A. Data Finding - An Error Analysis Of Narrative Text Made By The Ninth Year Students Of MTs Darul Amin Palangka Raya - Digital Library IAIN Palangka Raya

CHAPTER IV
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

This chapter discussed the result of study. It consisted of the data finding and
discussion. In data finding the research display the data which was found in the
field and in discussion the researcher explained the type of error on narrative text
and the cause of errors based on Heidi dulay’s theory.
A. Data Finding
Data collecting activity was conducted on 26th September, 2013. The sample
was 25 students. The students were given a writing test. The data collected from
the students were in form of essay. The researchers used inter rater in analyzing
the writing products. There are total two examiners.
1. Types of Errors in Narrative Text Made by The Ninth Year Students of
MTs Darul Amin Palangka Raya
After conducting the data collecting activity, now the researcher
displayed and explained the result of the analysis activity. In this part, errors
are identified by writing all the errors based on the result of the test, here the
writer classified the kinds of errors are made by the students and then give
an analysis. See the table 4.1 identification and Classification of errors.

45


46

Table 4.1
Identification and Classification of Errors
Students’
code
A1

Students’ Revise Identify
errors
errors
Peas
Peas
Omission
scatter on scattere
the ground d on the
ground

A2


There
were many
kind
dinosaurs

A3

he jumped
out door

A4

By misty
spring
The cloud
aren’t
even what
I think


A5

Rabbits
lived
in
burrows
the ground

A6

You have
no soldier

A7

Sumatran
tiger was
smallest
tiger


There
were
many
kind of
dinosau
rs
he
jumped
out the
door.
By the
misty
spring
The
clouds
aren’t
even
what I
think
Rabbits

lived in
burrow
s in the
ground
You
have no
soldiers
The
Sumatr
an tiger
was the
smalles
t tiger

Explanation
of errors
Simple past
tense
incorrect
Omission

of –ed
Omission
of
preposition

Number
of error
1

Omission

Omission
of the
article

1

Omission

Omission

of the
article
Failure to
attach –s

1

Omission

Omission
of
preposition

1

Omission

Failure to
attach –s


1

Omission

Omission
of the
article

1

Omission

Omission

1

1

Percentage
of errors


47

A9

We
Omission
don’t
want to
play
with
you
There
There Omission
were no were no
spike on spikes
my body
on my
body
by the

by the
Omission
misty
misty
spring.
springs

Disagreeme
nt of
subject and
tense

1

Failure to
attach –s

1

Failure to

attach –s

1

A12

Even
smallest
eagles.

Omission

Omission
of the
article

1

A13

They have They
Omission
no
have no
backbone backbo
nes

Failure to
attach –s

1

A14

He force
himself
into
thinking

Omission

Omission
of –ed

1

A16

Peas
Peas
Omission
scatter on scattere
the
d on the
ground.
ground.

Omission
of –ed

1

A17

But
brain

no But no
brains

Omission

Failure to
attach –s

1

A18

A reptile’s a
skin look reptile’
slimy.
s skin

Omission

Failure to
attach –s

1

A10

A11

We
doesn’t
want
to
play with
you

Even
the
smalles
t
eagles,

He
forced
himself
into
thinkin
g

48

looks
slimy,
A19

Wolf
smacked
his lips

The
wolf
smacke
d his
lips

Omission

Omission
of the
article

1

A22

Golden
eagles can
be found
in USA

Golden
eagles
can be
found
in the
USA

Omission

Omission
of the
article

1

A23

Dinosaurs Dinosa
were
a urs
type lizard were a
type of
lizard

Omission

Omission
of
preposition

1

A25

I’m
bravest
knight in
your
kingdom

Omission

Omission
of the
article

1

I’m the
bravest
knight
in your
kingdo
m

Total of
Errors

20

51.28%

Based on the analysis result, the researcher found 20 errors or
51.28% students omit several words in the sentences. The students wrote it

by omitted such as articles, to be, and preposition. It is because they did
not know the rules how to write the word in English.

49

Students’
code
A2

A4

Students’
errors
Dinosaurs
becomed
extinct

Revise
Dinosa
urs
became
extinct

Tiger
Tiger
shaked his shook
head
his
head

Identify
errors
Addition
(regulari
zation)

Addition

A6

But taked But
out
a took
leader
out a
leader

Addition

A10

Landy
feeled
lonely

Landy
felt
lonely

Addition

A15

They were They
finded in were
every part found
in
every
part

Addition

A19

A
wolf
seed
a
goat
grazing

Addition

A wolf
saw a
goat
grazing

Explanation
of errors
Simple past
tense
incorrect
Adding –ed
to past
already
formed
Simple past
tense
incorrect
Adding –ed
to past
already
formed
Simple past
tense
incorrect
Adding –ed
to past
already
formed
Simple past
tense
incorrect
Adding –ed
to past
already
formed
Simple past
tense
incorrect
Adding –ed
to past
already
formed
Simple past
tense
incorrect
Adding –ed
to past
already

Number
of error
1

Percentage
of errors

1

23.07%
1

1

1

1

50

A21

Kodi seed
the crown
behind the
curtain

Kodi
saw the
crown
behind
the
curtain

Addition

A24

He seed a He saw
frog
a frog

Addition

A25

A terrible
dragon
comed to
the
kingdom

Addition

A
terrible
dragon
came to
the
kingdo
m
Rabbits
Rabbits
lived
in lived in
burrows
burrow
the ground s in the
ground

A5

Addition

formed
Simple past
tense
incorrect
Adding –ed
to past
already
formed
Simple past
tense
incorrect
Adding –ed
to past
already
formed
Simple past
tense
incorrect
Adding –ed
to past
already
formed
Preposition

1

1

1

1

2.56%

10

25.64%

(simple
addition)

Total of
Errors

Based on the analysis result, the researcher found regularization
addition occurred by 9 errors or 23.07% and simple addition occurred by 1
error or 2.56% of total error. This kind of addition occurred if the student
overgeneralized the pattern of V2 and V3. For example the verb “eat” does
not became “eated”, but “ate”.

51

Students’
code
A2

Students’
errors
There
were no
tress
in
earth

Revise

Identify
errors
There
Misform
were no ation
tress on
earth

Explanation
of errors
Misuse of
preposition

Number
of error
1

A4

Far off on Far off
the jungle in the
jungle

Misform
ation

Misuse of
preposition

1

A6

Gregor
and him
soldiers
run away

Gregor
and his
soldiers
run
away

Misform
ation

Use of
wrong
possessive

1

A8

Some
jellyfish
can glow
on
darkness

Some
jellyfis
h can
glow in
darknes
s

Misform
ation

Use of
wrong
possessive

1

A9

No
one
wanted to
play with
his

No one
wanted
to play
with
him

Misform
ation

Use of
wrong
possessive

1

A20

Kuku
nodded
him head

Kuku
nodded
his
head

Misform
ation

Use of
wrong
possessive

1

A24

The
scorpion
remove
him
stinger

The
scorpio
n
remove
his
stinger

Misform
ation

Use of
wrong
possessive

1

A25

He opened He
him basket opened

Misform
ation

Use of
wrong

1

Percentage
of errors

52

his
basket
A16

Sat sadly Sat
in
a sadly
branch
on a
branch

possessive
Misform
ation

Misuse of
preposition

Total of
Errors

1

9

23.07%

Based on the analysis result, the alternating forms misformation
error occurred by 9 errors or 23.07% of total error. This result indicates
that the students failed to use the correct word that totally different from
the true one. The using of him in the sentence will make it ungrammatical
in the deep structure.
Based on the table above the type of error frequency high to low
are omission by 51.28%, addition by 25.63%, misformation by 23.07 and
misordering by 0%. See the appendices for the detail of the analysis.
Figure 4.1
Types of Errors Made by the Students

0
23.07
51.28
25.63

Omission
Addition
Misformation
Misordering

53

Based on the analysis result, the trend errors occurred by omission
51.28% of total errors. From the students’ writing products, the researcher
found some of them omit several words in the sentences. The students wrote
it by omitted such as articles, to be, and preposition. It is because they did
not know the rules how to write the word in English. See the figure 4.2 for
trend of errors made by the students was omission.
Figure 4.2
Trend of Errors Made by the Student

60

51.28

50
40
30

omission

20
10
0
trend of
error

2. Cause of Errors in Narrative Text Made by The Ninth Year Students
of MTs Darul Amin Palangka Raya
The students’ errors is classified into four categorizes based on the error
cause. Those are developmental, interlingual, ambiguous, and other errors.

54

Table 4.2
Explanation of Errors
Students’
Code

Errors

Cause of Errors

A1

Peas scatter on the ground

Developmental Error

A3

He jumped out door

Developmental Error

A4

By misty springs

Developmental Error

A6

Gregor and him soldiers run
away
Sumatran tiger was smallest

Developmental Error

A7

Developmental Error

tiger

A9
A12
A14
A16
A19
A20
A24
A25
A25

We doesn’t want to play
with you
No one wanted to play with
his
Even smallest eagles

Developmental Error

He force
thinking

Developmental Error

himself

into

Developmental Error
Developmental Error

Sat sadly in a branch

Developmental Error

Wolf smacked his lips

Developmental Error

Kuku nodded him head

Developmental Error

The scorpion remove him
stinger

Developmental Error

He opened him basket

Developmental Error

I’m bravest knight in your
kingdom

Developmental Error

55

Based on the analysis result, developmental error occurred by
38.46% of total error. This result indicated that some students are still
learning the language and still in a phase where they learn English
language like native speaker’s child learn the language. This cause of
errors was experienced by A25, A4, A3, A19, A12, A7, A9, A25, A20,
A9, A6, A24, A1, A14 and A16 were the students who experienced this
error.
Students’
Code

Errors

Cause of Errors

A1

Peas scatter on the ground

Interlingual Error

A2

Dinosaurs becomed extinct

Interlingual Error

A4

Tiger shaked his head

Interlingual Error

A6

But taked out a leader

Interlingual Error

A10

Landy feeled lonely

Interlingual Error

A14

He force himself into
thinking
They were finded in every

Interlingual Error

A15

Interlingual Error

part
A16

Peas scatter on the ground

Interlingual Error

A19

A wolf seed a goat grazing

Interlingual Error

A24

He seed a frog

Interlingual Error

56

A terrible dragon comed to
the kingdom

A25

Interlingual Error

Based on the analysis result, interlingual error caused students’
errors by 28.20% of total error. It indicates some of the students are
using their mother tongue language pattern in English writing. This
cause of errors was experienced by A1, A24, A19, A2, A15, A6, A10,
A25, A14, and A16 were the students who experienced this error.

Students’
Code

Errors

Cause of Errors

A2

There were no tress in earth

Other Error

A2

There were many
dinosaurs
Far off on the jungle

Other Error

A4
A5
A6

kind

Rabbits lived in burrows the
ground
You have no soldier

Other Error
Other Error
Other Error

A11

The cloud aren’t even what
I think
By the misty spring

A13

They have no backbone

Other Error

A16

Peas scattered in the ground

Other Error

A17

But no brain

Other Error

A7

Other Error
Other Error

57

A18

A reptile’s skin look slimy.

A22

Golden eagles can be found
in USA
Dinosaurs were a type lizard

A23

Other Error
Other Error
Other Error

Based on the analysis result, other errors caused students error by
33.33% of total error. It indicates that most of the students are making
errors due to their misconception of English language. These errors can be
solved by learning more about English rules in writing. This cause of
errors was experienced by A18, A11, A23, A2, A7, A6, A5, A22, A16,
A4, A2, A17 and A13 students. Other errors are the opposite of ambiguous
errors. Those errors classified neither developmental nor interlingual.
Table 4.5
Calculation of cause of errors
Cause of Errors

Number of Errors

Percentage

Developmental errors

15

38.46%

Interlingual Errors

11

28.20%

Ambiguous Errors

0

0.00%

Other Errors

13

33.33%

Total

39

100%

58

See the appendices for the detail of the analysis.
Figure 4.3
Causes of Errors Made by the Students

developmental
errors
33.33%

38.46%

interlingual errors
ambiguous errors

0.00%

28.20%

other errors

Based on the table, developmental error occurred by 38.46% of
total errors. The errors categorized as errors caused by developmental
errors because the pattern of errors similar to the way of native speaker
children learn their mother tongue language. Interlingual errors
occurred by 28.20% of total error. This error categorized as errors
caused by interlingual errors because the pattern of the sentences are
similar to the pattern of the students’ mother tongue language. Other
errors occurred by 33.33% of total errors. The errors categorized as
other errors because those errors couldn’t categorize neither
developmental nor interlingual error.

59

Based on the analysis result, the trend cause of errors occurred
by the students was developmental error. The errors categorized as
errors caused by developmental errors because the pattern of errors
similar to the way of native speaker children learn their mother tongue
language. See the figure 4.4 for trend cause of errors Made by the
students was developmental error.
Figure 4.4
Trend Causes of Errors Made by the Students
38.46
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0

develpmental
errors

trend
cause
of
errors

a. Discussion
1. Types of Errors in Narrative Text Made by The Ninth Year Students
of MTs Darul Amin Palangka Raya
Based on the description in the data presentation, there are several
things that can be noted down. Most of the students still make errors in
writing narrative paragraph. In this case, in analyzing the type of error
made by the ninth year of MTs Darul Amin Palangka Raya, the writer

60

reffered to the theory recommended by Dulay that the error type based on
surface strategy taxonomy. According to Dulay, a surface strategy
taxonomy highlight the ways surface structured is alerted: learners may
omit necessary items or add unnecessary ones; they may misform items or
misorder them. There are four kinds of error 1) omission (content
mmorpheme, grammatical morpheme), 2) addition (double marking, simple
addition, regularization) 3) misformation (archi-forms, alternating forms,
regularization). 4) misordering.
In this study, the writer only found three kinds of error. There are
omission, addition and misformation. According to the result of the
students’ product, the type of error frequency high to low are omission by
51.28%, addition by 25.63%, misformation by 23.07 and misordering by
0%.
Based on the analysis result, the trends of errors occurred by
omission 51.28% of total errors. From the students’ writing products, the
researcher found some of them omit several words in the sentences. The
students wrote it by omitting the grammatical morphemes such as articles,
to be, and suffix or prefix. It is because they did not know the rules how to
write the word in English.

61

2. Cause of Errors in Making Narrative Text Made by The Ninth Year
Students of MTs Darul Amin Palangka Raya
In this case, in analyzing the cause of error made by the ninth year
of MTs Darul Amin Palangka Raya, the writer reffered to the theory
recommended by Dulay that the error type based on comparative
taxonomy. According to Dulay, the classification of errors in a
comparative taxonomy is based on comparisons between the structure of L2
errors and certain other types of constructions. This taxonomy classified
the learners’ error into developmental errors, interlingual errors,
ambiguous errors, and other errors.
In this study, the writer only found three kinds of error. There is
developmental, interlingual and other error. According to the result of the
students’ product, developmental error occurred by 38.46% of total errors.
The errors categorized as errors caused by developmental errors because
the pattern of errors similar to the way of native speaker children learn their
mother tongue language. Interlingual errors occurred by 28.20% of total
error. This error categorized as errors caused by interlingual errors because
the pattern of the sentences are similar to the pattern of the students’
mother tongue language. Other errors occurred by 33.33% of total errors.
The errors categorized as other errors because those errors couldn’t
categorize neither developmental nor interlingual error.

62

Based on the analysis result, the trend cause of errors occurred by
the students was developmental error. The errors categorized as errors
caused by developmental errors because the pattern of errors similar to the
way of native speaker children learn their mother tongue language. They
omitted the articles from the sentences.