AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON THE MASTERY OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT SPEECH ( A STUDY AT THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 3 PURWOKERTO IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014) - repository perpustakaan
AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON THE MASTERY OF DIRECT AND
INDIRECT SPEECH
( A STUDY AT THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 3
PURWOKERTO IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014)
A Thesis
Submitted to English Department
As a Partial fulfillment of Requirements for S.Pd Degree
Compiled by:
Anggun Nur Zainudin
1001050013
ENGLISH DEPATMENT
TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF PURWOKERTO
2015
APPROVAL
Title : AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON THE MASTERY OF
DIRECT AND INDIRECT SPEECH (A Study at the Second Grade Students of SMA Negeri 3 Purwokerto in the Academic Year 2013/2014)
Name : Anggun Nur Zainudin NIM : 10010500 13 Faculty : Tea cher Training and Education Faculty Department : English Department Consultant : Drs. Bambang Suroso, M. Hum.
SKRIPSI BERJUDUL
AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON THE MASTERY OF DIRECT AND
INDIRECT SPEECH
( A Study at the Second Grade Students of SMA Negeri 3 Prwokerto in the
Academic Year 2013/2014)yang dipersiapkan dan disusun oleh:
ANGGUN NUR ZAINUDIN
1001050013
Telah dipertahankan di depan Dewan Penguji pada tanggal 28 Januari 2015 dan dinyatakan telah memenuhi syarat untuk diterima sebagai kelengkapan untuk mendapatkan gelar Sarjana Pendidikan
Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Pembimbing
1. Drs. Bambang Suroso, M. Hum. (....................................) NIK. 2160102
Penguji
2. Drs. Pudiyono, M. Hum. (....................................)
NIP. 19560508 198603 1 003
3. Listiani, M. Pd. (...................................) NIK. 2160448
4. Rina Agustina, S. S., MAppILing TESOL. (...................................)
NIK. 2160314
SURAT PERNYATAAN
Saya yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini : Nama : Anggun Nur Zainudin NIM : 1001050013 Program Studi : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Fakultas : Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Menyusun skripsi dengan judul :
AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON THE MASTERY OF DIRECT AND
INDIRECT SPEECH
( A Study at the Second Grade Students of SMA Negeri 3 Prwokerto in the
Academic Year 2013/2014)Menyatakan dengan sesungguhnya bahwa skripsi ini adalah hasil karya tulis saya sendiri dan bukan dibuatkan orang lain atau jiplakan atau modifikasi karya orang lain. Bila pernyataan ini tidak benar, maka saya bersedia menerima sanksi, termasuk pencabutan gelar kesarjanaan yang sudah saya peroleh.
Purwokerto, 28 Januari 2015 Yang menyatakan,
Anggun Nur Zainudin
NIM. 1001050013 Motto “To get a success, your courage must be greater than your fear.”
“Success is not a final and failure is not an initial.”
“The formulas of a success are a hard work and never give up.”
“Do your best at any moment that you have.” “Intelligence is not the determinant of success, but hard work is the real determinant of your success.”
“When you have never made a mistake, it means you have not tried
anything.”“A life without education is like a bird without wings.”
“Learn from the mistakes in the past, try by using a different way, and always hope for a successful future.”
DEDICATION
This thesis is dedicated to: Thanks to Allah SWT who gave me mercy and blessing.
My beloved Father and Mother ( Tulab Ahadi (Alm) and Kartini ) Thank you for everything that you have given to me. I will do the best to make you proud of me. You are the best parents for me. May Allah SWT bless us always, Aamiin. My beloved brother and sister ( Arif and Endah) . Thank you for the motivation and support.
My beloved Meita Kusuma Wardani thanks for your support and motivation. My best friends:Wahid, Rian, Puji, Ofi, Chandra, Bang Anggit, Bang
Wahyu, Fani, Atik thanks for your help and being my best friends Thanks to all my friends in A class PBI 2010 for being my inspiration. All my friends who have given their support and motivation and being my inspiration.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Praise to Allah SWT, the most graceful and merciful who gave me guidance and inspiration, so that the writer could accomplish the thesis as a partial fulfillment of the requirements of S.Pd degree at English Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty.
The writer wishes to express his great appreciation and special thanks to:
1. Drs. Ahamd, M. Pd. the Dean of the Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Muhammadiyah University of Purwokerto, who has given permission to do this research.
2. Drs. Bambang Suroso, M. Hum, as the consultant who gave me guidance, encouragement, advise, support, suggestion and helpful correction.
3. Drs. Pudiyono, M. Hum, as the head of English Department who had given permission to conduct this research.
4. All the lecturers in English Department for the dedication in giving the knowledge to me.
5. The Principle of SMA Negeri 3 Purwokerto, Drs. H. Warmanto, M. Pd who gave permission in accomplishing this research.
6. My collaborator teacher, Suherman, S. Pd who helped in conducting the research.
7. My students of XI IA 2 and XI IA 3 thank the participation cooperation.
The last, the writer gives big thanks to everyone who helps me to finish the thesis. The writer realizes that there are many lacks of thesis, critism and suggestion are welcome to make this thesis better in the future. This thesis is hoped will give positive contributions and be useful to this field study.
Purwokerto, 28 Januari 2015 The writer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE ..................................................................................................... i APPROVAL ........................................................................................... ii LEMBAR PENGESAHAN ................................................................... iii SURAT PERNYATAAN ....................................................................... iv MOTTO .................................................................................................. v DEDICATION ........................................................................................ vi ACKNOWLEDGMENT ......................................................................... vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................ ix LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................. xi LIST OF APPENDICES ......................................................................... xii ABSTRACT ............................................................................................ xiii
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Background of The Research ...............................................
1 B. Reason for Choosing the Topic ............................................
3 C. Research Problems ...............................................................
3 D. Objectives of the Research...................................................
3 E. Clarification of Terms ..........................................................
4 F. Contribution of the Research ................................................
5 CHAPTER II. LITERATURE REVIEW A. Previous Study .....................................................................
6 B. Grammar ...............................................................................
7 C. Definition of Direct and Indirect speech .............................
8
D. The Concept of Direct and Indirect Speech .........................
9 E. Types of Direct and Indirect Speech ....................................
10 F. Error Analysis ......................................................................
17 CHAPTER III. RESEARCH METHOD A. Methodology ........................................................................
20 B. Place and Time of Research .................................................
20 C. Object of the Research .........................................................
21 D. Technique for Collecting Data .............................................
23 E. Method of Analyzing the Data .............................................
24 CHAPTER IV. RESULT AND DISCUSSION A. Result of the Data Analyzing .............................................
29 1. Measuring the students’ individual mastery ...............
29 2. Measuring the mean of the students’ mastery .............
30
3. Analyzing the error of students’ mastery .................... 32 B. Discussion ............................................................................
33 CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION A. Conclusions ..........................................................................
36 B. Implications ..........................................................................
36 REFERENCES APPENDICES
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1 (The blue print of the test) .....................................................23 Table 3.2 (The Categories of
26 Students’ mastery) ...................................
Table 3.3 (The categories of error made by students’) ..………………. 28Figure 4.1 (The category of the students’ mastery) …………………….. 30Figure 4.2 (Frequency distribution) …………………………………….. 31Figure 4.3 (Category of error made by the st udents) …………………… 32LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix 1 Table of Validity Data Analyzing, Reliability, and Item difficulty Appendix 2 Students’ list of SMA Negeri 3 Purwokerto Appendix 3 The percentage score of students’ mastery Appendix 4
The category of students’ mastery Appendix 5 The percentage of error made by students Appendix 6 Instrument
AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON THE MASTERY OF DIRECT AND
INDIRECT SPEECH
( A STUDY AT THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI
3 PURWOKERTO IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014)
ANGGUN NUR ZAINUDIN
1001050013
ABSTRACTThis research was aimed at knowing the students’ mastery of direct and indirect speech and to find out types of grammatical errors were made by students in using direct and indirect speech. This research was conducted at SMA Negeri 3 Purwokerto in academic year 2013/2014. The subject of this research was the second grade students of SMA Negeri 3 Purwokerto. The method of this research used a descriptive method. The sample of this research was 65 students, it was obtained from 25% of the population. The researcher used purposive sampling technique. The data was collected through the test. The research was
th
conducted at June 9 2014. After the data had been analyzed, it was obtained four categories of students’ individual mastery those were very good, good, fair and bad. The first category was very good for 81% - 100%, there were 3 students (4.7%). Second category was good for 61% - 80%, there were 32 students (49.2%). The third category was fair for 41% - 60%, there were 29 students (44.6%). The last category was bad, there was 1 student ( 1.5%). The result also showed that the error the students’ made belonged to three categories, those were; over generalization, there were 43 (66,9%), ignorance of the rule restriction there were 26 students (40%) and false concept hypothesis there were 21 students (33.2%). Those typical errors belonged to intralingual error. The average of the students’ mastery in using direct and indirect speech at the second grade students of SMA Negeri 3 Purwokerto in Academic year 2013/2014 was 62.8%. It meant that the students’ mastery in using direct and indirect speech belonged to good category.