INVESTIGATING THE USE OF CONTEXTUAL TEACHING ANDLEARNING (CTL) IN TEACHING SPEAKING AT THE SECOND YEAR Investigating The Use Of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) In Teaching Speaking At The Second Year Of SMPn 3 Colomadu.
INVESTIGATING THE USE OF CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) IN TEACHING SPEAKING AT THE SECOND YEAR
OF SMP N 3 COLOMADU
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education
in English Department
Proposed by:
RENDI TYAS LOGISLATIF A 320 080 112
SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
(2)
APPROVAL
INVESTIGATING THE USE OF CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) IN TEACHING SPEAKING AT THE SECOND YEAR
OFSMP N 3 COLOMADU
RESEARCH PAPER
Proposed by:
RENDI TYAS LOGISLATIF A 320 080 112
Approved to be Examined by:
First Consultant
Aryati Prasetyarini, M.Pd
Second Consultant
(3)
ACCEPTANCE
INVESTIGATING THE USE OF CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) IN TEACHING SPEAKING AT THE SECOND YEAR
OFSMP N 3 COLOMADU
By:
RENDY TYAS LOGISLATIF A320 080 112
Accepted and Approved by the Board of Examiners School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta Team of Examiners:
1. Aryati Prasetyarini, M.Pd ( )
(Chair Person)
2. Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M.Hum ( )
(Member I)
3. Drs. Agus Wijayanto, MA, Ph. D ( )
(Member II)
Dean,
Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M.Si 547
(4)
TESTIMONY
I state that there is no plagiarism of the previous literary studies which have been conducted to obtain bachelor degree of neither university nor ideas or opinions have been published by other, except those which the writings are referred in literature review, underlying theory and bibliography. Hence, if it is proven that there are some mistakes in this testimony, I will be fully responsible.
Surakarta, Maret 2012
RENDI TYAS LOGISLATIF
(5)
MOTTO
Bisa karena Terbiasa (The W rit er)
You can, if You t hink, You can (The writ er)
God help t hose who help t hemselves (Benjamin Franlin)
N ever give up t o diff icult ies, if t here is dif f icult y, t here must be a way t o f inish it (Qs. Al- I nsyirah: 6)
(6)
DEDICATION
This research paper is dedicat ed t o
:
Allah SWT The Lord of Everything
My beloved Parents Bapak Suradal and Ibu Sunarni My grandma Mbh. Semarang
My Lovely young brothers Robert & Rony My dearest Friends The Gembelz English 08
His beloved one in heart Dek. Ery
(7)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Assalamu alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh
Alhamdulillahi robbil alamin, praise and thanks to Allah SWT for His blessing and guidance, so this research is finally finished. On this opportunity the writer would like to express his gratitude to people who have directly and indirectly helped him to finish this research.
In conducting this research paper, the writer gets some help from many people. On this occasion, the writer would like to express his deep gratitude and appreciation, to the following people.
1. Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M, Si., as the Dean of School of Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
2. Titis Setyabudi, S.S, M.Hum., as the Head of English Department, School of Teacher Training and Education Faculty.
3. The first consultant, Aryati Prasetyarini, M.Pd, who has given her great patience for giving time to read this little work, help, guidance infinishing this research paper.
4. The second consultant, Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M.Hum, who given him motivation to finish my research paper.
5. Drs. Agus Wijayanto, MA, Ph. D., thanks for being a good examiner in order to make the research paper better.
6. Drs. Sigit Haryanto, M.Hum as the consultant academic.
7. Drs. Suparto, SH., M.Pd. as the Headmaster ofSMP N3 Colomadu who has
(8)
8. Mrs. Rusmini, S.Pd., as the teacher of English inSMP N3 Colomadu who has
given help to get the data and information about teaching of English using CTL method especially in teaching speaking in second grade.
9. All of the students at SMP N3 Colomadu, especially in VIII.E class for
helping him in collecting the data.
10. His beloved family Bapak Suradal Heri Susilo’ and Ibu Sunarni’, Mbah Semarang’ and also his young brothers ‘Robert Donny Sanjaya & Rony Ferdiago’ who have sacrificed everything for me and always support me with praying and love.
11. His closed friend Tomy, Aris, Mira, Arif ‘Q-run’, Tw, Ang’q, Jarot,and Mbesur’our friendship will never end.
12. His crazy friend in the world The
GEMBELZ
community ‘Denik, Elly, Riska, Ambari, Ilham, Ana Ndutz, Arif, Laili (Mbel), Septi, Ratih ‘Dolphin’, Huda, Saras, Atik, Nia ‘Nya’, Udin, Tri May, Linda, Galuh, Narko+Tikawho always give him happiness every day.13. His friends in English 08, Ratna, Mimi, Mbk. Dwi, Fatma, Sasa, Ari Indah, Yuni, etc. thanks for the great relationship.
14. Three idiot ‘Ratih, Septi, & Latief’ who always give him spirit in doing his research.
15. His beloved one in heart Dek. Ery’thanks for love, support and the patience without end.
For all those who cannot be mentioned one by one, thank for the support in finishing this paper. Finally the writer realizes that this research paper in far from perfect. Therefore, the writer is very pleased to accept more suggestion and construction criticism for the improvement of the research.
Wassalamu alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh
Surakarta, Maret 2012 RENDI TYAS LOGISLATIF
(9)
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE ... i
APPROVAL ... ii
ACCEPTANCE ... iii
TESTIMONY... iv
MOTTO ... v
DEDICATION ... vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ... vii
TABLE OF CONTENT ... ix
SUMMARY ... xii
CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION ... 1
A. Background of the Study ... 1
B. Problem Statement... 3
C. Limitation of the Study ... 3
D. Objective of the Study ... 4
E. Benefit of the Study ... 4
F. Research Paper Organization... 5
CHAPTER II : REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ... 7
(10)
B. Theoretical Review... 8
1. General Concept of CTL... 8
a. Notion of CTL ... 8
b. Characteristics of CTL ... 9
c. The Components of CTL ... 11
d. Procedure of CTL in Teaching Speaking ... 15
2. General Concept of Teaching Speaking ... 17
a. Notion of Speaking ... 17
b. Teaching Speaking ... 17
c. Principle in Teaching Speaking ... 18
d. Component of Speaking ... 19
CHAPTER III : RESEARCH METHOD ... 21
A. Type of the Study ... 21
B. Object of the Study ... 21
C. Subject of The Study ... 22
D. Data and Data source ... 22
E. Technique of Collecting Data ... 22
F. Technique of Analyzing Data ... 23
CHAPTER IV: RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION ... 25
A. Research Finding ... 25
(11)
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION... 44 A.Conclusion ... 44 B. Suggestion ... 44 BIBLIOGRAPHY
VIRTUAL REFERENCE APPENDIXES
(12)
SUMMARY
Rendi Tyas Logislatif, A 320 080 112. INVESTIGATING THE USE OF CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) IN TEACHING SPEAKING AT THE SECOND YEAR OFSMP N 3 COLOMADU. Research Paper. Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. 2012.
This research aims at finding out the implementation of Contextual Teaching and Learning in teaching speaking and to find strengths and weaknesses of teaching speaking inSMP N 3 Colomadu. The writer takes the English teacher
and students of the second year as the subject of the study.
In this research, the writer used the qualitative research for analyzing the data. To collect the data the writer uses observation, interview, and document. The data were analyzed by finding out the teaching procedures used by the teacher in teaching English using CTL method, comparing the result of interview with the situation in the class, making note about the activities in classroom, concluding the procedures used by the teacher are appropriate or not with the seven components in CTL, making conclusion based on the result of analysis and giving some suggestions.
The result of the analysis shows that (1) there are three-phase techniques teaching learning process: pre-teaching, whilst teaching, and post teaching. There are seven components used by the teacher in teaching learning process: constructivism, inquiry, questioning, learning community, modeling, reflections, and authentic assessment. The teaching procedures used by the teacher are appropriate with components of CTL in giving material to the students. (2) There are three strengths of CTL: the students become more active and creative in teaching learning process, there is cooperation between students, and the teacher easy to teach the material. While the weaknesses of CTL are: The teacher finds difficulty for giving score to the students and managing of time.
Consultant I
Aryati Prasetyarini, M.Pd
Consultant II
Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M.Hum
Dean,
(1)
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Assalamu alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh
Alhamdulillahi robbil alamin, praise and thanks to Allah SWT for His blessing and guidance, so this research is finally finished. On this opportunity the writer would like to express his gratitude to people who have directly and indirectly helped him to finish this research.
In conducting this research paper, the writer gets some help from many people. On this occasion, the writer would like to express his deep gratitude and appreciation, to the following people.
1. Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M, Si., as the Dean of School of Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
2. Titis Setyabudi, S.S, M.Hum., as the Head of English Department, School of Teacher Training and Education Faculty.
3. The first consultant, Aryati Prasetyarini, M.Pd, who has given her great patience for giving time to read this little work, help, guidance infinishing this research paper.
4. The second consultant, Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M.Hum, who given him motivation to finish my research paper.
5. Drs. Agus Wijayanto, MA, Ph. D., thanks for being a good examiner in order to make the research paper better.
6. Drs. Sigit Haryanto, M.Hum as the consultant academic.
7. Drs. Suparto, SH., M.Pd. as the Headmaster ofSMP N3 Colomadu who has given him permission to do this research.
(2)
8. Mrs. Rusmini, S.Pd., as the teacher of English inSMP N3 Colomadu who has given help to get the data and information about teaching of English using CTL method especially in teaching speaking in second grade.
9. All of the students at SMP N3 Colomadu, especially in VIII.E class for helping him in collecting the data.
10. His beloved family Bapak Suradal Heri Susilo’ and Ibu Sunarni’, Mbah Semarang’ and also his young brothers ‘Robert Donny Sanjaya & Rony Ferdiago’ who have sacrificed everything for me and always support me with praying and love.
11. His closed friend Tomy, Aris, Mira, Arif ‘Q-run’, Tw, Ang’q, Jarot,and Mbesur’our friendship will never end.
12. His crazy friend in the world The
GEMBELZ
community ‘Denik, Elly, Riska, Ambari, Ilham, Ana Ndutz, Arif, Laili (Mbel), Septi, Ratih ‘Dolphin’, Huda, Saras, Atik, Nia ‘Nya’, Udin, Tri May, Linda, Galuh, Narko+Tikawho always give him happiness every day.13. His friends in English 08, Ratna, Mimi, Mbk. Dwi, Fatma, Sasa, Ari Indah, Yuni, etc. thanks for the great relationship.
14. Three idiot ‘Ratih, Septi, & Latief’ who always give him spirit in doing his research.
15. His beloved one in heart Dek. Ery’thanks for love, support and the patience without end.
For all those who cannot be mentioned one by one, thank for the support in finishing this paper. Finally the writer realizes that this research paper in far from perfect. Therefore, the writer is very pleased to accept more suggestion and construction criticism for the improvement of the research.
Wassalamu alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh
Surakarta, Maret 2012 RENDI TYAS LOGISLATIF
(3)
ix
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE ... i
APPROVAL ... ii
ACCEPTANCE ... iii
TESTIMONY... iv
MOTTO ... v
DEDICATION ... vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ... vii
TABLE OF CONTENT ... ix
SUMMARY ... xii
CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION ... 1
A. Background of the Study ... 1
B. Problem Statement... 3
C. Limitation of the Study ... 3
D. Objective of the Study ... 4
E. Benefit of the Study ... 4
F. Research Paper Organization... 5
CHAPTER II : REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ... 7
(4)
B. Theoretical Review... 8
1. General Concept of CTL... 8
a. Notion of CTL ... 8
b. Characteristics of CTL ... 9
c. The Components of CTL ... 11
d. Procedure of CTL in Teaching Speaking ... 15
2. General Concept of Teaching Speaking ... 17
a. Notion of Speaking ... 17
b. Teaching Speaking ... 17
c. Principle in Teaching Speaking ... 18
d. Component of Speaking ... 19
CHAPTER III : RESEARCH METHOD ... 21
A. Type of the Study ... 21
B. Object of the Study ... 21
C. Subject of The Study ... 22
D. Data and Data source ... 22
E. Technique of Collecting Data ... 22
F. Technique of Analyzing Data ... 23
CHAPTER IV: RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION ... 25
A. Research Finding ... 25
(5)
xi
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION... 44 A.Conclusion ... 44 B. Suggestion ... 44 BIBLIOGRAPHY
VIRTUAL REFERENCE APPENDIXES
(6)
SUMMARY
Rendi Tyas Logislatif, A 320 080 112. INVESTIGATING THE USE OF CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) IN TEACHING SPEAKING AT THE SECOND YEAR OFSMP N 3 COLOMADU. Research Paper. Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. 2012.
This research aims at finding out the implementation of Contextual Teaching and Learning in teaching speaking and to find strengths and weaknesses of teaching speaking inSMP N 3 Colomadu. The writer takes the English teacher and students of the second year as the subject of the study.
In this research, the writer used the qualitative research for analyzing the data. To collect the data the writer uses observation, interview, and document. The data were analyzed by finding out the teaching procedures used by the teacher in teaching English using CTL method, comparing the result of interview with the situation in the class, making note about the activities in classroom, concluding the procedures used by the teacher are appropriate or not with the seven components in CTL, making conclusion based on the result of analysis and giving some suggestions.
The result of the analysis shows that (1) there are three-phase techniques teaching learning process: pre-teaching, whilst teaching, and post teaching. There are seven components used by the teacher in teaching learning process: constructivism, inquiry, questioning, learning community, modeling, reflections, and authentic assessment. The teaching procedures used by the teacher are appropriate with components of CTL in giving material to the students. (2) There are three strengths of CTL: the students become more active and creative in teaching learning process, there is cooperation between students, and the teacher easy to teach the material. While the weaknesses of CTL are: The teacher finds difficulty for giving score to the students and managing of time.
Consultant I
Aryati Prasetyarini, M.Pd
Consultant II
Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M.Hum
Dean,