A SAT T A Study On The Method Of Teaching Reading At The Second Semester Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta In 2011/2012 Academic Year.
A STUDY
S
ON
N THE MET
THOD OF TEACHING
T
G READING
G
AT THE
T
SECON
ND SEMES
STER OF EN
NGLISH D
DEPARTME
ENT
OF
F MUHAMM
MADIYAH
H UNIVERS
SITY OF SU
URAKARTA
A
IN 2011/2012 ACADEM
MIC YEAR
EARCH PAP
PER
RESE
Submitted as
a a Partial Fulfillmentt of the Req
quirements
for Getting
G
Bach
helor Degreee of Educattion
in Engglish Departtment
by
RIHATININGSIH
DEWI PR
A 320 080 024
4
SCHO
OOL OF TEACHER
T
R TRAINIING AND EDUCAT
TION
MUH
HAMMAD
DIYAH UNIVERSIITY OF SU
URAKAR
RTA
2012
APPROVAL
A STUDY ON THE METHOD OF TEACHING READING
AT TITE SECOND SNMESTER OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
OF MUHAMMADIYAH T]MVERSITY OT' SURAKARTA
IN 2011/2012 ACADEMIC YEAR
RESEARCH PAPER
by
DEWI PRIHATII\INGSIH
A 320 080 024
Approved to be Examined by Consultant
Consultant
(
,')
I
/'
\-(?
\1/-5
Consultant
l\
-t
.h,^
II
rn
\YT
V
Drs. Dioko Sriiono. M.Hum.
Dra. Dwi Harvanti. M.Hum.
NrP. 19s90601 195803 1 003
NIK.477
ACCEPTANCE
A STUDY ON TI{E METHOD OF TEACHING READING
AT THE SECOND SEMESTER OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNWERSITY OF SURAIA{ITTA
TN 2OI T/2012
ACADEMIC YEAR
by
DEWI PRIHATININGSIH
A 320 080 024
Accepted and Approved by Board of Examiners
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
on
November
,2012
-\
Team of Examiner:
1. Drs. Djoko Srijono.
M.Hum.
(Chair Person)
2.
Dra. Dwi Har.vanti. M.Hum.
(Member I)
3.
Drs. Maryadi" M.A.
(Member
II)
{r?
tffli
-; \? ti' 91,"t :s
-\
?. tl
7- ;\.
t,.R,
r
a:ffi
Fa.;,fr1
W
*-a&
TESTIMOI{Y
Oa this opportuaif,
I
state that &ere
is no proposed work kfore in &is
research to get bachelor degree in a certiain university, and as far as I know there is
no also work or idea that has been written or published by other people, except
those which are referre#written
in this
research paper and meationed
in
the
bibliography.
If it is proved
there
will be something wrong in my
statement above in the
firture, I E'ill wholly be rpspnsible.
Surakarta, November 20 1 2
Dewi Prihatininssih
A32B 080 024
1V
MOTTO
“ Ya Allah, kasihilah kedua orang tuaku sebagaimana mereka telah
mengasuhku ketika aku masih kecil”.
( QS.Al Israa: 24)
“If there is a difficulty, there must be away to finish it”.
( Surah Al Insyirah: 6 )
v
DEDICATION
This research paper is proudly dedicated to:
♥ My wonderful parents,
♥ My beloved older sisters and brothers,
♥ My lovely nephews and nieces,
♥ My dearest friends, and
♥ Myself.
vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Alhamdulillah, praise and gratitude for Allah SWT, the Glorious, the Lord,
and the Almighty, who has blessed the researcher to finish the research paper
entitled “A STUDY ON THE METHOD OF TEACHING READING AT THE
SECOND SEMESTER OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH
UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA IN 2011/2012 ACADEMIC YEAR” as a
partial fulfillment of the requirements to get the Bachelor Degree in English
Department of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
The writer would like to thank all the people who have helped and supported
her so that she can accomplish the research paper. They are as follows:
1.
Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M. Si. as Dean of School of Teacher Training and
Education of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, for giving permission
to write the research paper,
2.
Titis Setyabudi, S.S., M.Hum., as Head of English Department UMS, for
giving permission to do this work,
3.
Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M.Hum., as the writer’s Academic Advisor of
English Department UMS,
4.
Drs. Djoko Srijono, M.Hum., as the first consultant who guides patiently and
gives her advice during the making of this research,
5.
Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M.Hum., as the second consultant who has given the
guidance and advice,
6.
All lecturers of English Department, for the knowledges and lectures,
vii
SUMMARY
Dewi Prihatiningsih. A320080024. A STUDY ON THE METHOD OF
TEACHING READING AT THE SECOND SEMESTER OF ENGLISH
DEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
IN 2011/2012 ACADEMIC YEAR. Research Paper. School of Teacher
Training and Education. Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. 2012.
The objectives of this study are (1) to describe the methods used in teachinglearning process of Reading at the second semester of English Department at
UMS, (2) to describe the strengths and weaknesses of the methods used by the
lecturer, and (3) to describe the strengths and weaknesses of the methods for the
students. The study was done at English Department of UMS in 2011/2012
academic year.
In this research, the data are derived from event, informant and document.
There are three techniques in collecting data, namely: documentation, observation,
and interview.
The study shows that (1) the method used by lecturer is active learning. The
lecturer also used some methods, namely wall poster, Jigsaw learning, and
drilling. (2) the strengths of the methods used by the lecturer includes; the lecturer
should be creative in transferring material to students, the lecturer can unearth the
students’ skills, and the lecturer has reference to the next teaching. The
weaknesses of the methods used by the lecturer includes; the preparation of
materials and the preparation of instructions. (3) the strengths of the methods for
the students includes; students do not feel bored, students get experiences in
teaching, students’ motivation, increasing vocabulary. The weaknesses of the
methods for the students are; reading class is a big class, students are
uncomfortable in the big class, student and lecturer needs much time in the class.
Conclusion, the use of active learning method on the teaching Reading at the
second semester students of English Department of UMS are successful.
Key words: method, teaching, reading.
Consultant I
Consultant II
Drs. Djoko Srijono, M.Hum.
NIP. 19590601 198503 1 003
Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M.Hum.
NIK. 477
Dean
Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M.Si.
NIK. 547
ix
TABLE OF CONTENT
page
TITLE …………………………………………………………….…….
i
APPROVAL ……………………………………………………………
ii
ACCEPTANCE ………………………………………………………..
iii
TESTIMONY …………………………………………………………..
iv
MOTTO ………………………………………………………………...
v
DEDICATION …………………………………………………………
vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ………………………………………………
vii
SUMMARY …………………………………………………………….
ix
TABLE OF CONTENT ……………………………………………….
x
CHAPTER I
: INTRODUCTION …………………………………
1
A. Background of the Study ……………………….
1
B. Limitation of the Study ………………………….
4
C. Problem Statement……………………………….
5
D. Objective of the Study …………………………..
5
E. Benefit of the Study …………………………….
5
F. Research Paper Organization ……………………
6
: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ………
8
A. Previous Study …………………………………..
8
B. Notion of Reading ……………………………….
8
C. Notion of Teaching Reading …………………….
10
D. Principles of Teaching Reading …………………
11
E. Method of Teaching Reading ………………..….
12
CHAPTER II
x
F. Active Learning ……………………..………..…. 14
G. Wall Poster ………………………..………..….… 16
H. Jigsaw Learning …………………………….…… 18
I. Drilling …………………………….…….………
19
CHAPTER III : RESEARCH METHOD …………………………..
21
A. Type of the Study ……………………………….
21
B. Object and Subject of the Study ………………...
21
C. Data and Data Sources …………………………..
22
D. Technique of Collecting Data …………………...
22
E. Technique for Analyzing Data …………………..
23
CHAPTER IV : RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION ……
25
A. Research Finding ………………………………... 25
B. Discussion ……………………………………….. 41
CHAPTER V
: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION …………...
58
A. Conclusion……………………………………….. 58
B. Suggestion ……………………………………….
61
BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………………………………...
63
VIRTUAL REFERENCE ……………………………………………..
64
APPENDIX
xi
S
ON
N THE MET
THOD OF TEACHING
T
G READING
G
AT THE
T
SECON
ND SEMES
STER OF EN
NGLISH D
DEPARTME
ENT
OF
F MUHAMM
MADIYAH
H UNIVERS
SITY OF SU
URAKARTA
A
IN 2011/2012 ACADEM
MIC YEAR
EARCH PAP
PER
RESE
Submitted as
a a Partial Fulfillmentt of the Req
quirements
for Getting
G
Bach
helor Degreee of Educattion
in Engglish Departtment
by
RIHATININGSIH
DEWI PR
A 320 080 024
4
SCHO
OOL OF TEACHER
T
R TRAINIING AND EDUCAT
TION
MUH
HAMMAD
DIYAH UNIVERSIITY OF SU
URAKAR
RTA
2012
APPROVAL
A STUDY ON THE METHOD OF TEACHING READING
AT TITE SECOND SNMESTER OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
OF MUHAMMADIYAH T]MVERSITY OT' SURAKARTA
IN 2011/2012 ACADEMIC YEAR
RESEARCH PAPER
by
DEWI PRIHATII\INGSIH
A 320 080 024
Approved to be Examined by Consultant
Consultant
(
,')
I
/'
\-(?
\1/-5
Consultant
l\
-t
.h,^
II
rn
\YT
V
Drs. Dioko Sriiono. M.Hum.
Dra. Dwi Harvanti. M.Hum.
NrP. 19s90601 195803 1 003
NIK.477
ACCEPTANCE
A STUDY ON TI{E METHOD OF TEACHING READING
AT THE SECOND SEMESTER OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNWERSITY OF SURAIA{ITTA
TN 2OI T/2012
ACADEMIC YEAR
by
DEWI PRIHATININGSIH
A 320 080 024
Accepted and Approved by Board of Examiners
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
on
November
,2012
-\
Team of Examiner:
1. Drs. Djoko Srijono.
M.Hum.
(Chair Person)
2.
Dra. Dwi Har.vanti. M.Hum.
(Member I)
3.
Drs. Maryadi" M.A.
(Member
II)
{r?
tffli
-; \? ti' 91,"t :s
-\
?. tl
7- ;\.
t,.R,
r
a:ffi
Fa.;,fr1
W
*-a&
TESTIMOI{Y
Oa this opportuaif,
I
state that &ere
is no proposed work kfore in &is
research to get bachelor degree in a certiain university, and as far as I know there is
no also work or idea that has been written or published by other people, except
those which are referre#written
in this
research paper and meationed
in
the
bibliography.
If it is proved
there
will be something wrong in my
statement above in the
firture, I E'ill wholly be rpspnsible.
Surakarta, November 20 1 2
Dewi Prihatininssih
A32B 080 024
1V
MOTTO
“ Ya Allah, kasihilah kedua orang tuaku sebagaimana mereka telah
mengasuhku ketika aku masih kecil”.
( QS.Al Israa: 24)
“If there is a difficulty, there must be away to finish it”.
( Surah Al Insyirah: 6 )
v
DEDICATION
This research paper is proudly dedicated to:
♥ My wonderful parents,
♥ My beloved older sisters and brothers,
♥ My lovely nephews and nieces,
♥ My dearest friends, and
♥ Myself.
vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Alhamdulillah, praise and gratitude for Allah SWT, the Glorious, the Lord,
and the Almighty, who has blessed the researcher to finish the research paper
entitled “A STUDY ON THE METHOD OF TEACHING READING AT THE
SECOND SEMESTER OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH
UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA IN 2011/2012 ACADEMIC YEAR” as a
partial fulfillment of the requirements to get the Bachelor Degree in English
Department of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
The writer would like to thank all the people who have helped and supported
her so that she can accomplish the research paper. They are as follows:
1.
Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M. Si. as Dean of School of Teacher Training and
Education of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, for giving permission
to write the research paper,
2.
Titis Setyabudi, S.S., M.Hum., as Head of English Department UMS, for
giving permission to do this work,
3.
Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M.Hum., as the writer’s Academic Advisor of
English Department UMS,
4.
Drs. Djoko Srijono, M.Hum., as the first consultant who guides patiently and
gives her advice during the making of this research,
5.
Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M.Hum., as the second consultant who has given the
guidance and advice,
6.
All lecturers of English Department, for the knowledges and lectures,
vii
SUMMARY
Dewi Prihatiningsih. A320080024. A STUDY ON THE METHOD OF
TEACHING READING AT THE SECOND SEMESTER OF ENGLISH
DEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
IN 2011/2012 ACADEMIC YEAR. Research Paper. School of Teacher
Training and Education. Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. 2012.
The objectives of this study are (1) to describe the methods used in teachinglearning process of Reading at the second semester of English Department at
UMS, (2) to describe the strengths and weaknesses of the methods used by the
lecturer, and (3) to describe the strengths and weaknesses of the methods for the
students. The study was done at English Department of UMS in 2011/2012
academic year.
In this research, the data are derived from event, informant and document.
There are three techniques in collecting data, namely: documentation, observation,
and interview.
The study shows that (1) the method used by lecturer is active learning. The
lecturer also used some methods, namely wall poster, Jigsaw learning, and
drilling. (2) the strengths of the methods used by the lecturer includes; the lecturer
should be creative in transferring material to students, the lecturer can unearth the
students’ skills, and the lecturer has reference to the next teaching. The
weaknesses of the methods used by the lecturer includes; the preparation of
materials and the preparation of instructions. (3) the strengths of the methods for
the students includes; students do not feel bored, students get experiences in
teaching, students’ motivation, increasing vocabulary. The weaknesses of the
methods for the students are; reading class is a big class, students are
uncomfortable in the big class, student and lecturer needs much time in the class.
Conclusion, the use of active learning method on the teaching Reading at the
second semester students of English Department of UMS are successful.
Key words: method, teaching, reading.
Consultant I
Consultant II
Drs. Djoko Srijono, M.Hum.
NIP. 19590601 198503 1 003
Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M.Hum.
NIK. 477
Dean
Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M.Si.
NIK. 547
ix
TABLE OF CONTENT
page
TITLE …………………………………………………………….…….
i
APPROVAL ……………………………………………………………
ii
ACCEPTANCE ………………………………………………………..
iii
TESTIMONY …………………………………………………………..
iv
MOTTO ………………………………………………………………...
v
DEDICATION …………………………………………………………
vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ………………………………………………
vii
SUMMARY …………………………………………………………….
ix
TABLE OF CONTENT ……………………………………………….
x
CHAPTER I
: INTRODUCTION …………………………………
1
A. Background of the Study ……………………….
1
B. Limitation of the Study ………………………….
4
C. Problem Statement……………………………….
5
D. Objective of the Study …………………………..
5
E. Benefit of the Study …………………………….
5
F. Research Paper Organization ……………………
6
: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ………
8
A. Previous Study …………………………………..
8
B. Notion of Reading ……………………………….
8
C. Notion of Teaching Reading …………………….
10
D. Principles of Teaching Reading …………………
11
E. Method of Teaching Reading ………………..….
12
CHAPTER II
x
F. Active Learning ……………………..………..…. 14
G. Wall Poster ………………………..………..….… 16
H. Jigsaw Learning …………………………….…… 18
I. Drilling …………………………….…….………
19
CHAPTER III : RESEARCH METHOD …………………………..
21
A. Type of the Study ……………………………….
21
B. Object and Subject of the Study ………………...
21
C. Data and Data Sources …………………………..
22
D. Technique of Collecting Data …………………...
22
E. Technique for Analyzing Data …………………..
23
CHAPTER IV : RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION ……
25
A. Research Finding ………………………………... 25
B. Discussion ……………………………………….. 41
CHAPTER V
: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION …………...
58
A. Conclusion……………………………………….. 58
B. Suggestion ……………………………………….
61
BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………………………………...
63
VIRTUAL REFERENCE ……………………………………………..
64
APPENDIX
xi