S BIO 1200051 Bibliography
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Acar, O. Turkmen, L., & Roychoudhury, A. (2010). Student Difficulties in SocioScintific Argumentation and Decision-Making Research Findings: Crosing
The Borders of Two Research Lines. International Journal of Science
Education. 32, (9), 1191-1206
Afisha, Helen M. (2015). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning terhadap
Kemampuan Berargumentasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. FKIP: Universitas
Lampung
Alexiandre, M. P. J. (2008). Designing Argumentation Learning Environments.
Argumentation in Science Education: Perspective from Classroom-Based
Research. Tallhasse: Springer
Anderson, L.W. & Kartwholl,D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching,
and
Assessing. (a revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives). New York: Addison Wisley Longman. Inc.
Arikunto, Suhasimi. (1999). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Arikunto, Suhasimi (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik Edisi
Revisi 2010. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific Arguments As Learning Artifacts:
Designing For Learning From The Web With KIE. International Journal Of
Science Education, 22(8), 797–817.
Bulu, S. T., & Pedersen, S. (2010). Scaffolding Middle School Students’ Content
Knowledge And Illustrated Problem Solving In A Problem-Based
Hypermedia Learning Environment. Educational Technology Research and
Development, 58, 507–529.
Campbell, N. A., Reece, J. B., Gain, L. M., Wasserman, S. A., (2008). Biology
Eight Edition. San Fransisco: Pearson Benjamin Cummings
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students’ Questions And Discursive Interaction:
Their Impact On Argumentation During Collaborative Group Discussions
In Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 883–908.
Dahar, Wilis Ratna (1998). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga
Daud. (2013). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Materi Ekosistem Melalui Penerapan
Media Mindmanager dan Media Powerpointpada Siswa Kelas X SMA
Negeri 9 Marusu Kabupaten Maros. FPMIPA: Universitas Negeri Makasar
Adita Fadhlun Rusyda, 2016
PENGARUH PERTANYAAN PENGARAH TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN BERARGUMENTASI DAN
HUBUNGANNYA DENGAN PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA SMA PADA MATERI EKOSISTEM
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
75
Dawson, V & Venville, G.J. (2009). High School Student Informal Reasoning and
Argumentation About Biotechnology: An Indicator of Science Literacy.
International Journal of Science Education
Dawson, V & Venville, G.J. (2010). Teaching Strategies for Developing Student’s
Argumentation Skills About Socioscientific Issues in High School Genetics.
Research in Science Education: 40 (1). 133-148
Ekanara, Bambang. (2011). Hubungan Kemampuan Penalaran dengan
Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa pada Konsep Sistem Pencernaan Melalui
Problem Based Learning. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Dokumen
Skripsi (Tidak diterbitkan)
Ekanara, Bambang. (2014). Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa SMA (Studi tentang
Keterampilan Pembentukan Klaim Mengenai Isu Sosio-Saintifik SMA pada
Kelompok Budaya Sunda). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Dokumen
Tesis (Tidak diterbitkan)
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Tapping Into Argumentation:
Developments In The Application of Toulmin’s Argument. Pattern for
Studying Science Discourse. Science Education, 88, 915–933.
Fathoni, Toto.(2003). Penelitian Eksperimen. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia:
Tidak diterbitkan
Hake.(1999).
Analyzing
Change/Gain
Scores.
[Online].
http://www.physics.indiana.edu (diakses pada 8 Januari 2016).
Tersedia:
Hakyolu, H. & Bekiroglu, F.O (2011). Assessment of Student’s Science
Knowledge Levels and Their Invovlement with Argumentation. International
Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 2(1), 264368
Henderson, J. B., Osborne, J., MacPherson, A., & Szu, E. (2014). A New Learning
Progression For Student Argumentation In Scientific Contexts. California:
Stanford University.
Inch, E.S(2006). Critical Thingking and Communication: The Use of Reason in
Argument (Fifth Ed). Boston: Pearson Education
Indargani, Taurusina. (2015). Pengaruh Penerapan Argumentasi Ilmiah
Terstruktur terhadap Persepsi Siswa tentang Hakikat Sains dan
Keterampilan Berargumentasi dalam Topik Sistem Transportasi.
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Dokumen Skripsi (Tidak diterbitkan)
Jhonson, Raven. (2006). Biology 6th Edition. Tersedia:www.biocourse.com [17
Februari 2016]
76
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Rasional Kurikulum 2013.
Jakarta: Depdikbud
Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as Argument: Implications for Teaching and Learning
Scientific Thingking. Science Education, 77, 319-337
Kuhn, D., Crowell, A., & Yanklowitz, S. (2010). Effects of a dialogic
argumentation Curriculum on Middle-School Expository Writing.
Manuscript Submitted for Publication
Kuhn, D. (2008). Arguing on The Computer. A Microgenetic Study of Developing
Argument Skills in A Computer-supported Environment. Child
Development, 79, 1311-1329
Kuhn, D., & Udell, W (2003). The Development of Arguments Skills. Child
Development, 74(5), 1245-1260
McNeill & Kneight. (2012). Supporting Students’ Construction Of Scientific
Explanations By Fading Scaffolds In Instructional Materials. Journal of the
Learning Sciences, 15, 153–191.
McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2012). Teachers' Pedagogical Content
Knowledge Of Scientific Argumentation: The Impact Of Professional
Development On K-12 Teachers. Science Education, 97, 937-972.
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., & Krajcik, J. (in press). Supporting Student’s
Construction Of Scientific Explanations By Fading Scaffolds In
Instructional Materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences.
Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who Reason Well? Two Studies Of Informed
Reasoning Among Children Of Different Grade, Ability, And Knowledge
Levels.Cognition and Instruction, 14, (2), 139-178
Novak, J.D. (2008). The Promise of New Ideas and New Technology for
Improving Teaching and Learning. Cell Biology Education: Volume 2,
Hal.122–132.
Nursani, Zamzam (2012). Analisis Argumentasi & Penguasaan Konsep dalam
Menggambarkan Keterampilan Berfikir Sistem pada Pembelajaran
Fisiologi Manusia. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Dokumen Tesis
(Tidak diterbitkan)
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing The Quality Of
Argumentation In School Science. Journal Of Research In Science
Education, 41(10), 994–1020.
Patterson, W. (2011). Scientific Argument and Explanation: A necessary
distinction?. Stanford. USA: Science Education, 95, 627-638
77
Purwanto. (2001). Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung:
Remaja Rosdakarya
Rahmawati, Resmi.(2014). Hubungan Kemampuan Argumentasi dengan Tingkat
Pemahaman Siswa pada Siswa Kelas X MIA SMA Negeri 9 Bandung.
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Dokumen Skripsi (Tidak diterbitkan).
Sadler, T. D. & Zeidler D. L. (2005). Beyond STS: A Research-Based Framework
for Socioscientific Issues Education. Science Education, 89, (3), 357-377
Sadler, T. D. &Fowler S. R. (2006). A Treshold Model of Content Knowledge
Transfer for Socioscientific Argumentation. Science Education, 90, (6), 9861004
Sampson, P(2011). Argument-driven Inquiry as A Way to Help Students Learn
How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft Written
Arguments: An Exploratory Study. Tallahasse, USA: Science Education, 95,
217-257
Schworm, F (2007). Learning Argumentation Skills Through The Use Of Prompts
For Self-explaining Examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 285–
296.
Setiyaningsih, Y. 1993. Kajian Elemen-elemen Argumen pada Karya Ilmiah
Mahasiswa S2 Pendidikan Bahasa IKIP Malang. IKIP Malang: Tidak
Diterbitkan
Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta:
Rineka Cipta
Sriasih, S. A. P. 2000. Perkembangan Struktur Wacana Tulis Argumentatif Siswa
Sekolah Dasar Lab. STKIP Singaraja. Universitas Negeri Malang: Tidak
Diterbitkan
Subardi. (2009). Biologi untuk Kelas X SMA dan MA. Jakarta: Pusat Perubukuan
DepartemenPendidikan Nasional.
Sugiyono. (2005). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung:
Alfabeta
Sulistyorini, A. (2009). Biologi 1 untuk Sekolah Menengah Atas/ Madrasah
Aliyah Kelas X. Jakarta: Pusat Perubukuan Departemen Pendidikan
Nasional.
Suryabrata, S. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada
78
Timawati.
(2012).
Penguasaan
Konsep.
[Online].
Tersedia:
http://kekeislearning/2012/09/ penguasaankonsep.html (Desember 2015)
Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Udell, W. (2007). Coordinating Own and Other Perspective in Arguments.
Journal of Experimental Education. 77: 339-366
Venville & Dawson. (2009). The Impact Of A Classroom Intervention On Grade
10 Students’ Argumentation Skills, Informal Reasoning, And Conceptual
Understanding Of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47,
952–977. Doi: 10.1002/tea.20358 Zangori
Wang, Chia-Yu. (2014). Scaffolding Middle Scholl Students’ Construction of
Scientific Explanations: Comparing a cognitive versus a metacognitive
evaluation approach. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 237271. Hsinchu: Taiwan
Winkel, W.S. (1991). Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Grasindo
Woolfolk, A. E., & Nicolich, L. (2004). Educational Psychology for Teacher.
Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall
Zaini, dkk (2004). Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif. Yogyakarta: CTSD
Acar, O. Turkmen, L., & Roychoudhury, A. (2010). Student Difficulties in SocioScintific Argumentation and Decision-Making Research Findings: Crosing
The Borders of Two Research Lines. International Journal of Science
Education. 32, (9), 1191-1206
Afisha, Helen M. (2015). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning terhadap
Kemampuan Berargumentasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. FKIP: Universitas
Lampung
Alexiandre, M. P. J. (2008). Designing Argumentation Learning Environments.
Argumentation in Science Education: Perspective from Classroom-Based
Research. Tallhasse: Springer
Anderson, L.W. & Kartwholl,D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching,
and
Assessing. (a revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives). New York: Addison Wisley Longman. Inc.
Arikunto, Suhasimi. (1999). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Arikunto, Suhasimi (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik Edisi
Revisi 2010. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific Arguments As Learning Artifacts:
Designing For Learning From The Web With KIE. International Journal Of
Science Education, 22(8), 797–817.
Bulu, S. T., & Pedersen, S. (2010). Scaffolding Middle School Students’ Content
Knowledge And Illustrated Problem Solving In A Problem-Based
Hypermedia Learning Environment. Educational Technology Research and
Development, 58, 507–529.
Campbell, N. A., Reece, J. B., Gain, L. M., Wasserman, S. A., (2008). Biology
Eight Edition. San Fransisco: Pearson Benjamin Cummings
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students’ Questions And Discursive Interaction:
Their Impact On Argumentation During Collaborative Group Discussions
In Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 883–908.
Dahar, Wilis Ratna (1998). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga
Daud. (2013). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Materi Ekosistem Melalui Penerapan
Media Mindmanager dan Media Powerpointpada Siswa Kelas X SMA
Negeri 9 Marusu Kabupaten Maros. FPMIPA: Universitas Negeri Makasar
Adita Fadhlun Rusyda, 2016
PENGARUH PERTANYAAN PENGARAH TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN BERARGUMENTASI DAN
HUBUNGANNYA DENGAN PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA SMA PADA MATERI EKOSISTEM
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
75
Dawson, V & Venville, G.J. (2009). High School Student Informal Reasoning and
Argumentation About Biotechnology: An Indicator of Science Literacy.
International Journal of Science Education
Dawson, V & Venville, G.J. (2010). Teaching Strategies for Developing Student’s
Argumentation Skills About Socioscientific Issues in High School Genetics.
Research in Science Education: 40 (1). 133-148
Ekanara, Bambang. (2011). Hubungan Kemampuan Penalaran dengan
Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa pada Konsep Sistem Pencernaan Melalui
Problem Based Learning. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Dokumen
Skripsi (Tidak diterbitkan)
Ekanara, Bambang. (2014). Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa SMA (Studi tentang
Keterampilan Pembentukan Klaim Mengenai Isu Sosio-Saintifik SMA pada
Kelompok Budaya Sunda). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Dokumen
Tesis (Tidak diterbitkan)
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Tapping Into Argumentation:
Developments In The Application of Toulmin’s Argument. Pattern for
Studying Science Discourse. Science Education, 88, 915–933.
Fathoni, Toto.(2003). Penelitian Eksperimen. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia:
Tidak diterbitkan
Hake.(1999).
Analyzing
Change/Gain
Scores.
[Online].
http://www.physics.indiana.edu (diakses pada 8 Januari 2016).
Tersedia:
Hakyolu, H. & Bekiroglu, F.O (2011). Assessment of Student’s Science
Knowledge Levels and Their Invovlement with Argumentation. International
Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 2(1), 264368
Henderson, J. B., Osborne, J., MacPherson, A., & Szu, E. (2014). A New Learning
Progression For Student Argumentation In Scientific Contexts. California:
Stanford University.
Inch, E.S(2006). Critical Thingking and Communication: The Use of Reason in
Argument (Fifth Ed). Boston: Pearson Education
Indargani, Taurusina. (2015). Pengaruh Penerapan Argumentasi Ilmiah
Terstruktur terhadap Persepsi Siswa tentang Hakikat Sains dan
Keterampilan Berargumentasi dalam Topik Sistem Transportasi.
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Dokumen Skripsi (Tidak diterbitkan)
Jhonson, Raven. (2006). Biology 6th Edition. Tersedia:www.biocourse.com [17
Februari 2016]
76
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Rasional Kurikulum 2013.
Jakarta: Depdikbud
Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as Argument: Implications for Teaching and Learning
Scientific Thingking. Science Education, 77, 319-337
Kuhn, D., Crowell, A., & Yanklowitz, S. (2010). Effects of a dialogic
argumentation Curriculum on Middle-School Expository Writing.
Manuscript Submitted for Publication
Kuhn, D. (2008). Arguing on The Computer. A Microgenetic Study of Developing
Argument Skills in A Computer-supported Environment. Child
Development, 79, 1311-1329
Kuhn, D., & Udell, W (2003). The Development of Arguments Skills. Child
Development, 74(5), 1245-1260
McNeill & Kneight. (2012). Supporting Students’ Construction Of Scientific
Explanations By Fading Scaffolds In Instructional Materials. Journal of the
Learning Sciences, 15, 153–191.
McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2012). Teachers' Pedagogical Content
Knowledge Of Scientific Argumentation: The Impact Of Professional
Development On K-12 Teachers. Science Education, 97, 937-972.
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., & Krajcik, J. (in press). Supporting Student’s
Construction Of Scientific Explanations By Fading Scaffolds In
Instructional Materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences.
Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who Reason Well? Two Studies Of Informed
Reasoning Among Children Of Different Grade, Ability, And Knowledge
Levels.Cognition and Instruction, 14, (2), 139-178
Novak, J.D. (2008). The Promise of New Ideas and New Technology for
Improving Teaching and Learning. Cell Biology Education: Volume 2,
Hal.122–132.
Nursani, Zamzam (2012). Analisis Argumentasi & Penguasaan Konsep dalam
Menggambarkan Keterampilan Berfikir Sistem pada Pembelajaran
Fisiologi Manusia. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Dokumen Tesis
(Tidak diterbitkan)
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing The Quality Of
Argumentation In School Science. Journal Of Research In Science
Education, 41(10), 994–1020.
Patterson, W. (2011). Scientific Argument and Explanation: A necessary
distinction?. Stanford. USA: Science Education, 95, 627-638
77
Purwanto. (2001). Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung:
Remaja Rosdakarya
Rahmawati, Resmi.(2014). Hubungan Kemampuan Argumentasi dengan Tingkat
Pemahaman Siswa pada Siswa Kelas X MIA SMA Negeri 9 Bandung.
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Dokumen Skripsi (Tidak diterbitkan).
Sadler, T. D. & Zeidler D. L. (2005). Beyond STS: A Research-Based Framework
for Socioscientific Issues Education. Science Education, 89, (3), 357-377
Sadler, T. D. &Fowler S. R. (2006). A Treshold Model of Content Knowledge
Transfer for Socioscientific Argumentation. Science Education, 90, (6), 9861004
Sampson, P(2011). Argument-driven Inquiry as A Way to Help Students Learn
How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft Written
Arguments: An Exploratory Study. Tallahasse, USA: Science Education, 95,
217-257
Schworm, F (2007). Learning Argumentation Skills Through The Use Of Prompts
For Self-explaining Examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 285–
296.
Setiyaningsih, Y. 1993. Kajian Elemen-elemen Argumen pada Karya Ilmiah
Mahasiswa S2 Pendidikan Bahasa IKIP Malang. IKIP Malang: Tidak
Diterbitkan
Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta:
Rineka Cipta
Sriasih, S. A. P. 2000. Perkembangan Struktur Wacana Tulis Argumentatif Siswa
Sekolah Dasar Lab. STKIP Singaraja. Universitas Negeri Malang: Tidak
Diterbitkan
Subardi. (2009). Biologi untuk Kelas X SMA dan MA. Jakarta: Pusat Perubukuan
DepartemenPendidikan Nasional.
Sugiyono. (2005). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung:
Alfabeta
Sulistyorini, A. (2009). Biologi 1 untuk Sekolah Menengah Atas/ Madrasah
Aliyah Kelas X. Jakarta: Pusat Perubukuan Departemen Pendidikan
Nasional.
Suryabrata, S. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada
78
Timawati.
(2012).
Penguasaan
Konsep.
[Online].
Tersedia:
http://kekeislearning/2012/09/ penguasaankonsep.html (Desember 2015)
Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Udell, W. (2007). Coordinating Own and Other Perspective in Arguments.
Journal of Experimental Education. 77: 339-366
Venville & Dawson. (2009). The Impact Of A Classroom Intervention On Grade
10 Students’ Argumentation Skills, Informal Reasoning, And Conceptual
Understanding Of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47,
952–977. Doi: 10.1002/tea.20358 Zangori
Wang, Chia-Yu. (2014). Scaffolding Middle Scholl Students’ Construction of
Scientific Explanations: Comparing a cognitive versus a metacognitive
evaluation approach. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 237271. Hsinchu: Taiwan
Winkel, W.S. (1991). Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Grasindo
Woolfolk, A. E., & Nicolich, L. (2004). Educational Psychology for Teacher.
Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall
Zaini, dkk (2004). Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif. Yogyakarta: CTSD