IMPROVING SPEAKING ABILITY OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA NU AL MA’RUF KUDUS IN ACADEMIC YEAR 20132014 BY USING FISHBOWL DISCUSSION By NA’IMATUL ROSIDAH
IMPROVING SPEAKING ABILITY
OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS
OF SMANU AL MA’RUF KUDUS
IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014
BY USING FISHBOWL DISCUSSION
By
NA’IMATUL ROSIDAH
NIM. 2010 32 183
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF MURIA KUDUS
2014
IMPROVING SPEAKING ABILITY
OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS
OF SMA NU AL MA’RUF KUDUS
IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014
BY USING FISHBOWL DISCUSSION
SKRIPSI
Presented to
Muria Kudus University
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for Completing the Sarjana Program
in English Education
By
NA’IMATUL ROSIDAH
NIM 2010 32 183
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF MURIA KUDUS
2014
MOTTO AND DEDICATION
MOTTO- Don’t give up
- Where there is a will there is away
- Better late than never
- Our parents are the greatest gift in a life
- Allah is always with us
DEDICATION
This skripsi is dedicated to:
- Her beloved Father and Mother (Mr.Suharno and Mrs.Rukanah)
- Her beloved sister and brother (Mega
Asmara Dewi, Kharfan Sadid Hidayatullah and Tirta Adi Kusuma)
- Everyone who always supports her to finish her skripsi: her beloved someone, her big family, and her best friends
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In the name of Allah, the most gracious and the most merciful, in this occasion, the writer would like to express his gratitude to the God, Allah S.W.T, who has given us mercies and blessing so that the writer can finish this research proposal entitle “The Speaking Ability of the Tenth Grade Students of SMA
NU Al Ma ’ruf Kudus in Academic Year 2013/2014 by Using Fishbowl Discussion ”.
During this struggle to finísh this proposal, the writer would also like to convey her special gratitude to:
1. Dr. Drs. Slamet Utomo, M.Pd as the Dean of English Education Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Muria Kudus University.
2. Diah Kurniati, S.Pd, M.Pd as the Head of English Education Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Muria Kudus University.
3. Drs. Muh Syafei, M.Pd as the first advisor, who has guided and given her advice to the writer in finishing this skripsi wisely and patiently.
4. Fajar Kartika, SS, M.Hum as the second advisor who has assisted the writer to develop and finish her skripsi with her calm mind
5. Drs. H. Shodiqun M.Ag, as the principal of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus who gives the writer permission and ease to conduct the research
6. English teachers especially H. Dalkhin, S.Pd who have supported the researcher during research in SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus.
7. Students of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in Academic Year 2013/2014, especially X1 for their participation.
8. All lecturers and staffs of English Education Department who have given worthy knowledge and support
9. Her beloved family, Mom Rukanah, Dad Suharno, her sister Mega Asmara Dewi for support, criticism and suggestion, her brothers Kharfan Sadid Hidayatullah and Tirta Adi Kusuma who cute, her big family members for the support
, and her beloved someone “flat-nose” for extraordinary support and love, also everlasting warm care
10. Her beloved friends, Yunita Dwi Nuraeni, Novella Widyastika, Rokis Alfiah, Anita Murdiani, Hidayathul Mahmudah, Chintya Aini Badria, Siti Nur Jannah, Fidiana Astuti for the togetherness in happiness and sadness 11. All of her friends in Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Muria Kudus
University 12. All of her friends since she was born until now
The writer hopes that this skripsi will be useful for those especially who are in the field of education.
Kudus, July 2014 The writer
Na’imatul Rosidah
ABSTRACT
Rosidah, Na’imatul. 2014. The Speaking Ability of the Tenth Grade Students of
SMA NU Al Ma ’ruf Kudus in Academic Year 2013/2014 by Using Fishbowl Discussion. Skripsi. Department of English Education.
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education. Muria Kudus University. Advisors (i) Drs. Muh Syafei, M.Pd. (ii) Fajar Kartika, S.S, M.Hum.
Key Words: Speaking Ability, Fishbowl Discussion.
Speaking is one of elements of human daily activities. The writer can share ideas and thoughts with other people by speaking. A smooth interaction between people can take place in that way. Speaking skill is taught to students to make them capable of communicating by using English correctly. In fact, a teacher has less motivation to give the students’ special treatment in teaching speaking.
This research is to find out the answer from the statement of the problem; First,
“can Fishbowl Discussion improve student’s speaking ability of the tenth grade students of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in academic year 2013/2014?”. Second,
“What are the strengths and the weaknesses of using Fishbowl Discussion w hen it is applied at the tenth grade students of SMA NU AL Ma’ruf Kudus in academic year 2013/2014 to improve students’ speaking ability?”
This is a classroom action research. The research was conducted in SMA
NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus. Subject of the research is the grade X-1 in second semester
The material used is descriptive text. The writer uses some instrument in this research. Observation and achievement test. There were four steps in conducting the Classroom Action Research i.e. planning, acting, observing and reflecting.
The result of this research shows that the improvements happen in every cycle. In cycle I, the average score of achievement test of speaking ability by using Fishbowl Discussion technique is 71.06 then the average from 71.06 into percentage to be 71.06%. In cycle II, the average score of achievement test of speaking ability by using Fishbowl Discussion technique in cycle II is 81.46 then the average score from 81.46 into percentage to be 81.46% so the speaking ability in cycle II is very satisfied. The writer concluded that Fishbowl Discussion as a technique of teaching English had proven effective in improving the ability of English speaking of the students of
SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in academic year 2013/2014. Based on the result of the research above, the writer can conclude that the use of
Fishbowl Discussion can improve students’ speaking ability at the Tenth Grade Students of
SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in the academic 2013/2014. First, the writer suggests that the English teacher should try to use fishbowl discussion
as one of the teaching technique. Second, English teacher should encourage the students to improve their speaking ability by giving more practice and exercise. It is to make students fell fun and active in class. So it can improve their speaking ability.
ABSTRAKSI
Rosidah, Na’imatul. 2014. Kemampuan Berbicara Siswa Kelas Sepuluh di SMA
NU A l Ma’ruf Kudus Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014 dengan Menggunakan Fishbowl Discussion. Skripsi. Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa
Inggris, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Muria Kudus. Pembimbing (i) Drs. Muh Syafei, M.Pd. (ii) Fajar Kartika, S.S, M.Hum.
Key Words: Kemampuan berbicara, Fishbowl Doscussion.
Berbicara adalah salah satu element dari beberapa aktivitas manusia sehari-hari. Penulis dapat membagi ide dan pemikiran kita dengan orang lain dengan berbicara. Interaksi yang lancar diantaranya orang dapat menggunakan kearah itu. Keterampilan berbicara diajarkan kepada siswa untuk membuat mereka mampu berkomunikasi dengan bahasa Inggris yang benar. Faktanya, guru kurang memiliki motivasi untuk memberikan perlakuan khusus kepada siswa dalam pengajaran berbicara.
Penelitian ini mempunyai beberapa tujuan untuk menemukan jawaban dari pernyataan dari sebuah masalah adakah this research has a purpose to find out menjawab dari pernyataan masalah; Pertama,
“Dapatkah Fishbowl Discussion meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara siswa kel as X SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus di tahun 2013/2014
?”. Kedua, “kekuatan dan kelemahan apa dari penggunaan Fishbowl Discussion ketika diaplikasikan pada murid-murid kelas X SMA NU Al Ma’ruf di tahun 2013/2014 untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara siswa?”.
Ini merupakan penelitian tindak kelas (Classroom Action Research). Penelitian ini di SMA NU Al
Ma’ruf Kudus. Subject penelitian adalah kelas X1 pada semester kedua. Materi yang digunakan adalah descriptive text. Penulis
menggunakan beberapa instrument di dalam penelitian ini. Yang digunakan adalah observation and achievement test menggunakan fishbowl discussion. Ada empat langkah dalam melakukan Penilitian Tindakan Kelas yaitu perencanaa, pelaksanaa, observasi, dan refleksi.
Hasil dari penelitian ini memperlihatkan bahwa terjadi peningkatan pada setiap cycle. Pada cycle I, nilai rata-rata test kemampuan berbicara menggunakan Fishbowl Discussion adalah 71.06 kemudian rata-rata dari 71.06 kedalam presentase yaitu 71.06%. Pada cycle II nilai rata-rata test kemampuan berbicara menggunakan Fishbowl Discussion adalah 81.46 kemudian rata-rata dari 81.46 kedalam presentase yaitu 81.46 %. Jadi kemampuan berbicara pada cycle II sangat puas. Penulis dapat menarik kesimpulan bahwa pengajaran menngunakan Fishbowl Discussion untuk mengajar bahasa Inggris terbukti efektif untuk meningkatkan penguasaan berbicara murid- murid SMA MU Al Ma’ruf Kudus di tahun pelajaran 2013/2014.
Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diatas, peneliti bisa menyimpulkan bahwa penggunaan Fishbowl Discussion bisa meningkatkan kemampuan siswa dalam berbicara terhadap kelas X di SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus di tahun ajaran 2013/2014. Pertama, penulis menyarankan bahwa guru bahasa Inggris harus mencoba untuk menggunakan Fishbowl Discussion sebagai salah satu tehnik pembelajaran. Kedua, guru bahasa Inggris harus mendorong siswa untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berbahasa mereka dengan memberikan lebih banyak praktek dan latihan. Itu untuk membuat siswa merasa senang dan aktif dikelas. Sehingga dapat meningkatkan pemahaman mereka dalam berbicara.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
COVER ...................................................................................................... i
PAGE OF LOGO ...................................................................................... ii
PAGE OF TITLE ...................................................................................... iii
MOTTO AND DEDICATION ................................................................. iv
ADVISORS ’ APPROVAL ....................................................................... v EXAMINERS ’ APPROVAL .................................................................... vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ........................................................................ vii
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................... ix
ABSTRAK ................................................................................................. xi
TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................... xiii
LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................... xvi
LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................. xvii
LIST OF APPENDICES .......................................................................... xviii
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the Research ..............................................................
1 1.2 Statement of the Problems .................................................................
3 1.3 Objective of the Research ..................................................................
4 1.4 Significance of the Research .............................................................
4 1.5 Scope of the Research ........................................................................
5 1.6 Operational Definition .......................................................................
5 CHAPTER II REVIEW TO RELATED LITERATURE AND
HYPOTHESIS
2.1 Teaching English in SMP NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus ............................................ 6
2.1.1 Purposes of Teaching English in SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus .................... 7
2.1.2 The Curriculum in SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus .......................................... 8
2.1.3 The Material of Teaching English in SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus .............. 9
2.2 Speaking ...................................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 The Nature of Teaching Speaking ...............................................................
11
2.3 Fishbowl Discussion .................................................................................... 12
2.4 Review of Previous Research ....................................................................... 14
2.5 Theoretical Framework ............................................................................... 15
2.6 Action Hypothesis ....................................................................................... 16
CHAPTER III METHOD OF THE RESEARCH 3.1 Setting and characteristic of the Research ......................................
17 3.2 Variable of the Research .................................................................
18 3.3 Design of the Research....................................................................
19 3.4 Procedure of the Research ...............................................................
20
3.4.1 Planning of the Research .......................................................................... 21
3.4.1.1 Action Planning ....................................................................................... 21
3.4.1.2 Observing the Action Research ................................................................ 22
3.4.1.3 Analysis and Reflection ............................................................................ 23 3.5 Technique of Analyzing Data ...................................................................
23 CHAPTER IV FINDING OF THE RESEARCH
4.1 Pre-reflection ..................................................................................... 27
4.2 The Cycle Action Procedure .............................................................. 29
4.2.1 The Result of Cycle I ......................................................................... 29 4.2.1.1 Planning ..........................................................................................
30 4.2.1.2 Implementing the Action.................................................................
30 4.2.1.2.1 The First Meeting of Action (Cycle I) ........................................
31 4.2.1.2.2 The Second Meeting of Action (Cycle I) ....................................
32 4.2.1.3 Observation .....................................................................................
32 4.2.4 Analysis and Reflection of the Observation Result ...........................
39 4.3 The Result of Cycle II ...........................................................................
41 4.3.1 Planning .............................................................................................
41 4.3.2 Implementing the Action....................................................................
42 4.3.2.1 The First Meeting of Action (Cycle II) ..........................................
43 4.3.2.2 The second Meeting of Action (Cycle II) ......................................
45 4.3.3 Observation ........................................................................................
45 4.3.4 Analysis and Reflection of the Observation Result ...........................
52 4.4 The recapitulation of the Result of Second ...........................................
53
CHAPTER V DISCUSSION
5.1 Improving Speaking Ability of the Tenth Grade Students of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus by Using Fishbowl Discussion ...................................... 55
5.2 The Process of Improving Speaking Ability by Using Fishbowl Discussion of the Tent h Grade Students of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus .................... 57
CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
6.1 Conclusion ......................................................................................... 59
6.2 Suggestion ......................................................................................... 61 REFERENCES ..........................................................................................
63 APPENDICES ...........................................................................................
64 STATEMENT ............................................................................................ 105
CURRICULUM VITAE ........................................................................... 106
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page2.1 The Material of Tenth Grade Students of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in Academic Year 2014/2015 ........................................................ 9
3.5 The Criteria of Test Score ...................................................................... 25
3.5 T he Students’ Achievement Criteria ....................................................... 28
4.1 Score of daily assessment of class X1 of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in Academic Year 2013/2014 ................................................................... 33
4.2 The Result of Observation To Know The students’ Activities In Teaching
Learning Process In Improving Students’ Speaking Ability By Using Fishbowl Discussion In Academic Year 2013/2014 ............................ 46
4.3 Scores of Students Speaking Ability of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus by Using Fishbowl Discussion in Academic Year 2013/2014 ............................. 37
4.4 The Result of Observation to Know the Students’ Activities in the Teaching
Learning Pr ocess in Improving Students’ Speaking Ability by Using Fishbowl Discussion in Academic Year 2013/2014 ............................ 45
4.5 Scores of Students’ Speaking Ability of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus by Using Fishbowl Discussion in Academic Year 2013/2014 ................... 50
4.6 Recapitulayion of the Result of Second Cycle in Improving Speaking Ability of the Class X1of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus by Using Fishbowl Discussion in Academic Year 2013/2014 ............................................. 53
LIST OF FIGURES Figures Page
2.1 The Chronological of the Action Research ...........................................15
2.1 The Burn's model of action research ....................................................19
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix Page 1.The Syllabus The Syllabus of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in academic 2013/2014 ................................................................................................ 65
2 LESSON PLAN I ..................................................................................... 70
3 LESSON PLAN II ................................................................................... 78
4 Speaking Test Cycle I ............................................................................... 86
5 Speaking Test Cycle II .............................................................................. 87
6 The Name of Tenth Grade Students of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus In Academic Year 2013/2014........................................................................ 88
7 The result of observation cycle I to know the students’ activities in the teaching learning process in improvi ng students’ speaking ability by using fishbowl discussion of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in Academic year 2013/2014 .......................................................................................... 90
8 Score of students’ speaking ability of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus by Using Fishbowl Discussion in Academic year 2013/2014 in First Cycle. 94
9 Accounting Means of Students’ Speaking Ability of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus by Using Fishbowl Discussion in Academic Year 2013/2014 in First Cycle ........................................................................... 96
10 The result of observation cycle II to know the students’ activities in the teaching learning process in imp roving students’ speaking ability by using fishbowl discussion of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in Academic year 2013/2014 .......................................................................................... 97
11 Score of students’ speaking ability of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus by Using Fishbowl Discussion in Academic year 2013/2014 in Second Cycle ......................................................................................................... 101
12 Accounting Means of Students’ Speaking Ability of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus by Using Fishbowl Discussion in Academic Year 2013/2014 in Second Cycle ...................................................................... 103
13 Recapitulation of the Result of Second Cycles in Improving Speaking Ability of the Class X1 of SMA N
U Al Ma’ruf Kudus by Using
Fishbowl Discussion in Academic Year 2013/2014 ................................. 104
14 Penetapan Pembimbing Skripsi Letter ...................................................... 105
15 Keterangan Selesai Bimbingan ................................................................. 106
16 Permohonan Ujian Skripsi ....................................................................... 107
17 Reseacrh Permission Letter ....................................................................... 108
18 Research Decision Letter from SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus .................... 109
19 Berita Acara Bimbingan ........................................................................... 110