T FIS 1402256 Bibliography
84
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Açisli, Sibel et al. (2011). Effects of the 5E learning model on students’ academic
achievements in movement and force issues. Procedia Social and
Behavioral Sciences. 15 (), 2459–2462
Ajaja. O. P., Urhievwejire. & Eravwoke. O. (2012). Effects of 5E Learning Cycle
on Students’ achievement in Biology and Chemistry. Cypriot Journal of
Educational Sciences, 7 (3), 244-262.
Amin, M (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Argument-Driven Inquiry
(ADI) dalam Pembelajaran Fisika untuk Meningkatkan kemampuan
Berargumentasi, Penalaran Ilmiah, dan Kognitif Siswa SMA. Tesis Magister
Pendidikan Fisika. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia : Bandung.
Anderson, W. L. & Krathwohl (Editor). (2010). Kerangka Landasan untuk
Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asessmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning To Teach, Ninth Edition. New York: The McGrawHill Companies, Inc.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (edisi 2). Jakarta: Bumi
Aksara.
Artun, H. & Costu, B. (2012). Effect of the 5E Model on Prospective Teacher’
Conceptual Understanding of Diffusion and Osmosis. Springer,J Sci Edu29371c Technol. DOI 10.1007/s10956-012-9371-2
Ash, D. (2000). The Process Skills of Inquiry, Foundation, edisi agustus: 51-62
Balcit, S., Cakiroglu, J. & Tekkaya, C. (2006).Engagement, Exploration,
Explanation, Extension, and Evaluation (5E) Learning Cycle and
Conceptual Change Text as Learning Tools.Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology Education.34 (3),199-203
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
85
Beatty, I. D., Gerace, W. J., Leaonard, W. J., & Dufresne, R. J. (2006). Designing
effective question for classroom response system teaching. American
Journal of Physics 74, 31-39. Caldwell JE (2007). Clikers in the large
classroom: current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sci Educ 6, 920.
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P. V., Powell, J. C., Westbrook,
A., & Landes, N. 2006. The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins,
Effectiveness,
and
Applications.http://www.bscs.org/pdf/bscs5eexecsummary.pdf
Calik, M. & Ayas, A. (2004). A Comparison of Level of Eighth-Grade Students
and Science Student Teacher Related to Selected Chemistry Concepts.
Journal of Research in Scinece Teaching. Vol. 24, No. 6, PP. 638-667.
Calik, M., & Mehmed,A.K. (2008). Using Different Conceptual Change Methods
Embedded within the 5E Model: A Sample Teaching for Heat and
Temperature. J. Phys. Educ. Online, 5(1), 3-7.
Carin, A.A (1993). Teaching Modern Science,6th ed. New York: Maxwell
macmillan International.
Chandra, M. (2014). Penggunaan Website Dalam Model Perubahan Konseptual
dengan
Setting
Kooperatif
Problem
Solving
untuk
Meningkatkan
Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMA
pada Materi. Tesis Magister Pendidikan Fisika. Bandung: Universitas
Pendidikan Indonesia. Tidak diterbitkan.
Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H. and La Vancher, C. (1994). Eliciting
self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reimann, P. and Glaser, R. (1989). Self
explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve
problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 145-183.
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
86
Colt, H. G., Davoudi, M., Murgu, S., Rohani, N. Z. (2011). Measuring Learning
Gain During a One-Day Introductory Course. Surg. Endost. 25(1): 207 –
216.
Cummings, K. & Stephen G. Roberts. (2008). A Study of Peer Instruction Method
with High School Physics Student. Physics Education Research Conference.
AIP Conference Proceedings, Volume 10644, pp. 103 – 106.
Dahar, R. (1996). Teori-teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga
Demirbas, Murat & Huseyin M.P. (2015). Evaluation of Experiments conducted
about 5E Learning Cycle Model and Determination of the Problem
Encountered. Internasional Journal of Education Science. 7 (1), 51- 64
Dolan, E. & Grady, J. (2009). Recognizing Students’ Scientific Reasonin: A Tool
for
Categorizing
Complexity of
Reasoning During Teaching by
Inquiry.Journal Scinece Teacher Education. Vol. 21:31-55.
Duran, D., Duran, L., Haney, J., & Scheuermann, A. (2011). A Learning Cycle for
All Student, Modifying the 5E Instructional Model to Address the Needs of
All Learne
Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding The 5E Model: A Proposed 7E Model
Emphasizes “ Transfer Of Learning “ And Impostance Of Eliciting Prior
Understanding, The Science Teacher, 70 (6), hlm. 57-59.
Faramita, S. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Yang
Dipadukan Dengan Strategi Peer Instruction untuk Meningkatkan
Kemampuan Kognitif dan Efikasi-Diri Siswa SMA Pada Materi Suhu dan
Kalor. Tesis Magister Pendidikan Fisika. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia. Tidak diterbitkan.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N> E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and
Evaluate Research In Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
87
Furtak, E. M. (2010). A Framework for Analyzing Evidence-Based Reasoning in
Science Classroom Discourse. Educational Assesment, 15: 175-196, 2010.
Furtak, E. M. (2010).The Evidence-Based Reasoning Framework: Assesing
Scientific Reasoning. Educational Assesment, 15: 123-141, 2010.
Gobert D. Janice & John J. Clement. (1999). Effects of Student-Generated
Diagrams
versus
Student-Generated
Summaries
on
Conceptual
Understanding of Causal and Dynamic Knowledge in Plate Tectonics.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 36(1), 39 – 53
Hake, R. R. (1989). Interactive-Engagement Versus Tradisional Methode: A SixThousand Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses.
Am. J. Phys. 66 (1), 64-74
Hanuscin, D. L. & Lee, M. H. (2007). Using a Learning Cycle Approach to
Teaching the Learning Cycle to Preservice Elementary Teacher. Paper
presented at the 2007 annual meeting of the Association for Science
Teacher Education, Clearwater, FL. 1–4
Havard Magazine. (2015). Mazur Wins Minerva Prize. [Online]. Tersedia di :
http://havardmagazine.com/2014/05/mazur-minerva-prize.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhammer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory.
The Physics Teacher, 30, 141.
Husni, A., Juanda, E.A. & Hamidah, I. 2010. Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif
Berbantuan Web Pada Materi Fluida Statis Untuk Meningkatkan
Pemahaman Konsep Siswa SMA.Prosiding
Seminar
Nasional
Fisika
2010. p 451-458.
Indrawati, S. (2007). Peningkatan kemampuan bernalar siswa didik melalui
pembelajaran konstruktivistik. Jurnal pengembangan Manusia edisi 5.
James, M. C. (2006). The Effect of Grading Incentive On Student Discourse In
Peer Instruction. American Journal of Physics, 74, 689 – 691.
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
88
James, M. C., Barbieri, F., & Paula, G. (2008). What are They Talking About?
Lesson Learnrd from A Study of Peer Instruction. The Astronomy Education
Review, Issues, Volume 7, pp. 37 – 43.
Janice, M.Y. (2013). Using peer intruction pedagogy for teaching dynammics :
Lessons Learned from pre-Class Reading Quizze. Proceeding of the
Canadian Engineering Education Association.
Jufri, A. W (2010). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Sains. Pustaka Reka Cipta :
Jakarta.
Kanli, U. (2009). Root and Evolution of Learning Cycle Model in Light of
Contructivist Theory-A sample Activity. Education and Science, 34 (151),
44-64.
Karplus, R. (1980). Teaching for The Development of Reasoning. Science
Education Information Report: The Ohio State University.
Kemendikbud. (2014). PPT sosialisasi kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kementerian
Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Knight, J. K. & Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching More by Lecturing Less. Cell Biol
Educ., 4 (4) 298-310.
Kurniawati, I. D., Wartono, & Diantoro. (2004). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Inkuiri
Terbimbing yang dipadukan dengan peer instruction Terhadap Penguasan
Konsep dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika
Indonesia, Vol. 10, 36-46.
Larkin, J., & H. Simon. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand
words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–99
Lasry, N. (2008). Clickers or Flashcards: is There Really a Difference?.The
Physics Teacher, Vol. 46, 242-244.
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
89
Lawson, A (2003). The Nature and development of hypothetico-predictive
argumentation with implications for science teaching. International Journal
of Science Education, 25(11), 1387-140
Liu, TC., Peng, H., Wu, WH., & Lin MS. (2009). The Effects of Mobile Naturalscience Learning Based on the 5E Learning Cycle: A Case Study.
Educational Technology & Society, 12 (4), 344–358
Lorsbach, A. W. (2002). The Learning Cycle As A Tool For Planning Science
Instruction.
[Online].
Tersedia
http://www.coe.ilstu.edu/scienceed/Lorbach2571rcy.htm.
di:
Diakses
10
Februari 2016.
Lutfhy,
Nicole.
The
learning
cycle.
diakses
di
http://www.ohiorc.org/pm/science/Sci_LearningCycle.aspx.
Maftuhah. (2015). Penerapan Learning Cycle untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan
Konsep dan Perubahan Konseptual Siswa SMA Pada Konsep Sistem
Koordinasi. Tesis Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. (tidak diterbitkan)
Marshall, Jeff C. et al. (2009). 4E x 2 Instructional Model: Uniting Three
Learning Constructs to Improve Praxis in Science and Mathematics
Classrooms. Journal Science Teacher Education. (20), 501–516. DOI
10.1007/s10972-008-9114-7
Mazur, E. & Crouch, C. (2001). A Peer Intruction: Ten Years of Experience and
Result. Am J. Pys. 69 (9),pp. 970-977.
Miller, K., Schell, J., Andrew,. H., Lukoff, B., & Mazur, E. (2015). Response
Switching and Self-Efficacy in Peer Instruction Classroom. Phy. Rev. ST.
Phy. Educ. Res 11, 010104, 1-8.
Moyer, R. H., Hackett, J. K., & Eferett, S. A. (2007).Teaching Science as
Investigation: Modeling Inquiry Through Learning Cycle Lessons. New
Jersey: Pearson Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
90
Nanik.(2011). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share
dengan Pendekatan Guide Discovery untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman
Konsep Fisika Siswa SMA Kelas X. Skripsi. FPMIPA UPI Bandung. Tidak
diterbitkan.
NRC. (1996). National Science seducation standards. Whashington, DC :
National Academies Press.
Patrick, Ajaja, O. (2013). Which way We Go in the Teaching of Biology?
Concept Mapping, Cooperative Learning or Learning Cycle?. International
Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 4(2), 18 – 19.
Patrick, Ajaja. O. (2013) . Which way We Go in the Teaching of Biology?
Concept Mapping, Cooperative Learning or Learning Cycle?. International
Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 4 (2), 18–29
Purwanto, N. (2009). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung:
Reamaja Rosdakarya.
Ramsey, John. (1993). Developing Conceptual Storylines with the Learning
Cycle. Journal of Elementary Science Education. 5(2), 1 – 20
Riduwan. (2012). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Bandung:
Alfabeta.
Ruseffendi. (1998). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian dalam Bidang No-Eksakta. Bandung:
PT. Tristo.
Rustaman, et al. (2005). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Malang: UM Press.
Sadi, O. & Cakiroglu, J. (2010). Effect of 5E Learning Cycle on Student’ Human
Circulatory System Achievement. Journal of Applied Biological Science.
4(3), 63 – 67.
Sani, K., N. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7E
Menggunakan Pendekatan Saintifik untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
91
Konsep dan Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA. Tesis Magister
Pendidikan Fisika. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Tidak
diterbitkan.
Slavin, Robert E. (2009). Cooperative Learning : Teori, Riset dan Praktik.
Bandung: Nusamedia.
Smith, M. K., Wood, W.B., Adam W.K., Wieman C., Knight J.K., Guild N, Su
TT (2009). Why peer discussion imprive student performance on in class
concept question. Science Magazine vol. 323, 122-124.
Smith, M.K., Wood, W.B, Krauter, K., & Knight, J.K. (2011). Combining peer
discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from inclass concept question. Life science education, vol. 10, spring, 55-63.
Stiggin, R.J. (1994). Sudent-Centered Classroom Assesment. New York:
Macmillan College Publishing Company, Inc.
Sudjana, Nana & Ibrahim. (2012). Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung.
Sinar baru Algensindo.
Sudjana, Nana. (2005). Metode Statistika. Bandung: Cv Tarsito.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung:
Penerbit Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung:
Penerbit Alfabeta.
Suparno. (1997). Filsafat konstruktivisme dalam pendidikan. Jakarta: Kanisius
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
92
Talanquer, Vicente. et al. (2013). Assessing Students’ Understanding of Inquiry:
What Do Prospective Science Teachers Notice?. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching. 50(2), 189 – 208
Taslidere, Erdal. (2015). A Study Investigating the Effect of Treatment Developed
by Integrating the 5E and Simulation on Pre-service Science Teachers’
Achievement in Photoelectric Effect. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,
Science & Technology Education. pp. 1-16.
Tipler, P.A. (1998) Fisika untuk Sains dan Teknik. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Tolga. (2012). The Effect of Peer Instruction on Students’ Conceptual Learning
and Motivation. Asian-Pasific on Science Learning and Teaching, Vol. 13,
Issue 1, Article 1.
Trianto., (2013). Mendesain Pembelajaran Inovative-Progresif.Jakarta: Kencana
Prenada Media Group.
Tuna, A. & Kacar, A. (2013).The Effect of 5E Learning Cycle Model inTeaching
Trigonometry on Student’ Academic Achievement and the Permanence of
Their Knowledge.International Journal on New Trends in Education and
Their Impications.www.ijonte.org. pp. 73–87
Turk, Fatma & Muammer Calik. (2008). Using Different Conceptual Changes
Methods Embedded Within 5E Model: A Sampel Teaching of Endothermic
– Exothermic Reactions. Asia Facific Forum of Science Learning and
Teaching. 9(1), 1 – 10.
Waldrip, B., Prain, V. & Sellings, P. (2013). Explaining Newton’s laws of motion:
Using student reasoning through representations to develop conceptual
understanding. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9223-8.
Wena, M. (2009). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Jakarta: Bumi
Aksara.
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
93
Young, J. M. (2013). Using Peer Intruction Pedagogy for Teaching Dynamics:
Lesson Learned from Pre-Class Reading Quizzes. Proc. Canadian Engineer
Education Association conf. Paper 080.
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Açisli, Sibel et al. (2011). Effects of the 5E learning model on students’ academic
achievements in movement and force issues. Procedia Social and
Behavioral Sciences. 15 (), 2459–2462
Ajaja. O. P., Urhievwejire. & Eravwoke. O. (2012). Effects of 5E Learning Cycle
on Students’ achievement in Biology and Chemistry. Cypriot Journal of
Educational Sciences, 7 (3), 244-262.
Amin, M (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Argument-Driven Inquiry
(ADI) dalam Pembelajaran Fisika untuk Meningkatkan kemampuan
Berargumentasi, Penalaran Ilmiah, dan Kognitif Siswa SMA. Tesis Magister
Pendidikan Fisika. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia : Bandung.
Anderson, W. L. & Krathwohl (Editor). (2010). Kerangka Landasan untuk
Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asessmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning To Teach, Ninth Edition. New York: The McGrawHill Companies, Inc.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (edisi 2). Jakarta: Bumi
Aksara.
Artun, H. & Costu, B. (2012). Effect of the 5E Model on Prospective Teacher’
Conceptual Understanding of Diffusion and Osmosis. Springer,J Sci Edu29371c Technol. DOI 10.1007/s10956-012-9371-2
Ash, D. (2000). The Process Skills of Inquiry, Foundation, edisi agustus: 51-62
Balcit, S., Cakiroglu, J. & Tekkaya, C. (2006).Engagement, Exploration,
Explanation, Extension, and Evaluation (5E) Learning Cycle and
Conceptual Change Text as Learning Tools.Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology Education.34 (3),199-203
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
85
Beatty, I. D., Gerace, W. J., Leaonard, W. J., & Dufresne, R. J. (2006). Designing
effective question for classroom response system teaching. American
Journal of Physics 74, 31-39. Caldwell JE (2007). Clikers in the large
classroom: current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sci Educ 6, 920.
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P. V., Powell, J. C., Westbrook,
A., & Landes, N. 2006. The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins,
Effectiveness,
and
Applications.http://www.bscs.org/pdf/bscs5eexecsummary.pdf
Calik, M. & Ayas, A. (2004). A Comparison of Level of Eighth-Grade Students
and Science Student Teacher Related to Selected Chemistry Concepts.
Journal of Research in Scinece Teaching. Vol. 24, No. 6, PP. 638-667.
Calik, M., & Mehmed,A.K. (2008). Using Different Conceptual Change Methods
Embedded within the 5E Model: A Sample Teaching for Heat and
Temperature. J. Phys. Educ. Online, 5(1), 3-7.
Carin, A.A (1993). Teaching Modern Science,6th ed. New York: Maxwell
macmillan International.
Chandra, M. (2014). Penggunaan Website Dalam Model Perubahan Konseptual
dengan
Setting
Kooperatif
Problem
Solving
untuk
Meningkatkan
Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMA
pada Materi. Tesis Magister Pendidikan Fisika. Bandung: Universitas
Pendidikan Indonesia. Tidak diterbitkan.
Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H. and La Vancher, C. (1994). Eliciting
self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reimann, P. and Glaser, R. (1989). Self
explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve
problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 145-183.
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
86
Colt, H. G., Davoudi, M., Murgu, S., Rohani, N. Z. (2011). Measuring Learning
Gain During a One-Day Introductory Course. Surg. Endost. 25(1): 207 –
216.
Cummings, K. & Stephen G. Roberts. (2008). A Study of Peer Instruction Method
with High School Physics Student. Physics Education Research Conference.
AIP Conference Proceedings, Volume 10644, pp. 103 – 106.
Dahar, R. (1996). Teori-teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga
Demirbas, Murat & Huseyin M.P. (2015). Evaluation of Experiments conducted
about 5E Learning Cycle Model and Determination of the Problem
Encountered. Internasional Journal of Education Science. 7 (1), 51- 64
Dolan, E. & Grady, J. (2009). Recognizing Students’ Scientific Reasonin: A Tool
for
Categorizing
Complexity of
Reasoning During Teaching by
Inquiry.Journal Scinece Teacher Education. Vol. 21:31-55.
Duran, D., Duran, L., Haney, J., & Scheuermann, A. (2011). A Learning Cycle for
All Student, Modifying the 5E Instructional Model to Address the Needs of
All Learne
Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding The 5E Model: A Proposed 7E Model
Emphasizes “ Transfer Of Learning “ And Impostance Of Eliciting Prior
Understanding, The Science Teacher, 70 (6), hlm. 57-59.
Faramita, S. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Yang
Dipadukan Dengan Strategi Peer Instruction untuk Meningkatkan
Kemampuan Kognitif dan Efikasi-Diri Siswa SMA Pada Materi Suhu dan
Kalor. Tesis Magister Pendidikan Fisika. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia. Tidak diterbitkan.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N> E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and
Evaluate Research In Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
87
Furtak, E. M. (2010). A Framework for Analyzing Evidence-Based Reasoning in
Science Classroom Discourse. Educational Assesment, 15: 175-196, 2010.
Furtak, E. M. (2010).The Evidence-Based Reasoning Framework: Assesing
Scientific Reasoning. Educational Assesment, 15: 123-141, 2010.
Gobert D. Janice & John J. Clement. (1999). Effects of Student-Generated
Diagrams
versus
Student-Generated
Summaries
on
Conceptual
Understanding of Causal and Dynamic Knowledge in Plate Tectonics.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 36(1), 39 – 53
Hake, R. R. (1989). Interactive-Engagement Versus Tradisional Methode: A SixThousand Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses.
Am. J. Phys. 66 (1), 64-74
Hanuscin, D. L. & Lee, M. H. (2007). Using a Learning Cycle Approach to
Teaching the Learning Cycle to Preservice Elementary Teacher. Paper
presented at the 2007 annual meeting of the Association for Science
Teacher Education, Clearwater, FL. 1–4
Havard Magazine. (2015). Mazur Wins Minerva Prize. [Online]. Tersedia di :
http://havardmagazine.com/2014/05/mazur-minerva-prize.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhammer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory.
The Physics Teacher, 30, 141.
Husni, A., Juanda, E.A. & Hamidah, I. 2010. Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif
Berbantuan Web Pada Materi Fluida Statis Untuk Meningkatkan
Pemahaman Konsep Siswa SMA.Prosiding
Seminar
Nasional
Fisika
2010. p 451-458.
Indrawati, S. (2007). Peningkatan kemampuan bernalar siswa didik melalui
pembelajaran konstruktivistik. Jurnal pengembangan Manusia edisi 5.
James, M. C. (2006). The Effect of Grading Incentive On Student Discourse In
Peer Instruction. American Journal of Physics, 74, 689 – 691.
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
88
James, M. C., Barbieri, F., & Paula, G. (2008). What are They Talking About?
Lesson Learnrd from A Study of Peer Instruction. The Astronomy Education
Review, Issues, Volume 7, pp. 37 – 43.
Janice, M.Y. (2013). Using peer intruction pedagogy for teaching dynammics :
Lessons Learned from pre-Class Reading Quizze. Proceeding of the
Canadian Engineering Education Association.
Jufri, A. W (2010). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Sains. Pustaka Reka Cipta :
Jakarta.
Kanli, U. (2009). Root and Evolution of Learning Cycle Model in Light of
Contructivist Theory-A sample Activity. Education and Science, 34 (151),
44-64.
Karplus, R. (1980). Teaching for The Development of Reasoning. Science
Education Information Report: The Ohio State University.
Kemendikbud. (2014). PPT sosialisasi kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kementerian
Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Knight, J. K. & Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching More by Lecturing Less. Cell Biol
Educ., 4 (4) 298-310.
Kurniawati, I. D., Wartono, & Diantoro. (2004). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Inkuiri
Terbimbing yang dipadukan dengan peer instruction Terhadap Penguasan
Konsep dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika
Indonesia, Vol. 10, 36-46.
Larkin, J., & H. Simon. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand
words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–99
Lasry, N. (2008). Clickers or Flashcards: is There Really a Difference?.The
Physics Teacher, Vol. 46, 242-244.
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
89
Lawson, A (2003). The Nature and development of hypothetico-predictive
argumentation with implications for science teaching. International Journal
of Science Education, 25(11), 1387-140
Liu, TC., Peng, H., Wu, WH., & Lin MS. (2009). The Effects of Mobile Naturalscience Learning Based on the 5E Learning Cycle: A Case Study.
Educational Technology & Society, 12 (4), 344–358
Lorsbach, A. W. (2002). The Learning Cycle As A Tool For Planning Science
Instruction.
[Online].
Tersedia
http://www.coe.ilstu.edu/scienceed/Lorbach2571rcy.htm.
di:
Diakses
10
Februari 2016.
Lutfhy,
Nicole.
The
learning
cycle.
diakses
di
http://www.ohiorc.org/pm/science/Sci_LearningCycle.aspx.
Maftuhah. (2015). Penerapan Learning Cycle untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan
Konsep dan Perubahan Konseptual Siswa SMA Pada Konsep Sistem
Koordinasi. Tesis Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. (tidak diterbitkan)
Marshall, Jeff C. et al. (2009). 4E x 2 Instructional Model: Uniting Three
Learning Constructs to Improve Praxis in Science and Mathematics
Classrooms. Journal Science Teacher Education. (20), 501–516. DOI
10.1007/s10972-008-9114-7
Mazur, E. & Crouch, C. (2001). A Peer Intruction: Ten Years of Experience and
Result. Am J. Pys. 69 (9),pp. 970-977.
Miller, K., Schell, J., Andrew,. H., Lukoff, B., & Mazur, E. (2015). Response
Switching and Self-Efficacy in Peer Instruction Classroom. Phy. Rev. ST.
Phy. Educ. Res 11, 010104, 1-8.
Moyer, R. H., Hackett, J. K., & Eferett, S. A. (2007).Teaching Science as
Investigation: Modeling Inquiry Through Learning Cycle Lessons. New
Jersey: Pearson Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
90
Nanik.(2011). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share
dengan Pendekatan Guide Discovery untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman
Konsep Fisika Siswa SMA Kelas X. Skripsi. FPMIPA UPI Bandung. Tidak
diterbitkan.
NRC. (1996). National Science seducation standards. Whashington, DC :
National Academies Press.
Patrick, Ajaja, O. (2013). Which way We Go in the Teaching of Biology?
Concept Mapping, Cooperative Learning or Learning Cycle?. International
Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 4(2), 18 – 19.
Patrick, Ajaja. O. (2013) . Which way We Go in the Teaching of Biology?
Concept Mapping, Cooperative Learning or Learning Cycle?. International
Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 4 (2), 18–29
Purwanto, N. (2009). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung:
Reamaja Rosdakarya.
Ramsey, John. (1993). Developing Conceptual Storylines with the Learning
Cycle. Journal of Elementary Science Education. 5(2), 1 – 20
Riduwan. (2012). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Bandung:
Alfabeta.
Ruseffendi. (1998). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian dalam Bidang No-Eksakta. Bandung:
PT. Tristo.
Rustaman, et al. (2005). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Malang: UM Press.
Sadi, O. & Cakiroglu, J. (2010). Effect of 5E Learning Cycle on Student’ Human
Circulatory System Achievement. Journal of Applied Biological Science.
4(3), 63 – 67.
Sani, K., N. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7E
Menggunakan Pendekatan Saintifik untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
91
Konsep dan Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA. Tesis Magister
Pendidikan Fisika. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Tidak
diterbitkan.
Slavin, Robert E. (2009). Cooperative Learning : Teori, Riset dan Praktik.
Bandung: Nusamedia.
Smith, M. K., Wood, W.B., Adam W.K., Wieman C., Knight J.K., Guild N, Su
TT (2009). Why peer discussion imprive student performance on in class
concept question. Science Magazine vol. 323, 122-124.
Smith, M.K., Wood, W.B, Krauter, K., & Knight, J.K. (2011). Combining peer
discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from inclass concept question. Life science education, vol. 10, spring, 55-63.
Stiggin, R.J. (1994). Sudent-Centered Classroom Assesment. New York:
Macmillan College Publishing Company, Inc.
Sudjana, Nana & Ibrahim. (2012). Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung.
Sinar baru Algensindo.
Sudjana, Nana. (2005). Metode Statistika. Bandung: Cv Tarsito.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung:
Penerbit Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung:
Penerbit Alfabeta.
Suparno. (1997). Filsafat konstruktivisme dalam pendidikan. Jakarta: Kanisius
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
92
Talanquer, Vicente. et al. (2013). Assessing Students’ Understanding of Inquiry:
What Do Prospective Science Teachers Notice?. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching. 50(2), 189 – 208
Taslidere, Erdal. (2015). A Study Investigating the Effect of Treatment Developed
by Integrating the 5E and Simulation on Pre-service Science Teachers’
Achievement in Photoelectric Effect. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,
Science & Technology Education. pp. 1-16.
Tipler, P.A. (1998) Fisika untuk Sains dan Teknik. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Tolga. (2012). The Effect of Peer Instruction on Students’ Conceptual Learning
and Motivation. Asian-Pasific on Science Learning and Teaching, Vol. 13,
Issue 1, Article 1.
Trianto., (2013). Mendesain Pembelajaran Inovative-Progresif.Jakarta: Kencana
Prenada Media Group.
Tuna, A. & Kacar, A. (2013).The Effect of 5E Learning Cycle Model inTeaching
Trigonometry on Student’ Academic Achievement and the Permanence of
Their Knowledge.International Journal on New Trends in Education and
Their Impications.www.ijonte.org. pp. 73–87
Turk, Fatma & Muammer Calik. (2008). Using Different Conceptual Changes
Methods Embedded Within 5E Model: A Sampel Teaching of Endothermic
– Exothermic Reactions. Asia Facific Forum of Science Learning and
Teaching. 9(1), 1 – 10.
Waldrip, B., Prain, V. & Sellings, P. (2013). Explaining Newton’s laws of motion:
Using student reasoning through representations to develop conceptual
understanding. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9223-8.
Wena, M. (2009). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Jakarta: Bumi
Aksara.
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
93
Young, J. M. (2013). Using Peer Intruction Pedagogy for Teaching Dynamics:
Lesson Learned from Pre-Class Reading Quizzes. Proc. Canadian Engineer
Education Association conf. Paper 080.
Iip Suparna, 2016
Integrasi Strategi Peer Instruction Ke dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e untuk
Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Ajar dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu