THE EFFECT OF FISCAL POLICY ON ECONOMIC GROWTH CASE STUDY IN INDONESIA.
THE EFFECT OF FISCAL POLICY ON ECONOMIC GROWTH
CASE STUDY IN INDONESIA
THESIS
This is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the bachelor degree
By :
FANNY OKTIVIA DENOVIS
0910514021
Bachelor Degree of Economics Department
Faculty of Economy
Andalas University
Padang
2014
UniversityاAlumnus
RegistrationاNoا:
FacultyاAlumnus
RegistrationاNoا:
FANNY OKTIVIA DENOVIS
PERSONAL OF IDENTITY
a).اPlace/اDateاofاBirth:اPadangاPanjangا/ا29اoktoberا1991ااb).Parent’sاnameا:اSastramed
& اEvi اNoveri اc).Faculty:Economics اd).Development:Economics اe) اStudent اId اNo ا:
0910514021 اf). اDate اof اExamination: اJanuary, ا27th ا2014 اg).Graduate اStandard:
Satisfaction اh). اGPA: ا2,94 اi). اLength اof اStudy اPeriod ا: ا4 اyear ا5 اmonth اj). اparent’s
address:اNagariاPanyalaianاKec.اXاKotoاkab.اTanahاDatar
THE EFFECT OF FISCAL POLICY ON ECONOMIC GROWTH
CASE STUDY : IN INDONESIA
Thesis by : Fanny Oktivia Denovis Thesis Advisor : Dr, H.Hefrizal Handra M.Soc.Sc
ABSTRACT
The اobjectives اof اthe اresearch اare اtoاanalyze اthe اeffect اof اfiscal اpolicyاon اeconomic اgrowth اin
Indonesia.اThisاresearchاappliesاOLS(اOrdinaryاLeastاSquares)اmethod.ااIndependentاvariablesاused
inاthisاresearchاareاrecurrentاexpenditure,اdevelopmentاexpenditureاandاincomeاtaxاinاtheاperiodاof
2002-2012. اThisاresearchاindicates اthatاfiscalاpolicyاinfuences اthe اeconomicاgrowthاinاIndonesia.
The اcoefficient اof اdetermination( اR2) اshows اthat اthe اvariation اof اindependent اvariables اexplains
variationاofاdependentاvariableاbyا99.2اpercents.اFuthermore,اgovernmentاexpenditure(اrecurrentاor
development) اand اincome اtax اhave اsignificantly اinfluenced اto اthe اgrowth اin اIndonesia. اIn اother
words, اeconomic اgrowth اof اIndonesia اwill اbe اmore اprogressive اwith اthe اraise اof اgovernment
expendituresاandاincomeاtax.ا
Key words: economic growth, government expenditure, and income tax.
This thesis has been presented in front of the examiners in the Thesis Examination and
successfully passed the Thesis Examination on January 27, 2014.
The Abstract has been approved by the advisor and examiners
1.
2.
3.
Signature
FullName
Dr.H.HefrizalاHandra,M.Soc.Sc
Prof.H.اSjafrizal,اSE.MA
Approvedاby,
HeadاofاDepartmentا:ااااDr,اH.HefrizalاHandra,اM.Soc.Sc
NIP.ا196510201993021001
Drs.اH.Masrizal,اM.Soc.Sc
Signature
TheاAlumnusاhasاregisteredاtoاtheاfaculty/UniversityاandاhasاobtainedاTheاAlumnusاRegister
Numberا:
UniversityاAlumnusاRegistrationاNoا:
OfficerFaculty/University
NameااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااSignature
FacultyاAlumnusاRegistrationاNoا:
NameااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااSignature
Appendixاا1.4اMulticollinearityاTest................................................................ااا71
Appendixاا1.5اNormalityاTest...........................................................................ااا73
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1.1
Background
Economicاdevelopmentاisاanاabsoluteاphaseاthatاshouldاbeاdoneاbyاeveryاnationاto
improveاprosperity.اTheاimplementationاofاeconomicاdevelopmentاisاneverاapartاfromاthe
increase اin اincome اor اwe اcalled اeconomic اgrowth. اEconomic اgrowth اand اeconomic
development اare اalmost اsame اbut اthey اare اfundamentally اdifferent. اEconomic اgrowth اis
increaseاinاaverageاincomeاofاanاeconomy,اwhileاeconomicاdevelopmentاisاtheاincreaseاin
welfareاofاpeopleاofاthatاeconomy.
EconomicاGrowthااisاanاincreaseاinاaاcountry'sاrealاlevelاofاnationalاoutputاwhichاcan
be اcaused اby اan اincrease اin اthe اquality اand اquantity اof اresources, اan اimprovement اin
technology اorاinاanotherاwayاanاincreaseاinاtheاvalueاofاgoodsاandاservicesاproducedاby
everyاsectorاofاtheاeconomy.ا
EconomicاGrowthاcanاbeاmeasuredاbyاanاincreaseاinاaاcountry'sاGDP(اgrossاdomestic
product).“اEconomicاgrowthاisاaاprocess,اnotاanاeconomicاpictureاinاaاgivenاperiod,اthereاare
developmentاorاchangesاandاuseاofاtime”(اBoediono,ا1992).
Indonesia’s اeconomic اgrowth اhas اbeen اup اand اdown اin اover اrecent اdecades, اin
accordance اwith اthe اconditions اof اthe اworld اeconomy. اNational اincome اis اa اmeasure اof
economic اgrowth, اwhich اis اshowed اby اfluctuating اgrowth. اThe اeconomic اcondition اof
Indonesia اas اa اdeveloping اcountry اhas اnot اreached اsteady اstate اconditions اin اwhich اan
economyاisاalreadyاinاaاstableاandاlessاsusceptibleاtoاshocks.
Indonesia’sاeconomicاgrowthاisاinfluencedاbyاtheاvariousاshocks.اShocksاthatاmake
Indonesian’sاeconomyاisاdisruptedاeconomicاcrisisاofا1998,اnamelyاinflationا78ا%اandاGDP
decreasedاbyاapproximatelyا11اpercent.اInا2008اtheاworldاeconomyاwasاinاrecessionاor
globalاeconomicاrecession,اtriggeredاbyاfinancialاturmoilاinاtheاunitedاstates.اThisاfinancial
crisisاhitاcountriesاaroundاtheاworldاincludesاIndonesia.اTheاimpactاofاthisاcrisisاinاIndonesia
wasاmarkedاbyاtheاsideاofاstateاpending,اstateاspendingاonاstateاbudgetاallocationاinا2009
wasاestimatedاtoاincreaseاbyاRpا51,8اtrillion,اcompareاtoاtheاrealizationاofاtheاstateاbudgetاof
2008اwithاtotalاexpendituresاsetاatاRpا1,037.1اtrillion(ا19.5اpercentاofاGDP),اdrivenاbyاan
increase اin اcentral اgovernment اspending اfor اRp ا23.74 اtrillion اand اthe اallocation اof
expenditureاtoاtheاregionاofا28.06اtrillionاwhenاcomparedاwithاtheاrealizationاofاtheا2008
budgetاtheاgovernmentاhasاbeenاableاtoاanticipateاtheاsituation,اsoاthatاeconomicاgrowthاin
Indonesiaاisاrelativelyاsafe,اaroundا6,38%(اDataاBPS,ا2008).
اIndonesiaاisاbetterاequippedاtoاsurviveاinاthisاtimeاofاcrisisاbecauseاofاtheاexperience
learnedاfromاpreviousاcrisis.اAاcountryاmustاhas اaاgovernmentاthatاservesاasاaاeconomic
dampening اand اpolitical اturmoil اboth اfrom اdomestic اand اabroad. اDampers اare اable اto
stabilizeاtheاturmoilاinاtheاsenseاofاaاmoreاconduciveاsituationاthroughاvariousاpolicies.
Governmentاisاaاveryاimportantاactorاinاtheاeconomyاofاaاcountry.اAnاeconomicاactivityاwill
beاoptimalاifاthereاisاaاgovernmentاactivityاthereاin.
EconomicاgrowthاinاIndonesiaاisاstillاatاtheاdevelopmentاstage.اGovernmentاspending
onاGovernmentاactivitiesاthatاincludeاspendingاinاtheاpoliticalاsphereاasاwellاasاinاtheاfieldاof
economyاwhereاeverythingاhasاplannedاinاtheاbudgetاrevenueاandاexpenditureاofاtheاstate
budget.اManagingاsourcesاofاrevenueاandاgovernmentاspending,اgovernmentاcanاmakeاa
policyاtoاincreaseاeconomicاgrowthاsuchاasاFiscalاPolicy.
FiscalاPolicyاisاtheاgovernmentاpolicyاwhichاincluded اgovernmentاexpenditureاand
taxesاinاcollaborationاwithاtheاmonetaryاpolicyاwhoseاobjectiveاwasاtoاaccelerateاeconomic
growth. ا اGovernment اexpenditure اconsists اof اrecurrent اexpenditure اand اdevelopment
expenditure.
Recurrentاexpenditureاisاexpenditureاthatاusedاforاmaintenanceاandاoperationاofاa
government اthat اincludes اspending اon اpersonnel, اgoods اexpenditures, اinterest اpayments,
subsidiesاandاotherاroutineاexpenses.اThroughاroutine اexpenses,اtheاgovernmentاcanاcarry
out اits اmission اin اorder اto اmaintain اthe اsmooth اimplementation اof اthe اgovernment, اthe
operations اand اmaintenance اof اstate اassets, اGovernment's اresponsibility اto اthird اparties,
protection اof اthe اpoor اand اunderprivileged اand اmaintain اeconomic اstability
(Mangkoesoebroto,ا1994).
Development اexpenditure اis اexpenditure اincurred اto اfinance اdevelopment اin اthe
economic, اsocial, اand اpublic اand اthat اis اto اraise اcapital اin اthe اform اof اcommunity
developmentاbothاphysicalاandاnon-physicalاinfrastructureاisاimplementedاinاaاgivenاperiod.
Budgetاphysicalاandاnon-physicalاdevelopmentاisاalwaysاadjustedاtoاtheاfundsاmobilized.
Theاfundsاareاallocatedاtoاtheاvariousاfieldsاinاaccordanceاwithاtheاprioritiesاthatاhaveاbeen
planned.اTheاroleاofاtheاdevelopmentاbudgetاisاmoreاemphasisاonاeffortsاtoاcreateاaاstable
andاconduciveاconditionsاforاtheاcontinuityاofاtheاprocessاofاeconomicاrecoveryاbyاproviding
aاstimulusاtoاtheاgrowthاofاtheاnationalاeconomy.اInاconnectionاwithاtheاmanagementاofاthe
overall اstate اbudget اwith اlimited اfinancial اresources اavailable, اthe اachievement اof
developmentاgoalsاshouldاbeاasاoptimalاasاpossible(اNotaاKeuanganاdanاAPBN,ا2004).
Taxes اhave اa اvery اimportant اrole اin اthe اlife اof اthe اstate. اParticularly اin اthe
implementation اof اdevelopment اbecause اthe اtaxes اa اsource اof اstate اrevenue اto اfund اall
expensesاincludingاtheاexpensesاofاgovernment.اWhetherاit'sاforاrecurrentاexpendituresاand
developmentاexpenditures.
AccordingاtoاWaluyo(ا2006),اhighاeconomicاgrowthاwillاincreaseاtheاrevenueاofاthe
governmentاofاtaxes(اVATاandاincomeاtax)اasاwellاasاprovidingاemploymentاandاearningsاor
savingاforeignاexchange.
Since اthe اpurpose اof اtaxation اand اgovernment اexpenditure, اboth اrecurrent اand
developmentاareاtoاsupportاnationalاeconomicاactivityاinاmaintainingاtheاmomentumاofاhigh
economicاgrowth,اandاimproveاtheاwelfareاofاtheاwholeاpeopleاofاIndonesia.اThereاforeاthe
role اofاgovernment اin اtheاfieldاoffiscal اpolicy اto اaccelerate اeconomic اgrowth,اtheاauthors
triedاtoاexamineااhowاtheاeffectاofاfiscalاpolicyاonاeconomicاgrowth,اinاIndonesia.Inاthisاcase
theاgovernmentاfiscalاpolicyاareاgovernmentاexpenditureاandاtaxes.
Basedاonاtheاaboveاassumptions,اFiscalاpolicyاisاaاgovernmentاpolicyاcanاimpactاof
activitiesاagainstاtheاgovernmentاinاrunningاinاtheاfieldاofاtheاeconomyاinاindonesia.ااtoاthe
authorsاareاinterestedاinاdoingاresearchاtoاtakeاtheاtitleاofا
“The Effect Of Fiscal Policy On Economic Growth : Case Study In Indonesia”.
1.2 Research Question
Basedاonاtheاaboveاexplanation,اtheاissuesاtoاbeاanalyzedاinاthisاstudyاare:
1. How اdoes اgovernment اrecurrent اexpenditure اinfluence اeconomic اgrowth اin
Indonesia?
2. How اdoes اgovernment اdevelopment اexpenditure اinfluence اeconomic اgrowth اin
Indonesia?
3. HowاdoesاtaxesاinfluenceاeconomicاgrowthاinاIndonesia?
1.3 Research objectives
Inاaccordanceاwithاtheاaboveاproblemsاtheاpurposeاofاthisاstudyاwereاto:
1. Toاexamineاtheاeffectاofاgovernment اrecurrentاexpenditureاonاeconomicاgrowthاin
Indonesia;
2. Toاexamineاtheاeffectاofاgovernmentاdevelopmentاexpenditureاonاeconomicاgrowth
inاIndonesia;
3. ToاexamineاtheاeffectاofاtaxesاonاeconomicاgrowthاinاIndonesia.
1.4 Research Advantage
Theاadvantages ofاthisاresearchاare:
1. For اI اand اmyself, اto اimprove اmy اability اin اwriting اreport اand اdoing اresearch,
especiallyاinاmonetaryاeconomics,اparticularlyاfiscalاpolicy.
2. Forاgovernmentاasاinputاforاfiscalاpolicy.
3. Asاaاreferenceاforاotherاresearcherاwhoاareاinterestedاtoاstudyاinاtheاsameاfieldاwith
theاapproachاadاscopeاareاdifferent.
CASE STUDY IN INDONESIA
THESIS
This is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the bachelor degree
By :
FANNY OKTIVIA DENOVIS
0910514021
Bachelor Degree of Economics Department
Faculty of Economy
Andalas University
Padang
2014
UniversityاAlumnus
RegistrationاNoا:
FacultyاAlumnus
RegistrationاNoا:
FANNY OKTIVIA DENOVIS
PERSONAL OF IDENTITY
a).اPlace/اDateاofاBirth:اPadangاPanjangا/ا29اoktoberا1991ااb).Parent’sاnameا:اSastramed
& اEvi اNoveri اc).Faculty:Economics اd).Development:Economics اe) اStudent اId اNo ا:
0910514021 اf). اDate اof اExamination: اJanuary, ا27th ا2014 اg).Graduate اStandard:
Satisfaction اh). اGPA: ا2,94 اi). اLength اof اStudy اPeriod ا: ا4 اyear ا5 اmonth اj). اparent’s
address:اNagariاPanyalaianاKec.اXاKotoاkab.اTanahاDatar
THE EFFECT OF FISCAL POLICY ON ECONOMIC GROWTH
CASE STUDY : IN INDONESIA
Thesis by : Fanny Oktivia Denovis Thesis Advisor : Dr, H.Hefrizal Handra M.Soc.Sc
ABSTRACT
The اobjectives اof اthe اresearch اare اtoاanalyze اthe اeffect اof اfiscal اpolicyاon اeconomic اgrowth اin
Indonesia.اThisاresearchاappliesاOLS(اOrdinaryاLeastاSquares)اmethod.ااIndependentاvariablesاused
inاthisاresearchاareاrecurrentاexpenditure,اdevelopmentاexpenditureاandاincomeاtaxاinاtheاperiodاof
2002-2012. اThisاresearchاindicates اthatاfiscalاpolicyاinfuences اthe اeconomicاgrowthاinاIndonesia.
The اcoefficient اof اdetermination( اR2) اshows اthat اthe اvariation اof اindependent اvariables اexplains
variationاofاdependentاvariableاbyا99.2اpercents.اFuthermore,اgovernmentاexpenditure(اrecurrentاor
development) اand اincome اtax اhave اsignificantly اinfluenced اto اthe اgrowth اin اIndonesia. اIn اother
words, اeconomic اgrowth اof اIndonesia اwill اbe اmore اprogressive اwith اthe اraise اof اgovernment
expendituresاandاincomeاtax.ا
Key words: economic growth, government expenditure, and income tax.
This thesis has been presented in front of the examiners in the Thesis Examination and
successfully passed the Thesis Examination on January 27, 2014.
The Abstract has been approved by the advisor and examiners
1.
2.
3.
Signature
FullName
Dr.H.HefrizalاHandra,M.Soc.Sc
Prof.H.اSjafrizal,اSE.MA
Approvedاby,
HeadاofاDepartmentا:ااااDr,اH.HefrizalاHandra,اM.Soc.Sc
NIP.ا196510201993021001
Drs.اH.Masrizal,اM.Soc.Sc
Signature
TheاAlumnusاhasاregisteredاtoاtheاfaculty/UniversityاandاhasاobtainedاTheاAlumnusاRegister
Numberا:
UniversityاAlumnusاRegistrationاNoا:
OfficerFaculty/University
NameااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااSignature
FacultyاAlumnusاRegistrationاNoا:
NameااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااSignature
Appendixاا1.4اMulticollinearityاTest................................................................ااا71
Appendixاا1.5اNormalityاTest...........................................................................ااا73
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1.1
Background
Economicاdevelopmentاisاanاabsoluteاphaseاthatاshouldاbeاdoneاbyاeveryاnationاto
improveاprosperity.اTheاimplementationاofاeconomicاdevelopmentاisاneverاapartاfromاthe
increase اin اincome اor اwe اcalled اeconomic اgrowth. اEconomic اgrowth اand اeconomic
development اare اalmost اsame اbut اthey اare اfundamentally اdifferent. اEconomic اgrowth اis
increaseاinاaverageاincomeاofاanاeconomy,اwhileاeconomicاdevelopmentاisاtheاincreaseاin
welfareاofاpeopleاofاthatاeconomy.
EconomicاGrowthااisاanاincreaseاinاaاcountry'sاrealاlevelاofاnationalاoutputاwhichاcan
be اcaused اby اan اincrease اin اthe اquality اand اquantity اof اresources, اan اimprovement اin
technology اorاinاanotherاwayاanاincreaseاinاtheاvalueاofاgoodsاandاservicesاproducedاby
everyاsectorاofاtheاeconomy.ا
EconomicاGrowthاcanاbeاmeasuredاbyاanاincreaseاinاaاcountry'sاGDP(اgrossاdomestic
product).“اEconomicاgrowthاisاaاprocess,اnotاanاeconomicاpictureاinاaاgivenاperiod,اthereاare
developmentاorاchangesاandاuseاofاtime”(اBoediono,ا1992).
Indonesia’s اeconomic اgrowth اhas اbeen اup اand اdown اin اover اrecent اdecades, اin
accordance اwith اthe اconditions اof اthe اworld اeconomy. اNational اincome اis اa اmeasure اof
economic اgrowth, اwhich اis اshowed اby اfluctuating اgrowth. اThe اeconomic اcondition اof
Indonesia اas اa اdeveloping اcountry اhas اnot اreached اsteady اstate اconditions اin اwhich اan
economyاisاalreadyاinاaاstableاandاlessاsusceptibleاtoاshocks.
Indonesia’sاeconomicاgrowthاisاinfluencedاbyاtheاvariousاshocks.اShocksاthatاmake
Indonesian’sاeconomyاisاdisruptedاeconomicاcrisisاofا1998,اnamelyاinflationا78ا%اandاGDP
decreasedاbyاapproximatelyا11اpercent.اInا2008اtheاworldاeconomyاwasاinاrecessionاor
globalاeconomicاrecession,اtriggeredاbyاfinancialاturmoilاinاtheاunitedاstates.اThisاfinancial
crisisاhitاcountriesاaroundاtheاworldاincludesاIndonesia.اTheاimpactاofاthisاcrisisاinاIndonesia
wasاmarkedاbyاtheاsideاofاstateاpending,اstateاspendingاonاstateاbudgetاallocationاinا2009
wasاestimatedاtoاincreaseاbyاRpا51,8اtrillion,اcompareاtoاtheاrealizationاofاtheاstateاbudgetاof
2008اwithاtotalاexpendituresاsetاatاRpا1,037.1اtrillion(ا19.5اpercentاofاGDP),اdrivenاbyاan
increase اin اcentral اgovernment اspending اfor اRp ا23.74 اtrillion اand اthe اallocation اof
expenditureاtoاtheاregionاofا28.06اtrillionاwhenاcomparedاwithاtheاrealizationاofاtheا2008
budgetاtheاgovernmentاhasاbeenاableاtoاanticipateاtheاsituation,اsoاthatاeconomicاgrowthاin
Indonesiaاisاrelativelyاsafe,اaroundا6,38%(اDataاBPS,ا2008).
اIndonesiaاisاbetterاequippedاtoاsurviveاinاthisاtimeاofاcrisisاbecauseاofاtheاexperience
learnedاfromاpreviousاcrisis.اAاcountryاmustاhas اaاgovernmentاthatاservesاasاaاeconomic
dampening اand اpolitical اturmoil اboth اfrom اdomestic اand اabroad. اDampers اare اable اto
stabilizeاtheاturmoilاinاtheاsenseاofاaاmoreاconduciveاsituationاthroughاvariousاpolicies.
Governmentاisاaاveryاimportantاactorاinاtheاeconomyاofاaاcountry.اAnاeconomicاactivityاwill
beاoptimalاifاthereاisاaاgovernmentاactivityاthereاin.
EconomicاgrowthاinاIndonesiaاisاstillاatاtheاdevelopmentاstage.اGovernmentاspending
onاGovernmentاactivitiesاthatاincludeاspendingاinاtheاpoliticalاsphereاasاwellاasاinاtheاfieldاof
economyاwhereاeverythingاhasاplannedاinاtheاbudgetاrevenueاandاexpenditureاofاtheاstate
budget.اManagingاsourcesاofاrevenueاandاgovernmentاspending,اgovernmentاcanاmakeاa
policyاtoاincreaseاeconomicاgrowthاsuchاasاFiscalاPolicy.
FiscalاPolicyاisاtheاgovernmentاpolicyاwhichاincluded اgovernmentاexpenditureاand
taxesاinاcollaborationاwithاtheاmonetaryاpolicyاwhoseاobjectiveاwasاtoاaccelerateاeconomic
growth. ا اGovernment اexpenditure اconsists اof اrecurrent اexpenditure اand اdevelopment
expenditure.
Recurrentاexpenditureاisاexpenditureاthatاusedاforاmaintenanceاandاoperationاofاa
government اthat اincludes اspending اon اpersonnel, اgoods اexpenditures, اinterest اpayments,
subsidiesاandاotherاroutineاexpenses.اThroughاroutine اexpenses,اtheاgovernmentاcanاcarry
out اits اmission اin اorder اto اmaintain اthe اsmooth اimplementation اof اthe اgovernment, اthe
operations اand اmaintenance اof اstate اassets, اGovernment's اresponsibility اto اthird اparties,
protection اof اthe اpoor اand اunderprivileged اand اmaintain اeconomic اstability
(Mangkoesoebroto,ا1994).
Development اexpenditure اis اexpenditure اincurred اto اfinance اdevelopment اin اthe
economic, اsocial, اand اpublic اand اthat اis اto اraise اcapital اin اthe اform اof اcommunity
developmentاbothاphysicalاandاnon-physicalاinfrastructureاisاimplementedاinاaاgivenاperiod.
Budgetاphysicalاandاnon-physicalاdevelopmentاisاalwaysاadjustedاtoاtheاfundsاmobilized.
Theاfundsاareاallocatedاtoاtheاvariousاfieldsاinاaccordanceاwithاtheاprioritiesاthatاhaveاbeen
planned.اTheاroleاofاtheاdevelopmentاbudgetاisاmoreاemphasisاonاeffortsاtoاcreateاaاstable
andاconduciveاconditionsاforاtheاcontinuityاofاtheاprocessاofاeconomicاrecoveryاbyاproviding
aاstimulusاtoاtheاgrowthاofاtheاnationalاeconomy.اInاconnectionاwithاtheاmanagementاofاthe
overall اstate اbudget اwith اlimited اfinancial اresources اavailable, اthe اachievement اof
developmentاgoalsاshouldاbeاasاoptimalاasاpossible(اNotaاKeuanganاdanاAPBN,ا2004).
Taxes اhave اa اvery اimportant اrole اin اthe اlife اof اthe اstate. اParticularly اin اthe
implementation اof اdevelopment اbecause اthe اtaxes اa اsource اof اstate اrevenue اto اfund اall
expensesاincludingاtheاexpensesاofاgovernment.اWhetherاit'sاforاrecurrentاexpendituresاand
developmentاexpenditures.
AccordingاtoاWaluyo(ا2006),اhighاeconomicاgrowthاwillاincreaseاtheاrevenueاofاthe
governmentاofاtaxes(اVATاandاincomeاtax)اasاwellاasاprovidingاemploymentاandاearningsاor
savingاforeignاexchange.
Since اthe اpurpose اof اtaxation اand اgovernment اexpenditure, اboth اrecurrent اand
developmentاareاtoاsupportاnationalاeconomicاactivityاinاmaintainingاtheاmomentumاofاhigh
economicاgrowth,اandاimproveاtheاwelfareاofاtheاwholeاpeopleاofاIndonesia.اThereاforeاthe
role اofاgovernment اin اtheاfieldاoffiscal اpolicy اto اaccelerate اeconomic اgrowth,اtheاauthors
triedاtoاexamineااhowاtheاeffectاofاfiscalاpolicyاonاeconomicاgrowth,اinاIndonesia.Inاthisاcase
theاgovernmentاfiscalاpolicyاareاgovernmentاexpenditureاandاtaxes.
Basedاonاtheاaboveاassumptions,اFiscalاpolicyاisاaاgovernmentاpolicyاcanاimpactاof
activitiesاagainstاtheاgovernmentاinاrunningاinاtheاfieldاofاtheاeconomyاinاindonesia.ااtoاthe
authorsاareاinterestedاinاdoingاresearchاtoاtakeاtheاtitleاofا
“The Effect Of Fiscal Policy On Economic Growth : Case Study In Indonesia”.
1.2 Research Question
Basedاonاtheاaboveاexplanation,اtheاissuesاtoاbeاanalyzedاinاthisاstudyاare:
1. How اdoes اgovernment اrecurrent اexpenditure اinfluence اeconomic اgrowth اin
Indonesia?
2. How اdoes اgovernment اdevelopment اexpenditure اinfluence اeconomic اgrowth اin
Indonesia?
3. HowاdoesاtaxesاinfluenceاeconomicاgrowthاinاIndonesia?
1.3 Research objectives
Inاaccordanceاwithاtheاaboveاproblemsاtheاpurposeاofاthisاstudyاwereاto:
1. Toاexamineاtheاeffectاofاgovernment اrecurrentاexpenditureاonاeconomicاgrowthاin
Indonesia;
2. Toاexamineاtheاeffectاofاgovernmentاdevelopmentاexpenditureاonاeconomicاgrowth
inاIndonesia;
3. ToاexamineاtheاeffectاofاtaxesاonاeconomicاgrowthاinاIndonesia.
1.4 Research Advantage
Theاadvantages ofاthisاresearchاare:
1. For اI اand اmyself, اto اimprove اmy اability اin اwriting اreport اand اdoing اresearch,
especiallyاinاmonetaryاeconomics,اparticularlyاfiscalاpolicy.
2. Forاgovernmentاasاinputاforاfiscalاpolicy.
3. Asاaاreferenceاforاotherاresearcherاwhoاareاinterestedاtoاstudyاinاtheاsameاfieldاwith
theاapproachاadاscopeاareاdifferent.