THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SENTENCE RACE GAME AS A TECHNIQUE FOR TEACHING VOCABULARY (An Experimental Research at Grade VII Students of SMPNegeri 1 Kalibagor in Academic Year 2015/2016) - repository perpustakaan

APPENDIX I

3. Validity, Reliability, and Item Difficulty

4. Example of Validity, reliability, and item difficulty computation Students’s _number ^{Number of Test Items} ^y ₁ ₂ ₃ ₄ ₅ ₆ ₇ ₈ ₉ ₁₀ ₁₁ ₁₂ ₁₃ ₁₄ ₁₅ ₁₆ ₁₇ ₁₈ ₁₉ ₂₀ ₂₁ ₂₂ ₂₃ ₂₄ ₂₅ ₂₆ ₂₇ ₂₈ ₂₉ ₃₀ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{26 676} ₂ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{23 529} ₃ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{22 484} ₄ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{18 324} ₅ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{25 625} ₆ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{24 576} ₇ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{29 841}

8 ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{29 841} ₉ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{24 576} ₁₀ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{26 676} ₁₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{22 484} ₁₂ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{26 676} ₁₃ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{27 729} ₁₄ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{23 529} ₁₅ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{24 576} ₁₆ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{23 529}

17 ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{29 841} ₁₈ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{24 576} ₁₉ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{26 676} ₂₀ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{24 576} ₂₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{24 576} ₂₂ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{23 529} ₂₃ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{30 900} ₂₄ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{25 625} ₂₅ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{22 484}

26 ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{24 576} ₂₇ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{28 784} ₂₈ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{24 576} ₂₉ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{30 900} ₃₀ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{23 529} ₃₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{25 625} ₃₂ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ ₁ _{30 900}

V âl îd ît ^y Ʃx ²⁹ ²⁷ ²⁵ ²⁵ ²⁷ ²⁷ ²⁷ ²⁶ ²⁷ ²⁷ ²⁸ ²⁸ ²⁷ ²⁷ ²⁶ ²⁷ ²⁶ ²⁴ ²⁹ ²⁷ ²⁶ ²⁷ ²⁶ ²⁵ ²⁴ ²⁹ ²⁶ ²⁶ ²² ²⁸ ⁷⁸ ₉ ^20,52 ₄ _{841 729 625 625 729 729 729 676 729 729 784 784 729 729 676 729 676 576 841 729 676 729 676 625 576 841 676 676 484 784} Ʃxy 738 692 639 642 687 684 689 662 687 685 706 706 688 685 665 689 663 617 736 688 664 697 661 638 616 739 664 662 564 710

᷊rxy 0.676 ^0.62 ₁ ^0.46 ₉ ^0.53 ₁ ^0.50 ₃ ^0.43 ₂ ^0.55 ^0.46 ^0.50 ₅ ^0.45 ₅ ^0.40 ₅ ^0.40 ₅ ^0.52 ₆ ^0.45 ₅ ^0.52 ₆ ^0.55 ^0.48 ₃ ^0.50 ^0.61 ₇ ^0.52 ₆ ^0.50 ₄ ^0.73 ₉ ^0.43 ₈ ^0.44 ₈ ^0.48 ^0.70 ₆ ^0.50 ₄ ^{0.46 0.399} ^0.50 ₉ _{rtable 0.349} _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.34 ₉ _0.349 _0.34 _Vali ₉ _{Result Valid Vali} _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _Vali _{Valid Vali} ^Students’s ^number

^{Number of Test Items}

^y ¹ ² ³ ⁴ ⁵ ⁶ ⁷ ⁸ ⁹ ¹⁰ ¹¹ ¹² ¹³ ¹⁴ ¹⁵ ¹⁶ ¹⁷ ¹⁸ ¹⁹ ²⁰ ²¹ ²² ²³ ²⁴ ²⁵ ²⁶ ²⁷ ²⁸ ²⁹ ³⁰ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{19 361} ² ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{12 144} ³ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{13 169} ⁴ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{14 196} ⁵ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{20 400} ⁶ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{22 484} ⁷ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{20 400} ⁸ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{23 529} ⁹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{14 196} ¹⁰ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{17 289} ¹¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{12 144} ¹² ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{18 324} ¹³ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{18 324} ¹⁴ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{19 361} ¹⁵ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{18 324} ¹⁶ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{20 400} ¹⁷ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{23 529} ¹⁸ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{20 400} ¹⁹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{22 484} ²⁰ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{17 289} ²¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{20 400} ²² ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{14 196} ²³ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{25 625} ²⁴ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{17 289} ²⁵ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{15 225} ²⁶ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{22 484} ²⁷ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{18 324} ²⁸ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{17 289} ²⁹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{23 529} ³⁰ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{17 289} ³¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{19 361} ³² ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ^{21 441} ^V ^a ^li ^d ^ity ^Ʃx ²⁵ ¹⁹ ²² ²⁰ ¹⁸ ¹⁹ ¹⁸ ¹⁸ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²⁴ ²² ²² ¹⁸ ¹⁵ ²¹ ¹⁸ ²² ¹⁸ ¹⁹ ²¹ ²⁰ ¹⁸ ¹⁷ ¹⁷ ¹⁸ ¹⁴ ^{Ʃxy 477 372 424 393 355 381 359 357 374 440 471 418 396 402 337 258 381 353 425 324 367 394 390 343 337 310 351 279 343 371} ¹⁷ ^{19 589 11,196}

^{625 361 484 400 324 361 324 324 529 529 529 576 484 484 324 196 441 324 484 324 361 441 400 324 289 289 324 196 289 361}

^{᷊rxy 0.382 0.425 0.386 0.476 0.448 0.598 0.524 0.486 0.519 0.556 0.994 0.514 0.426 0.548 0.486 0.384 0.483 0.409 0.406 0.429 0.521 0.519 0.424 0.410 0.453 0.374 0.370 0.403 0.566 0.406} ^{rtable 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349 0.349} ^{Result Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid} ^D îffi ^c û ^l ^ty ^F ²⁵ ¹⁹ ²² ²⁰ ¹⁸ ¹⁹ ¹⁸ ¹⁸ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²⁴ ²² ²² ¹⁸ ¹⁵ ²¹ ¹⁸ ²² ¹⁸ ¹⁹ ²¹ ²⁰ ¹⁸ ¹⁷ ¹⁷ ¹⁸ ¹⁴ ¹⁷ ¹⁹ ^N ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ³² ^{FN 0.781 0.593 0.687 0.625 0.562 0.593 0.562 0.562 0.718 0.718 0.718} ^{0.75 0.687 0.687 0.562 0.468 0.656 0.562 0.687 0.562 0.593 0.656 0.625 0.562 0.531 0.531 0.562 0.437 0.531 0.593} ^{F.V 0.781 0.593 0.687 0.625 0.562 0.593 0.562 0.562 0.718 0.718 0.718} ^{0.75 0.687 0.687 0.562 0.468 0.656 0.562 0.687 0.562 0.593 0.656 0.625 0.562 0.531 0.531 0.562 0.437 0.531 0.593} ^{Critera Easy Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Easy Easy Easy Easy Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair} ^R ê ^li â ^b îl îty ^{P 0.781 0.593 0.687 0.625 0.562 0.593 0.562 0.562 0.718 0.718 0.718} ^{0.75 0.687 0.687 0.562 0.468 0.656 0.562 0.687 0.562 0.593 0.656 0.625 0.562 0.531 0.531 0.562 0.437 0.531 0.593} ^{Q 0.219 0.407 0.313 0.375 0.438 0.407 0.438 0.438 0.282 0.282 0.282} ^{0.25 0.313 0.313 0.438 0.532 0.344 0.438 0.313 0.438 0.407 0.344 0.375 0.438 0.469 0.469 0.438 0.563 0.469 0.407} ^{pq 0.171 0.241 0.215 0.234 0.246 0.241 0.246 0.246 0.202 0.202 0.202 0.187 0.215 0.215 0.246 0.249 0.225 0.246 0.215 0.246 0.241 0.225 0.234 0.246 0.249 0.249 0.246 0.246 0.249 0.241} ^{Ʃpq 6.667} ^k ³⁰ ^{Vt 20.875} ^{r11 0.704}

– =

}{ } √{ =

√{ }{ } =

√ =

√ = = 0.382

Criterion = valid r-table = 0.349 b. Example of item difficulty computation of pre-test number 1

R = 25 N = 32 F.V = F.V = 0.781

Criterion = easy

= 20.875

The reliability of pre-test number 1 = = 1.0345 x 0.6806 = 0.704 Criteria = reliable because r11> r-table (0.704>0.349) The criteria of reliability values : high reliability

APPENDIX II

3. R-Table

4. T-Table N Sig.level N Sig.level N Sig.level 5% 1% 5% 1% 5% 1%

3 0.997 0.999 28 0.374 0.478 65 0.244 0.317

0.95

0.99 29 0.366

0.47 70 0.235 0.306 5 0.878 0.959 30 0.361 0.463 75 0.227 0.296 6 0.811 0.917 31 0.355 0.456 80 0.220 0.286 7 0.754 0.874 32 0.349 0.449 85 0.213 0.278 8 0.707 0.834 33 0.344 0.442 90 0.207 0.270 9 0.666 0.798 34 0.339 0.436 95 0.202 0.263 10 0.632 0.765 35 0.334 0.430 100 0.195 0.256 11 0.602 0.735 36 0.329 0.424 125 0.176 0.230 12 0.576 0.708 37 0.325 0.418 150 0.159 0.210 13 0.553 0.684 38 0.32 0.413 175 0.148 0.194 14 0.532 0.661 39 0.316 0.408 200 0.138 0.181 15 0.514 0.641 40 0.312 0.403 300 0.113 0.148 16 0.497 0.623 41 0.308 0.398 400 0.098 0.128 17 0.482 0.606 42 0.304 0.393 500 0.088 0.115 18 0.458

0.59 43 0.301 0.389 600 0.080 0.105 19 0.456 0.575 44 0.297 0.384 700 0.074 0.097 20 0.444 0.561 45 0.294 0.38 800 0.070 0.091 21 0.438 0.549 46 0.291 0.376 900 0.065 0.086 22 0.423 0.537 47 0.288 0.372 1000 0.06 0081 23 0.413 0.526 48 0.284 0.368 24 0.404 0.515 49 0.281 0.364 25 0.396 0.505 50 0.279 0.361 26 0.388 0.496 55 0.266 0.345 27 0.381 0.487 60 0.254

0.33 Df

0.1 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.005 0.0025

50 1.298714 1.675905 2.008559 2.403272 2.677793 2.936964 51 1.298373 1.675285 2.007584 2.401718 2.675722 2.934311 52 1.298045 1.674689 2.006647 2.400225 2.673734 2.931765 53 1.297730 1.674116 2.005746 2.398790 2.671823 2.929318 54 1.297426 1.673565 2.004879 2.397410 2.669985 2.926965 55 1.297134 1.673034 2.004045 2.396081 2.668216 2.924701

APPENDIX III 1.

46 Fair

80 Good

21 LintangLuhhita

66 Good

80 Good

22 NiningSupriatin

56 Fair

23 NurHalimah

83 Very good

30 30 100 Very good

24 NurlinaRamadani

56 Fair

60 Fair

76 Good

17 JulyantikaRizki

76 Good

96 Very good

18 Karismantoro

80 Good

19 KharismaYuliana

73 Good

86 Very good

20 LapiyaLaviana

76 Good

29 SulthanFazaHirzi

76 Good

30 30 100 Very good

30 VebiWaryanti

56 Fair

31 Wiwit Sara Kurniati

63 Good

83 Very good

32 ZainurIsnaini

70 Good

30 30 100 Very good Total 589 1934 802 2613

80 Good

83 Very good

25 RegiSulistiono

50 Fair

73 Good

26 ReynataSintawi

63 Good

80 Good

27 SefrikaCatur Vegan

60 Fair

93 Very good

28 StafanusFandi

56 Fair

Students’ score in experimental group

2. The individual competence of pre test and post test in experimental group 3.

73 Good

60 Fair

5 DaniWaluyo

66 Good

83 Very good

6 David ArifRamdani

80 Good

7 DoniMikoSetiawan

66 Good

96 Very good

8 EkaApprilia

46 Fair

76 Good

Students’ score in control group

4. The individual competence of pre test and post test in experimental group

5. Measuring t-test value No Name Pre test No Post test F N P (%) Category F N P (%) Category

1 Agustina

63 Good

86 Very good

2 BagusAji W

40 Bad

66 Good g Budi Siwoyo

43 Fair

73 Good

4 CahyaRisma P

63 Good

86 Very good

13 GhazaAbdurahman

60 Fair

90 Very good

14 ImanHidayat

76 Good

15 Indri Puspitasari

60 Fair

80 Good

16 IrmasRosyida

60 Fair

56 Fair

96 Very good

9 Ely Rahmawati

46 Fair

80 Good

10 FarrasAzizah

86 Very good

11 FeronikaSalamah

40 Bad

53 Fair

12 FirmanNurhidayah

66 Good

No Name Pre test No Post test F N P (%) Category F N P (%) Category

83 Very good

73 Good

26 RestiMardiana

76 Good

70 Good

27 Riskyannas S

60 Fair

39 SaptoAji P

66 Good

60 Fair

76 Good

28 Riski Muhammad N

83 Good

25 RennyPrawhesti

80 Good

22 OktianiAtiqoh

83 Good

60 Fair

21 Nova A.Wahyudi

63 Good

60 Fair

56 Fair

24 PutriVidia Lestari

80 Good

73 Good

23 PancaAfid F

66 Good

56 Fair

60 Fair

4 BambangM

56 Fair

53 Fair

3 AnggiRahmawati

63 Good

56 Fair

6 DhiyaUlhaq

56 Fair

73 Good

63 Good

5 DelaEka S

86 Very good

56 Fair

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SENTENCE RACE GAME AS A TECHNIQUE FOR TEACHING VOCABULARY (An Experimental Research at Grade VII Students of SMPNegeri 1 Kalibagor in Academic Year 2015/2016) - repository perpustakaan

APPENDIX II

APPENDIX III 1.

Dokumen yang terkait

IMPROVING STUDENTSÂ’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH WORD CLAP GAME (An Experimental Research of the Seventh Grade Students of SMP Muhamadiyah 06 DAU)

THE USE OF MEME COMIC AS MEDIA TO TEACH SPOOF TEXT An Experimental Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Kutowinangun, Kebumen in the Academic Year of 20152016

THE USE OF SECRET MESSAGE GAME TO IMPROVE THESTUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY (A Classroom Action Research for the Fifth Grade Students of SD 1 Prambatan Kidul Kudus in Academic Year 20142015)

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PRE-QUESTIONING TECHNIQUE TO TEACH READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXT (An Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Student at SMP N 2 Mejobo Kudus in the Academic Year 20172018) By: AGHITA OKTAVIANA

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING SONG LYRIC TO IMPROVE STUDENT’S UNDERSTANDING ON CONDITIONAL SENTENCE (An Experimental Research of the Eleventh Grade of “SMK Negeri 1 Jetis”

THE USE OF TEAMS GAME TOURNAMENT (TGT) METHOD TO DEVELOPE STUDENTS’ READING SKILLS (An Experimental Study at Eleventh Grade in SMA N 3 Salatiga in the Academic Year 20142015) A GRADUATING PAPER

THE USE OF ENGLISH GRAMMAR ¬¬TEST OF ANDROID GAME TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ GRAMMAR COMPETENCE ON PHRASAL VERBS (An Experimental Research of the Fourth Semester Students of English Education Department of IAIN Salatiga in the Academic Year of 2015/2016) -

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING IN TEACHING SPEAKING VIEWED FROM STUDENTS‘ SELF-ESTEEM (An Experimental Research in the Second Semester Students of English Department–Siliwangi University Tasikmalaya in the Academic Year of 2011/2012

A THESIS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING INDUCTIVE METHOD IN TEACHING ENGLISH GRAMMAR ( An Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade of SMP Negeri 16 Surakarta in the Academic Year of 20172018 )

1 THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING VOCABRA GAMES IN TEACHING VOCABULARY VIEWED FROM STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION (An Experimental Study at the Fifth Grade Students of SDIT Sabilul Huda Cirebon in the Academic Year of 20182019) THESIS

Dukungan

Links

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SENTENCE RACE GAME AS A TECHNIQUE FOR TEACHING VOCABULARY (An Experimental Research at Grade VII Students of SMPNegeri 1 Kalibagor in Academic Year 2015/2016) - repository perpustakaan

APPENDIX II

APPENDIX III 1.

Dokumen yang terkait

IMPROVING STUDENTSÂ’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH WORD CLAP GAME (An Experimental Research of the Seventh Grade Students of SMP Muhamadiyah 06 DAU)

THE USE OF MEME COMIC AS MEDIA TO TEACH SPOOF TEXT An Experimental Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Kutowinangun, Kebumen in the Academic Year of 20152016

THE USE OF SECRET MESSAGE GAME TO IMPROVE THESTUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY (A Classroom Action Research for the Fifth Grade Students of SD 1 Prambatan Kidul Kudus in Academic Year 20142015)

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PRE-QUESTIONING TECHNIQUE TO TEACH READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXT (An Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Student at SMP N 2 Mejobo Kudus in the Academic Year 20172018) By: AGHITA OKTAVIANA

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING SONG LYRIC TO IMPROVE STUDENT’S UNDERSTANDING ON CONDITIONAL SENTENCE (An Experimental Research of the Eleventh Grade of “SMK Negeri 1 Jetis”

THE USE OF TEAMS GAME TOURNAMENT (TGT) METHOD TO DEVELOPE STUDENTS’ READING SKILLS (An Experimental Study at Eleventh Grade in SMA N 3 Salatiga in the Academic Year 20142015) A GRADUATING PAPER

THE USE OF ENGLISH GRAMMAR ¬¬TEST OF ANDROID GAME TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ GRAMMAR COMPETENCE ON PHRASAL VERBS (An Experimental Research of the Fourth Semester Students of English Education Department of IAIN Salatiga in the Academic Year of 2015/2016) -

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING IN TEACHING SPEAKING VIEWED FROM STUDENTS‘ SELF-ESTEEM (An Experimental Research in the Second Semester Students of English Department–Siliwangi University Tasikmalaya in the Academic Year of 2011/2012

A THESIS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING INDUCTIVE METHOD IN TEACHING ENGLISH GRAMMAR ( An Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade of SMP Negeri 16 Surakarta in the Academic Year of 20172018 )

1 THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING VOCABRA GAMES IN TEACHING VOCABULARY VIEWED FROM STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION (An Experimental Study at the Fifth Grade Students of SDIT Sabilul Huda Cirebon in the Academic Year of 20182019) THESIS

Dokumen yang Anda mencari sudah siap untuk unduhkan