both countries have a medium-term plan, which South Africa does not have, which integrates the outcomes into a broader planning picture and helps to provide an integrated and sustained agenda for the term of government. In both countries these plans are supported by legislation.

22. A strong Information Management System empowers people