Hubungan Karakteristik Suami dengan Peran Suami dalam Menggunakan Alat Kontrasepsi IUD (Intra Uterine Device) pada Pasangan Usia Subur di Desa Percut Kecamatan Percut Sei Tuan Tahun 2014
Lampiran 1
PERNYATAAN KESEDIAAN MENJADI RESPONDEN
Yang bertandatangan dibawah ini: Nama : …………………………………………………. Umur : …………………………………………………. Alamat : ………………………………………………….
Setelah mendapatkan penjelasan tentang penelitian ini maka saya menyatakan
bersedia berpartisipasi menjadi subjek dalam penelitian yang akan dilakukan oleh
saudari Laurena Ginting mengenai “Peran Suami terhadap Wanita Pasangan Usia
Subur dalam Menggunakan Alat Kontrasepsi IUD (Intra Uterin Device) di Desa
Percut Kec. Percut Sei Tuan Tahun 2014”.Saya menyadari sepenuhnya bahwa penelitian ini sangat bermanfaat untuk
kepentingan ilmiah dan upaya untuk mendukung Program Keluarga Berencana (KB).
Indentitas responden digunakan hanya untuk keperluan penelitian dan akan dijaga
kerahasiaannya.Demikian pernyataan ini dibuat dengan sukarela tanpa ada paksaan dari pihak manapun agar dapat dipergunakan sesuai keperluan.
Deli Serdang, …………2014 Peneliti Laurena Ginting
KUESIONER PERAN SUAMI TERHADAP WANITA PASANGAN USIA
SUBUR DALAM MENGGUNAKAN ALAT KONTRASEPSI IUD (INTRAUTERIN DEVICE)
TAHUN 2014
No. Kuesioner : Kode responden :A. Pengantar
Berikut ini adalah pernyataan yang berkaitan dengan “ Pengaruh peran suami
terhadap wanita pasangan usia subur dalam menggunakan alat kontrasepsi IUD “.
Bacalah setiap pernyataan dengan cermat sebelum menjawab, kemudian pilihlah
jawaban yang anda rasa paling sesuai dengan keadaan diri anda pada lembar jawaban
yang tersedia. Saya sangat menghargai kejujuran dan keterbukaan anda.B. Petunjuk pengisian kuesioner
1. Pilihlah salah satu jawaban yang saudara anggap paling sesuai dengan pendapat
saudara seperti yang telah ditelah digambarkan oleh pertanyaan yang tersedia.2. Berilah tanda ( √ ) pada salah satu pilihan yang tertera dibelakang pernyataan untuk menunjukkan jawaban yang saudara pilih dan berikan alasanya.
C. Identitas
1. Nama Ibu : ……………….. Nama Suami : ……………………
2. Umur Ibu : ……………….. Umur Suami : ……………………
3. Pendidikan Suami Tidak sekolah Lulus SMA Lulus SD Perguruan Tinggi Lulus SMP
5. Pendidikan Suami Tidak sekolah Lulus SMA Lulus SD Perguruan Tinggi Lulus SMP
6. Apakah pekerjaan Anda Buruh Petani Wiraswasta PNS
Nelayan Dll,………………………
7. Jika menggunakan IUD apakah membayar Ya Tidak
8. Jika Membayar berapa biaya pemasangan IUD Rp ………………….
9. Berapa lama penggunaan IUD : ................................
10. Jika menggunakan IUD tempat pelayanan pemasangan IUD Puskesmas Safari KB Klinik Bidan Klinik Dokter Puskesmas Pembantu
11. Pernah mendapat informasi tentang kesehatan pengguaan alat kontrasepsi
IUD/ SPIRAL ? Ya Tidak
12. Jika pernah dari mana sumber informasi : Teman Radio Orang Tua PetugasKB(Keluarga Berencana) Televisi Internet Koran atau Majalah
13. Jumlah anak hidup
1 2 > 5
3
4 Kuesioner Pengetahuan : 14.
No Pernyataan Benar Salah
1 Kontrasepsi adalah penggunaan alat-alat atau cara untuk mencegah terjadinya kehamilan atau memperkecil terjadinya kehamilan setelah melakukan hubungan seksual
2 Jenis alat kontrasepsi adalah sebagai berikut: IUD/ SPIRAL, IMPLAN/ susuk , Kondom, Vasektomi/ tubektomi, PIL, Injeksi/ Suntikan
3 Lama kerja/daya kerja kontrasepsi dapat diatur menurut kebutuhan pasangan
4 Penggunaan kontrasepsi dapat mencegah kehamilan dan tidak dapat meninbulkan komplikasi/penyakit yang berat bila digunakan
5 Salah satu cara kerja IUD/ SPIRAL adalah untuk mencegah agar tidak terjadi kehamilan
6 Berikut adalah salah keuntungan penggunaan alat kontrasepsi IUD/ SPIRAL yaitu Tidak mempengaruhi Hubungan seksual
7 Penggunaan alat kontrasepsi IUD/ SPIRAL Tidak dapat mencegah terjadinya Infeksi Menular Seksual (IMS) termasuk HIV/AIDS
8 Pemakaian IUD/ SPIRAL dapat menyebabkan haid pada wanita lebih lama dan banyak serta mengakibatkan perdarahan
9 Jika IUD dibuka sewaktu – waktu maka istri/wanita dapat hamil subur dan hamil kembali
10 IUD/ SPIRAL dapat meningkatkan kenyamanan seksual karena tidak perlu takut untuk hamil
11 IUD/ SPIRAL dapat efektif setelah pemasangan dan berjangka waktu panjang sampai 10 Tahun tidak dapat diganti
12 Penggunaan IUD/ SPIRAL sangat efektif karena tidak perlu dilakukan penggantian secara rutin setiap bulannya
13 IUD/ SPIRAL dapat digunakan pada ibu yang sedang menyusui
14 Ibu perokok dapat menggunakan IUD/ SPIRAL
15 Pemasang IUD/ SPIRAL tidak dapat dilakukan pada saat wanita sedang Haid
16 Pada wanita yang akan menggunakan alat kontrasepsi, pemilihan IUD/ SPIRAL merupakan pilihan yang tepat, nyaman dan aman untuk digunakan
Peran Suami 15. No Pertanyaan Ya Tidak
Peran Motivator
1 Apakah suami yang mendukung istri menggunakan alat kontrasepsi IUD Alasannya ...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
2 Apakah suami mengijinkan/memberi persetujuan dalam menggunakan alat kontrasepsi maka istri/wanita akan menggunakan alat kontrasepsi IUD Alasannya ............................................................................................................................... ...............................................................................................................................
3 Apakah suami yang memutuskan istri menggunakan alat kontrasepsi IUD Alasannya ...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
4 Apakah suami memberikan kebutuhan istri/wanita saat akan memeriksakan masalah yang berkaitan dengan penggunaan
alat kontrasepsi IUD Alasannya ............................................................................................................................... ...............................................................................................................................
5 Suami bersedia menggantikan pemakaian kontrasepsi bila kesehatan istri/wanita tidak memungkinkan menggunakan alat kontrasepsi Alasannya ............................................................................................................................... ...............................................................................................................................
Peran Edukator
6 Apakah suami membantu istri/wanita memilih alat kotrasepsi yang cocok, sesuai dengan keinginan dan kondisi istrinya Alasannya ............................................................................................................................... ...............................................................................................................................
7 Apakah suami membantu istri/dalam menggunakan alat kontrasepsi IUD dengan mengingatkan untuk kontrol Alasannya ...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
8 Apakah suami ikut berkonsultasi pada tenaga kesehatan saat istri/wanita akan menggunakan alat kontrasepsi Alasannya ...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
9 Apakah suami mengingatkan istri/wanita hal yang tidak boleh dilakukan saat menggunakan alat kontrasepsi Alasannya ...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
10 Suami memberikan informasi kepada istri tentang penggunaan alat kontrasepsi IUD Alasannya ...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
Peran Fasilitator
11 Apakah suami menemani istri saat akan memasang alat kontrasepsi dan control Alasannya ...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
12 Suami memberikan biaya untuk istri/wanita ketika akan memasang alat kontrasepsi maupun control Alasannya ...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
13 Suami membantu istri dalam menentukan tempat pelayanan kesehatan yang akan digunakan untuk pemasangan alat kontrasepsi
Alasannya ...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
14 Suami membantu istri dalam menentukan petugas kesehatan yang akan melakukan pemasangan alat kontrasepsi Alasannya : ...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
15 Suami membantu mencari pertolongan bila terjadi efek samping atau komplikasi Alasannya ...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
Lampiran 2
Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas
Reliability Pengetahuan Tidak ValidScale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary
N % Cases Valid 30 100.0
Excluded
a
.0 Total 30 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .894
20 Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N p1 .83 .379 30 p2 .77 .430 30 p3 .67 .479 30 p4 .67 .479 30 p5 .70 .466 30 p6 .77 .430 30 p7 .77 .430 30 p8 .77 .430 30 p9 .70 .466 30 p10 .80 .407 30 p11 .73 .450 30 p12 .50 .509 30 p13 .50 .509 30 p14 .80 .407 30 p15 .67 .479 30 p16 .70 .466 30 p17 .77 .430 30 p18 .53 .507
30 p19 .83 .379
30 p20 .73 .450
30 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item
Deleted Scale Variance if
Item Deleted Corrected Item-
Total Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted p1 13.37 24.585 .584 .887 p2
13.43 23.564 .760 .882 p3 13.53 24.602 .440 .891 p4 13.53 23.292 .735 .882 p5 13.50 26.328 .079 .901 p6 13.43 23.909 .673 .884 p7 13.43 25.013 .401 .892 p8 13.43 24.668 .485 .890 p9 13.50 23.776 .645 .885 p10 13.40 24.110 .663 .885 p11 13.47 24.464 .507 .889 p12 13.70 24.976 .332 .895 p13 13.70 25.528 .221 .898 p14 13.40 24.041 .681 .884 p15 13.53 24.740 .410 .892 p16 13.50 23.431 .726 .882 p17 13.43 23.564 .760 .882 p18 13.67 25.126 .303 .896 p19 13.37 25.068 .451 .890 p20 13.47 23.913 .639 .885
Scale Statistics
Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 14.20 26.924 5.189
20
Reliability Pengetahuan Valid Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary
N % Cases Valid 30 100.0
Excluded
a
.0 Total 30 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .913
16 Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N p1 .83 .379 30 p2 .77 .430 30 p3 .67 .479 30 p4 .67 .479 30 p6 .77 .430 30 p7 .77 .430 30 p8 .77 .430 30 p9 .70 .466 30 p10 .80 .407 30 p11 .73 .450 30 p14 .80 .407 30 p15 .67 .479 30 p16 .70 .466 30 p17 .77 .430 30 p19 .83 .379 30 p20 .73 .450
30
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Item Deleted
Corrected Item- Total Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted p1 11.13 19.223 .595 .908 p2
11.20 18.234 .796 .902 p3 11.30 19.114 .477 .912 p4 11.30 18.217 .708 .904 p6 11.20 18.579 .696 .905 p7 11.20 19.545 .424 .913 p8 11.20 19.200 .520 .910 p9 11.27 18.685 .606 .908 p10 11.17 18.833 .664 .906 p11 11.23 19.289 .469 .912 p14 11.17 18.695 .706 .905 p15 11.30 19.252 .443 .913 p16 11.27 18.340 .698 .905 p17 11.20 18.234 .796 .902 p19 11.13 19.637 .465 .912 p20 11.23 18.806 .599 .908
Scale Statistics
Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 11.97 21.344 4.620
16
Reliability Peran Suami Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary
N % Cases Valid 30 100.0
Excluded
a
.0 Total 30 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .898
15 Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N ps1 .73 .450 30 ps2 .77 .430 30 ps3 .70 .466 30 ps4 .70 .466 30 ps5 .77 .430 30 ps6 .70 .466 30 ps7 .80 .407 30 ps8 .77 .430 30 ps9 .63 .490 30 ps10 .77 .430 30 ps11 .70 .466 30 ps12 .87 .346 30 ps13 .73 .450 30 ps14 .73 .450 30 ps15 .70 .466
30
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Item Deleted
Corrected Item- Total Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted ps1 10.33 16.437 .448 .896 ps2
10.30 16.631 .415 .897 ps3 10.37 15.620 .661 .888 ps4 10.37 15.964 .561 .892 ps5 10.30 16.424 .477 .895 ps6 10.37 16.102 .522 .894 ps7 10.27 15.995 .648 .889 ps8 10.30 15.941 .624 .890 ps9 10.43 15.220 .735 .885 ps10 10.30 15.941 .624 .890 ps11 10.37 15.551 .681 .887 ps12 10.20 16.855 .457 .896 ps13 10.33 16.230 .507 .894 ps14 10.33 15.609 .692 .887 ps15 10.37 15.964 .561 .892
Scale Statistics
Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 11.07 18.271 4.274
15
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 4
Hasil Statistik
UnivariatUmur
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 20-35
26
34.2
34.2
34.2 36-49
50
65.8 65.8 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pendidikan Istri
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Pendidikan Dasar
56
73.7
73.7
73.7 Pendidikan Lanjut
20
26.3 26.3 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pendidikan suami
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Pendidikan Dasar
53
69.7
69.7
69.7 Pendidikan Lanjut
23
30.3 30.3 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pekerjaan Suami
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Buruh
8
10.5
10.5
10.5 wiraswasta
48
63.2
63.2
73.7 Nelayan
12
15.8
15.8
89.5 Petani
6
7.9
7.9
97.4 Lain-lain
2
2.6 2.6 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Tempat
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Puskesmas
2
2.6
2.6
2.6 Klinik Bidan
6
7.9
7.9
10.5 Safari KB
68
89.5 89.5 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Sumber Informasi
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Sedikit
49
64.5
64.5
64.5 Banyak
27
35.5 35.5 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Jumlah Anak
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 anak
11
14.5
14.5
14.5 2 anak
13
17.1
17.1
31.6 3 anak
18
23.7
23.7
55.3 4 anak
23
30.3
30.3
85.5 >=5 anak
11
14.5 14.5 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pengetahuan 1
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Benar 76 100.0 100.0 100.0
Pengetahuan 2
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Salah
2
2.6
2.6
2.6 Benar
74
97.4 97.4 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pengetahuan 3
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Salah
11
14.5
14.5
14.5 Benar
65
85.5 85.5 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pengetahuan 7
Percent Benar
92.1 92.1 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
60
78.9 78.9 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pengetahuan 8
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Salah
61
80.3
80.3
80.3 Benar
15
Pengetahuan 6
70
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
15
Percent Valid Salah
5
6.6
6.6
6.6 Benar
71
93.4 93.4 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pengetahuan 4
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Salah
19.7
7.9 Benar
19.7
19.7 Benar
61
80.3 80.3 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pengetahuan 5
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Salah
6
7.9
7.9
19.7 19.7 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pengetahuan 9
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Salah
20
26.3
26.3
26.3 Benar
56
73.7 73.7 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pengetahuan 13
Percent Benar
81.6 81.6 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
59
77.6 77.6 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pengetahuan 14
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Salah
14
18.4
18.4
18.4 Benar
62
Pengetahuan 12
62
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
8
Percent Valid Salah
9
11.8
11.8
11.8 Benar
67
88.2 88.2 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pengetahuan 10
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Salah
10.5
18.4 Benar
10.5
10.5 Benar
68
89.5 89.5 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pengetahuan 11
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Salah
14
18.4
18.4
81.6 81.6 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pengetahuan 15
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Salah
47
61.8
61.8
61.8 Benar
29
38.2 38.2 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pengetahuan 16
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Salah
9
11.8
11.8
11.8 Benar
67
88.2 88.2 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Pengetahuan
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid tidak baik
7
9.2
9.2
9.2 Baik
69
90.8 90.8 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Peran Suami 1
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Tidak
5
6.6
6.6
6.6 ya
71
93.4 93.4 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Peran Suami 2
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Tidak
10
13.2
13.2
13.2 ya
66
86.8 86.8 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Peran Suami 3
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Tidak
35
46.1
46.1
46.1 ya
41
53.9 53.9 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Peran Suami 4
35.5 ya
54
71.1 71.1 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Peran Suami 7
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
27
35.5
35.5
49
28.9
64.5 64.5 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Peran Suami 8
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
33
43.4
43.4
43.4 ya
43
28.9 ya
28.9
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
22
28.9
28.9
28.9 ya
54
71.1 71.1 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Peran Suami 5
Percent Valid Tidak
22
50
65.8
65.8
65.8 ya
26
34.2 34.2 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Peran Suami 6
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
56.6 56.6 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Peran Suami 9
64.5
22
28.9
28.9
28.9 ya
54
71.1 71.1 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Peran Suami 13
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
49
64.5
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
64.5 ya
27
35.5 35.5 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Peran Suami 14
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
56
73.7
73.7
73.7 ya
20
Percent Valid Tidak
Peran Suami 12
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
72.4
Percent Valid Tidak
31
40.8
40.8
40.8 ya
45
59.2 59.2 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Peran Suami 10
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
55
72.4
23.7 23.7 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
72.4 ya
21
27.6 27.6 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Peran Suami 11
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
58
76.3
76.3
76.3 ya
18
26.3 26.3 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Peran Suami 15
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
11
14.5
14.5
14.5 ya
65
85.5 85.5 100.0 Total 76 100.0 100.0
Peran Motivator Pengetahuan * Peran Motivator Crosstab
Chi-Square Tests
76 a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,12.
b
.000 .000 Linear-by-Linear Association 17.533 1 .000 N of Valid Cases
14.314 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 18.455 1 .000 Fisher's Exact Test
b
1 .000 Continuity Correction
a
Pearson Chi-Square 17.767
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
76 % within Pengetahuan 30.3% 69.7% 100.0% % within Peran Motivator 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.3% 69.7% 100.0%
Peran Motivator Total tidak berperan Berperan
53
23
Total Count
69 % within Pengetahuan 23.2% 76.8% 100.0% % within Peran Motivator 69.6% 100.0% 90.8% % of Total 21.1% 69.7% 90.8%
53
16
Baik Count
7 % within Pengetahuan 100.0% .0% 100.0% % within Peran Motivator 30.4% .0% 9.2% % of Total 9.2% .0% 9.2%
7
Pengetahuan tidak baik Count
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Sumber Informasi * Peran Motivator Crosstab
Chi-Square Tests
76 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,17.
b
.067 .042 Linear-by-Linear Association 3.938 1 .047 N of Valid Cases
3.016 1 .082 Likelihood Ratio 3.904 1 .048 Fisher's Exact Test
b
1 .046 Continuity Correction
a
Pearson Chi-Square 3.991
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
76 % within Sumber Informasi 30.3% 69.7% 100.0% % within Peran Motivator 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.3% 69.7% 100.0%
Peran Motivator Total tidak berperan Berperan
53
23
Total Count
27 % within Sumber Informasi 44.4% 55.6% 100.0% % within Peran Motivator 52.2% 28.3% 35.5% % of Total 15.8% 19.7% 35.5%
15
12
Banyak Count
49 % within Sumber Informasi 22.4% 77.6% 100.0% % within Peran Motivator 47.8% 71.7% 64.5% % of Total 14.5% 50.0% 64.5%
38
11
Sumber Informasi Sedikit Count
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pendidikan suami * Peran Motivator Crosstab
Chi-Square Tests
76 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,96.
b
.787 .407 Linear-by-Linear Association .269 1 .604 N of Valid Cases
.063 1 .802 Likelihood Ratio .277 1 .599 Fisher's Exact Test
b
1 .602 Continuity Correction
a
Pearson Chi-Square .273
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
76 % within Pendidikan suami 30.3% 69.7% 100.0% % within Peran Motivator 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.3% 69.7% 100.0%
Peran Motivator Total tidak berperan Berperan
53
23
Total Count
23 % within Pendidikan suami 26.1% 73.9% 100.0% % within Peran Motivator 26.1% 32.1% 30.3% % of Total 7.9% 22.4% 30.3%
17
6
Pendidikan Lanjut Count
53 % within Pendidikan suami 32.1% 67.9% 100.0% % within Peran Motivator 73.9% 67.9% 69.7% % of Total 22.4% 47.4% 69.7%
36
17
Pendidikan suami Pendidikan Dasar Count
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
UKAT * Peran Motivator Crosstab
Chi-Square Tests
76 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,87.
b
1.000 .572 Linear-by-Linear Association .005 1 .945 N of Valid Cases
.000 1 1.000 Likelihood Ratio .005 1 .945 Fisher's Exact Test
b
1 .945 Continuity Correction
a
Pearson Chi-Square .005
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
76 % within UKAT 30.3% 69.7% 100.0% % within Peran Motivator 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.3% 69.7% 100.0%
Peran Motivator Total tidak berperan Berperan
53
23
Total Count
50 % within UKAT 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within Peran Motivator 65.2% 66.0% 65.8% % of Total 19.7% 46.1% 65.8%
35
15
36-49 Count
26 % within UKAT 30.8% 69.2% 100.0% % within Peran Motivator 34.8% 34.0% 34.2% % of Total 10.5% 23.7% 34.2%
18
8
UKAT 20-35 Count
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Peran Edukator Pengetahuan * Peran Edukator Crosstab
Chi-Square Tests
76 a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,95.
b
.002 .002 Linear-by-Linear Association 10.462 1 .001 N of Valid Cases
8.147 1 .004 Likelihood Ratio 13.101 1 .000 Fisher's Exact Test
b
1 .001 Continuity Correction
a
Pearson Chi-Square 10.601
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
76 % within Pengetahuan 42.1% 57.9% 100.0% % within Peran Edukasi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 42.1% 57.9% 100.0%
Peran Edukasi Total tidak berperan Berperan
44
32
Total Count
69 % within Pengetahuan 36.2% 63.8% 100.0% % within Peran Edukasi 78.1% 100.0% 90.8% % of Total 32.9% 57.9% 90.8%
44
25
Baik Count
7 % within Pengetahuan 100.0% .0% 100.0% % within Peran Edukasi 21.9% .0% 9.2% % of Total 9.2% .0% 9.2%
7
Pengetahuan tidak baik Count
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Sumber Informasi * Peran Edukator Crosstab
Chi-Square Tests
76 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11,37.
b
.232 .150 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.610 1 .204 N of Valid Cases
1.071 1 .301 Likelihood Ratio 1.625 1 .202 Fisher's Exact Test
b
1 .201 Continuity Correction
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.632
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
76 % within Sumber Informasi 42.1% 57.9% 100.0% % within Peran Edukasi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 42.1% 57.9% 100.0%
Peran Edukasi Total tidak berperan Berperan
44
32
Total Count
27 % within Sumber Informasi 51.9% 48.1% 100.0% % within Peran Edukasi 43.8% 29.5% 35.5% % of Total 18.4% 17.1% 35.5%
13
14
Banyak Count
49 % within Sumber Informasi 36.7% 63.3% 100.0% % within Peran Edukasi 56.2% 70.5% 64.5% % of Total 23.7% 40.8% 64.5%
31
18
Sumber Informasi Sedikit Count
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pendidikan suami * Peran Edukator
Crosstab
Chi-Square Tests
76 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,68.
b
.212 .134 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.819 1 .177 N of Valid Cases
1.220 1 .269 Likelihood Ratio 1.885 1 .170 Fisher's Exact Test
b
1 .175 Continuity Correction
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.843
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
76 % within Pendidikan suami 42.1% 57.9% 100.0% % within Peran Edukasi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 42.1% 57.9% 100.0%
Peran Edukasi Total tidak berperan Berperan
44
32
Total Count
23 % within Pendidikan suami 30.4% 69.6% 100.0% % within Peran Edukasi 21.9% 36.4% 30.3% % of Total 9.2% 21.1% 30.3%
16
7
Pendidikan Lanjut Count
53 % within Pendidikan suami 47.2% 52.8% 100.0% % within Peran Edukasi 78.1% 63.6% 69.7% % of Total 32.9% 36.8% 69.7%
28
25
Pendidikan suami Pendidikan Dasar Count
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
UKAT * Peran Edukator Crosstab
Chi-Square Tests
76 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10,95.
b
.221 .115 Linear-by-Linear Association 2.056 1 .152 N of Valid Cases
1.436 1 .231 Likelihood Ratio 2.124 1 .145 Fisher's Exact Test
b
1 .149 Continuity Correction
a
(1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 2.083
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig.
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
76 % within UKAT 42.1% 57.9% 100.0% % within Peran Edukasi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 42.1% 57.9% 100.0%
Peran Edukasi Total tidak berperan Berperan
44
32
Total Count
50 % within UKAT 48.0% 52.0% 100.0% % within Peran Edukasi 75.0% 59.1% 65.8% % of Total 31.6% 34.2% 65.8%
26
24
36-49 Count
26 % within UKAT 30.8% 69.2% 100.0% % within Peran Edukasi 25.0% 40.9% 34.2% % of Total 10.5% 23.7% 34.2%
18
8
UKAT 20-35 Count
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Peran Fasilitator Pengetahuan * Peran fasilitator Crosstab
Chi-Square Tests
76 a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,86.
b
.230 .136 Linear-by-Linear Association 2.213 1 .137 N of Valid Cases
1.197 1 .274 Likelihood Ratio 2.546 1 .111 Fisher's Exact Test
b
1 .134 Continuity Correction
a
(1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 2.242
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig.
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
76 % within Pengetahuan 59.2% 40.8% 100.0% % within Peran fasilitator 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 59.2% 40.8% 100.0%
Peran fasilitator Total tidak berperan Berperan
31
45
Total Count
69 % within Pengetahuan 56.5% 43.5% 100.0% % within Peran fasilitator 86.7% 96.8% 90.8% % of Total 51.3% 39.5% 90.8%
30
39
Baik Count
7 % within Pengetahuan 85.7% 14.3% 100.0% % within Peran fasilitator 13.3% 3.2% 9.2% % of Total 7.9% 1.3% 9.2%
1
6
Pengetahuan tidak baik Count
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Sumber Informasi * Peran fasilitator Crosstab
Chi-Square Tests
76 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11,01.
b
.636 .405 Linear-by-Linear Association .229 1 .633 N of Valid Cases
.056 1 .812 Likelihood Ratio .231 1 .631 Fisher's Exact Test
b
1 .630 Continuity Correction
a
Pearson Chi-Square .232
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
76 % within Sumber Informasi 59.2% 40.8% 100.0% % within Peran fasilitator 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 59.2% 40.8% 100.0%
Peran fasilitator Total tidak berperan Berperan
31
45
Total Count
27 % within Sumber Informasi 55.6% 44.4% 100.0% % within Peran fasilitator 33.3% 38.7% 35.5% % of Total 19.7% 15.8% 35.5%
12
15
Banyak Count
49 % within Sumber Informasi 61.2% 38.8% 100.0% % within Peran fasilitator 66.7% 61.3% 64.5% % of Total 39.5% 25.0% 64.5%
19
30
Sumber Informasi Sedikit Count
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pendidikan suami * Peran fasilitator Crosstab
Chi-Square Tests
76 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,38.
b
.211 .141 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.747 1 .186 N of Valid Cases
1.158 1 .282 Likelihood Ratio 1.754 1 .185 Fisher's Exact Test
b
1 .183 Continuity Correction
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.770
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
76 % within Pendidikan suami 59.2% 40.8% 100.0% % within Peran fasilitator 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 59.2% 40.8% 100.0%
Peran fasilitator Total tidak berperan Berperan
31
45
Total Count
23 % within Pendidikan suami 47.8% 52.2% 100.0% % within Peran fasilitator 24.4% 38.7% 30.3% % of Total 14.5% 15.8% 30.3%
12
11
Pendidikan Lanjut Count
53 % within Pendidikan suami 64.2% 35.8% 100.0% % within Peran fasilitator 75.6% 61.3% 69.7% % of Total 44.7% 25.0% 69.7%
19
34
Pendidikan suami Pendidikan Dasar Count
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
UKAT * Peran fasilitator Crosstab
Chi-Square Tests
76 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10,61.
b
.228 .150 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.621 1 .203 N of Valid Cases
1.073 1 .300 Likelihood Ratio 1.674 1 .196 Fisher's Exact Test
b
1 .200 Continuity Correction
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.643
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
76 % within UKAT 59.2% 40.8% 100.0% % within Peran fasilitator 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 59.2% 40.8% 100.0%
Peran fasilitator Total tidak berperan Berperan
31
45
Total Count
50 % within UKAT 54.0% 46.0% 100.0% % within Peran fasilitator 60.0% 74.2% 65.8% % of Total 35.5% 30.3% 65.8%
23
27
36-49 Count
26 % within UKAT 69.2% 30.8% 100.0% % within Peran fasilitator 40.0% 25.8% 34.2% % of Total 23.7% 10.5% 34.2%
8
18
UKAT 20-35 Count
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Lampiran 5 Nama – Nama Akseptor KB No Nama Suami Nama Istri
16 Heri Susi
28 Sutan Neni Nopika
28 Rusli Masitah
27 Suprapto Legianti
26 M. Zainal Eliyani
25 Erwansyah Hermawati
24 Elviono Sari
23 Darul Amin Sri Wulan dari
22 Jumali Nurhabibah
21 Aswan Aviv Linda
20 Abdul Malik Rolia
19 Suryadi Mardiana
18 Septiadi Lubis Rini
17 Zulkarnain Siti Amira
15 Budiman Jamila
1 Muklis Nurhadijah
14 Sugi Hartono Juli
13 Ahmad ram Afnizar
12 Anda Zuraida
11 Fauzan nasution Julihartati
10 Bambang irawan Saribah
9 Sopiah Murtianti
8 Hamdani Sumarni
7 Arie Alin Asmara
6 Ramlin Siti Aisyah
5 Ramsyah Hasrani
4 Ahmad sofyan Safira
3 Sofyan Nurleli
2 Hendrik siringo-ringo Nurhadija
30 Zailani Dina
31 M. Azrai Latifah
58 Sahban Siregar Elisa
52 Azudin Suryani
53 Rahmad Suamiati
54 Sahril Jamila
55 Muklis Fatima
56 Bahruddin Mardiani
57 Retno Atmaja Amina
59 Rusli Harahap Rohani
50 Safrudin Rahmah
60 Mulia Mansyah Mastitah
61 Suramto Suranto
62 Irwansyah Kartini
63 Anizar Suratmi
64 Suryadi Aisyah
65 Haidil Lubis Murni
51 Saiful Lina
49 Safriza Siti Fatimah
32 M. Irvan Anasari
39 Herman Hasan Pardosi
33 Zinal Abidin Masitah
34 Buyung Nuraini
35 Irwansyah Leni
36 Abdul Hakim S Erna
37 Awaluddin Robiah
38 Arjon Khadijah
40 Faizah Hamdani Saifah
48 Ahmad Salman Susilayani
41 Ruslan Siti
42 Dedek Salijah