T BIO 1303131 Bibliography
101
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Acar, O. & Patton B. R. (2012). Argumentation and Formal Reasoning Skills in
Argumentation-based Guided Inquiry Course. Procedia – Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4756-4760.
Arends, R. I. (2009). Learning to Teach. New York: The McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc.
Bekiroglu, F. O. & Eskin, H. (2012). Examination of the Relationship Between
Engagement in Scientific Argumentation and Conceptual Knowledge.
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 14151443.
Berland, L. K. & Hammer, D. (2011). Framing for Scientific Argumentation.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Bottcher, F. & Meisert, A. (2011). Argumentation in Science Education: A
Model-based Framework. Journal of Science and Education, 20, 102–140.
Bulgren, J. A., Ellis J. D., & Marquis J. G. (2014). The Use and Effectiveness of
an Argumentation and Evaluation Intervention in Science Classes. Journal
of Science Education Technology, 23, 82-97.
Brown, N. J. S., et al. (2010). The Evidence-Based Reasoning Framework:
Assessing Scientific Reasoning. Educational Assessment, 15, 123-141.
Cetin, P. S., Dogan, N., & Kutluca, A. Y. (2014). The Quality of Pre-service
Science Teachers’ Argumentation: Influence of Content Knowledge.
Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 309-331.
Chen, C. T. & She, H. C. (2014). The Effectiveness of Scientific Inquiry with/
without Integration of Scientific Reasoning. International Journal of
Science and Mathematics Education.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design 3rd ed. USA::
SAGE Publications, Inc.
Dawson, V. & Venville, G. J. (2009). High-School Students’ Informal Reasoning
and Argumentation about Biotechnology: An indicator of scientific
literacy?. International Journal of Science Education, 3 (11), 1421–1445.
Desti Herawati , 2015
PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN
SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
102
Dawson, V. M. & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching Strategies for Developing
Students’ Argumentation Skills About Socioscientific Issues in High School
Genetics. Research in Science Education, 40, 133–148.
Ding, L., Wei X., & Mollohan K. (2014). Does Higher Education Improve
Student Scientific Reasoning Skills?. International Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education.
101
Dolan, E. & Grady, J. (2010). Recognizing Students’ Scientific Reasoning: A
Tool for Categorizing Complexity of Reasoning During Teaching by
Inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 31 – 55.
Dunbar, K. N. & Klahr, D. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and
Reasoning. USA: Oxford University Press.
Duschl, R. A. (2007). Quality Argumentation and Epistemic Criteria. Dalam S.
Erduran & M. Jimenez-Aleixandre (eds). Argumentation in Science
Education, Science & Teachnology Education Library, 35, 159-175.
Ekanara, B. (2013). Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas.
(Tesis). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J. Y. (2015). Research Trends on Argumentation
in Science Education: A Journal Content Analysis From 1998 – 2014.
International Journal of STEM Education, 2, 5.
Feierabend, T., et al. (2012). Two approaches for analyzing students’ competence
of ‘evaluation’ in group discussions about climate change. International
Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 7 (4), 581-598.
Foong, C. C. & Daeniel, E. G. S. (2010). Assessing students’ argumentation made
in sosio-scientific contexts: The considerations of structural complexity and
the depth of content knowledge. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 9,
1120-1127.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate
research in education. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Furtak, E. M., et al. (2008). A Framework For Analyzing Reasoning In Science
Classroom Discourse. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the
American Educational Research Association. New York.
Gillies, R. M. & Nichols, K. (2015). How to Support Primary Teachers’
Implementation of Inquiry: Teachers’ Reflections on Teaching Cooperative
Inquiry-Based Science. Research in Science Education, 45, 171-191.
Desti Herawati , 2015
PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN
SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
103
Goldstein, M., Crowell, A., & Kuhn, D. (2009). What Constitutes Skilled
Argumentation and How Does it Develop?. Informal Logic, 29 (4), 379-395.
Han, J. (2013). Scientific Reasoning: Research, Development, and Assessment.
Dissertation. The Ohio State University.
Hakyolu, H. & Bekiroglu, F. O. (2011). Assessment of Students’ Science
Knowledge Levels and Their Involvement with Argumentation.
International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education
(IJCDSE), 2 (1).
Inch, E. S., Warnick, B., & Endres, D. (2006). Critical Thinking and
Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument. USA: Pearson Education,
Inc.
Kaya, E., Erduran, S., & Cetin, P. S. (2010). High School Students’ Perception of
Argumentation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3971–3975.
Keskin, S. C. et al. (2013). Students’ Cognitive Awareness about the Reasons of
Environmental Problems. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28 (3), 378-381.
Khan, M. A. & Ghouri, A. M. (2011). Environmental Pollution: Its Effects on Life
and Its Remedies. Journal of Arts, Science, & Commerce, 11 (2).
Koenig, K., Schen M., & Bao L. (2012). Explicitly Targeting Pre-service Teacher
Scientific Reasoning Abilities and Understanding of Nature of Science
through an Introductory Science Cource. Winter, 21 (2).
Konstantinidou, A., & Macagno, F. (2013). Understanding Students’ Reasoning:
Argumentation Schemes as an Interpretation Method in Science Education.
Science & Education, 22, 1069 – 1087.
Korir, D. K., & Kipkemboi F. (2014). The Impact of School Environment and
Peer Influences on Students’ Academic Performance in Vihiga Country,
Kenya. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4 (5).
Kuhn, D. & Udell, W. (2003). The Development of Argument Skills. Child
Development, 74 (5), 1245 – 1260.
Kutluca, A. Y., Cetin, P. S., & Dogan, N. (2014). Effect of Content Knowledge on
Scientific Argumentation Quality: Cloning Context. Necatibey Faculty of
Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8 (1),
1 – 30.
Desti Herawati , 2015
PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN
SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
104
Lawson, A. E. (2004). The Nature and Development of Scientific Reasoning: A
synthetic view. International Journal of Science and Mathematic Education,
2, 307-338.
Lazonder, A. W., & Drost S. W. (2014). Advancing Scientific Reasoning in
Upper Elementary Classrooms: Direct Instruction Versus Task Structuring.
Journal of Science Education and Technology.
Lee, C. Q., & She, H. C. (2010). Facilitating Students’ Conceptual Change and
Scientific Reasoning Involving the Unit of Combustion. Research in
Science Education, 40, 479–504.
Manurung, S. R. (2013). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Dengan Media
Hiperteks Berdasarkan Skema Pemecahan Masalah Berintikan Argumentasi
Tolmin: Suatu Studi Penerapan pada Topik Kinematika. (Disertasi).
Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Marzita P., et al. (2015). The Classroom Physical Environment and Its Relation to
Teaching and Learning Comfort Level. International Journal of Social
Science and Humanity, 5 (3).
McDonald, C. V. (2013). An examination of preservice primary teachers’ written
arguments in an open inquiry laboratory task. Science Education
International, 24 (3), 254-281.
McDonald, C. V. (2014). Preservice Primary Teachers’ Written Arguments in a
Socioscientific
Argumentation Task. Electronic Journal of Science
Education,18 (7).
Mercier, H., & Heintz, C. (2014). Scientist’s Argumentative Reasoning. Springer
Science and Business Media, 33, 513-524.
Mohammad, R. F., & Kumari, R. (2007). Effective Use of Textbooks: A
Neglected Aspect of Education in Pakistan. Journal of Education for
International Development, 3, 1.
Nuangchalerm, P. & Kwuanthong, B. (2010). Teaching “Global Warming”
through Socioscientific Issues-based Instruction. Asian Social Science, 6 (8).
Okumus, S. & Unal, S. (2012). The effects of Argumentation Model on Studens’
Achievement and Argumentation Skills in Science. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 46, 457 – 461.
Osborne, J., et al. (2001). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science.
School Science Review. 83 (301).
Desti Herawati , 2015
PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN
SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
105
Palar, H. (2008). Pencemaran dan Toksikologi Logam Berat. Jakarta: Rineka
Cipta.
Permana, J. (2008). Pengelolaan Kelas dalam Belajar Mengajar. (Online).
Tersedia:
http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FIP/JUR._ADMINISTRASI_PENDIDIKAN/19
5908141985031-JOHAR_PERMANA/A_Pengelolaan_Kelas.pdf. [27 Juli
2015].
Piraksaa, C., Srisawasdib, N., & Koulc, R. (2014). Effect of Gender on Students’
Scientific Reasoning Ability : A Case Study in Thailand. Procedia - Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 486 – 491.
Purwanto, N. (2010). Prinsip – Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran.
Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Robinson, T. J., et al. (2014). The Impact of Open Textbooks on Secondary
Science Learning Outcomes. Educational Researcher, 43 (7), 341 – 351.
Roshayanti, F. (2012). Pengembangan Model Asesmen Argumentatif Untuk
Mengukur Keterampilan Argumentasi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Fisiologi
Manusia. (Disertasi). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia, Bandung.
Rustaman, N., et al. (2003). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Bandung:
FPMIPA UPI.
Sagala, S. (2010). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Salandanan, G. G. (2000). Teaching Approaches and Strategies. Quezon city:
Katha Publishing Co., Inc.
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the Ways Students Generate
Arguments in Science Education: Current Perspectives and
Recommendations for Future Directions. WileyInterScience.
Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational Psychology 5th ed. New York: The McGrawHill Companies, Inc.
Santrock, J. W. (2013). Children. New York: The Mc-Graw Hill Companies, Inc.
Šešelja, C., & Straßer, D. (2013). Abstract argumentation and explanation applied
to scientific debates. Synthese, 190, 2195–2217.
Desti Herawati , 2015
PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN
SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
106
Simosi, M. (2003). Using Toulmin’s Framework for the Analysis of Everyday
Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations. Argumentation, 17,:
185-202.
Sprod, T. (1998). “I Can Change Your Opinion On That”: Social Constructivist
Whole Class Discussions and Their Effect on Scientific Reasoning.
Research in Science Education, 28 (4), 463 – 480.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif,
Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sutopo & Waldrip, B. (2014). Impact of A Representational Approach on
Students’ Reasoning and Conceptual Understanding in Learning Mechanics.
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 741-765.
Tytler, R. & Peterson S. (2003). Tracing Young Children’s Scientific Reasoning.
Research in Science Education, 33, 433-465.
Tytler, R. et al. (2013). Constructiong Representations to Learn in Science. The
Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Varma, K. (2014). Supporting Scientific Experimentation and Reasoning in
Young Elementary School Students. Journal of Science Education and
Technology, 23, 381–397.
Verheij, B. (2005). Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme.
Argumentation, 19, 347-371.
Waldrip, B. (2012). Reasoning through representing in school science. Teaching
Science., 58, 14-18.
Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Sellings, P. (2013). Explaining Newton’s laws of
motion: using student reasoning through representations to develop
conceptual understanding. Instructional Science, 41, 165 – 189.
Walsh, J. A. & Sattes, B. D. (2011). Thinking Through Quality Questioning:
Deepening Student Engagement. USA: Library of Congress Cataloging-inPublication Data.
Weinberger, Y. & Dreyfus, A. (2013). Teacher college students' views of
controversial evironmental issues: Ambivalence and readiness to adopt a
stance. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education , 8,
627-643
Desti Herawati , 2015
PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN
SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
107
Wu, Y. T. & Tsai, C. C. (2011). The Effects of Different On-Line Searching
Activities on High School Students’ Cognitive Structures and Informal
Reasoning Regarding a Socio-scientific Issue. Research in Science
Education, 41, 771-785.
Yang, F.Y. & Tsai, C.C. (2010). Reasoning about science-related uncertain issues
and epistemological perspectives among children. Instructional Science, 38,
325–354.
Yun, S, M. & Kim, H. B. (2015). Changes in Studens’ Partisipation and Small
Group Norms in Scientific Argumentation. Research in Science Education,
45, 465 – 484.
Zimmerman, C. (2005). The Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills: What
Psychologists Contribute to an Understanding of Elementary Science
Learning.
(Online).
Tersedia:
http://informalscience.org/image/research/Corine_Zimmerman_Final_Paper
.pdf. [6 September 2014].
Desti Herawati , 2015
PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN
SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Acar, O. & Patton B. R. (2012). Argumentation and Formal Reasoning Skills in
Argumentation-based Guided Inquiry Course. Procedia – Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4756-4760.
Arends, R. I. (2009). Learning to Teach. New York: The McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc.
Bekiroglu, F. O. & Eskin, H. (2012). Examination of the Relationship Between
Engagement in Scientific Argumentation and Conceptual Knowledge.
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 14151443.
Berland, L. K. & Hammer, D. (2011). Framing for Scientific Argumentation.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Bottcher, F. & Meisert, A. (2011). Argumentation in Science Education: A
Model-based Framework. Journal of Science and Education, 20, 102–140.
Bulgren, J. A., Ellis J. D., & Marquis J. G. (2014). The Use and Effectiveness of
an Argumentation and Evaluation Intervention in Science Classes. Journal
of Science Education Technology, 23, 82-97.
Brown, N. J. S., et al. (2010). The Evidence-Based Reasoning Framework:
Assessing Scientific Reasoning. Educational Assessment, 15, 123-141.
Cetin, P. S., Dogan, N., & Kutluca, A. Y. (2014). The Quality of Pre-service
Science Teachers’ Argumentation: Influence of Content Knowledge.
Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 309-331.
Chen, C. T. & She, H. C. (2014). The Effectiveness of Scientific Inquiry with/
without Integration of Scientific Reasoning. International Journal of
Science and Mathematics Education.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design 3rd ed. USA::
SAGE Publications, Inc.
Dawson, V. & Venville, G. J. (2009). High-School Students’ Informal Reasoning
and Argumentation about Biotechnology: An indicator of scientific
literacy?. International Journal of Science Education, 3 (11), 1421–1445.
Desti Herawati , 2015
PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN
SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
102
Dawson, V. M. & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching Strategies for Developing
Students’ Argumentation Skills About Socioscientific Issues in High School
Genetics. Research in Science Education, 40, 133–148.
Ding, L., Wei X., & Mollohan K. (2014). Does Higher Education Improve
Student Scientific Reasoning Skills?. International Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education.
101
Dolan, E. & Grady, J. (2010). Recognizing Students’ Scientific Reasoning: A
Tool for Categorizing Complexity of Reasoning During Teaching by
Inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 31 – 55.
Dunbar, K. N. & Klahr, D. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and
Reasoning. USA: Oxford University Press.
Duschl, R. A. (2007). Quality Argumentation and Epistemic Criteria. Dalam S.
Erduran & M. Jimenez-Aleixandre (eds). Argumentation in Science
Education, Science & Teachnology Education Library, 35, 159-175.
Ekanara, B. (2013). Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas.
(Tesis). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J. Y. (2015). Research Trends on Argumentation
in Science Education: A Journal Content Analysis From 1998 – 2014.
International Journal of STEM Education, 2, 5.
Feierabend, T., et al. (2012). Two approaches for analyzing students’ competence
of ‘evaluation’ in group discussions about climate change. International
Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 7 (4), 581-598.
Foong, C. C. & Daeniel, E. G. S. (2010). Assessing students’ argumentation made
in sosio-scientific contexts: The considerations of structural complexity and
the depth of content knowledge. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 9,
1120-1127.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate
research in education. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Furtak, E. M., et al. (2008). A Framework For Analyzing Reasoning In Science
Classroom Discourse. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the
American Educational Research Association. New York.
Gillies, R. M. & Nichols, K. (2015). How to Support Primary Teachers’
Implementation of Inquiry: Teachers’ Reflections on Teaching Cooperative
Inquiry-Based Science. Research in Science Education, 45, 171-191.
Desti Herawati , 2015
PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN
SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
103
Goldstein, M., Crowell, A., & Kuhn, D. (2009). What Constitutes Skilled
Argumentation and How Does it Develop?. Informal Logic, 29 (4), 379-395.
Han, J. (2013). Scientific Reasoning: Research, Development, and Assessment.
Dissertation. The Ohio State University.
Hakyolu, H. & Bekiroglu, F. O. (2011). Assessment of Students’ Science
Knowledge Levels and Their Involvement with Argumentation.
International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education
(IJCDSE), 2 (1).
Inch, E. S., Warnick, B., & Endres, D. (2006). Critical Thinking and
Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument. USA: Pearson Education,
Inc.
Kaya, E., Erduran, S., & Cetin, P. S. (2010). High School Students’ Perception of
Argumentation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3971–3975.
Keskin, S. C. et al. (2013). Students’ Cognitive Awareness about the Reasons of
Environmental Problems. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28 (3), 378-381.
Khan, M. A. & Ghouri, A. M. (2011). Environmental Pollution: Its Effects on Life
and Its Remedies. Journal of Arts, Science, & Commerce, 11 (2).
Koenig, K., Schen M., & Bao L. (2012). Explicitly Targeting Pre-service Teacher
Scientific Reasoning Abilities and Understanding of Nature of Science
through an Introductory Science Cource. Winter, 21 (2).
Konstantinidou, A., & Macagno, F. (2013). Understanding Students’ Reasoning:
Argumentation Schemes as an Interpretation Method in Science Education.
Science & Education, 22, 1069 – 1087.
Korir, D. K., & Kipkemboi F. (2014). The Impact of School Environment and
Peer Influences on Students’ Academic Performance in Vihiga Country,
Kenya. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4 (5).
Kuhn, D. & Udell, W. (2003). The Development of Argument Skills. Child
Development, 74 (5), 1245 – 1260.
Kutluca, A. Y., Cetin, P. S., & Dogan, N. (2014). Effect of Content Knowledge on
Scientific Argumentation Quality: Cloning Context. Necatibey Faculty of
Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8 (1),
1 – 30.
Desti Herawati , 2015
PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN
SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
104
Lawson, A. E. (2004). The Nature and Development of Scientific Reasoning: A
synthetic view. International Journal of Science and Mathematic Education,
2, 307-338.
Lazonder, A. W., & Drost S. W. (2014). Advancing Scientific Reasoning in
Upper Elementary Classrooms: Direct Instruction Versus Task Structuring.
Journal of Science Education and Technology.
Lee, C. Q., & She, H. C. (2010). Facilitating Students’ Conceptual Change and
Scientific Reasoning Involving the Unit of Combustion. Research in
Science Education, 40, 479–504.
Manurung, S. R. (2013). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Dengan Media
Hiperteks Berdasarkan Skema Pemecahan Masalah Berintikan Argumentasi
Tolmin: Suatu Studi Penerapan pada Topik Kinematika. (Disertasi).
Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Marzita P., et al. (2015). The Classroom Physical Environment and Its Relation to
Teaching and Learning Comfort Level. International Journal of Social
Science and Humanity, 5 (3).
McDonald, C. V. (2013). An examination of preservice primary teachers’ written
arguments in an open inquiry laboratory task. Science Education
International, 24 (3), 254-281.
McDonald, C. V. (2014). Preservice Primary Teachers’ Written Arguments in a
Socioscientific
Argumentation Task. Electronic Journal of Science
Education,18 (7).
Mercier, H., & Heintz, C. (2014). Scientist’s Argumentative Reasoning. Springer
Science and Business Media, 33, 513-524.
Mohammad, R. F., & Kumari, R. (2007). Effective Use of Textbooks: A
Neglected Aspect of Education in Pakistan. Journal of Education for
International Development, 3, 1.
Nuangchalerm, P. & Kwuanthong, B. (2010). Teaching “Global Warming”
through Socioscientific Issues-based Instruction. Asian Social Science, 6 (8).
Okumus, S. & Unal, S. (2012). The effects of Argumentation Model on Studens’
Achievement and Argumentation Skills in Science. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 46, 457 – 461.
Osborne, J., et al. (2001). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science.
School Science Review. 83 (301).
Desti Herawati , 2015
PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN
SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
105
Palar, H. (2008). Pencemaran dan Toksikologi Logam Berat. Jakarta: Rineka
Cipta.
Permana, J. (2008). Pengelolaan Kelas dalam Belajar Mengajar. (Online).
Tersedia:
http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FIP/JUR._ADMINISTRASI_PENDIDIKAN/19
5908141985031-JOHAR_PERMANA/A_Pengelolaan_Kelas.pdf. [27 Juli
2015].
Piraksaa, C., Srisawasdib, N., & Koulc, R. (2014). Effect of Gender on Students’
Scientific Reasoning Ability : A Case Study in Thailand. Procedia - Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 486 – 491.
Purwanto, N. (2010). Prinsip – Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran.
Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Robinson, T. J., et al. (2014). The Impact of Open Textbooks on Secondary
Science Learning Outcomes. Educational Researcher, 43 (7), 341 – 351.
Roshayanti, F. (2012). Pengembangan Model Asesmen Argumentatif Untuk
Mengukur Keterampilan Argumentasi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Fisiologi
Manusia. (Disertasi). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia, Bandung.
Rustaman, N., et al. (2003). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Bandung:
FPMIPA UPI.
Sagala, S. (2010). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Salandanan, G. G. (2000). Teaching Approaches and Strategies. Quezon city:
Katha Publishing Co., Inc.
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the Ways Students Generate
Arguments in Science Education: Current Perspectives and
Recommendations for Future Directions. WileyInterScience.
Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational Psychology 5th ed. New York: The McGrawHill Companies, Inc.
Santrock, J. W. (2013). Children. New York: The Mc-Graw Hill Companies, Inc.
Šešelja, C., & Straßer, D. (2013). Abstract argumentation and explanation applied
to scientific debates. Synthese, 190, 2195–2217.
Desti Herawati , 2015
PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN
SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
106
Simosi, M. (2003). Using Toulmin’s Framework for the Analysis of Everyday
Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations. Argumentation, 17,:
185-202.
Sprod, T. (1998). “I Can Change Your Opinion On That”: Social Constructivist
Whole Class Discussions and Their Effect on Scientific Reasoning.
Research in Science Education, 28 (4), 463 – 480.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif,
Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sutopo & Waldrip, B. (2014). Impact of A Representational Approach on
Students’ Reasoning and Conceptual Understanding in Learning Mechanics.
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 741-765.
Tytler, R. & Peterson S. (2003). Tracing Young Children’s Scientific Reasoning.
Research in Science Education, 33, 433-465.
Tytler, R. et al. (2013). Constructiong Representations to Learn in Science. The
Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Varma, K. (2014). Supporting Scientific Experimentation and Reasoning in
Young Elementary School Students. Journal of Science Education and
Technology, 23, 381–397.
Verheij, B. (2005). Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme.
Argumentation, 19, 347-371.
Waldrip, B. (2012). Reasoning through representing in school science. Teaching
Science., 58, 14-18.
Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Sellings, P. (2013). Explaining Newton’s laws of
motion: using student reasoning through representations to develop
conceptual understanding. Instructional Science, 41, 165 – 189.
Walsh, J. A. & Sattes, B. D. (2011). Thinking Through Quality Questioning:
Deepening Student Engagement. USA: Library of Congress Cataloging-inPublication Data.
Weinberger, Y. & Dreyfus, A. (2013). Teacher college students' views of
controversial evironmental issues: Ambivalence and readiness to adopt a
stance. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education , 8,
627-643
Desti Herawati , 2015
PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN
SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
107
Wu, Y. T. & Tsai, C. C. (2011). The Effects of Different On-Line Searching
Activities on High School Students’ Cognitive Structures and Informal
Reasoning Regarding a Socio-scientific Issue. Research in Science
Education, 41, 771-785.
Yang, F.Y. & Tsai, C.C. (2010). Reasoning about science-related uncertain issues
and epistemological perspectives among children. Instructional Science, 38,
325–354.
Yun, S, M. & Kim, H. B. (2015). Changes in Studens’ Partisipation and Small
Group Norms in Scientific Argumentation. Research in Science Education,
45, 465 – 484.
Zimmerman, C. (2005). The Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills: What
Psychologists Contribute to an Understanding of Elementary Science
Learning.
(Online).
Tersedia:
http://informalscience.org/image/research/Corine_Zimmerman_Final_Paper
.pdf. [6 September 2014].
Desti Herawati , 2015
PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN
SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu