The Role of Nuclear Medicine in Diagnosis of the Diabetic Limb.

The Role of Nuclear Medicine
in Diagnosis of the Diabetic Limb1

A. Hussein S. Kartamihardja
Department of Nuclear Medicine
Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran
Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital

Introduction
Diabetes mellitus is a systemic metabolic disease that is associated with significant
complications affecting multiple organs and cause of cardiovascular disease, stroke, endstage kidney disease, and lower extremity disease (diabetic limb), which lead to nontraumatic amputations. As the prevalence of diabetes increases, a number of important
complications affecting lower extremity, such as foot infection are being more frequently
and becoming a major worldwide health problem. Up to 15% of diabetic patients will
develop foot ulcers, and about 15%–25% of these patients with severe forms of diabetic
neuropathy require amputations. The foot of a diabetic patient has the potential risk of
pathologic consequences, including infection, ulceration, and/or destruction of deep tissues
associated.1,2
Diabetic foot infections require careful attention and integrated management
involving a multidisciplinary foot-care team. The team managing should include, or have
ready and direct access to specialist on infectious diseases or microbiologist. Diabetic foot
infections can potentially reduce the incidence of infection-related morbidities, the need for

and duration of hospitalization, and the incidence of amputation by adequate management.

The 8th Asia Pacific Conference on Diabetic Limb Problem, Bandung, 16-17 December 2011

An early and prompt diagnosis is very important and necessary in order antibiotic
therapy, in conjunction with conservative surgery will give a benefit to cure diabetic limb
and avoid amputation.2
There are several diagnostic modalities can be use in diabetic limb including imaging
modalities. Imaging modalities for the diagnosis of diabetic limb can be divided into 2
goup. Imaging modalities based on anatomical changes and based on physiology and
pathophysiology of the diseases. Nuclear medicine modalities have an important role in the
management of diabetic limb.
Diabetic limb complications
There are 3 serious foot complications of diabetes mellitus, foot ulceration, infections
and charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy.

Charcot foot may manifest as arthropathy,

osteoarthropathy, neuroarthropathy. Non-infectious destruction of bone and joint in
patients with diabetic limb usually associated with neuropathy, neurologic abnormalities,

various degrees of peripheral vascular disease, and/or metabolic complications of diabetes
in the lower limb. (Based upon the World Health Organization [WHO] definition.
The underlying pathophysiology of diabetic limb complications has been elucidated
to a great extent. It is very important to determine which of treatments are most effective.
How to effectively prevent those ulcerations, which are leading to amputation also very
important.
Diagnosis of diabetic foot
Foot infection is a very serious and relatively frequent complication in diabetic
patients. An early and prompt diagnosis is very important and necessary in order antibiotic
2

therapy, in conjunction with conservative surgery will give a benefit to cure diabetic limb
and avoid amputation.1 Unfortunately, a prompt diagnosis in early stage of the disease is
very difficult in the presence of diabetic osteopathy. Defining the location and extent of the
infectious process is very important in deciding on the duration of antibiotic therapy and
the need surgery for amputation.3
The detection of diabetic foot infection can’t be simple. It is difficult to differentiate
between soft-tissue infection and osteomyelitis based on clinical examination only. Bone
biopsy is the best modality, but it is not always performed, because it is an invasive
procedure that loses its reliability when the biopsy fragment is contaminated by cutaneous

bacteria. In this situation, Imaging modalities are valuable for the diagnosis and crucial in
the evaluation of infections in DM.2
Several imaging modalities have been proposed to image foot infection in diabetic
patients. These imaging diagnostic modalities could be divided into two groups, those are
based on anatomical changes and physiology and pathophysiology of the disease.

Table 1. Imaging of Diabetic Limb Osteomyelitis2
Basic Principle
Morphologic imaging

Functional imaging
(Nuclear Medicine)

Techniques
1. X-ray
2. USG
3. CT
4. MR
The radiopharmaceutical used
for imaging infection/inflammation

J Nucl Med 2011; 52(7)

3

Routine radiographic techniques have a low sensitivity since they do not reveal
changes until the bone has been significantly eroded; furthermore a concomitant
neuroarthropathy may hinder the radiological interpretation. 4
CT is one of imaging diagnostic modality based on anatomical can be used, but is not
sufficiently accurate. MRI is also based on anatomical changes has high sensitivity and
specificity, but has some limitations in differentiating osteomyelitis from neuropathic
osteoarthropathy, from stress changes related to altered weight bearing, and from
alterations of signal due to surgery.3
Nuclear medicine techniques
Nuclear medicine using gamma camera planar/SPECT system has an important role
in the management of diabetic limb, particularly on the diagnosis of diabetic limb
infection. Several radiopharmaceuticals can be use for imaging of infection. Following
injection, radiopharmaceutical agent accumulates in the infectious/ inflammatory lesion
due to the locally changed physiological condition. Table 2 shows various
radiopharmaceutical can be use to image infection process.
Table 2: Radiopharmaceutical for diagnosis of diabetic limb.

Radiopharmaceutical

Sensitivity

Specificity

72% -100%

67% - 100%,

99m

90% - 93%

86% - 100%

99m

75% - 100%


10% - 67% ,

92.6%

97.6%,

67% - 93%

56% - 85%

Leukoscan

91.9%

87.5%

99m

Tc-nanocolloid


100%

60%

F-FDG-PET/CT

81%

93%

111

In-HMPAO leukocyte
Tc-HMPAO leukocyte
Tc 3-phase bone scan

WBC with 3-phase bone scan
Non- specific polyclonal 99mTc-IgG

18


4

Bone Scintigraphy
Bone scintigraphy is the most commonly performed nuclear medicine
procedure. The common radiopharmaceutical used for bone scintigraphy is
technetium-99m-labeled phosphonates. This radiopharmaceutical was introduce in
the early 1970s and responsible for the establishment of bone scanning as a major
diagnostic tool.5 Following injection of

99mTc-methylene

diphosphonate (MDP), this

radiopharmaceutical has rapid blood clearance, excellent in vivo chemical stability,
and a high bone-to-soft tissue ratio, which are ideal for bone imaging.5 Bone
scintigraphy is a highly sensitive method for demonstrating disease in bone, often
permitting earlier diagnosis or demonstrating more lesions than are found by conventional
radiological methods.6
Table . Sensitivity and specificity of bone scan in the diagnose of diabetic limb

Authors

99m

n

Sensitivity

Specificity

Seldin (JNM 1985)

30

94%

79%

Maurer (Radiology 1986)


13

75%

59%

Shults (Am J Surg 1989)

25

67%

43%

Keenan (Arch Int Med 1989)

77

100%


38%

Larcos (AJR 1991)

51

93%

43%

Newman (JAMA 1991

41

69%

39%

Harvey (JFAS 1997)

31

91%

40%

Blume (JFAS 1997)

27

75%

29%

Palestro JFAS 2003

25

90%

27%

Tc- HMPAO)–WBC scintigraphy
Three phase bone scan using

99m

Tc-MDP has a 100% sensitivity, but a very low

specificity due to the high incidence of neuroarthropathy or traumatic fracture.4

99m

Tc-

HMPAO (hexamethylpropylene amine oxime)-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy has been
5

also used to image diabetic foot infection, but is often unable to differentiate bone from
soft-tissue involvement. If the WBC-labelled scan was positive for osteomyelitis or if local
therapy failed to heal the ulcer irrespective of the scan result, resection of the involved
bone should be considered.4 Radiolabeled leukocytes scintigraphy is the nuclear medicine
technique of choice to diagnose infection and define involvement of soft tissues and/or
osteomyelitis.

99m

Tc-MDP is often used in association with labeled leukocyte scintigraphy

to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of osteomyelitis. Combination this dual-isotope scans
had a sensitivity of 92.6%, a specificity of 97.6% and accuracy 95.1%, while

99m

alone had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 28% and accuracy 62%.4

99m

bone scans with the appropriate

Tc-MDP
Tc-MDP

111

In-WBC scans can determine the site and extent of

osteomyelitis in the neuropathic diabetic foot.7
Labeled leukocyte scintigraphy currently remains the gold standard imaging
technique in patients with suspected diabetic foot infection.7
SPECT/CT Technology
SPECT/CT system is a technique to increas the accuracy of conventional
scintigraphic imaging using planar gamma camera. SPECT system provide detail data
throught 3 dimentional images with 3 sectional slices, sagital, coronal and horizontal
slicing images. In this system, low dose CT is used to give detail anatomical information.
SPECT/CT scan can be useful for imaging infectious processes, particularly when
osteomyelitis is suspected in patients with diabetic limb.
18

F-FDG PET/CT SCAN
PET/CT scan is another diagnostic modality using nuclear medicine technique.

Radiopharmaceutical commonly use for diagnose of diabetic limb with infection is

18

F6

FDG (fluorodioxyglucoce). FDG behave similar to glucose will be uptake by any cell with
high metabolic activity. 18 F-FDG PET/CT scan has some theoretic advantages, such as no
blood manipulation is necessary, acquisition time is shorter, and image resolution is higher
compared to SPECT. 18F-FDG-PET is a highly specific complimentary imaging modality
for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis, but due to its characteristic, it is
impossible to distinguish infection from aseptic inflammation or malignancy. Quantitative
parameter from PET scan such as SUVmax is not useful for differentiating soft-tissue
infection from osteomyelitis as well as dual-time acquisition was not helpful. Combining
visual assessment of PET and CT images was more useful. 2
The data on the role of PET and PET/CT in the evaluation of diabetic foot infections
are limited.8
Concluding Remarks


Radionuclide tests are decisive in the localization and diagnosis of foot osteomyelitis



99m

Tc-MDP and labeled leukocytes bone scans are the main imaging modalities

employed, while emerging techniques include SPET/CT and, 18F-FDG-PET/CT.


Three phase bone scan is a useful clinical tool to assist the orthopedist in making a
more objective decision regarding the amputation level of ischemic lower limbs and
surgical procedure to be employed, prior to surgery



SPECT/CT can represent a potential tool for diagnosing diabetic foot infection by
99m

Tc-HMPAO–labeled leukocytes by differentiating between bone and soft-tissue

involvement and by more precisely defining the extent of the disease, thus supporting
treatment planning and avoiding more invasive procedures

7

Reference
1. Baker J et al. Diabetic musculoskeletal complications and their imaging mimics.
RadioGraphics 2012; 32:1959-1974.
2. Familiari D, Glaudemans AWJM, Vitale V, et al. Can sequential F-18 FDG-PET/CT
replace WBC imaging in the diabetic foot? J Nucl Med. 2011 (52) : 1012–1019.
3. Filippi L, Uccioli L, Giurato L, and Schillaci O. Diabetic Foot Infection: Usefulness of
SPECT/ CT for

99m

Tc-HMPAO-Labeled Leukocyte Imaging. J Nucl Med 2009;

50:1042–1046
4. Poirier JY, Garin E, Derrien C, Deviller A, Moisan A, Bourguet A and Maugendre D.
Diagnosis of Osteomyelitis in the Diabetic Foot with a
scintigraphy combined with

99m

99m

Tc-HMPAO Leucocyte

Tc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy. Diabetes Metab

2002.28.485-490.
5. Peller PJ, Ho VB and Kransdorf

MJ.

Extraosseus

99m

Tc-MDP Uptake: A

Pathophysiologic Approached. RadioGraphics 1993. Volume 13 Number 4: 715-734
6. Bombardieri E, Aktolun C, Baum RP, Bishof-Delaloye A, Buscombe J, Chatal JF, et
al. Bone scintigraphy: procedure guidelines for tumour imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol
Imaging (2003) 30:BP99–BP106
7. Palestro CJ. 18F-FDG and Diabetic Foot Infections: The Verdict Is…J Nucl Med 2011;
52:1009-1011

8

9

10

11