D IPA 1007239 Bibliography
179
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Akinoglu, O. (2008). Assessment of The Inquiry-Based Project Implementation
Process in Science Education Upon Students’ Points of Views. International
Journal of Instruction. 1(1). 1-12.
Anderson, L.W., et al. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and
Assessing:A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New
York: Longman.
Arends, R.I. (2012). Learning to Teach. 9th Ed. New York: McGraw Hill
Companies. Inc.
Atkin, J.M. et al. (2005). Designing Everyday Assessment in the Science
Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Atkin, J.M. & Coffey, J.E. (2003). Everyday Assessment in the Science
Classroom. Virginia: NSTA Press.
Bass, M., et al. (1995). Handbook of Optics Volume I. New York: McGraw-Hill,
Inc.
Black, P. et al. (2006). Learning How to Learn and Assessment for Learning: a
theoretical inquiry. Research Papers in Education. 21(2). 119–132.
Bloom, B.S, Engelhart, M.D, Furst, E.J, Hill, WH, & Krathwohl, D.R (Eds)
(1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives; The Classification of
Educational Goals. Handbook I; The cognitive domain. New York: David
McKay Co Inc.
Brookhart, S.M. (2010). How to Assess Higher-order Thinking Skills in your
classroom, Virginia: ASCD.
Bryant, R. (2006). Assessment Results Following Inquiry and Traditional Physics
Laboratory Activities. Journal of College Science Teaching; 35(7). 56-61.
Campbell, T., Abd-Hamid, N.H., & Chapman, H. (2010). Development of
Instruments to Assess Teacher and Student Perceptions of Inquiry
Experiences in Science Classrooms. J Sci Teacher Educ (2010) 21: 13–30.
Cottingham, S.M. (2010). An initial Assessment of Science Inquiry Curriculum
Practices at a Local Level. Disertation, Walden University, tidak
diterbitkan.
Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed
Methods Research. California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Cutnell, J.D. & Johnson, K.W. (2012). Physics 9th. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons,
Inc.
Dahar, R.W. (2011). Teori-Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Diamond, R.M. (2008). Designing and Assessing Courses and Curricula: A
Practical Guide.3rd ed. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Ding, L. et al.(2006). Evaluating an Electricity and Magnetism Assessment Tool:
Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment. Physical Review Special
Topics – Physics Education Research 2.
Doran, R. et al.(2002). Science Educator’s Guide to Laboratory Assessment.
Virginia: NSTA Press.
Riskan Qadar, 2015
Pengembangan Asesmen Terintegrasi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Pada Perkuliahan Optika Calon Guru
Fisika
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
180
Dunbar, T.F. (2002). Development and Use of an Instrument to Measure Scientific
Inquiry and Related Factors. Dissertation. The University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque. New Mexico: not published.
Gagne, R. (1988). Conditions of Learnig. lrc.binus.ac.id/downloads/TE/Gagne
Greenstein, L. (2010). What Teacher Really Need to Know about Formative
Assessment. Alexandria: ASCD.
Hake, R. R. (1998). “Interactive-engagement versus Traditional Methods: A SixThousand-Student survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics
Courses”. Am. J. Phys., 66 (1), 64-74.
Hanauer, D.I., Hatfull, G.F., & Jacob-Sera, D. (2009). Active Assessment:
Assessing Scientific Inquiry. Virginia: Springer.
Heinbecker, B., et al. (2002). Physics: Concepts and Connections Two. Toronto:
Irwin Publishing Ltd.
Heller, K.J. (2009). Development and Validation of a Physics Problem-Solving
Assessment Rubric. Disertation, Minnesota University, not published.
Hill, W.F. (2001). Learning: A Survey of Psychological Interpretations 7th.
Boston: Pearson.
Hotiu, A. (2006). The Relationship Between Item difficulty and Discrimination
Indices in Multiple Choice Test in A Physical Science Course. Thesis,
Florida Atlantic University, not published.
Johnson R.L., Penny, J.A., & Gordon, B. (2009). Assessing Performance:
Designing, Scoring, and Validating Performance Tasks. New York: The
Guilford Press.
Krathwohl, D.L., Bloom, B.S., & Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives: The Classifications of Educational Goals. Handbook II.
Kuhlthau, C.C., et al. Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century. Westport:
Libraries Unlimited.
Lawson, A.E. (1985). A Review of Research On Formal Reasoning and Science
Teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 22(7), 569-617.
Marshall, J.C., & Smart, J.B., (2013). Teachers’ Transformation to Inquiry-Based
Instructional Practice. ScientificResearch Journal.4(2), 132-142. Source:
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.42019. (online: 25 December 2014).
Marzano, R.J. (2006). Classroom Assessment and Grading that Work. Alexandria:
ASCD.
Marzano, R.J. & Kendall J.S. (2008). Designing and Assessing Educational
Objectives: Applying the New Taxonomy. California: Corwin Press.
Miedijensky, S. (2009). “Embedded Assessment in Project-Based Science Course
for the Gifted: Insight to Inform Teaching all Student”. International
Journal of Science Education. 31(18), 2411-2435.
Mislevy, R.J. et al.(2003). Design Patterns for Assessing Science Inquiry.
California: SRI International.
Nahadi. (2009). Efektivitas Pembekalan Kemampuan Asesmen Pembelajaran
Bagi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Kimia. Disertasi Doktor pada SPS UPI.
Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.
Riskan Qadar, 2015
Pengembangan Asesmen Terintegrasi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Pada Perkuliahan Optika Calon Guru
Fisika
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
181
NCREL. (2001). Performance-Based Teaching and Assessment. Tersedia:
http://www. clickit.ort.org.il/files/up1/192089623/851598900.doc. (on-line:
26 Maret 2011)
NRC. (1996). National Science Educational Standards. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
NRC. (2001). Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education
Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Olatunji, M.O. (2013). International Journal On New Trends In Educational And
Their Implications; Teaching and Assessing of Affective Characteristics: A
Critical Missing Link In Online Education. Tersedia: www.
ijonte.org//?pnum=30&pt=2013 Volume 4 Number 1/file/09. on-line:
13/6/2014)
Pierre, E, & Oughton, J, (2007). The affective Domain: Undiscovered Country.
College Quaterly, 10(4), hlm.1-7. Terseida: eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ813766 (online: 24 September 2014)
Popham, W.J. (2011). Classroom Assessment What Teacher Needs to Know. 6th.
Boston:. Pearson.
Ross, R. & Venugopal, P. (2007). Inquiry-Based Activities In A Second Semester
Physics Laboratory: Results Of A Two-Year Assessment. American Society
For Engineering Education,
Ruiz-Primo, M.A., & Furtak, E.M. (2006). Informal Formative Assessment and
Scientific Inquiry: Exploring Teachers’ Practices and Student Learning.
Educational Assessment, 11(3 & 4), 205–235.
Ruiz-Primo, M.A., & Furtak, E.M. (2007). Exploring Teachers’ Informal
Formative Assessment Practices and Students’Understanding in the Context
of Scientific Inquiry. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching. 44(1), 57–
84.
Rustaman, N.Y. (2004). Asesmen Pendidikan IPA, Makalah Diklat NTT
www.file.upi,edu/ direktori/SPS/Prodi.PendidikanIPA.pdf. (on-line:11-62014)
Rustaman, N.Y. (2013). Assessment Literacy, materi kuliah program pascasarjana.
www.file.upi,edu/ direktori/SPS/Prodi.PendidikanIPA.pdf. (on-line:11-62014)
Rustaman, N.Y. (1995). Pengembangan Butir Soal Keterampilan Proses Sains.
www.scribd.com/doc/pengembangan butir soal keterampilan proses sainsNuryani Rustaman. (on-line:11-6-2014)
Sarwi. (2009). "Penerapan Open-Ended Laboratory Technique Pada Eksperimen
Gelombang". Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 111-120.
Serway, R.A., & Jewett, J.W., 2010. Physics for Scientists and Engineers with
Modern Physics,- 9th ed. Boston: Brooks/Cole.
Serway, R.A., & Vuille, C. 2012. College Physics, - 9th ed. Boston: Brooks/Cole.
Shaw, J.M., & Nagashima, S.O. (2009). "The Achievement of Student Subgroups
on Science Performance Assessments in Inquiry-Based Classrooms".
Electronic Journal of Science Education [Online], 13(2), 24 halaman.
Tersedia: http://www. ejse.southwestern. edu /article /viewArticle /7797 Amerika Serikat - [22 September 2010]
Riskan Qadar, 2015
Pengembangan Asesmen Terintegrasi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Pada Perkuliahan Optika Calon Guru
Fisika
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
182
Shuter, V.J. & Becker, B.J. (2010). Innovative Assessment 21st Century. New
York: Springer.
Stinggins, R.J. (1994). Student-Centered Classroom Assessment. New York:
Macmillan College Publishing Company. Inc.
Tatsuoka, K.K. (2009). Cognitive Assessment: An Introduction to the Rule Space
Method. New York: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Teodorescu, R.E. (2009). Cognitive Development in Introductory Physics: A
Research-Based Approach to Curriculum Reform. Dissertation, the George
Washington university, ProQuest LLC, on-line: 2 Pebruari 2014.
Tipler, P.A., & Mosca, G. (2008). Physics for Scientists and Engineers with
Modern Physics 6th. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Tomei, L.A. (2005).Taxonomy for the Technology Domain. Hershey: Information
Science Publishing.
Valanides, N.C. (1996). Formal Reasoning and Science Teaching. School Science
and Mathematics, 96(2), 99-107.
Valanides, N.C. (1997). Formal Reasoning Abilities and School Achiement.
Studies in Educational Evaluation. 23(2), 169-185.
Walker, J. 2008. Halliday and Resnick Fundamentals of Physics, - 8th ed.
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.
Wenning, C.J. (2007). Assessing Inquiry Skills as a Component of Scientific
Literacy. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 4(2), 21-24. Winter.
Tersedia: [email protected] (online:18 Nopember 2011).
Wenning, C.J. (2005a). Levels of Inquiry: Hierarchies of Pedagogical Practices
and Inquiry Processes (revisi 2011). Journal of Physics Teacher Education
Online. 2(3). 3-11. Tersedia: [email protected] (online:18 Nopember
2011).
Wenning, C.J. (2005b). Minimizing Resistance to Inquiry- Oriented Instruction:
The Importance of Climate Setting. Journal of Physics Teacher Education
Online. 3(2). 10-15. Tersedia: [email protected]
(online:18
Nopember 2011).
Wenning, C.J. (2011a). Experimental Inquiry in Introductory Physics Courses.
Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 6(2), 2-8. Summer. Tersedia:
[email protected] (on-line:18 Nopember 2011).
Wenning, C.J. (2011b). The Levels of Inquiry Model of Science Teaching.
Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. 6(2). 9-16. Summer.
Tersedia: [email protected] (online:18 Nopember 2011).
Wenning, C.J. & Khan, M.A. (2011). The Levels of Inquiry Model of Science
Teaching: Learning Sequences to Lesson Plans. Journal of Physics Teacher
Education Online. 6(2). 17-20. Summer. Tersedia: [email protected]
(online:18 Nopember 2011).
Wenning, C.J. (2010). The Levels of Inquiry: Using Inquiry Spectrum Learning
Sequences to Teach Science. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online.
5(4). 11-20. Summer. Tersedia: [email protected]
(online:18
Nopember 2011).
Wiggins, G.P. (1993). Assessing Student Performance: Exploring the Purpose and
Limits of Testing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Riskan Qadar, 2015
Pengembangan Asesmen Terintegrasi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Pada Perkuliahan Optika Calon Guru
Fisika
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
183
Wulan, AR. (2007). Pembekalan Kemampuan Performance Assessment kepada
Calon Guru Biologi dalam Menilai Kemampuan Inquiry.Disertasi Doktor
pada SPS UPI Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.
Young, H.D., & Freedman R.A., (2012). Sears and Zemansky’s University
Physics: With Modern Physics, - 13th ed. San Fransisco: Addison-Wesley.
Riskan Qadar, 2015
Pengembangan Asesmen Terintegrasi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Pada Perkuliahan Optika Calon Guru
Fisika
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Akinoglu, O. (2008). Assessment of The Inquiry-Based Project Implementation
Process in Science Education Upon Students’ Points of Views. International
Journal of Instruction. 1(1). 1-12.
Anderson, L.W., et al. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and
Assessing:A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New
York: Longman.
Arends, R.I. (2012). Learning to Teach. 9th Ed. New York: McGraw Hill
Companies. Inc.
Atkin, J.M. et al. (2005). Designing Everyday Assessment in the Science
Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Atkin, J.M. & Coffey, J.E. (2003). Everyday Assessment in the Science
Classroom. Virginia: NSTA Press.
Bass, M., et al. (1995). Handbook of Optics Volume I. New York: McGraw-Hill,
Inc.
Black, P. et al. (2006). Learning How to Learn and Assessment for Learning: a
theoretical inquiry. Research Papers in Education. 21(2). 119–132.
Bloom, B.S, Engelhart, M.D, Furst, E.J, Hill, WH, & Krathwohl, D.R (Eds)
(1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives; The Classification of
Educational Goals. Handbook I; The cognitive domain. New York: David
McKay Co Inc.
Brookhart, S.M. (2010). How to Assess Higher-order Thinking Skills in your
classroom, Virginia: ASCD.
Bryant, R. (2006). Assessment Results Following Inquiry and Traditional Physics
Laboratory Activities. Journal of College Science Teaching; 35(7). 56-61.
Campbell, T., Abd-Hamid, N.H., & Chapman, H. (2010). Development of
Instruments to Assess Teacher and Student Perceptions of Inquiry
Experiences in Science Classrooms. J Sci Teacher Educ (2010) 21: 13–30.
Cottingham, S.M. (2010). An initial Assessment of Science Inquiry Curriculum
Practices at a Local Level. Disertation, Walden University, tidak
diterbitkan.
Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed
Methods Research. California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Cutnell, J.D. & Johnson, K.W. (2012). Physics 9th. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons,
Inc.
Dahar, R.W. (2011). Teori-Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Diamond, R.M. (2008). Designing and Assessing Courses and Curricula: A
Practical Guide.3rd ed. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Ding, L. et al.(2006). Evaluating an Electricity and Magnetism Assessment Tool:
Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment. Physical Review Special
Topics – Physics Education Research 2.
Doran, R. et al.(2002). Science Educator’s Guide to Laboratory Assessment.
Virginia: NSTA Press.
Riskan Qadar, 2015
Pengembangan Asesmen Terintegrasi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Pada Perkuliahan Optika Calon Guru
Fisika
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
180
Dunbar, T.F. (2002). Development and Use of an Instrument to Measure Scientific
Inquiry and Related Factors. Dissertation. The University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque. New Mexico: not published.
Gagne, R. (1988). Conditions of Learnig. lrc.binus.ac.id/downloads/TE/Gagne
Greenstein, L. (2010). What Teacher Really Need to Know about Formative
Assessment. Alexandria: ASCD.
Hake, R. R. (1998). “Interactive-engagement versus Traditional Methods: A SixThousand-Student survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics
Courses”. Am. J. Phys., 66 (1), 64-74.
Hanauer, D.I., Hatfull, G.F., & Jacob-Sera, D. (2009). Active Assessment:
Assessing Scientific Inquiry. Virginia: Springer.
Heinbecker, B., et al. (2002). Physics: Concepts and Connections Two. Toronto:
Irwin Publishing Ltd.
Heller, K.J. (2009). Development and Validation of a Physics Problem-Solving
Assessment Rubric. Disertation, Minnesota University, not published.
Hill, W.F. (2001). Learning: A Survey of Psychological Interpretations 7th.
Boston: Pearson.
Hotiu, A. (2006). The Relationship Between Item difficulty and Discrimination
Indices in Multiple Choice Test in A Physical Science Course. Thesis,
Florida Atlantic University, not published.
Johnson R.L., Penny, J.A., & Gordon, B. (2009). Assessing Performance:
Designing, Scoring, and Validating Performance Tasks. New York: The
Guilford Press.
Krathwohl, D.L., Bloom, B.S., & Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives: The Classifications of Educational Goals. Handbook II.
Kuhlthau, C.C., et al. Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century. Westport:
Libraries Unlimited.
Lawson, A.E. (1985). A Review of Research On Formal Reasoning and Science
Teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 22(7), 569-617.
Marshall, J.C., & Smart, J.B., (2013). Teachers’ Transformation to Inquiry-Based
Instructional Practice. ScientificResearch Journal.4(2), 132-142. Source:
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.42019. (online: 25 December 2014).
Marzano, R.J. (2006). Classroom Assessment and Grading that Work. Alexandria:
ASCD.
Marzano, R.J. & Kendall J.S. (2008). Designing and Assessing Educational
Objectives: Applying the New Taxonomy. California: Corwin Press.
Miedijensky, S. (2009). “Embedded Assessment in Project-Based Science Course
for the Gifted: Insight to Inform Teaching all Student”. International
Journal of Science Education. 31(18), 2411-2435.
Mislevy, R.J. et al.(2003). Design Patterns for Assessing Science Inquiry.
California: SRI International.
Nahadi. (2009). Efektivitas Pembekalan Kemampuan Asesmen Pembelajaran
Bagi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Kimia. Disertasi Doktor pada SPS UPI.
Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.
Riskan Qadar, 2015
Pengembangan Asesmen Terintegrasi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Pada Perkuliahan Optika Calon Guru
Fisika
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
181
NCREL. (2001). Performance-Based Teaching and Assessment. Tersedia:
http://www. clickit.ort.org.il/files/up1/192089623/851598900.doc. (on-line:
26 Maret 2011)
NRC. (1996). National Science Educational Standards. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
NRC. (2001). Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education
Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Olatunji, M.O. (2013). International Journal On New Trends In Educational And
Their Implications; Teaching and Assessing of Affective Characteristics: A
Critical Missing Link In Online Education. Tersedia: www.
ijonte.org//?pnum=30&pt=2013 Volume 4 Number 1/file/09. on-line:
13/6/2014)
Pierre, E, & Oughton, J, (2007). The affective Domain: Undiscovered Country.
College Quaterly, 10(4), hlm.1-7. Terseida: eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ813766 (online: 24 September 2014)
Popham, W.J. (2011). Classroom Assessment What Teacher Needs to Know. 6th.
Boston:. Pearson.
Ross, R. & Venugopal, P. (2007). Inquiry-Based Activities In A Second Semester
Physics Laboratory: Results Of A Two-Year Assessment. American Society
For Engineering Education,
Ruiz-Primo, M.A., & Furtak, E.M. (2006). Informal Formative Assessment and
Scientific Inquiry: Exploring Teachers’ Practices and Student Learning.
Educational Assessment, 11(3 & 4), 205–235.
Ruiz-Primo, M.A., & Furtak, E.M. (2007). Exploring Teachers’ Informal
Formative Assessment Practices and Students’Understanding in the Context
of Scientific Inquiry. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching. 44(1), 57–
84.
Rustaman, N.Y. (2004). Asesmen Pendidikan IPA, Makalah Diklat NTT
www.file.upi,edu/ direktori/SPS/Prodi.PendidikanIPA.pdf. (on-line:11-62014)
Rustaman, N.Y. (2013). Assessment Literacy, materi kuliah program pascasarjana.
www.file.upi,edu/ direktori/SPS/Prodi.PendidikanIPA.pdf. (on-line:11-62014)
Rustaman, N.Y. (1995). Pengembangan Butir Soal Keterampilan Proses Sains.
www.scribd.com/doc/pengembangan butir soal keterampilan proses sainsNuryani Rustaman. (on-line:11-6-2014)
Sarwi. (2009). "Penerapan Open-Ended Laboratory Technique Pada Eksperimen
Gelombang". Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 111-120.
Serway, R.A., & Jewett, J.W., 2010. Physics for Scientists and Engineers with
Modern Physics,- 9th ed. Boston: Brooks/Cole.
Serway, R.A., & Vuille, C. 2012. College Physics, - 9th ed. Boston: Brooks/Cole.
Shaw, J.M., & Nagashima, S.O. (2009). "The Achievement of Student Subgroups
on Science Performance Assessments in Inquiry-Based Classrooms".
Electronic Journal of Science Education [Online], 13(2), 24 halaman.
Tersedia: http://www. ejse.southwestern. edu /article /viewArticle /7797 Amerika Serikat - [22 September 2010]
Riskan Qadar, 2015
Pengembangan Asesmen Terintegrasi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Pada Perkuliahan Optika Calon Guru
Fisika
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
182
Shuter, V.J. & Becker, B.J. (2010). Innovative Assessment 21st Century. New
York: Springer.
Stinggins, R.J. (1994). Student-Centered Classroom Assessment. New York:
Macmillan College Publishing Company. Inc.
Tatsuoka, K.K. (2009). Cognitive Assessment: An Introduction to the Rule Space
Method. New York: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Teodorescu, R.E. (2009). Cognitive Development in Introductory Physics: A
Research-Based Approach to Curriculum Reform. Dissertation, the George
Washington university, ProQuest LLC, on-line: 2 Pebruari 2014.
Tipler, P.A., & Mosca, G. (2008). Physics for Scientists and Engineers with
Modern Physics 6th. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Tomei, L.A. (2005).Taxonomy for the Technology Domain. Hershey: Information
Science Publishing.
Valanides, N.C. (1996). Formal Reasoning and Science Teaching. School Science
and Mathematics, 96(2), 99-107.
Valanides, N.C. (1997). Formal Reasoning Abilities and School Achiement.
Studies in Educational Evaluation. 23(2), 169-185.
Walker, J. 2008. Halliday and Resnick Fundamentals of Physics, - 8th ed.
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.
Wenning, C.J. (2007). Assessing Inquiry Skills as a Component of Scientific
Literacy. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 4(2), 21-24. Winter.
Tersedia: [email protected] (online:18 Nopember 2011).
Wenning, C.J. (2005a). Levels of Inquiry: Hierarchies of Pedagogical Practices
and Inquiry Processes (revisi 2011). Journal of Physics Teacher Education
Online. 2(3). 3-11. Tersedia: [email protected] (online:18 Nopember
2011).
Wenning, C.J. (2005b). Minimizing Resistance to Inquiry- Oriented Instruction:
The Importance of Climate Setting. Journal of Physics Teacher Education
Online. 3(2). 10-15. Tersedia: [email protected]
(online:18
Nopember 2011).
Wenning, C.J. (2011a). Experimental Inquiry in Introductory Physics Courses.
Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 6(2), 2-8. Summer. Tersedia:
[email protected] (on-line:18 Nopember 2011).
Wenning, C.J. (2011b). The Levels of Inquiry Model of Science Teaching.
Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. 6(2). 9-16. Summer.
Tersedia: [email protected] (online:18 Nopember 2011).
Wenning, C.J. & Khan, M.A. (2011). The Levels of Inquiry Model of Science
Teaching: Learning Sequences to Lesson Plans. Journal of Physics Teacher
Education Online. 6(2). 17-20. Summer. Tersedia: [email protected]
(online:18 Nopember 2011).
Wenning, C.J. (2010). The Levels of Inquiry: Using Inquiry Spectrum Learning
Sequences to Teach Science. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online.
5(4). 11-20. Summer. Tersedia: [email protected]
(online:18
Nopember 2011).
Wiggins, G.P. (1993). Assessing Student Performance: Exploring the Purpose and
Limits of Testing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Riskan Qadar, 2015
Pengembangan Asesmen Terintegrasi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Pada Perkuliahan Optika Calon Guru
Fisika
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
183
Wulan, AR. (2007). Pembekalan Kemampuan Performance Assessment kepada
Calon Guru Biologi dalam Menilai Kemampuan Inquiry.Disertasi Doktor
pada SPS UPI Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.
Young, H.D., & Freedman R.A., (2012). Sears and Zemansky’s University
Physics: With Modern Physics, - 13th ed. San Fransisco: Addison-Wesley.
Riskan Qadar, 2015
Pengembangan Asesmen Terintegrasi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Pada Perkuliahan Optika Calon Guru
Fisika
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu