ENZIM

ENZIM
Oleh:
Maria Ulfah, S.Si, M.Pd

JURUSAN PEND.BIOLOGI FPMIPA
IKIP PGRI SEMARANG

What Are Enzymes?





Most enzymes are
Proteins (tertiary
and quaternary
structures)
Act as Catalyst to
accelerates a reaction
Not permanently
changed in the

process

Enzymes
Are specific for
what they will
catalyze
 Are Reusable
 End in –ase
-Sucrase
-Lactase
-Maltase


Enzyme-Substrate Complex
The substance
(reactant) an
enzyme acts on is
the substrate

Substrate


Joins

Enzyme

Formation of an enzyme-substrate complex

How do enzymes
Work?
Enzymes work
by weakening
bonds which
lowers
activation
energy

Active Site


A restricted region of an enzyme

molecule which binds to the substrate
Active
Site
Substrate

Enzyme

The enzyme active site (features)





The catalytic site is relatively small compared
with the rest of the enzyme. Why are many
enzymes so big then?
The catalytic site is a three-dimensional entity
Substrates are bound to enzymes by multiple
weak, non-covalent interactions (electrostatic
bonds, hydrogen bonds, van der Waals

forces, hydrophobic interactions)

The specificity of binding depends on the
precisely defined arrangement of atoms in
an active site


Emil Fischer (over
100 years ago): came
up with the “lock and
key” hypothesis to
describe enzymesubstrate interactions

Active site of cytochrome P-450

Induced Fit

A change in
the shape of
an enzyme’s

active site
 Induced by the
substrate






“Induced fit” model: a
more refined model
that takes into
account the enzyme
assumes a
complimentary shape
to that of its substrate
only after substrate
binds to the enzyme.
More dynamic
scenario compared to

the lock and key
hypothesis

Induced Fit




A change in the configuration of an
enzyme’s active site (H+ and ionic
bonds are involved)
Induced by the substrate

substrate

Active Site
Enzyme

induced fit


What Affects Enzyme Activity?



Three factors:
1. Environmental Conditions
2. Cofactors and Coenzymes
3. Enzyme Inhibitors

1. Environmental Conditions
1. Extreme Temperature are the most
dangerous
- high temps may denature (unfold) the
enzyme.
2. pH (most like 6 - 8 pH near neutral)
3. Ionic concentration (salt ions)

Environmental factors affecting enzyme activity

2. Cofactors and Coenzymes

Inorganic substances (zinc, iron)
and vitamins (respectively) are
sometimes need for proper
enzymatic activity.
activity
 Example:
Iron must be present in the
quaternary structure hemoglobin in order for it to
pick up oxygen.


KINETIKA ENZIM

Michaelis-Menten model of
enzyme kinetics (Vmax & Km)
Key element in their model is the
existence of the ES complex
 Rate of catalysis (V) increases with
increasing [S], where V is defined as the
number of moles of product formed per

second






When enzyme concentrations are constant, V is
linearly proportional to [S] WHEN [S] IS SMALL.
At high [S] (when S is in vast excess of the
[enzyme]), V is nearly independent of [S]

The Michaelis-Menten equation

Km & Vmax
Km = the Michaelis constant
 Defined as the [substrate] at which the
reaction rate is half of its maximal value
 Used to define relative affinity of an
enzyme for its substrate

 The higher the Km value, the lower the
affinity


Vmax: describes the maximal rate of
product formation when [S] is high
 Under such conditions all of the existing
“pool” of enzyme active sites are full
 From Vmax an enzyme’s turnover
number can be determined (expressed
as the number of substrate molecules
converted into product per unit time)


Double-reciprocal
(lineweaver-Burk) plot







Used to calculate Km &
Vmax
Also used to characterize
mechanisms of enzyme
inhibition by specific
compounds
Data expressed as 1/V
versus 1/[S]: gives a
straight line

Calculating Km and Vmax

Allosteric enzymes do not conform
to Michaelis-Menten kinetics






Yield a sigmoidal curve on a V versus S
plot (not hyperbolic as seen under
Michaelis-Menten conditions)
Sigmoidal curve indicates cooperative
binding (binding of one molecule of S
affects affinity and binding of
additional S molecules)
Regulatory molecules can alter
activity of allosteric enzymes

INHIBITOR
ENZIM

Enzyme inhibition
For enzymes that obey Michaelis-Menten
laws, compounds that reversibly inhibit
enzyme activity can be kinetically
classified
 Consider two general types:


 Competitive

inhibitors
 Noncompetitive inhibitors

Competitive vs.
noncompetitive
inhibitors

Competitive inhibitors: are
chemicals that resemble an
enzyme’s normal substrate and
compete with it for the active site.
site

Substrate

Competitive inhibitor

Enzyme

Noncompetitive inhibitors:
Inhibitors that do not enter the
active site,
site but bind to another
part of the enzyme causing the
enzyme to change its shape,
shape which
in turn alters the active site.
site

Substrate
active site
altered

Enzyme

Noncompetitive
Inhibitor

Competitive inhibitors


Y intercept the same regardless of whether
inhibitor is present or absent, BUT the slope
differs between the two lines

Competitive inhibitors

Do not alter Vmax
 Increase Km
 Competitive inhibition can be overcome by
increasing substrate concentration
 Block substrate binding to the active site
of an enzyme


Examples of competitive inhibitors

Alcohol (alcohol dehydrogenase)
 UpCA (RNase)
 DHFR inhibitors (DNA metabolic inhibitor of
tumors)
 Sulfa drugs (anti-bacterial drugs)
 Physiological examples: feedback
inhibition, pancreatic trypsin inhibitor


Enzyme inhibition & automobile
antifreeze
Ethylene glycol (EG) is a constituent of
antifreeze
 EG not toxic but is converted to oxalic acid
which form crystals in the kidneys leading
to extensive tissue damage and renal
failure


First step of conversion of EG to oxalic
acid is its oxidation to an aldehyde by
alcohol dehydrogenase
 This reaction inhibited by ethanol which
competes with EG for binding to the
alcohol dehydrogenase


Inhibition of RNase
by UpCA
An example of a
typical competitive
inhibitor:
UpCA has a very
similar structure
to the genuine
substrate, but is
chemically unable
to undergo reaction.

Use of Enzyme inhibitors as anti-cancer drugs:

Folate (folic acid)

Transformation of folate to tetrahydrofolate catalyzed by dihydrofolate reductase:

eventually leads to synthesis of thymine nucleotides (DNA metabolism)
Competitive inhibitors of dihydrofolate reductase used in cancer treatment
(resemble folate, bind ~1000x tighter):

Sulfa Drugs
Resemble PABA in
structure
 Blocks metabolic
activity of bacteria


Examples of the Physiological (regulatory) Role of Enzyme Inhibitors
Feedback inhibition: The end-product of a biochemical pathway is similar to the
starting product and may (competitively) bind to and inhibit one of the enzymes
in the pathway:

Another example of regulatory competitive
inhibition: Inhibition
by Pancreatic Trypsin Inhibitor

Noncompetitive inhibitors


Plots converge on the X axis in the
presence or absence of inhibitor

Noncompetitive inhibitors
Do not alter Km
 Decrease Vmax
 Noncompetitive inhibition cannot be
overcome by adding excess substrate
 Bind to a site outside of catalytic site of
enzyme and act by decreasing the
turnover number of an enzyme


In noncompetitive inhibition
why is Vmax decreased while
Km remains unchanged?

The inhibitor lowers the concentration of
functional enzyme






The remaining “uninhibited” enzyme behaves
like a more dilute solution of that enzyme
(assumes [inhibitor] is limiting)
In other words, the substrate can still bind to
enzyme alone or enzyme complexed with the
inhibitor. But only free enzyme will catalyze
the reaction.
Since the pool of free enzyme is lower in
presence of inhibitor, Vmax will also be lower

Irreversible Enzyme Inhibitors
Inhibitor becomes covalently linked to the
enzyme
 Attachment often occurs at the active site
 Examples: 5-fluorouracil, DIPF (nerve
gas), penicillin


Suicide Inhibitors







Irreversible enzyme inhibitors
Participate in the enzymatic reaction like the
substrate
At some point in the reaction they get ‘stuck’
and become permanently linked to the enzyme.
Example: 5-Fluorouracil, a suicide inhibitor
which targets thymidylate synthase and is used
in cancer treatement.

TS cannot catalyze 
reaction

5­Fluorouracil

Enzyme inhibitors as anti-bacterial drugs

Penicillin

Most Drugs
and
toxins are
enzyme
inhibitors:

Enzyme Inhibition – 1: Irreversible





Denaturation or
specific sites
Heavy metals
Usually try to avoid
 EDTA in



buffers

Occasionally useful
experimentally
 Hg-inactivation



If bind at active site:
 Substrate

can
reduce rate of
irreversible inhibition
 Rate(inhibition) vs.
[S] gives substrate
dissociation
constant, KS.

can

implicate Cys

Reversible Inhibition more interesting

Reversible inhibition
Competitive, non-competitive, mixed,
uncompetitive
 Each suggestive of a different mechanism
 Actually, operational definitions


 Depend

on kinetic behavior
 Point to be emphasized later

1. Competitive inhibition - 1


Poss. Mechanism: Binds in active site,
competing with substrate.
EI

Ki
S+E+
I
ES
E+P

Inhibition constant: in this
mechanism, this is a true
dissociation constant, because
EI is a “dead-end” complex
KM (apparent
dissociation, as ES can
progress…)

Competitive inhibition 2 - example


Succinate dehydrogenase
CO2-

CO2-

CH2

CH

CH2

CH

CO2-

CO2-

Succinate

CO2CH2
CO2malonate

Fumarate

Competitive inhibition 3: kinetics




Kinetics in the presence of many types of inhibitor
looks like Michaelis-Menton w/ modified constants:
app

Vmax
S
v  app
;
K
M   S
With competitive inhibition...

Vmax  S
app
v
; Vmax
Vmax
K M 1   I K i    S
K Mapp

Show the effect on a
double-reciprocal plot

Competitive inhibition 4 - plots


Kinetics show Vmax
unchanged
if [S] >> [I], drown out
inhibition

Affect (increase) KM
 amount

of S required
for 1/2 Vmax

in
d hi



bi
te

 Non-mathematically

1/v0
-1/KM

Slope =
KM/Vmax

1/Vmax
1/[S]

Competitive inhibition 5: mechanism


Previously suggested mechanism was one of
several that lead to similar kinetic effects
 Perhaps



I is really an alternative substrate

Competitive inhibition defined operationally
 Often

don’t know the mechanism
 Any inhibitor that affects KM, but not Vmax


The “specificity” constant = kcat/KM is changed
 Some

use “specific inhibition” to avoid mechanistic
implication



Operational definition


Lower Vmax, without changing KM.



affect rate w/o affect substrate-binding
Very small addition to active site



-1/KM

Vmax = kcat[E0] can be lowered by


reducing kcat - non-competitive inhibition



reducing amount of active enzyme - irreversible inhibition

Rare: difficult to affect kcat w/o affecting KM.


1/Vmax

e.g. H+ or cation.
1/[S]
Remote inhibitor binding that affects exact positioning of catalytic
groups

Difficult to distinguish from irreversible inhibition




1/v0

Possible mechanisms




in



d h ib i
te

2. Non-competitive inhibition

More commonly, component of “mixed inhibition”.

3. Mixed inhibition
Operational definition
Lower Vmax,



also raise KM, EIS more likely
to dissociate than ES

bi
te

d



1/v0

-1/KM

in
hi



1/Vmax
1/[S]

4. Uncompetitive inhibition






Operational: Km and Vmax are
changed by the same factor.
Possible mechanism: Inhibitor
te
i
binds to ES complex, not at all to 1/v hib
0 in
free-E.
d
1/Vmax
Naturally rare:
-1/K
 Inhibition

of myo-inositol
monophosphatase by Li+ antidepressant



Experimental product inhibition
often uncompetitive

M

1/[S]

Classification of Inhibitors according to
effect on kinetic parameters
Vapp/ Vapp
KMapp
Competitive

Yes

No

i.e. only KM changed

Uncompetitive

No

Yes

Vmax
& KM changed by
corresponding amounts giving
/ / double- reciprocal plots

Mixed

Yes

Yes

Enzymes
Without Enzyme
With Enzyme

Free
Energy

Free energy of activation
Reactants

Products

Progress of the reaction

Active site involves amino acids far
apart in the primary sequence of a
protein (example: lysozyme)

Catalytic sites form clefts or
crevices







Substrate molecules bound within cleft
Water (unless involved in catalysis) is
normally excluded
Overall nonpolar character of cleft can
enhance binding of substrate
Cleft may also contain polar residues which
may take on catalytic properties within this
nonpolar microenvironment (exception to the
rule regarding hydrophobic “core” present in
many globular proteins)