HUBUNGAN PERSEPSI GURU TERHADAP PERUBAHAN KURIKULUM DAN PENGALAMAN MENGAJAR DENGAN KINERJA GURU SMA DI KECAMATAN LUBUK PAKAM.
2008
TESIS
HUBUNGAN PERSEPSI GURU TERHADAP
PERUBAHAN KURIKULUM DAN PENGALAMAN
MENGAJAR DENGAN KINERJA GURU SMA DI
KECAMATANLUBUKPAKAM
Disusun dan diajukan oleh :
REH MALEM GINTING
NIM. 025020120
T lah dipertahankan di depan Panitia Ujian Tesis Pada tanggal 09 Juni 2008 dan
dinyatakan telah memenuhi salah satu syarat untuk memperoleh Gelar Magister
Pendidikan Program Studi Teknologi Pendidikan
Medan, 09 Juni 2008
Menyetujui
Tim Pembimbing
~
Pembimbing I
Dr. Julaga Situmorang, M.Pd
NIP.130686932
Prof. Drs. Dian Armanto, M.Sc.MA.P.hD
NIP. 131765634
Ketua Program Studi
Tekno ogi Pendidikan
Prof. Dr. Muhammad Badiran, M.Pd
NIP. 130535891
Universitas
Prof. Dr. Belfrik Manullang
NIP.130518778
PERSETUJUAN DEW AN PENGUJI
UJIAN TESIS MAGISTER PENDIDIKAN
NAMA
NO
1.
Dr. Julaga Situmorang, M.Pd
NIP. 130686932
(Pembimbing I)
2.
Prof. Drs. Dian Armanto, Msc.MA.P.hD
NIP.131765634
(Pembimbing II)
3.
Prof. Dr. Harun Sitompul, M.Pd
NIP.131570453
(Penguji)
4.
Pof. Dr. Abdul Hamid K, M.Pd
NIP.130935475
(Penguji)
5.
Dr. Sabat Siagian, M.Pd
NIP.l31662734
(Penguji)
TANDA TANGAN
ABSTRAK
Reh Malem Ointing, NIM : 025020120. Hubungan Persepsi Guru Terhadap
Perubahan Kurikulum dan Pengalaman Mengajar dengan Kineija Guru SMA di
Lubuk Pakam. Tesis. Medan: Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Medan,
Juni 2008.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui ( 1) hubungan persepsi guru terhadap
perubahan kurikulum dengan kineija guru SMA di Lubuk Pakam, (2) mengetahui
hubungan pengalaman mengajar dengan kineija guru SMA di Lubuk Pakam, (3)
mengetahui hubungan persepsi guru terhadap perubahan kurikulum dan
pengalaman mengajar secara bersama-sama dengan kineija guru SMA di Lubuk
Pakam.
Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan
kuantitatif dengan jenis penelitian korelasional karena melihat hubungan antara
variabel penelitian. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh guru SMA baik
negeri dan swasta yang ada di Lubuk Pakam pada tahun pelajaran 2007/2008 yang
beijumlah 3 73 orang. Sampel penelitian ini sebanyak 44 orang yang diambil
berdasarkan stratified random sampling. Instrumen pengumpulan data adalah
koesioner dan dokumen. Untuk kineija guru diukur dengan kuesioner yang diisi
oleh siswa sedangkan untuk persepsi diukur dengan koesioner yang diisi oleh
guru serta untuk pengalaman mengajar diukur dengan dokumen sekolah
.lnstrumen memiliki keterandalan r1 = 0, 762 untuk instrumen persepsi guru
terhadap perubahan kurikuium, r2 0,938 untuk iiisttUtnen kinerja gUrti Tekrrik
Analisis yang digunakan adalah regresi linier dan regresi ganda dan korelasi
product moment dan korelasi ganda serta korelasi parsial.
=
Temuan penelitian ini adalah : ( 1) terdapat hubungan yang positif dan signifikan
antara persepsi guru terhadap perubahan kurikulum dengan kineija guru SMA di
Lubuk Pakam dengan koefisien korelasi 0,784; (2) Terdapat hubungan yang
positif dan signifikan antara pengalaman mengajar dengan kineija guru SMA di
Lubuk Pakam dengan koefisien korelasi 0,582; (3) Terdapat hubungan yang
positif dan signifikan antara persepsi guru terhadap perubahan kurikulum dan
pengalaman mengajar secara bersama-sama dengan kineija guru SMA di Lubuk
Pakam yang ditunjukkan dengan koefisien korelasi ganda sebesar 0, 786.
Koefisiert determinasi menunjukkan basil sebesar 0,618. Hal ini beratti 61,8 %
variasi kineija guru SMA di Lubuk Pakam, dapat dijelaskan melalui persepsi guru
terhadap perubahan kurikulum dan pengalaman mengajar secara bersama-sama
sedangkan sisanya sebesar 38,2 % dapat dijelaskan melalui variabel lain. Bentuk
hubungan persepsi guru terhadap perubahan kurikylum dengan kinerja guru SMA
di Lubuk Pakam melalui persamaan garis regresi Y = 55,55 + 7,13 Xt dan bentuk
hubungan pengalaman mengajar Adengan kineija guru SMA di Lubuk Pakam
melalui persamaan garis regresi Y = 25 + 1,25 X2. Sumbangan efektif persepsi
guru terhadap perubahan kurikulum sebesar 57,3 % dan sumbangan efektif
pengalaman mengajar 4,6 % terhadap kineija guru. Berdasarkan temuan dalam
penelitian ini, maka guru SMA di Lubuk Pakam perlu mendapatkan pemahaman
yang benar tentang perubahan kurikulum melalui diklat dan pelatihan sehingga
memiliki persepsi yang baik terhadap perubahan kurikulum yang pada akhimya
dapat meningkatkan kinerja guru SMA di Lubuk Pakam.
ABSTRACT
Reh Malem. Reg. No: 025020120. The relationship between the teacher's
perception to the changes of curriculum and the experience of teaching with
performance learn SMA in Lubuk Pakam : Post Graduate Program State
University of Medan, June 2008.
The objectivities of this research is to know (1) the relationship between The
teacher's perception to the changes of curriculum with Performance learn SMA in
Lubuk Pakam, (2) the relationship between The experience of teaching with
Performance learn SMA in Lubuk Pakam, (3) the relationship between both The
teacher's perception to the changes of curriculum and The experience of teaching
as together with Performance learn SMA in Lubuk Pakam.
In this study, the writer conduced the data by using descriptive method with the
correlation research to figure out the relationship between the variables of the
research. The population of the study was all of teacher in SMA Lubuk Pakam at
the 2007/2008 as many as 373 cadets. The samples of this study were 44 cadets,
selected by using stratified random sampling. The instruments of the data were
questioner and document. Performance learns and the teacher's perception to the
changes of curriculum was measured by using the questioner. The reliability of
calculation showed r, = 0,762 for the teacher's perception to the changes of
curriculum instrument, then r2 = 0,938 for performance learn instrument. The
study was used linier regression and double regression and product moment
correlation and double correlation and partial correlation of analysis technique.
The findings of study were: (1) there was a positive correlation between The
teacher's perception to the changes of curriculum with Performance learn SMA in
Lubuk Pakam which was showed by the coefficient correlation as 0, 784; (2) there
was a positive correlation between of teaching with performance learn SMA in
Lubuk Pakam which was showed by the coefficient correlation as 0,582; (3) there
was a positive correlation between both the teacher's perception to the changes of
curriculum and the experience of teaching as together with performance learn
SMA in Lubuk Pakam shown by coexistence of double coefficient correlation as
0,786. The determination coefficient showed the results 0,618 it meant 61,8 %
variation which affected performance learn SMA in Lubuk Pakam, it could be
explained by the teacher's perception to the changes of curriculum and the
experience of teaching as together and 38,2 ~ left come from other variable. The
result of variants analysis shows that regretion performance learn SMA in Lubuk
Pakam at the teacher's perception to the changes of curriculum was Y = 55,55 +
7,13 X 1 and regretion performance learn SMA in Lubuk Pakam at the experience
of teaching was Y = 25 + 1,25X2 means linier. The teacher's perception to the
changes of curriculum contribution reaches 57,3 % and the experience of teaching
contribution reach 4,6 %. According to the findings of the research, there teacher
SMA in Lubuk Pakam needs good understanding about changes the curriculum by
educational training and trainees with the result that good perception to the
changes of curriculum to improve performance learn SMA in Lubuk Pakam.
ii
DAFTARISI
Halaman
ABSTRAK..................................................................................................................... .i
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... ii
KATA PENGANTAR.................................................................................................. .iii
DAFTAR ISI ..................................................................................................................v
DAFTARTABEL ......................................................................................................... vii
DAFTAR GAMBAR.................................................................................................... ix
DAFTAR LAMPIRAN ................................................................................................. x
DAB I PENDAHULUAN
A. Latar Belakang....................................................................................................... 1
B. Identiftkasi Masalah ............................................................................................... 6
C. Pembatasan Masalah...............................................................................................6
D. Perumusan Masalah ................................................................................................ 7
E. Tujuan Penelitian................................................................................................... 7
F. Manfaat Penelitian................................................................................................. 8
DAB II KERANGKA TEORITIS, KERANGKA BERFIKIR DAN
PENGAJUAN HIPOTESIS
A. Deskripsi Teoretis.................................................................................................. 9
1. Hakikat Kineija Guru....................................................................................... 9
2. Hakikat Persepsi Guru Terhadap Perubahan Kurikulum ................................ 14
3. Hakikat Pengalaman Mengajar........................................................................ 31
4. Penelitian yang Relevan................................................................................... 34
B. Keran.gk.a Be.rfikir,. .•.•.•...........................•.....•.................•....................................... 35
v
C. Pengajuan Hipotesis Penelitian............................................................................. 40
DAB III METODE PENELITIAN
A. Tempat dan Waktu Penelitian................................................................................ 41
B. Metode Penelitian.................................................................................................. 41
C. Populasi dan Sampel Penelitian............................................................................. 41
D. Definisi Operasional dan Variabel Penelitian....................................................... .47
E. Teknik Pengum.pulan Dat:a............ "........................ ~·"
48
F. Uji Coba lnstrumen................................................................................................ 50
G. Teknik Analisis Data............................................................................................. 53
H. Hipotesis Statistik.................................................................................................. 57
DAB IV BASIL PENELITIAN
A. Deskripsi Data Penelitian....................................................................................... 58
B. Identifikasi Tingkat Kecenderungan V ariabel Penelitian...................................... 63
C. Uji Persyaratan. Analisis........................................................................................ 67
D. Pengujian Hipotesis Penelitian.............................................................................. 70
E. Pembahasan Hasil Penelitian................................................................................. 77
F. Keterbatasan Penelitian......................................................................................... 82
DAB V SIMPULAN, IMPLIKASI DAN SARAN
A. Simpulan................................................................................................................ 84
B. Implikasi. ............................................................................................................... 85
C. Saran........................................ "................................................. "' ............................ 89
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.................................................................................................... 91
Lampiran-lampiran...................................................................................................... 93
Vl
DAFTAR TABEL
TabeJ
1. Distribusi Jumlah Guru SMA dan Mata Pelajarannya di Lubuk Pakam ..................... 42
2. Distribusi Guru Berdasarkan Kelompok Mata Pelajaran .............................................. 43
3. Penetapan Sampel Penelitian ........................................................................................ 46
4. Kisi-kisi Angket Persepsi Guru Terhadap Perubahan Kurikulum ................................ 49
5. Kisi-kisi instrumen Pengalaman Mengajar ................................................................... 50
6. Kisi-kisi instrumen Kineija Guru .................................................................................. 50
7. Kisi-kisi Angket Persepsi Guru Terhadap Perubahan Kurikulum yang sudah valid .... 52
8. Distribusi Frekuensi Skor kineija Guru (Y) .................................................................. 58
9. Distribusi Frekuensi Skor Persepsi Guru Terhadap Perubahan Kurikulum
TESIS
HUBUNGAN PERSEPSI GURU TERHADAP
PERUBAHAN KURIKULUM DAN PENGALAMAN
MENGAJAR DENGAN KINERJA GURU SMA DI
KECAMATANLUBUKPAKAM
Disusun dan diajukan oleh :
REH MALEM GINTING
NIM. 025020120
T lah dipertahankan di depan Panitia Ujian Tesis Pada tanggal 09 Juni 2008 dan
dinyatakan telah memenuhi salah satu syarat untuk memperoleh Gelar Magister
Pendidikan Program Studi Teknologi Pendidikan
Medan, 09 Juni 2008
Menyetujui
Tim Pembimbing
~
Pembimbing I
Dr. Julaga Situmorang, M.Pd
NIP.130686932
Prof. Drs. Dian Armanto, M.Sc.MA.P.hD
NIP. 131765634
Ketua Program Studi
Tekno ogi Pendidikan
Prof. Dr. Muhammad Badiran, M.Pd
NIP. 130535891
Universitas
Prof. Dr. Belfrik Manullang
NIP.130518778
PERSETUJUAN DEW AN PENGUJI
UJIAN TESIS MAGISTER PENDIDIKAN
NAMA
NO
1.
Dr. Julaga Situmorang, M.Pd
NIP. 130686932
(Pembimbing I)
2.
Prof. Drs. Dian Armanto, Msc.MA.P.hD
NIP.131765634
(Pembimbing II)
3.
Prof. Dr. Harun Sitompul, M.Pd
NIP.131570453
(Penguji)
4.
Pof. Dr. Abdul Hamid K, M.Pd
NIP.130935475
(Penguji)
5.
Dr. Sabat Siagian, M.Pd
NIP.l31662734
(Penguji)
TANDA TANGAN
ABSTRAK
Reh Malem Ointing, NIM : 025020120. Hubungan Persepsi Guru Terhadap
Perubahan Kurikulum dan Pengalaman Mengajar dengan Kineija Guru SMA di
Lubuk Pakam. Tesis. Medan: Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Medan,
Juni 2008.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui ( 1) hubungan persepsi guru terhadap
perubahan kurikulum dengan kineija guru SMA di Lubuk Pakam, (2) mengetahui
hubungan pengalaman mengajar dengan kineija guru SMA di Lubuk Pakam, (3)
mengetahui hubungan persepsi guru terhadap perubahan kurikulum dan
pengalaman mengajar secara bersama-sama dengan kineija guru SMA di Lubuk
Pakam.
Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan
kuantitatif dengan jenis penelitian korelasional karena melihat hubungan antara
variabel penelitian. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh guru SMA baik
negeri dan swasta yang ada di Lubuk Pakam pada tahun pelajaran 2007/2008 yang
beijumlah 3 73 orang. Sampel penelitian ini sebanyak 44 orang yang diambil
berdasarkan stratified random sampling. Instrumen pengumpulan data adalah
koesioner dan dokumen. Untuk kineija guru diukur dengan kuesioner yang diisi
oleh siswa sedangkan untuk persepsi diukur dengan koesioner yang diisi oleh
guru serta untuk pengalaman mengajar diukur dengan dokumen sekolah
.lnstrumen memiliki keterandalan r1 = 0, 762 untuk instrumen persepsi guru
terhadap perubahan kurikuium, r2 0,938 untuk iiisttUtnen kinerja gUrti Tekrrik
Analisis yang digunakan adalah regresi linier dan regresi ganda dan korelasi
product moment dan korelasi ganda serta korelasi parsial.
=
Temuan penelitian ini adalah : ( 1) terdapat hubungan yang positif dan signifikan
antara persepsi guru terhadap perubahan kurikulum dengan kineija guru SMA di
Lubuk Pakam dengan koefisien korelasi 0,784; (2) Terdapat hubungan yang
positif dan signifikan antara pengalaman mengajar dengan kineija guru SMA di
Lubuk Pakam dengan koefisien korelasi 0,582; (3) Terdapat hubungan yang
positif dan signifikan antara persepsi guru terhadap perubahan kurikulum dan
pengalaman mengajar secara bersama-sama dengan kineija guru SMA di Lubuk
Pakam yang ditunjukkan dengan koefisien korelasi ganda sebesar 0, 786.
Koefisiert determinasi menunjukkan basil sebesar 0,618. Hal ini beratti 61,8 %
variasi kineija guru SMA di Lubuk Pakam, dapat dijelaskan melalui persepsi guru
terhadap perubahan kurikulum dan pengalaman mengajar secara bersama-sama
sedangkan sisanya sebesar 38,2 % dapat dijelaskan melalui variabel lain. Bentuk
hubungan persepsi guru terhadap perubahan kurikylum dengan kinerja guru SMA
di Lubuk Pakam melalui persamaan garis regresi Y = 55,55 + 7,13 Xt dan bentuk
hubungan pengalaman mengajar Adengan kineija guru SMA di Lubuk Pakam
melalui persamaan garis regresi Y = 25 + 1,25 X2. Sumbangan efektif persepsi
guru terhadap perubahan kurikulum sebesar 57,3 % dan sumbangan efektif
pengalaman mengajar 4,6 % terhadap kineija guru. Berdasarkan temuan dalam
penelitian ini, maka guru SMA di Lubuk Pakam perlu mendapatkan pemahaman
yang benar tentang perubahan kurikulum melalui diklat dan pelatihan sehingga
memiliki persepsi yang baik terhadap perubahan kurikulum yang pada akhimya
dapat meningkatkan kinerja guru SMA di Lubuk Pakam.
ABSTRACT
Reh Malem. Reg. No: 025020120. The relationship between the teacher's
perception to the changes of curriculum and the experience of teaching with
performance learn SMA in Lubuk Pakam : Post Graduate Program State
University of Medan, June 2008.
The objectivities of this research is to know (1) the relationship between The
teacher's perception to the changes of curriculum with Performance learn SMA in
Lubuk Pakam, (2) the relationship between The experience of teaching with
Performance learn SMA in Lubuk Pakam, (3) the relationship between both The
teacher's perception to the changes of curriculum and The experience of teaching
as together with Performance learn SMA in Lubuk Pakam.
In this study, the writer conduced the data by using descriptive method with the
correlation research to figure out the relationship between the variables of the
research. The population of the study was all of teacher in SMA Lubuk Pakam at
the 2007/2008 as many as 373 cadets. The samples of this study were 44 cadets,
selected by using stratified random sampling. The instruments of the data were
questioner and document. Performance learns and the teacher's perception to the
changes of curriculum was measured by using the questioner. The reliability of
calculation showed r, = 0,762 for the teacher's perception to the changes of
curriculum instrument, then r2 = 0,938 for performance learn instrument. The
study was used linier regression and double regression and product moment
correlation and double correlation and partial correlation of analysis technique.
The findings of study were: (1) there was a positive correlation between The
teacher's perception to the changes of curriculum with Performance learn SMA in
Lubuk Pakam which was showed by the coefficient correlation as 0, 784; (2) there
was a positive correlation between of teaching with performance learn SMA in
Lubuk Pakam which was showed by the coefficient correlation as 0,582; (3) there
was a positive correlation between both the teacher's perception to the changes of
curriculum and the experience of teaching as together with performance learn
SMA in Lubuk Pakam shown by coexistence of double coefficient correlation as
0,786. The determination coefficient showed the results 0,618 it meant 61,8 %
variation which affected performance learn SMA in Lubuk Pakam, it could be
explained by the teacher's perception to the changes of curriculum and the
experience of teaching as together and 38,2 ~ left come from other variable. The
result of variants analysis shows that regretion performance learn SMA in Lubuk
Pakam at the teacher's perception to the changes of curriculum was Y = 55,55 +
7,13 X 1 and regretion performance learn SMA in Lubuk Pakam at the experience
of teaching was Y = 25 + 1,25X2 means linier. The teacher's perception to the
changes of curriculum contribution reaches 57,3 % and the experience of teaching
contribution reach 4,6 %. According to the findings of the research, there teacher
SMA in Lubuk Pakam needs good understanding about changes the curriculum by
educational training and trainees with the result that good perception to the
changes of curriculum to improve performance learn SMA in Lubuk Pakam.
ii
DAFTARISI
Halaman
ABSTRAK..................................................................................................................... .i
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... ii
KATA PENGANTAR.................................................................................................. .iii
DAFTAR ISI ..................................................................................................................v
DAFTARTABEL ......................................................................................................... vii
DAFTAR GAMBAR.................................................................................................... ix
DAFTAR LAMPIRAN ................................................................................................. x
DAB I PENDAHULUAN
A. Latar Belakang....................................................................................................... 1
B. Identiftkasi Masalah ............................................................................................... 6
C. Pembatasan Masalah...............................................................................................6
D. Perumusan Masalah ................................................................................................ 7
E. Tujuan Penelitian................................................................................................... 7
F. Manfaat Penelitian................................................................................................. 8
DAB II KERANGKA TEORITIS, KERANGKA BERFIKIR DAN
PENGAJUAN HIPOTESIS
A. Deskripsi Teoretis.................................................................................................. 9
1. Hakikat Kineija Guru....................................................................................... 9
2. Hakikat Persepsi Guru Terhadap Perubahan Kurikulum ................................ 14
3. Hakikat Pengalaman Mengajar........................................................................ 31
4. Penelitian yang Relevan................................................................................... 34
B. Keran.gk.a Be.rfikir,. .•.•.•...........................•.....•.................•....................................... 35
v
C. Pengajuan Hipotesis Penelitian............................................................................. 40
DAB III METODE PENELITIAN
A. Tempat dan Waktu Penelitian................................................................................ 41
B. Metode Penelitian.................................................................................................. 41
C. Populasi dan Sampel Penelitian............................................................................. 41
D. Definisi Operasional dan Variabel Penelitian....................................................... .47
E. Teknik Pengum.pulan Dat:a............ "........................ ~·"
48
F. Uji Coba lnstrumen................................................................................................ 50
G. Teknik Analisis Data............................................................................................. 53
H. Hipotesis Statistik.................................................................................................. 57
DAB IV BASIL PENELITIAN
A. Deskripsi Data Penelitian....................................................................................... 58
B. Identifikasi Tingkat Kecenderungan V ariabel Penelitian...................................... 63
C. Uji Persyaratan. Analisis........................................................................................ 67
D. Pengujian Hipotesis Penelitian.............................................................................. 70
E. Pembahasan Hasil Penelitian................................................................................. 77
F. Keterbatasan Penelitian......................................................................................... 82
DAB V SIMPULAN, IMPLIKASI DAN SARAN
A. Simpulan................................................................................................................ 84
B. Implikasi. ............................................................................................................... 85
C. Saran........................................ "................................................. "' ............................ 89
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.................................................................................................... 91
Lampiran-lampiran...................................................................................................... 93
Vl
DAFTAR TABEL
TabeJ
1. Distribusi Jumlah Guru SMA dan Mata Pelajarannya di Lubuk Pakam ..................... 42
2. Distribusi Guru Berdasarkan Kelompok Mata Pelajaran .............................................. 43
3. Penetapan Sampel Penelitian ........................................................................................ 46
4. Kisi-kisi Angket Persepsi Guru Terhadap Perubahan Kurikulum ................................ 49
5. Kisi-kisi instrumen Pengalaman Mengajar ................................................................... 50
6. Kisi-kisi instrumen Kineija Guru .................................................................................. 50
7. Kisi-kisi Angket Persepsi Guru Terhadap Perubahan Kurikulum yang sudah valid .... 52
8. Distribusi Frekuensi Skor kineija Guru (Y) .................................................................. 58
9. Distribusi Frekuensi Skor Persepsi Guru Terhadap Perubahan Kurikulum