Pilot Test Validity Test Difficulty Test Item Facility

Riska Inggriana Setiadi, 2013 THE USE OF DIRECTED READING THINKING ACTIVITY IN TEACHING READING NARRATIVE TEXT : A Quasi Experimental Study at One Private School in Bandung Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | Repository.upi.edu | Perpustakaan.upi.edu punishment is a formula that has no minus system of score to the students’ in correct answers Arikunto, 2006. The formula of scoring technique is stated as follows: S = R S = Score R = Right

3.3.2.2 Pilot Test

The pilot test was conducted to find out whether or not the instrument was valid and reliable. In other words, it was to see if the test was appropriate to use or not. Furthermore, results of pilot test are attached in Appendix C.

3.3.2.3 Validity Test

The validity test was used to see whether the test was valid or not to be used in pre-test and post-test. According to Fraenkel and Wallen 2006, validity refers to appropriateness, meaningfulness, correctness and usefulness of the inferences a researcher makes. Pearson’s Product Moment was applied to test the validity. The data can be calculated using Bivariate-Correlation in SPSS 16 for Windows or calculated using Anates V4 programs. The result of r coefficient correlation is consulted to the critical table of r Product Moment. If the value of r-obtained is bigger than the r critical value with alpha 0.05, the correlation is significant and it can be said that the item is valid Arikunto, 2003. Riska Inggriana Setiadi, 2013 THE USE OF DIRECTED READING THINKING ACTIVITY IN TEACHING READING NARRATIVE TEXT : A Quasi Experimental Study at One Private School in Bandung Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | Repository.upi.edu | Perpustakaan.upi.edu

3.3.2.4 Difficulty Test Item Facility

This test was done to measure how far the test item relevant to the participants’ ability; whether the test items were too easy or too difficult for the participant. According to Heaton 1955 in order to find out how easy or difficult certain items established in the test, it can be analyzed using item difficulty index or facility value. Therefore, items with facility value around 0.50 were considered to be ideal, with an acceptable range being from around 0.30 to 0.70. The following is the formula of difficulty index: FV = Facility Index of difficulty R = The number of correct answers N = The number of students taking the test 3.3.2.5 Discrimination Test Arikunto 2006 states that discrimination index is used to indicate how far a single test item can differentiate the upper group from the lower group of the class. The procedures to find the discrimination index are: 1 Arranging the students’ total scores and dividing the scores into two groups of equal size the top half and the bottom half, 2 Counting the number of the students in the upper group who answer each item correctly, then counting the number of lower group students who answer the item correctly, 3 Subtracting the number of correct answer in the upper group to find the difference in the proportion passing in the Riska Inggriana Setiadi, 2013 THE USE OF DIRECTED READING THINKING ACTIVITY IN TEACHING READING NARRATIVE TEXT : A Quasi Experimental Study at One Private School in Bandung Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | Repository.upi.edu | Perpustakaan.upi.edu upper group and the proportion passing the lower group, and 4 Dividing the difference by the total number of students in one group. The following formula is used to calculate the discrimination index of an item: √ rpbi = point biserial correlation Xp = mean score on the test for those who get the item correct Xq = mean score on the test for those who get the item incorrectly Sx = standard deviation of test scores p = the proportion of test takers who get the item correct facility value q = the proportion of test takers who get the item incorrectly.

3.3.2.6 Reliability Test

Dokumen yang terkait

Applying Think-aloud Technique in Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (Quasi Experimental Study of Tenth Grade Students of SMK Bhakti 17 Jagakarsa)

0 11 119

The effect of directed reading thinking activity and reading interest on students' reading comprehension

0 7 125

The Influence Of Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) Technique On Students’ Achievement In Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text (A Quasi Experimental Study On The Implementation Of Csr At Sma Pgri 109 Kota Tangerang)

1 13 129

The Effectiveness of Using Mind Mapping in Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text A Quasi Experimental Study at the Second Grade of SMA Mathla’ul Huda Parung Panjang-Bogor.

0 5 126

The Influence of Directed Reading - Thinking Activity (DR-TA) Strategy on Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text

3 40 170

The Effectiveness Of Using Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) On Students' Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text" (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade ofSMA Mathia 'ul Huda Parung PanjangBogor in Academic Year of 201412015),

4 36 111

The effectiveness of directed reading activity towards students’ reading skill of descriptive text: an experimental study at the seventh grade student of MTs Al-Ihsan Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan.

0 2 122

THE USE OF MIND MAPPING IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY (A Quasi-Experimental Research at One Vocational High School in Bandung).

0 3 45

View of DIRECTED READING ACTIVITY (DRA) IN TEACHING READING NARRATIVE TEXT; THE IMPLEMENTATION AND RESPONSES

0 1 7

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIRECTED READING THINKING ACTIVITY (DRTA) STRATEGY FOR STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION IN NARRATIVE TEXT

0 0 15