Theoretical Framework METHOD OF INVESTIGATION

situation. The following figure is the model of the research adapted from Kemmis and McTaggart in Burns 2010:8. Figure 2.1: Action Reasearch model based on Kemmis and McTaggart in Burns 2010:8 Figure 2.1 shows that the processes of an action research are continually done until I find out the result by the solution as the treatments. A sequential of activities is done in the action phase.

2.3 Theoretical Framework

As has been reviewed in advance, it is obvious that the theoretical framework underlying this study is derived from the theory by relevant empirical research studies. The review reflects that improving the students’ motivation on reading comprehension will be successful if the students ’ interest is elaborated in Multiple Intelligences strategies. In other hand, their intelligences will improve not only linguistic but also other intelligences. As has been outlined in this chapter, this framework has been strongly backed up and supported by the theories and empirical research studies as well as some practical proposed by some teachers involved in the teaching and in doing related research. The theoretical framework of the study can be diagramed as shown bellows: Figure 2.2: Theoretical framework of the research A teaching learning process can be called successful if the process of it can build an effective learning activity. Based on Sardiman 2009:48 activity is an important principle in teaching learning process because learning is doing, Classroom Action Research Multiple Intelligences Linguistic Musical Spatial Kinesthetic logical- mathematical Interpersonal Intrapersonal Naturalistic Reading Reading Comprehension Intensive Reading Motivation Intrinstic Extrinsic Activities Students changing the behavior, and every learning process should has a sequential of activities, without any activities the learning will not be held well. Motivating student in teaching learning activities, especially in reading is not easy job for the teacher especially to the junior high school students. The teachers must construct various kinds of activities to improve the students’ motivation and to make the students comprehend the text they read. Thus, the teacher must choose suitable strategies for the process of teaching and learning. Multiple intelligence strategies are assumed to have good contribution to develop the students’ motivation to read texts. The various activities that use the students’ intelligences can motivate the students’ to be active in teaching learning process and later it influences their understanding.

CHAPTER III METHOD OF INVESTIGATION

This study is an action research about improving students’ motivation on reading comprehension by using Multiple Intelligences strategies. This chapter consists of some parts, namely subject of the study, research design, instruments of data collection, procedures of data collection and procedures for data analyzing. Those parts will be described as follow:

3.1 Subject of the Study

According to Best 1981:8 a sample is a small proportion selected for observation and analysis. The subject of this research was the class 8.G students of SMP N 1 Alian. The selection of the sample because of some considerations, the first, I graduated from the school so that I could get the permission easily and the second, SMP N 1 Alian is categorized into national standard school with good performance in the national examination last three years.

3.2 Research Design

The research was designed to seek the answer of the questions namely how the Multiple Intelligences strategies can be implemented in English learning class and how the strategies can improve the students’ motivation. Action research based on Kemmis and Mc. Taggart on Burns 2010:7 is to plan, act, observe and reflect carefully, more systematically and more rigorously than one usually does in everyday teaching learning process. Therefore, I started the research by doing 30

Dokumen yang terkait

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION BY USING BUZZ GROUPS TECHNIQUE (A Classroom Action Research Conducted at the Seventh Grade of SMP Negeri 7 Surakarta in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

3 163 93

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL BY USING GUIDED WRITING (A Classroom Action Research at Second Grade Students of SMP Negeri 1 Karanganyar in Academic Year of 2012/2013).

0 0 15

ENHANCING THE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION OF DESCRIPTIVE TEXT BY USING QUANTUM READING AT THE STUDENTS OF CLASS VIII G OF MTs N 1 KUDUS IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 20132014 (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH) SKRIPSI

0 0 21

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH THINK PAIR SHARE TECHNIQUE (A Classroom Action Research at the Eight Grade Students of SMP Muhammadiyah Sumbang in Academic Year 2012/2013) - repository perpustakaan

0 0 21

2. The Purpose of Reading - IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION BY USING PQ4R STRATEGY (A Classroom Action Research at VIIIF Grade of SMP N 1 Kedungbanteng -Banyumas in Academic Year 2011/2012) - repository perpustakaan

0 0 12

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION USING DIRECTED READING THINKING ACTIVITY (DRTA) METHOD (A Classroom Action Research at the X-2 Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rawalo in the Academic Year 20112012)

0 0 12

b. The Importance of Reading - IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH CIRC (Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition) TECHNIQUE ( A Classroom Action Research at the VIII C Grade Students of SMP Negeri 2 Adipala in Academic Year 2012/2013)

0 0 14

THE IMPROVEMENT OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH JIGSAW TECHNIQUE (A Classroom Action Research at the VIII G Grade Students of SMP Negeri 2 Adipala in Academic Year 20122013)

0 1 14

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ PARTICIPATION IN READING CLASS THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF POINT SYSTEM (A Classroom Action Research at Grade VIII E Students of SMP Negeri 1 Cilongok in Academic Year 20112012)

0 0 15