Data Presentation
A. Data Presentation
For the first data, the researcher too k from the students‟ questionnaire. Question number one until number twelve is aimed to know the students‟ problems of learning English speaking. Question number thirteen was to know the
students‟ reason for studying English speaking. Question number fourteen is aimed at knowing the students‟ response to the timing English speaking use. Question number fifteen is aimed to know the future English speaking use of the students. Question number sixteen is aimed to get the students opinion about the place of English speaking in the curriculum structure of University. Question number seventeen is aimed to find out the possible role of English in the present academic and future life of the students. Question number eighteen was asking
about the student‟s preference of speaking class activities. Question number ni neteen is aimed to investigate the students‟ preference of learning activities in
the classroom. And the last is question number twenty that is focused to examine the
student ‟s
preference
of
teacher‟s role.
For the second data was doing an interviewed with the lecturer who teaches English speaking for everyday communication at second-semester. In this case, the lecturer of English speaking for everyday communication was Mr Akhmad Ali Mirza, M.Pd. The questions that the researcher asked to the lecturer, as follows; The information related to speaking for everyday communication, the method that is used in teaching English speaking, the problem that is usually found in speaking class, the way to solve the problem of speaking, and the needs of the students according to lecturer‟s experienced.
For the third data, the researcher analysed the speaking projects of the students. There were 13 videos of each student, and the researcher only takes the first video and the last video for the samples, and total videos that the researcher analysed were 48 videos from 24 students. The researcher uses the theory of Clark and Clark (1997) in Fauziati (2009, p. 74-78), Ratner and Fromkim (1977). There is four errors classification in the analysis of English speaking, those are speech error (there are nine items of speech error), grammatical error (there are eight items of grammatical error), pronouniciating (there are two types of pronunciation error) and code-switching (there are two types of code-switching). Here the example of analysis of the error in English speaking found in the videos:
Speech Error
1. Silent pause: I live in Palangka Raya in Ma‟had Al-Jami‟ah and….
2. Filled pause: maybe travelling eeemm
3. Repeats: He has a big eyes/big eyes
4. Unretraced: to follow him live/life
5. Retraced: I can/ I‟m cannot play basketball
6. Corrections: My like...I mean my things
7. Interjection: Beauty, No..
8. Stutter: Be..be.. because
9. Slip of tongue: the word ninety, it should be nineteen, so the correct one is nineteen ninety-eight.
Grammatical Error
1. Omission of bound morpheme: I have got, the correct is I have gotten.
2. Omission of possessive marker: My father job is farmer, the correct is My father‟s job is farmer
3. Misordering: I a read newspaper, the correct is I read a newspaper.
4. Omission of auxiliary: I semester two, the correct one is: I am the second semester/I am semester two.
5. Omission of modal: I less vocab, the correct is I have less vocab or my vocabulary is less.
6. Omission of the article: I wanna be a professional teacher, the correct is I want to be a professional teacher.
7. Omission of a preposition: I direction from my house at the market, the correct
to the market.
8. Wrong in word selection: Remember me, the correct is remind me
Pronounciating
1. Faulty in producing consonant: enough [enoug], the correct is [ɪˈnʌf].
2. Faulty in producing vowel: Blood [blud], the correct is [blʌd]
Code Switching:
1. Use of Indonesian lexical item: potong-potong, klik klik
2. The modified of Indonesian words: I think enough for deskripsi my father