The effect of using animation pictures in teaching English vocabulary to the tenth graders of SMKN 1 Palangka Raya Digital Library IAIN Palangka Raya Chapter IV LP
CHAPTER IV
RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS
In this chapter, the writer presented the data which had been collected from the research
in the field of study. The data were the result of pretest of experimental and control group, the
result of post test of experimental and control group, result of data analysis, and discussion.
A. Data Presentation
1. The result of Pre Test Scores of the Experimental and control class.
The pre test at the experimental group was conducted on August 05 2015 in the class X
Tehnik Sepeda Motor (X TSM) Wednesday at time 06.30 – 08.45 the number of students was
37 students, and the control group was conduct on August 03 2015 in the class X Tehnik
Kendaraan Ringan (X TKR ) Monday at time 11.00 – 12.30 the number of students was 40
students. The Prêtest of the experimental and control group were presented in table
1.
The Result of Pre Test Score of the Experiment Class
The pre-test and post test of the experiment class were presented in the following table.
Table 4.1 the Description of Pre Test and Post Test scores of the Data Achieved by the
students in Experimental Class.
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Score of pre
test
60
32
52
35
40
57
50
72
62
47
Score of post
test
67
47
62
47
77
60
70
95
55
65
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
Higher Score
Lower Score
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Of Mean
67
47
52
65
42
40
70
55
62
45
50
75
37
52
55
65
42
60
57
52
35
37
55
45
32
40
52
75
32
51.8
11.243
1.873
70
87
67
72
75
52
92
67
75
82
70
72
57
72
60
67
65
70
55
57
50
77
77
62
50
80
50
95
47
67.3
12.009
2.001
Based on the data above, it can be seen that the students’ highest score at pre test
experiment class was 75 and the student’s lowest score was 32. And also, it can be seen that the
mean was 51.8, the standard deviation was 11.243 and the standard error was 1.873.
In addition, the result of post test score in experiment class could be know that the
highest score 95 and the lower score was 47. The mean was 67.3 the standard deviation was
12.009 and the standard error was 2.001.
2. The Result of Pre-Test and Post Test Score of Control Class
The pre test scores of the control group were presented in the following table.
Table 4.2 the Description of Pre-Test and Post Test Scores of Data Achieved by the
Students in Control Class.
No
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Score of pre test
47
40
47
50
30
50
42
50
25
42
30
45
22
25
52
40
60
32
45
37
45
47
22
42
55
52
25
27
Score of post test
50
30
47
50
40
47
45
52
35
45
40
42
35
35
55
45
62
22
45
30
42
45
32
45
55
55
32
37
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Higher Score
Lower Score
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Of Mean
45
37
57
37
57
35
60
60
27
42
65
40
65
22
42.6
11.426
1.829
45
25
57
27
60
25
65
62
37
45
70
30
70
22
43.6
11.693
1.872
Based on the data above, it can be seen that the students’ highest score at pre test control
class was 65 and the student’s lowest score was 22. And also, it can be seen that the mean was
42.6, the standard deviation was 11.426 and the standard error was 1.829.
In addition, the result of post test score in control class could be know that the highest
score 70 and the lower score was 22. The mean was 43.6 the standard deviation was 11.693 and
the standard error was 1.872.
B. The Result of Data Analysis
a. Calculate T-test using Manual Calculation
The writer chose the significance level on 5%, it means the significance level of refusal of
null hypothesis on 5%. The writer decided the significance level at 5% due to the hypothesis type
stated on non-directional (two-tailed test). It means that the hypothesis can’t direct the prediction
of alternative Hypothesis. Alternative Hypothesis symbolized by “Ha”. This symbol could direct
the answer of hypothesis, “Ha” can be (>) or (2.64. It means Ha
was accepted and Ho was rejected.
It could be interpreted based on the result of calculation that Ha stating that animation
pictures give influences toward student’s scores in increasing English vocabulary was accepted
and Ho stating that animation pictures does not give influences toward student’s scores in
increasing English vocabulary was rejected. It means that teaching vocabulary using animation
pictures gave significant effect on the students’ vocabulary score of the tenth grade students at
SMKN 1 Palangka Raya.
Table 4.5 the Comparison of Pre Test and Post Test Score Achieved by the Students
in Experiment Group.
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Dx ( Pre test )
60
32
52
35
40
57
50
72
62
47
67
47
52
65
42
40
70
55
62
45
50
75
37
52
55
65
42
60
57
52
35
37
55
45
32
Dy ( Post test )
67
47
62
47
77
60
70
95
55
65
70
87
67
72
75
52
92
67
75
82
70
72
57
72
60
67
65
70
55
57
50
77
77
62
50
Dx-Dy
7
10
10
12
30
3
20
23
7
18
3
40
15
7
33
13
22
12
13
37
20
3
20
20
5
2
23
10
2
5
15
40
22
17
18
36
37
Average
40
52
∑Dx = 1896
51.1
80
50
∑Dy= 2475
40
2
66.8
Table 4.6 the Comparison of Pre Test and Post Test Score Achieved by the Students
in Control Group.
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Dx ( Pre test )
47
40
47
50
30
50
42
50
25
42
30
45
22
25
52
40
60
32
45
37
45
47
22
42
55
52
25
27
45
37
57
37
57
Dy ( Post test )
50
30
47
50
40
47
45
52
35
45
40
42
35
35
55
45
62
22
45
30
42
45
32
45
55
55
55
32
37
45
25
57
27
Dx-Dy
3
10
0
0
10
3
3
2
10
3
10
3
13
10
3
5
2
10
0
7
3
2
10
13
0
3
30
5
8
8
32
20
30
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
35
60
60
27
42
65
40
∑Dx = 1688
60
25
62
37
45
70
30
∑Dy= 1733
Average
42.2
43.3
25
35
2
10
3
5
10
Based on the table above it can be seen that there was significant difference of mean score of
pre test and post test at Experiment class where pre test mean score was 51.1 and post test mean
score was 66.1.while based on the mean score at control class of pre test score, it was 42.2 and
post test was 43.3.
C. Discussion
In teaching learning process, English vocabulary by using animation pictures is a tool
using by the teacher to teach the students. From the result of analysis the use of media giving
positive effects for student’s vocabulary score. It meant media has important role in teaching
learning process.
The results of researcher study is supported by theory (Chapter II: page 25) about the
reasons why teaching vocabulary using animation pictures could increase students’ interest in
teaching learning process.1 The first reason is about the advantage of animation pictures in
learning process, such as: the skill and ability improvement; the interactive animation takes less
time to teach students complex things and makes them enjoy more to learn difficult things. the
students will more motivated and learner will get more skill, which is the main reason to make
1
Rasha rasheed awad, The Effect Of Using Animation In Teaching English Vocabulary For 3
Gaza Govermental School. Unpublished Thesis, Al – Azhar university- Gaza. 2013. P. 31
rd
Graders In
them more motivated. From the data above, it is shown that teaching vocabulary by using
animation as the media of learning process gave significant effects in improving students’
English vocabulary. The students more interested to receive vocabulary using animation pictures.
So, the research of improving students’ English vocabulary by using animation pictures as media
is balanced with the theory in chapter II : page 25. The theory supported the use of animation
pictures as media in learning process and suitable with the condition of the tenth grade students.
The result of data analysis showed that The Effect of using Animation Pictures in Teaching
English Vocabulary to the Tenth Graders of SMKN 1 Palangka Raya. It based on the means
score between Pre-test and Post-test. The mean score of Posttest reached higher score than the
mean score of Pretest (X= 67.3< Y=43.6). It indicated that the students’ scores increased after
conducting treatment. In other words, teaching vocabulary by using animation pictures.
Meanwhile, after the data was calculated using the ttest formula using manual calculation showed
that the tobserved was 8.649. By comparing the tobserved with the ttable, it was found that the tobserved
was higher than ttable at 5% level significance or tobserved = 8.649>ttable=1.99.
Therefore, t table ( 5 % = 1.99 ) < t observed ( 8.649 ). It means that the t observed empiric at 8.649
was greater than t
table
at 5 % and 1 % of significant level. In teaching vocabulary by using
animation pictures, writer find this media made the students more focus and motivated to
memorize word and able to write it and the students more interest.
RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS
In this chapter, the writer presented the data which had been collected from the research
in the field of study. The data were the result of pretest of experimental and control group, the
result of post test of experimental and control group, result of data analysis, and discussion.
A. Data Presentation
1. The result of Pre Test Scores of the Experimental and control class.
The pre test at the experimental group was conducted on August 05 2015 in the class X
Tehnik Sepeda Motor (X TSM) Wednesday at time 06.30 – 08.45 the number of students was
37 students, and the control group was conduct on August 03 2015 in the class X Tehnik
Kendaraan Ringan (X TKR ) Monday at time 11.00 – 12.30 the number of students was 40
students. The Prêtest of the experimental and control group were presented in table
1.
The Result of Pre Test Score of the Experiment Class
The pre-test and post test of the experiment class were presented in the following table.
Table 4.1 the Description of Pre Test and Post Test scores of the Data Achieved by the
students in Experimental Class.
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Score of pre
test
60
32
52
35
40
57
50
72
62
47
Score of post
test
67
47
62
47
77
60
70
95
55
65
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
Higher Score
Lower Score
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Of Mean
67
47
52
65
42
40
70
55
62
45
50
75
37
52
55
65
42
60
57
52
35
37
55
45
32
40
52
75
32
51.8
11.243
1.873
70
87
67
72
75
52
92
67
75
82
70
72
57
72
60
67
65
70
55
57
50
77
77
62
50
80
50
95
47
67.3
12.009
2.001
Based on the data above, it can be seen that the students’ highest score at pre test
experiment class was 75 and the student’s lowest score was 32. And also, it can be seen that the
mean was 51.8, the standard deviation was 11.243 and the standard error was 1.873.
In addition, the result of post test score in experiment class could be know that the
highest score 95 and the lower score was 47. The mean was 67.3 the standard deviation was
12.009 and the standard error was 2.001.
2. The Result of Pre-Test and Post Test Score of Control Class
The pre test scores of the control group were presented in the following table.
Table 4.2 the Description of Pre-Test and Post Test Scores of Data Achieved by the
Students in Control Class.
No
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Score of pre test
47
40
47
50
30
50
42
50
25
42
30
45
22
25
52
40
60
32
45
37
45
47
22
42
55
52
25
27
Score of post test
50
30
47
50
40
47
45
52
35
45
40
42
35
35
55
45
62
22
45
30
42
45
32
45
55
55
32
37
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Higher Score
Lower Score
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Of Mean
45
37
57
37
57
35
60
60
27
42
65
40
65
22
42.6
11.426
1.829
45
25
57
27
60
25
65
62
37
45
70
30
70
22
43.6
11.693
1.872
Based on the data above, it can be seen that the students’ highest score at pre test control
class was 65 and the student’s lowest score was 22. And also, it can be seen that the mean was
42.6, the standard deviation was 11.426 and the standard error was 1.829.
In addition, the result of post test score in control class could be know that the highest
score 70 and the lower score was 22. The mean was 43.6 the standard deviation was 11.693 and
the standard error was 1.872.
B. The Result of Data Analysis
a. Calculate T-test using Manual Calculation
The writer chose the significance level on 5%, it means the significance level of refusal of
null hypothesis on 5%. The writer decided the significance level at 5% due to the hypothesis type
stated on non-directional (two-tailed test). It means that the hypothesis can’t direct the prediction
of alternative Hypothesis. Alternative Hypothesis symbolized by “Ha”. This symbol could direct
the answer of hypothesis, “Ha” can be (>) or (2.64. It means Ha
was accepted and Ho was rejected.
It could be interpreted based on the result of calculation that Ha stating that animation
pictures give influences toward student’s scores in increasing English vocabulary was accepted
and Ho stating that animation pictures does not give influences toward student’s scores in
increasing English vocabulary was rejected. It means that teaching vocabulary using animation
pictures gave significant effect on the students’ vocabulary score of the tenth grade students at
SMKN 1 Palangka Raya.
Table 4.5 the Comparison of Pre Test and Post Test Score Achieved by the Students
in Experiment Group.
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Dx ( Pre test )
60
32
52
35
40
57
50
72
62
47
67
47
52
65
42
40
70
55
62
45
50
75
37
52
55
65
42
60
57
52
35
37
55
45
32
Dy ( Post test )
67
47
62
47
77
60
70
95
55
65
70
87
67
72
75
52
92
67
75
82
70
72
57
72
60
67
65
70
55
57
50
77
77
62
50
Dx-Dy
7
10
10
12
30
3
20
23
7
18
3
40
15
7
33
13
22
12
13
37
20
3
20
20
5
2
23
10
2
5
15
40
22
17
18
36
37
Average
40
52
∑Dx = 1896
51.1
80
50
∑Dy= 2475
40
2
66.8
Table 4.6 the Comparison of Pre Test and Post Test Score Achieved by the Students
in Control Group.
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Dx ( Pre test )
47
40
47
50
30
50
42
50
25
42
30
45
22
25
52
40
60
32
45
37
45
47
22
42
55
52
25
27
45
37
57
37
57
Dy ( Post test )
50
30
47
50
40
47
45
52
35
45
40
42
35
35
55
45
62
22
45
30
42
45
32
45
55
55
55
32
37
45
25
57
27
Dx-Dy
3
10
0
0
10
3
3
2
10
3
10
3
13
10
3
5
2
10
0
7
3
2
10
13
0
3
30
5
8
8
32
20
30
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
35
60
60
27
42
65
40
∑Dx = 1688
60
25
62
37
45
70
30
∑Dy= 1733
Average
42.2
43.3
25
35
2
10
3
5
10
Based on the table above it can be seen that there was significant difference of mean score of
pre test and post test at Experiment class where pre test mean score was 51.1 and post test mean
score was 66.1.while based on the mean score at control class of pre test score, it was 42.2 and
post test was 43.3.
C. Discussion
In teaching learning process, English vocabulary by using animation pictures is a tool
using by the teacher to teach the students. From the result of analysis the use of media giving
positive effects for student’s vocabulary score. It meant media has important role in teaching
learning process.
The results of researcher study is supported by theory (Chapter II: page 25) about the
reasons why teaching vocabulary using animation pictures could increase students’ interest in
teaching learning process.1 The first reason is about the advantage of animation pictures in
learning process, such as: the skill and ability improvement; the interactive animation takes less
time to teach students complex things and makes them enjoy more to learn difficult things. the
students will more motivated and learner will get more skill, which is the main reason to make
1
Rasha rasheed awad, The Effect Of Using Animation In Teaching English Vocabulary For 3
Gaza Govermental School. Unpublished Thesis, Al – Azhar university- Gaza. 2013. P. 31
rd
Graders In
them more motivated. From the data above, it is shown that teaching vocabulary by using
animation as the media of learning process gave significant effects in improving students’
English vocabulary. The students more interested to receive vocabulary using animation pictures.
So, the research of improving students’ English vocabulary by using animation pictures as media
is balanced with the theory in chapter II : page 25. The theory supported the use of animation
pictures as media in learning process and suitable with the condition of the tenth grade students.
The result of data analysis showed that The Effect of using Animation Pictures in Teaching
English Vocabulary to the Tenth Graders of SMKN 1 Palangka Raya. It based on the means
score between Pre-test and Post-test. The mean score of Posttest reached higher score than the
mean score of Pretest (X= 67.3< Y=43.6). It indicated that the students’ scores increased after
conducting treatment. In other words, teaching vocabulary by using animation pictures.
Meanwhile, after the data was calculated using the ttest formula using manual calculation showed
that the tobserved was 8.649. By comparing the tobserved with the ttable, it was found that the tobserved
was higher than ttable at 5% level significance or tobserved = 8.649>ttable=1.99.
Therefore, t table ( 5 % = 1.99 ) < t observed ( 8.649 ). It means that the t observed empiric at 8.649
was greater than t
table
at 5 % and 1 % of significant level. In teaching vocabulary by using
animation pictures, writer find this media made the students more focus and motivated to
memorize word and able to write it and the students more interest.