d ipa 0809569 bibliography
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E.,
& Pintrinch, P. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and
Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New
York: Longman.
Aulls, M. W. & Shore, B. M. (2008). Inquiry in Education. The Conceptual
Foundations for Research as a Curricular Imperative. Volume 1. New
York: Lawrences Erlbaum Associates.
Boersma K., Goedhart, M., Jong, O. D., & Eijkelhof, H. (2005). Research and The
Quality of Science Education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Buck, G. A., Latta, M. A. M. & Pelecky, D. L. L. (2007). “Learning How to Make
Inquiry into Electricity and Magnetism Discernible to Middle Level
Teachers”. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 18, 377 - 397.
Case, K.N., Reagen, T.G., Campbell, P. & Case, C. W. (1998). “The Role of
Collaborative Inquiry and reflective Practice in Teacher Preparation”. The
Professional Educator. 21 (1), 1–16.
Chin, C. (2007). Multimodality in Teaching and Learning Science. Proceeding
The 1st International Seminar on Science Education. Science Education
Program. Bandung : Graduate Scholl Indonesia University of Education.
Chiu, M. H. & Lin, L. W. (2005). “Promoting Fourth Graders' Conceptual
Change of Their Understanding of Electric Current via Multiple
Analogies”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 42, (4), 429 - 464.
Degeng, I. N. S. (1989). Ilmu Pengajaran Taksonomi Variabel. Jakarta: P2LPTK
Depdikbud.
Demirci, N. & Cirkinoglu, A. (2004). “Determining Students' Preconception/ Misconceptions in Electricity and Magnetism”. Journal of
Turkish science education. 1, (2), 50 - 54.
Duit, R. (1991). “On the Role of Analogies and Metaphors in Learning
Science”. Science Education. 75, (6), 649 - 672.
Engelhardt, P. V. & Beichner, R. J. (2004). “Students' Understanding of Direct
Current Resistive Electrical Circuits”. American Journal Physics. 72, (1),
98 - 115.
Ennis, R. H. (1995). Critical Thinking. New Jersey: University of Illionis.
Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458.
Gentner, D. (1983). “Structure-Mapping: A Theoritical Framework for Analogy”.
Cognitive Science. 7, 155 - 170.
Glynn, S. M. (1995). “Conceptual Bridges: Using Analogies to Explain Scientific
Concepts”. Journal of The Science Teacher. 62, (9), 25-27.
87
Gluck, P. & Perkalskis, B. (2009). “Analog of Optical Elements for Sound Waves
in Air”. The Physics Teacher. 47, (2), 75 - 79.
Guisasola, J., Almudi, J. M. & Zubimendi, J. L. (2004). “Difficulties in Learning
The Introductory Magnetic Field Theory in The First Years of University”.
Science Ecucations. 88, (3), 443-464.
Haladyna, T. M. (1997). Writing Test Item to Evaluate Higher Order Thinking.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon a Viacom Company.
Lawson, A. E. (1993). The Importance of Analogy: A Prelude to the Special
Issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30, (10), 1213-1214.
Maloney, D. P., O’Kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J. & Heuvelen A. V. (2001).
“Surveying Student's Conceptual Knowledge of Electricity and
Magnetism”. American Journal Physics. 69, (7), 12 - 23.
Marzano, R. J. & Kendall, J. S. (2008). Designing and Assessing Educational
Objectives. Applying the New Taxonomy. California: Corwin Press.
Mukhopadhyay, S. C. (2006). “Teaching Electromagnetics at The
Undergraduate Level: a Comprehensive Approach”. European Journal of
Physics. 27, 727-742.
Narjaikaew, P., Emarat, N., Arayathanakul, K. & Cowie, B. (2005). Year-1 Thai
University Students’ Conceptions of Electricity and Megnetism. Physics
Educational Network of Thailand (PENThai) and The Centre for science
and Technology Education Research (CSTER).
Nasution, S. (2006). Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar dan Mengajar.
Bandung: Bina Aksara.
Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Creating Scientific Concepts. Massachusetts: A Bradford
Book The MIT Press.
NRC. (1996). National Science Education Standars. Washington: National
Academy Press.
NSTA. (1998). Standards for Science Teacher preparation. NSTA in collaboration
with the Association for the Education of Theachers in Science.
Oliva, J. M. (2005). “What Professional Knowledge Should we as Physics
Teachers have about The Use of Analogies?”. Journal Physics Teacher
Education. 3, (1), 11 – 16.
Pask, C. (2003). “Mathematics and the Science of Analogies. American Journal of
Physics. 71, (6), 526 – 534.
Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2005). A Guide for Educators to Critical Thinking
Competency Standards. www.criticalthinking.org.
Planinic, M. (2006). “Assessment of Difficulties of Same Conceptual areas from
Electricity and Magnetism Using The Conceptual Survey of Electricity and
magnetism”. American Journal of Physics. 74, (12), 1143 – 1148.
88
Podolefsky, N. S. & Finkelstein, N. D. (2006). “Use of Analogy in Learning
Physics: The Role of Representation”. Physics Review Special Topics,
Physics Education Research. 2, (020101), 1 – 10.
Renzulli, J., Gentry, M & Reis, S. (2004). “A Time and Place for Authentic
Learning”. Education Leadership. 62, (73-7)
Rothenstein, B. & Popescu, S. (2009). “Relativistic Velocity Addition Low from
Machine Gun Analogy”. The Physics Teacher. 47, (1), 43 – 45.
Rustaman, N. Y. (2005). Perkembangan Penelitian Pembelajaran Berbasis
Inkuiri dalam Pendidikan Sains. Disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional II
Himpunan Ikatan Sarjana dan Pemerhati Pendidikan IPA Indonesia
bekerjasama dengan FPMIPA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia di Bandung
pada tanggal 22-23 Juli 2005.
Rustaman, N. Y. (2010). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Sains Berbasis
Kemampuan Dasar bekerja Ilmiah. Teori, Paradigma, Prinsip dan
Pendekatan Pembelajaran dalam Konteks Indonesia. Bandung: FMIPA.
UPI.
Scaife, T. M. & Heckler, A. F. (2010) “Student Understanding of The Direction of
The Magnetic Force on a Charged Particle”. American Journal Physics. 78,
(8), 869 – 876.
Singh, C. (2006). “Student Understending of Symmetry and Gauss’s Law of
Electricity”. American Journal of Physics. 74, (10), 923 – 936.
Singh, V. (2010). “The Electron Runaround: Understanding Electric Circuits
Basics Through a Classroom Activity. The Physics Teacher. 48, (5), 309 –
311.
Suseno, N., Setiawan, A. & Rustaman, N. Y. (2009). “The Importance of
Mapping and Utilizing Analogies in Learning of Abstract Concepts on
Electricity and Magnetism”. Proceeding of The Third International Seminar
on Science Education. 563 – 572.
Suseno, N., Setiawan, A. & Rustaman, N. Y. (2010). Penggunaan Analogi dan
Klasifikasinya dalam Perkuliahan Konsep Abstrak Listrik-Magnet di LPTK.
Disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional di P4TK Bandung pada tanggal 10
April 2010.
Suseno, N., Setiawan, A. & Rustaman, N. Y. (2010). Pembelajaran Menggunakan
Analogi dalam Perkuliahan Listrik-Magnet. Disampaikan pada Seminar
Nasional Fisika dan Pendidikan Sains di Universitas Sebelas Maret
Surakarta pada tanggal 8 Mei 2010.
Web, M. J. (1985) “Analogies and Their Limitations”. Journal of School Science
and Mathematics. 85, (8), 645 – 650.
Wong, E. D. (1993). “Understanding the Generative Capacity of Analogies as a
Tool for Explanation”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30, 1273 –
1290.
89
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E.,
& Pintrinch, P. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and
Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New
York: Longman.
Aulls, M. W. & Shore, B. M. (2008). Inquiry in Education. The Conceptual
Foundations for Research as a Curricular Imperative. Volume 1. New
York: Lawrences Erlbaum Associates.
Boersma K., Goedhart, M., Jong, O. D., & Eijkelhof, H. (2005). Research and The
Quality of Science Education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Buck, G. A., Latta, M. A. M. & Pelecky, D. L. L. (2007). “Learning How to Make
Inquiry into Electricity and Magnetism Discernible to Middle Level
Teachers”. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 18, 377 - 397.
Case, K.N., Reagen, T.G., Campbell, P. & Case, C. W. (1998). “The Role of
Collaborative Inquiry and reflective Practice in Teacher Preparation”. The
Professional Educator. 21 (1), 1–16.
Chin, C. (2007). Multimodality in Teaching and Learning Science. Proceeding
The 1st International Seminar on Science Education. Science Education
Program. Bandung : Graduate Scholl Indonesia University of Education.
Chiu, M. H. & Lin, L. W. (2005). “Promoting Fourth Graders' Conceptual
Change of Their Understanding of Electric Current via Multiple
Analogies”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 42, (4), 429 - 464.
Degeng, I. N. S. (1989). Ilmu Pengajaran Taksonomi Variabel. Jakarta: P2LPTK
Depdikbud.
Demirci, N. & Cirkinoglu, A. (2004). “Determining Students' Preconception/ Misconceptions in Electricity and Magnetism”. Journal of
Turkish science education. 1, (2), 50 - 54.
Duit, R. (1991). “On the Role of Analogies and Metaphors in Learning
Science”. Science Education. 75, (6), 649 - 672.
Engelhardt, P. V. & Beichner, R. J. (2004). “Students' Understanding of Direct
Current Resistive Electrical Circuits”. American Journal Physics. 72, (1),
98 - 115.
Ennis, R. H. (1995). Critical Thinking. New Jersey: University of Illionis.
Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458.
Gentner, D. (1983). “Structure-Mapping: A Theoritical Framework for Analogy”.
Cognitive Science. 7, 155 - 170.
Glynn, S. M. (1995). “Conceptual Bridges: Using Analogies to Explain Scientific
Concepts”. Journal of The Science Teacher. 62, (9), 25-27.
87
Gluck, P. & Perkalskis, B. (2009). “Analog of Optical Elements for Sound Waves
in Air”. The Physics Teacher. 47, (2), 75 - 79.
Guisasola, J., Almudi, J. M. & Zubimendi, J. L. (2004). “Difficulties in Learning
The Introductory Magnetic Field Theory in The First Years of University”.
Science Ecucations. 88, (3), 443-464.
Haladyna, T. M. (1997). Writing Test Item to Evaluate Higher Order Thinking.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon a Viacom Company.
Lawson, A. E. (1993). The Importance of Analogy: A Prelude to the Special
Issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30, (10), 1213-1214.
Maloney, D. P., O’Kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J. & Heuvelen A. V. (2001).
“Surveying Student's Conceptual Knowledge of Electricity and
Magnetism”. American Journal Physics. 69, (7), 12 - 23.
Marzano, R. J. & Kendall, J. S. (2008). Designing and Assessing Educational
Objectives. Applying the New Taxonomy. California: Corwin Press.
Mukhopadhyay, S. C. (2006). “Teaching Electromagnetics at The
Undergraduate Level: a Comprehensive Approach”. European Journal of
Physics. 27, 727-742.
Narjaikaew, P., Emarat, N., Arayathanakul, K. & Cowie, B. (2005). Year-1 Thai
University Students’ Conceptions of Electricity and Megnetism. Physics
Educational Network of Thailand (PENThai) and The Centre for science
and Technology Education Research (CSTER).
Nasution, S. (2006). Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar dan Mengajar.
Bandung: Bina Aksara.
Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Creating Scientific Concepts. Massachusetts: A Bradford
Book The MIT Press.
NRC. (1996). National Science Education Standars. Washington: National
Academy Press.
NSTA. (1998). Standards for Science Teacher preparation. NSTA in collaboration
with the Association for the Education of Theachers in Science.
Oliva, J. M. (2005). “What Professional Knowledge Should we as Physics
Teachers have about The Use of Analogies?”. Journal Physics Teacher
Education. 3, (1), 11 – 16.
Pask, C. (2003). “Mathematics and the Science of Analogies. American Journal of
Physics. 71, (6), 526 – 534.
Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2005). A Guide for Educators to Critical Thinking
Competency Standards. www.criticalthinking.org.
Planinic, M. (2006). “Assessment of Difficulties of Same Conceptual areas from
Electricity and Magnetism Using The Conceptual Survey of Electricity and
magnetism”. American Journal of Physics. 74, (12), 1143 – 1148.
88
Podolefsky, N. S. & Finkelstein, N. D. (2006). “Use of Analogy in Learning
Physics: The Role of Representation”. Physics Review Special Topics,
Physics Education Research. 2, (020101), 1 – 10.
Renzulli, J., Gentry, M & Reis, S. (2004). “A Time and Place for Authentic
Learning”. Education Leadership. 62, (73-7)
Rothenstein, B. & Popescu, S. (2009). “Relativistic Velocity Addition Low from
Machine Gun Analogy”. The Physics Teacher. 47, (1), 43 – 45.
Rustaman, N. Y. (2005). Perkembangan Penelitian Pembelajaran Berbasis
Inkuiri dalam Pendidikan Sains. Disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional II
Himpunan Ikatan Sarjana dan Pemerhati Pendidikan IPA Indonesia
bekerjasama dengan FPMIPA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia di Bandung
pada tanggal 22-23 Juli 2005.
Rustaman, N. Y. (2010). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Sains Berbasis
Kemampuan Dasar bekerja Ilmiah. Teori, Paradigma, Prinsip dan
Pendekatan Pembelajaran dalam Konteks Indonesia. Bandung: FMIPA.
UPI.
Scaife, T. M. & Heckler, A. F. (2010) “Student Understanding of The Direction of
The Magnetic Force on a Charged Particle”. American Journal Physics. 78,
(8), 869 – 876.
Singh, C. (2006). “Student Understending of Symmetry and Gauss’s Law of
Electricity”. American Journal of Physics. 74, (10), 923 – 936.
Singh, V. (2010). “The Electron Runaround: Understanding Electric Circuits
Basics Through a Classroom Activity. The Physics Teacher. 48, (5), 309 –
311.
Suseno, N., Setiawan, A. & Rustaman, N. Y. (2009). “The Importance of
Mapping and Utilizing Analogies in Learning of Abstract Concepts on
Electricity and Magnetism”. Proceeding of The Third International Seminar
on Science Education. 563 – 572.
Suseno, N., Setiawan, A. & Rustaman, N. Y. (2010). Penggunaan Analogi dan
Klasifikasinya dalam Perkuliahan Konsep Abstrak Listrik-Magnet di LPTK.
Disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional di P4TK Bandung pada tanggal 10
April 2010.
Suseno, N., Setiawan, A. & Rustaman, N. Y. (2010). Pembelajaran Menggunakan
Analogi dalam Perkuliahan Listrik-Magnet. Disampaikan pada Seminar
Nasional Fisika dan Pendidikan Sains di Universitas Sebelas Maret
Surakarta pada tanggal 8 Mei 2010.
Web, M. J. (1985) “Analogies and Their Limitations”. Journal of School Science
and Mathematics. 85, (8), 645 – 650.
Wong, E. D. (1993). “Understanding the Generative Capacity of Analogies as a
Tool for Explanation”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30, 1273 –
1290.
89