Lampiran 1 KUESIONER PENELITIAN HUBUNGAN KOMUNIKASI INTERPERSONAL PETUGAS KESEHATAN DENGAN KEPATUHAN BEROBAT PENDERITA TB PARU DI KECAMATAN SIBOLANGIT KABUPATEN DELI SERDANG TAHUN 2013

  Lampiran 1 KUESIONER PENELITIAN HUBUNGAN KOMUNIKASI INTERPERSONAL PETUGAS KESEHATAN DENGAN KEPATUHAN BEROBAT PENDERITA TB PARU DI KECAMATAN SIBOLANGIT KABUPATEN DELI SERDANG TAHUN 2013

A. Indentitas Responden 1. Nomor : …………….

  2. Umur : …………….

  3. Pendidikan : ……………..

  4. Pekerjaan : 1. PNS

  2. Pegawai Swasta

  3. Wirasasta

  4. IRT

  5. Petani

  B. Komunikasi Interpersonal Berilah tanda ( √) pada jawaban yang sesuai menurut saudara pada kolom disamping.

  Y : Ya (3) KK : Kadang-Kadang (2) T : Tidak (1)

  Pernyataan Y KK T Keterbukaan

  1. Petugas kesehatan secara terbuka menjelaskan tentang pengobatan TB Paru dan lamanya pengobatan

  2. Petugas kesehatan menjelaskan secara terbuka bahwa pengobatan TB paru dilaksanakan 2 tahap yaitu tahap awal dan tahap lanjutan.

  3. Petugas kesehatan ada kesediaan untuk membuka diri mengungkapkan informasi secara jelas tentang penyakit TB Paru dan pengobatannya.

  4. Petugas kesehatan secara tegas mengungkapkan seluruh informasi yang berhubungan dengan pengobatan TB paru selama pengobatan.

  5. Komunikasi yang dilakukan petugas kesehatan memperlihatkan keterbukaan dengan cara bereaksi secara spontan terhadap penderita TB Paru.

  6. Komunikasi petugas kesehatan yang terbuka, sehingga penderita TB Paru dapat lebih patuh berobat.

  Empati Y KK T

  1. Petugas kesehatan berkemampuan untuk mengetahui apa yang sedang dialami penderita TB Paru .

  2. Petugas kesehatan dapat merasakan apa yang sedang dirasakan dan keluhan - keluhan penderita TB Paru selama pengobatan.

  3. Petugas kesehatan empatik dan mampu memahami dan memotivasi penderita TB Paru dalam menghadapi pengobatan.

  4. Petugas kesehatan terlibat aktif dengan penderita TB Paru melalui ekspresi wajah dan gerak-gerik yang sesuai

  5. Petugas kesehatan melakukan s entuhan yang sepantasnya selama melakukan komunikasi dengan penderita TB Paru didasarkan pada ketulusan hati.

  6. Petugas kesehatan selalu menghargai dan konsentrasi terpusat meliputi kontak mata, postur tubuh yang penuh perhatian dan kedekatan fisik saat berkomunikasi

  Sikap mendukung Y KK T

  1. Petugas kesehatan memberikan dukungan setiap penderita TB Paru berbicara

  2. Petugas kesehatan memperlakukan penderita TB Paru dengan hormat sewaktu berkomunikasi.

  3. Petugas kesehatan memotivasi penderita TB Paru sewaktu berkomunikasi tentang pengobatan.

  4. Petugas kesehatan menghormati pendapat penderita TB Paru dalam berkomunikasi dan mendorong untuk tetap semangat dalam pengobatan.

  5. Petugas kesehatan menghargai penderita TB Paru ketika berkomunikasi

  6. Petugas kesehatan mendukung penderita TB Paru ketika penderita TB Paru setiap datang berobat.

  Sikap positif Y KK T

  1. Komunikasi petugas kesehatan dapat menambah kepercayaan penderita TB Paru untuk kesembuhan penyakitnya.

  2. Komunikasi yang dilakukan oleh petugas kesehatan akan menimbulkan penderita TB Paru merasa tenang dalam pengobatan

  3. Penderita TB Paru percaya bahwa informasi tentang penyakit dan pengobatan yang disampaikan oleh petugas kesehatan adalah benar dan akurat.

  4. Melalui sikap dan penampilan petugas kesehatan dapat membantu penderita TB Paru untuk semangat yang tinggi mengikuti pengobatan

  5. Melalui sikap dan penampilan petugas kesehatan dapat membantu penderita TB Paru untuk tenang dan nyaman dalam pengobatan

  6. Setelah berkomukasi dengan petugas kesehatan apakah penderita TB Paru lebih patuh untuk berobat.

  Kesetaraan Y KK T

  1. Petugas kesehatan menunjukkan rasa kebersamaan dan teman yang baik dalam berkomunikasi.

  2. Petugas kesehatan bersama-sama dengan penderita TB Paru dan tidak ada jarak yang ditunjukkan petugas kesehatan dalam mengkomunikasikan tentang penyakit dan pengobatan.

  3. Petugas kesehatan bersama-sama dengan penderita TB Paru membahas dan mendiskusikan segala masalah yang akan dihadapi penderita TB Paru selama pengobatan.

  4. Petugas kesehatan bersedia bersama-sama dengan penderita TB Paru membahas apabila penderita TB Paru belum mengetahui penyakit dan pengobatan dengan baik.

  5. Komunikasi yang dilakukan oleh petugas kesehatan menunjukkan bahwa petugas kesehatan tidak sebagai tenaga kesehatan tapi sebagai keluarga.

6. Cara berkomunikasi petugas kesehatan dapat membuat penderita TB Paru lebih patuh untuk berobat.

C. Kepatuhan

  1. Apakah saudara berobat setiap jadwal pengobatan dan minum obat?

  1. Ya

  2. Tidak

  D. Observasi Buku register TB 01 di Puskesmas

  1. Patuh

  2. Tidak patuh

  Lampiran 2 MASTER VALIDASI DAN RELIABILITAS DATA N0 Keterbukaan Empati Sikap Mendukung k1 k2 k3 k4 k5 k6 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5 e6 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  21

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  3

  20

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  23

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  2

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  22

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  17

  2

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  19

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  18

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  16

  2

  29

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  2

  2

  28

  3

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  30

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  25

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  2

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  24

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  27

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  26

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  1

  3

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  6

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  1

  5

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  8

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  2

  7

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  3

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  2

  4

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  2

  2

  3

  2

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  3

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  2

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  13

  3

  14

  3

  1

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  15

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  2

  2

  3

  2

  2

  2

  3

  1

  3

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  10

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  1

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  9

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  12

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  3

  2

  2

  3

  3

  2

  11

  3

  3

  3

  3

  N0

Sikap Positif Kesetaraan

p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 p6 k1 k2 k3 k4 k5 k6

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  21

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  20

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  23

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  22

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  17

  2

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  19

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  18

  3

  3

  16

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  2

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  28

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  29

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  30

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  3

  3

  25

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  24

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  2

  27

  3

  2

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  26

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  1

  2

  3

  2

  3

  2

  6

  2

  2

  3

  2

  3

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  5

  2

  3

  3

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  8

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  2

  2

  3

  2

  3

  7

  2

  3

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  4

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  2

  3

  2

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  14

  13

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  15

  3

  2

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  10

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  9

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  12

  3

  2

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  11

  2

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  Uji Validasi dan Reabilitas Variabel Keterbukaan

Co rrel atio ns

k1 k2 k3 k4 k5 k6 ktot k1 Pearson Correl ation

  1 ,932** ,856** ,856** ,649** ,932** ,968** Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 k2 Pearson Correl ation ,932** 1 ,791** ,791** ,583** 1,000** ,944** Sig. (2-tailed)

  ,000 ,000 ,000 ,001 ,000 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 k3 Pearson Correl ation ,856** ,791** 1 1,000** ,508** ,791** ,915** Sig. (2-tailed)

  ,000 ,000 ,000 ,004 ,000 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 k4 Pearson Correl ation ,856** ,791** 1,000** 1 ,508** ,791** ,915** Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000 ,004 ,000 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 k5 Pearson Correl ation ,649** ,583** ,508** ,508** 1 ,583** ,711** Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,001 ,004 ,004 ,001 ,000

  N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 k6 Pearson Correl ation ,932** 1,000** ,791** ,791** ,583** 1 ,944** Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,001 ,000

  N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 ktot Pearson Correl ation ,968** ,944** ,915** ,915** ,711** ,944**

  1 Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 **. Correlation is s ignificant at t he 0.01 level (2-t ailed).

  Reliability Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  ,815

  7 Ite m Statis tics Me an Std . De viati on N k1

,63 ,49 0

  30 k2

,60 ,49 8

  30 k3

,63 ,49 0

  30 k4 ,63 ,49 0 30 k5 ,60 ,49 8 30 k6 ,60 ,49 8 30 kto t 3,7 0 2,6 67

  30 Ite m-T ota l Sta tisti cs Sc ale Co rrec ted Cr onba ch's Sc ale Mea n if Va rian ce if Ite m-Total Al pha if Ite m

  Ite m Delete d Ite m Delete d Co rrela tion De lete d k1 6,7 7 23 ,633 ,96 1 ,77 7 k2 6,8 0 23 ,683 ,93 3 ,77 8 k3 6,7 7 23 ,909 ,89 8 ,78 1 k4 6,7 7 23 ,909 ,89 8 ,78 1 k5 6,8 0 24 ,924 ,66 0 ,79 9 k6 6,8 0 23 ,683 ,93 3 ,77 8 kto t

  3,7 0 7,1 14 1,0 00 ,95 3

  Uji Validasi dan Reabilitas Variabel Empati Correl ations e1 e2 e3 e4 e5 e6 etot e1 Pearson Correl ation

  1 1,000** ,623** ,196 ,397* ,146 ,864** Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,299 ,030 ,441 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 e2 Pearson Correl ation 1,000** 1 ,623** ,196 ,397* ,146 ,864** Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,299 ,030 ,441 ,000

  N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 e3 Pearson Correl ation ,623** ,623** 1 ,509** ,267 ,452* ,749** Sig. (2-tailed)

  ,000 ,000 ,004 ,153 ,012 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 e4 Pearson Correl ation ,196 ,196 ,509** 1 ,321 ,921** ,526** Sig. (2-tailed) ,299 ,299 ,004 ,084 ,000 ,003

  N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 e5 Pearson Correl ation ,397* ,397* ,267 ,321 1 ,262 ,579** Sig. (2-tailed) ,030 ,030 ,153 ,084 ,162 ,001

  N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 e6 Pearson Correl ation ,146 ,146 ,452* ,921** ,262 1 ,510** Sig. (2-tailed)

  ,441 ,441 ,012 ,000 ,162 ,004 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 etot Pearson Correl ation ,864** ,864** ,749** ,526** ,579** ,510**

  1 Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000 ,003 ,001 ,004 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 **. Correlation is s ignificant at t he 0.01 level (2-t ailed).

  • .

  Correlation is s ignificant at t he 0.05 level (2-t ailed).

  Reliability Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  ,814

  7

  Ite m Statis tics Me an Std . De viati on N e1 ,63 ,49 0

  30 e2

,63 ,49 0

  30 e3 ,50 ,50 9 30 e4

  

,30 ,46 6

  30 e5 ,53 ,50 7 30 e6

  

,27 ,45 0

  30 eto t 3,2 3 1,6 75

  30 Ite m-T ota l Sta tisti cs Sc ale Co rrec ted Cronba ch's Sc ale Mea n if Va rian ce if Ite m-Total Al pha if Ite m

  Ite m Delete d Ite m Delete d Co rrela tion De lete d e1 5,4 7 11 ,154 ,78 2 ,77 2 e2 5,4 7 11 ,154 ,78 2 ,77 2 e3 5,6 0 11 ,214 ,72 9 ,77 6 e4 5,8 0 11 ,959 ,55 2 ,79 8 e5

  5,5 7 11 ,909 ,51 1 ,80 1 e6 5,8 3 12 ,144 ,51 3 ,80 3 eto t 2,8 7 4,4 64 ,94 4 ,81 9

  Uji Validasi dan Reabilitas Variabel Sikap Mendukung Correl ations m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 mt ot m1 Pearson Correlation

  1 ,577** ,528** ,577** ,544** ,439* ,729** Sig. (2-tailed) ,001 ,003 ,001 ,002 ,015 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 m2 Pearson Correlation ,577** 1 ,934** ,864** ,336 ,864** ,911** Sig. (2-tailed) ,001 ,000 ,000 ,069 ,000 ,000

  N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 m3 Pearson Correlation ,528** ,934** 1 ,934** ,408* ,934** ,943** Sig. (2-tailed) ,003 ,000 ,000 ,025 ,000 ,000

  N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 m4 Pearson Correlation ,577** ,864** ,934** 1 ,471** ,864** ,938** Sig. (2-tailed) ,001 ,000 ,000 ,009 ,000 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 m5 Pearson Correlation ,544** ,336 ,408* ,471** 1 ,336 ,618** Sig. (2-tailed) ,002 ,069 ,025 ,009 ,069 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 m6 Pearson Correlation ,439* ,864** ,934** ,864** ,336 1 ,884** Sig. (2-tailed) ,015 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,069 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 mt ot Pearson Correlation ,729** ,911** ,943** ,938** ,618** ,884**

  1 Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 **. Correlation is s ignificant at t he 0.01 level (2-t ailed).

  • .

  Correlation is s ignificant at t he 0.05 level (2-t ailed).

  Reliability

  Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  ,806

  7 Ite m Statis tics Me an Std . De viati on N m1

,60 ,49 8

  30 m2

,43 ,50 4

  30 m3 ,40 ,49 8 30 m4 ,43 ,50 4 30 m5

  

,50 ,50 9

  30 m6

,43 ,50 4

  30 mtot

2,8 0 2,5 24

  30 Ite m-T ota l Sta tisti cs Sc ale Co rrec ted Cronba ch's Sc ale Mea n if Va rian ce if Ite m-Total Al pha if Ite m Ite m Delete d Ite m Delete d Co rrela tion De lete d m1 5,0 0 22 ,069 ,67 8 ,78 5 m2 5,1 7 21 ,109 ,89 1 ,76 6 m3

  5,2 0 20 ,993 ,93 0 ,76 3 m4 5,1 7 20 ,971 ,92 4 ,76 3 m5 5,1 0 22 ,576 ,54 9 ,79 4 m6 5,1 7 21 ,247 ,85 8 ,76 9 mt ot

  2,8 0 6,3 72 1,0 00 ,91 4 Uji Validasi dan Reabilitas Variabel Sikap Positif Correl ations p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 p6 ptot p1 Pearson Correl ation

  1 ,591** ,623** ,649** ,591** ,569** ,778** Sig. (2-tailed) ,001 ,000 ,000 ,001 ,001 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 p2 Pearson Correl ation ,591** 1 ,471** ,934** ,864** ,870** ,916** Sig. (2-tailed) ,001 ,009 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

  N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 p3 Pearson Correl ation ,623** ,471** 1 ,544** ,471** ,484** ,702** Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,009 ,002 ,009 ,007 ,000

  N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 p4 Pearson Correl ation ,649** ,934** ,544** 1 ,934** ,932** ,965** Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,002 ,000 ,000 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 p5 Pearson Correl ation ,591** ,864** ,471** ,934** 1 ,870** ,890** Sig. (2-tailed)

  ,001 ,000 ,009 ,000 ,000 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 p6 Pearson Correl ation ,569** ,870** ,484** ,932** ,870** 1 ,913** Sig. (2-tailed)

  ,001 ,000 ,007 ,000 ,000 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 ptot Pearson Correl ation ,778** ,916** ,702** ,965** ,890** ,913**

  1 Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 **. Correlation is s ignificant at t he 0.01 level (2-t ailed).

  Reliability

  Re liability S tati stic s Cr onba ch's A lp ha N of Ite ms

  ,80 7

  7 Ite m Statis tics Me an Std . De viati on N p1

  

,63 ,49 0

  30 p2

,57 ,50 4

  30 p3

,50 ,50 9

  30 p4

,60 ,49 8

  30 p5

,57 ,50 4

  30 p6

,63 ,49 0

  30 pto t

3,5 3 2,6 09

  30 Ite m-T ota l Sta tisti cs Sc ale Co rrec ted Cronba ch's Sc ale Mea n if Va rian ce if Ite m-Total Al pha if Ite m Ite m Delete d Ite m Delete d Co rrela tion De lete d p1 6,4 0 23 ,214 ,73 6 ,78 3 p2 6,4 7 22 ,395 ,89 7 ,76 9 p3 6,5 3 23 ,499 ,64 3 ,78 9 p4

  6,4 3 22 ,185 ,95 8 ,76 4 p5 6,4 7 22 ,464 ,88 2 ,77 0 p6 6,4 0 22 ,524 ,89 5 ,77 0 pto t 3,5 0 6,6 72 ,99 8 ,93 1

  Uji Validasi dan Reabilitas Variabel Kesetaraan Correl ations kt1 kt2 kt3 kt4 kt5 kt6 ktt ot kt1 Pearson Correlation

  1 ,472** ,566** 1,000** ,472** ,566** ,854** Sig. (2-tailed) ,008 ,001 ,000 ,008 ,001 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 kt2 Pearson Correlation ,472** 1 ,267 ,472** 1,000** ,267 ,738** Sig. (2-tailed) ,008 ,153 ,008 ,000 ,153 ,000

  N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 kt3 Pearson Correlation ,566** ,267 1 ,566** ,267 1,000** ,777** Sig. (2-tailed) ,001 ,153 ,001 ,153 ,000 ,000

  N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 kt4 Pearson Correlation 1,000** ,472** ,566** 1 ,472** ,566** ,854** Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,008 ,001 ,008 ,001 ,000

  N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 kt5 Pearson Correlation ,472** 1,000** ,267 ,472** 1 ,267 ,738** Sig. (2-tailed) ,008 ,000 ,153 ,008 ,153 ,000

  N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 kt6 Pearson Correlation ,566** ,267 1,000** ,566** ,267 1 ,777** Sig. (2-tailed) ,001 ,153 ,000 ,001 ,153 ,000

  N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 ktt ot Pearson Correlation ,854** ,738** ,777** ,854** ,738** ,777**

  1 Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 **. Correlation is s ignificant at t he 0.01 level (2-t ailed).

  Reliability

  Re liability S tati stic s ,79 7

  3

  1

  2

  11

  16

  3

  2

  3

  3

  2

  3

  11

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1

  14

  2

  3

  3

  1

  12

  1

  8

  1

  2

  1

  1

  2

  1

  1

  8

  2

  1

  1

  1

  2

  1

  12

  3

  2

  3

  1

  1

  3

  9

  11

  1

  3

  1

  2

  3

  1

  1

  9

  1

  1

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  1

  1

  2

  3

  10

  12

  1

  3

  3

  2

  2

  1

  17

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  3

  1

  11

  2

  3

  9

  1

  1

  9

  1

  1

  3

  1

  1

  2

  9

  1

  2

  2

  1

  1

  2

  1

  12

  1

  15

  2

  3

  3

  9

  2

  2

  1

  1

  2

  1

  13

  3

  1

  2

  2

  1

  2

  1

  8

  2

  1

  1

  3

  2

  3

  12

  13

  16

  3

  3

  2

  2

  3

  3

  1

  2

  3

  3

  2

  1

  2

  16

  3

  2

  1

  2

  1

  3

  2

  14

  14

  1

  2

  2

  3

  3

  14

  2

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  11

  2

  2

  1

  1

  7 Cr onba ch's

A lp ha N of Ite ms

Ite m Statis tics

  8

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  2

  3

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  2

  1

  2

  15

  3

  3

  16

  3

  2

  16

  8

  1

  2

  1

  1

  2

  1

  4

  3

  3

  2

  3

  3

  3

  2

  14

  2

  2

  3

  3

  2

  1

  MT MK 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 1 1 1 1 1

  9

  1

  2

  1

  1

  3

  1

  1

  KT KK Empati ET EK S. Mendukung

  3

  Lampiran 3 MASTER DATA PENELITIAN No Keterbukaan

  Cronba ch's Al pha if Ite m De lete d

  Ite m Delete d Co rrec ted Ite m-Total Co rrela tion

  Sc ale Mea n if Ite m Delete d Sc ale Va rian ce if

  6,1 3 18 ,602 ,82 3 ,76 0 6,2 7 18 ,961 ,68 3 ,77 0 6,3 0 18 ,769 ,72 8 ,76 6 6,1 3 18 ,602 ,82 3 ,76 0 6,2 7 18 ,961 ,68 3 ,77 0 6,3 0 18 ,769 ,72 8 ,76 6 3,4 0 5,5 59 1,0 00 ,87 8 kt1 kt2 kt3 kt4 kt5 kt6 ktt ot

  

Me an Std . De viati on N

Ite m-T ota l Sta tisti cs

  30 ,53 ,50 7 30 ,50 ,50 9 30 ,67 ,47 9 30 ,53 ,50 7 30 ,50 ,50 9 30 3,4 0 2,3 58 30 kt1 kt2 kt3 kt4 kt5 kt6 kttot

  ,67 ,47 9

  1

  3

  2

  14

  12

  1

  3

  3

  2

  1

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  2

  1

  2

  3

  14

  1

  2

  2

  1

  1

  2

  2

  3

  2

  2

  2

  7

  1

  8

  1

  2

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  8

  1

  1

  2

  3

  13

  1

  3

  1

  1

  3

  1

  8

  13

  1

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1

  9

  1

  1

  1

  2

  2

  2

  1

  2

  2

  3

  2

  2

  3

  3

  5

  11

  2

  2

  16

  2

  2

  1

  1

  7

  1

  1

  1

  3

  2

  14

  3

  1

  2

  2

  3

  3

  3

  6

  16

  3

  2

  2

  2

  3

  3

  12

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1

  16

  2

  1

  1

  8

  1

  2

  1

  1

  1

  2

  9

  2

  1

  39

  1

  3

  1

  1

  2

  1

  9

  1

  2

  1

  1

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  11

  2

  1

  2

  3

  1

  1

  12

  38

  2

  1

  2

  1

  1

  2

  9

  1

  1

  1

  1

  41

  2

  15

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  12

  1

  3

  2

  1

  1

  1

  2

  8

  1

  3

  3

  3

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1

  8

  1

  1

  2

  1

  2

  1

  9

Dokumen yang terkait

ANALISIS BUDAYA ORGANISASI PADA KINERJA PEGAWAI DI SAMSAT MEDAN UTARA

0 0 13

ABSTRAK PENGARUH KUALITAS PRODUK DAN CITRA MEREK TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN SMARTPHONE SAMSUNG DI MEDAN

1 3 14

BAB III METODE PENELITIAN 3.1.Jenis Penelitian - Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Konsumsi Mahasiswa Asing Di Universitas Sumatera Utara

0 0 26

SIMULASI PROSES DEEP DRAWING CUP (BASKOM) PELAT JENIS STAINLESS STEEL 304 DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN SOFTWARE ABAQUS 6.9-3

2 3 24

Lampiran 1.Deskripsi bawang merah varietas lokal Samosir Bawang merah varietas Samosir

0 2 33

PERANCANGAN SISTEM PAKAR UNTUK MENDIAGNOSA KERUSAKAN HANDPHONE DENGAN METODE

0 1 14

BAB 1 PENDAHULUAN 1.1 Latar Belakang - Pengaruh Pemberian cookies Substitusi Tepung Tempe terhadap Pertumbuhan Anak Batita Gizi Kurang di Kelurahan Pakuan Baru Kota Jambi Tahun 2013

0 0 7

THE INFLUENCE OF GIVING COOKIES AS TEMPEH FLOUR SUBSTITUTE ON THE GROWTH OF MALNUTRITION CHILDREN UNDER THREE YEARS OLD AT KELURAHAN PAKUAN BARU, JAMBI, IN 2013 THESIS BY RISTUA GULTOM 117032105IKM

0 0 12

BAB 1 PENDAHULUAN 1.1. Latar Belakang - Efektivitas Metode Simulasidan Media Leaflet Terhadap Pengetahuan dan Keterampilan Ibu-Ibu Rumah TanggaDalam PenanggulangandanPencegahan Diaredi Daerah Rawan Banjir di Kecamatan Matangkuli Kabupaten Aceh UtaraTahun

0 0 12

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SIMULATION METHOD AND LEAFLET MEDIA ON HOUSEWIVES’ KNOWLEDGE AND SKILL IN HANDLING AND PREVENTION OF DIARRHEA IN THE AREA SUBJECT TO FLOODIN MATANGKULI SUBDISTRICT, NORTH ACEH DISTRICT, IN 2013 THESIS BY

0 0 20