3.UN REDD inception workshop 0

• 24 Sept 08 ‐ Official Launch of UN REDD by UN 
Secretary General & Norway’s Prime Minister
• “to contribute to a successful REDD post‐
“
ib
f l
2012”

• Africa:  Democratic Republic of the Congo, 
Tanzania, Zambia
T
i Z bi
• Asia & Pacific:  Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, 
Vi t N
Viet Nam
• Latin America & Caribbean: Bolivia, Panama, 
Paraguay
• Observers: Argentina, Ecuador, Cambodia, 
Nepal Sri Lanka Costa Rica Kenya Mexico
Nepal, Sri Lanka, Costa Rica, Kenya, Mexico, 
Nigeria, the Philippines, Republic of Congo, 

Solomon Islands, Sudan

Government
Ministry of Forestry
DNPI
Bappenas
Ministry of Finance, 
Ministry of Agriculture, 
Public Works 
M HA
MoHA, ...

CSOs
AMAN, TNC, 
WWF... 

Donors, Dev Agencies
Norway
World Bank
AusAID, GTZ, JICA,…

AusAID, GTZ, JICA,… 

Others
CIFOR, ICRAF, 
universities, ,
private sector 

• July 2008: Formal request from MoFor
July 2008: Formal request from MoFor to UN to 
to UN to
become pilot country
• Multiple
Multiple missions, gap analysis, consultations, 
missions, gap analysis, consultations,
programme development
• March 2009: approval of 5.6 million USD for 
pp
Indonesia by UNREDD Policy Board
• November 2009: Bappenas endorsement and 
pp

signing of Programme by MoFor & UN

pp
g
“to support the GoI
in attaining REDD‐Readiness”
Duration
Budget

: 18 months
: 5.6 million USD

Lead Ministry
Ministry of Forestry
Directorate General of Forestry Planning
Directorate General of Forestry Planning
Forest Resources Inventory and Monitoring

• Forest cover and carbon   
National approach

National approach,
stock changes,
stock changes
Attractiveness,
sub‐national implementation • National  registry
Source of fund
Historical emission/ 
future scenario
future scenario

$

CO2
1
Reference 
Emission Level

REDDI Guideline,
REDDI Working Group

Developed from  IFCA study  (2007)

2
Strategy

Responsibilities 
and benefits

3

4

Monitoring

Market/
Funding

5
Distribution

IFCA 2007 recommendations: 
REDD strategy for 5 landscapes: 
Production forest, Conservation 
forest,  Timber plantation,  Peat land, 
Oil palm plantation (related to LUC)

• Outcome 1: Strengthened multi‐stakeholder 
participation and consensus at national level
participation and consensus at national level
Output Supporting 
A
Agency

Activities

1.1

UNDP

Consensus on key issues for national 

REDD policy development

1.2

UNDP

REDD lessons learned

13
1.3

UNEP

REDD
REDD communication programme
i ti

• Outcome 2: Successful demonstration of 
establishing a REL, MRV and fair payment 
establishing a REL MRV and fair payment

systems at provincial level (Sulawesi)
Output Supporting  Activities
Agency
2.1

FAO

Measuring, Reporting and Verification 
System (MRV)

2.2

FAO

Reference Emissions Level (REL)

2.3

UNDP

REDD payment mechanism 

UNEP

Pilot REDD site identification toolkit 
(including potential Carbon‐benefits and 
co‐benefits)

2.4

• Outcome 3: Capacity established to 
implement REDD at district levels (Sulawesi)
implement REDD at district levels (Sulawesi)
Output Supporting  Activities
Agency
g y
3.1

UNDP

Capacity for spatial socio‐economic 
planning to incorporate REDD 

3.2

UNDP

Local stakeholders are empowered to 
able to benefit from REDD 

UNDP

Development of multi‐stakeholder‐
endorsed district plans for REDD 
implementation

3.3

• Finalize annual work plan
• Coordinate plan with other initiatives

• Facilitation at national level
• Communication programme
• Development of methodologies for MRV 
and REL
• Selection of pilot province
• Approach to work with local communities