The 2nd International Conference on Science, Technology, and Humanity ISSN: 2477-3328
289
3. Results and Discussion
The subject in this research were 490 students from several schools in Surakarta. They were 290 students at junior high school and 200 students at senior high school.
3.1. Personal data
Personal data is important to see how the scale is different. The subjects of this study were students in senior and junior high school in Surakarta, East Java, Indonesia. In addition, they
consisted of young men of 46.7 and young women of 53.3, in which 95 of them are Muslims. A many as 326 respondents 66.5 had one gadget while 164 respondents 33.5
admitted they have more than one gadget. The question about the reasons they had internet access were:56.9 students answered they were online for completing their tasks, 31.2
students answered for social media, and 9.6 students answered for online game. The distribution of the respondents can be seen in Table 1.
Table 1. Personal Data Distribution. No.
Personal Data Category
Frequency Percent
1. Sex
Young men 229
46,7 Young women
261 53.3
2. Age
12-15 years 317
64,7 16-18 years
173 35,3
3. Ethnic Group
Java 432
88,2 Other Ethnics
58 11,8
4. Religion
Muslim 467
95 Christian
18 3,7
Catholic 4
0,8 Hindu
1 0,2
5. Education Level
Junior high schoolSMP
290 59,2
Senior high schoolSMA
200 40,8
6. Number of Gadgets
One 326
66,5 More than one
164 33,5
7. Online Durationday
1 hour 119
24,3 2 hours
128 26,1
3 hours 70
14,3 More than 3
hours 166
33,9 8.
Purpose of Internet Access School tasks
279 56,9
Social Media 153
31,2 Online game
47 9,6
9. Parent’s Educational
background Junior high
schoolSMP 44
9 Senior high
schoolSMA 206
42 University
238 48,6
3.2. Cyberperpetrator Media and Intensity in doing Cyberbullying
Based on the data, 308 respondents or around 62.9 never had done cyberbullying and 37.1 respondents had ever done cyberbullying-related activities. From 143 cyberperpetrator
The 2nd International Conference on Science, Technology, and Humanity ISSN: 2477-3328
290
of bullying, there were 29.2 subjects had done it once or twice, 6.1 subjects had done the cyberbullying several times, 1.2 had done it in many times, and 0.6 subjects do the
cyberbullying almost every day. Another question on the intensity in doing cyberbullying, almost 208 subjects or 42.4 had never conducted cyberbullying. The percentage of the
cyberperpetrator of bullyingusing social media was 61.8, smartphone was 15.1, online image sharing was 6.9, video or youtube was 1.6, and e-mail was 0.4.
Table. 2 Media and Intensity in doing Cyberbullying No.
Cyberbulliying Data Category
Frequency Percent
1. Have you ever done the cyberbullying ?
Never 308
62,9 Once Twice
143 29,2
Several Times 30
6,1 Many Times
6 1,2
Almost every day 3
0,6 2. Media of Cyberbullying
SMS 25
5,1 Smartphone
74 15,1
E-Mail 2
0,4 Image Online
34 6,9
VideoYoutube 8
1,6 Social Media,
Facebook, Twitter, etc 303
61,8 Other
41 8,4
3. Intensity of Cyberbullying Never
208 42,4
Once Twice 169
34,5 Several Times
75 15,3
Many Times 26
5,3 Almost all day
16 2,4
Results of analysis by cross-tabulation,indicated most of the Cyberperpetrator is boys 102 subjects and girls of 80 subjects. In senior high school, 81 subjects were doing the
cyberbullying., and in junior high school student there were 101 subjects. In the senior high school there were 119 students had never done cyberbullying and 189 students in junior high
school had never done cyberbullying.
Table. 3 Cyberperpetrator based on cross-tabulation analysis. Gender
Education Level Percent
Boy Girl
Senior Junior
Cyberbullying activity
Yes 102
80 81
101 37,1
No 127
181 119
189 62,9
3.3. The victims of Cyberbullying
Kategori