An error analysis on the understanding of Elliptical constructions by the first semester students of English Department of Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya, academic year 2003/2004 - Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya Repository

APPENDICES

APPENDD(A
THE CALCUII\TION OF DIFFICULTY INDEX OF THE TRY4IJT
Numbcr of Itcms
I

Difrrcultv Index
0.l7

2.

o .t7

J.

Intcrprctrtion

Difrcuh

Ditreft


0.13
0.28
o.37
0.tI

Diftcult

0.19

4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

0.22


Difficult
DifEcult

o.4l
0.13

Mcd.qzte
Diffiqllt

Difforlt
Moderate

Difrcult

ll.

o.22

12.
13.

14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.

0.59

DifEanlt
Moderate

o.22

Difficrllt

0.56

o.22
0.2


Moderate
Easy
Diffiorlt
Moderate
Diffiorlt

20.
2t.

0.37
0.09

o.72
o.2E
0.52

1t

o.25


23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
3l
32.

0.09
o.44
0.35

J.'-

34.
35.

36.
37.
38.

Difrcult
Moderate
DifEcult
Dfficult
Difficult
Moderate

0.81

Moderate
Moderate
Easy

o.67

Moderate


0 .l 3

Difficult
Difficult

o.57

0.3
0.8
0.28
0.31
0.48
0.35
0.35

Easy

Drfficult
Moderate


Moderate
Moderate
Moderate

o.52
o.44

Moderate
Moderate

39.

0.3l

Moderate

40.
4t42.


o.39

Moderate

0.52

Moderate

0.89

Frsy

APPEI\IDXB
THE CALCULATION OF THE DISCRIMINATION PiOWEROF THE TRY-OUT
Number of Itcms
I

Discriminrtion Indcr

0.33

o.2Ii

J-

0.r9

4.

0.48

Intcrprctetion
Satisfrctorv

Satisfrctorv

6.

0.22

t-


o.37

E.
9.
10.

0.3
0.59

Poor
Good
Good
Satisfaaorv
Satisfrctorv
Satisfrctorv
Good

o.26
0.3

Satisfraorv
Satisfrrrorv

o.44

ll

t2.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.

0.59

Crood

o.37
o.44
0.33

Sarisfrctorv
Gmd
Satisfrrtow

0.41
0.3

Good

21.
22.

0.t9

Satisfactorv
Satisfactorv
Satishctorv
Satishaorv
Poor

o.37

Satisfaclorv

zJ-

0.19

24.
25.
26.

o.22

Poor
Satisfactory

20.

28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
Jt.

34.

35.
36,
37.
3E.
39.
40.
41.

42.

0-22
0.33
o.37

0.33
0.4E
0.37
0
0.19

o.22
0.19
0.1l
0.04

o.07
0.33
0.tI
o.22
o.M
0.41
0.4E
0.15
0.07

Satisfactorv
Good

Satisfactory
Poor
Poor
Satisfrctow
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Satishctorv
Poor
Satisfactorv
Good
Good
Good

Poor
Poor

A'3

APPENDIXC
THE CALCULATION FOR RELIABILITY KR.2I OF THE TRY OITT

x

No
I

38
37
30
26
26
26

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

?5

8.

9.

t0.

u

t2.
13.
t4.
15.
16.

2l
l9
l9
l9
l8

t7.

IE

18.
19.

l8
l8
l8
l8

20.
2 t.
22.
23.
24.
2 5.

Where: x

n
M
V
K
R

25
23
23
22

t7
t7
l6
l6

26.
27.

l5
l5

28.
29.

t4
l4

30.

t4

X'
t444

No

1369

31.
32.

900

JJ.

676
676
676
625

34.
35.
36.

62s

38.
39-

37.

X
t4
l3
l3

t3
t2
t2
t2

K
196
169

r69
r69
t44
t44
t44

tzl

l2t

441

40.
41.
42.

ll
ll
ll
ll
ll

36r

43.

t0

100

361
361
324

M.
45.
46.

8l
8l

324
324
324

47.

9
9
8
7
7

529
529

4U

324
324
289
289
256
256
225

22s
196
196
196

the scoreofthe snrdents'test
nlmber of try-out sfudents
mean
variant
number of iterns
reliability

48.
49.
50.
5l

52.
53.
54.
55Total:
n
Mean

Var.

6
4
4
4
J

I
848
Jf

15,418

6t.12

tzr

t2l
12l

@

49
49
49

36
l6

t6
t6
9
I
16434

lilcrn:

7 4= 2 = & t
n55

=l5.4lt

Vrrtnt
prr-;r3rr
n

l&}1-lg}3/r2ttt

61"12

K =42
ncfrUf$t

,-L(F
r-l\

l5Jl

w
1L6

-qt6
)

Rcoilt
Bccqrser soorc(Q86) is more tta r tablc (0165) it cn bccuddod

tha trc Gst is rdiablc.

APPENDD(D
ERRONEOUSSENTENCESMADE BY THE STUDENTSIN
COMPLETIONOF SENTENCESUSINGELLIPTICAL PRGFORMS
(PARTA)

ERROR Abcencc of
No.
Erroneoussentences
We mug finish task four, srd Susanatoo
They harren'tgone to Bali before,and
neither - Diane
I had ners flown bdorg and Gorge either
Fahet has a new car from his boss,and
so - uncle Thomas
We can't handlethis caseany longer,
and ther' - either
You shouldn't leavetha room in these
hours"and he - either
Charlesalwayscomeslate to school,
and his friend - too
Fionawon't cometo this comp€tition,
and neither - [.adv
Total:

I

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.

ERROR: Misuseo
No.
Erroneoussentences
I

Beni was absenl and neither rlas
Charlie and Donv

2. We mustfinish taskfour, andSusana
should too
3 . Theyhaven'tgoneto Bali before,and
neitherftaw Diane
4 . I had never flown beforg and George
ftas either
5 Fatherhasa new car from his boss,and
so /las uncle Thomas
6 . We can't handlethis c"seanylonger,
and thq don't either
We can't handlethis caseanylonger,
and thw can either
8 . I didn't know that she was there. and
neither db thev

The missing Auxiliary
must

Frequencyof
ocqxTen@
57

has

42

hadn't

4l

docs

36

can't

29

shouldn't

27

does

t9

will

l8
269

The corred Auxiliarv

Frequency of
occurTence

w€fe

27

must

)i

has

l8

hadn't

l7

does

t1

c:tn't

t4

c{r't

l2

didn't

ll

You shouldn't leavethd room in these
hours"and he should either
Total:

ERROR: Misuseof
No,
Erroneoussentences
I
2.

3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

10.

I am readyto face the exam, rd either
is vour mother
Beni was absent urd either werc
Charlie and DonY
I had neverflown beforg and George
hadn't too
Fatherhas a new car from his boss,and
eilfter doesuncle Thomas
We can't handlethis caseany longer,
and thev can /oo
You shouldn'tleavetha room in these
hours. and he shoridn't neither
You shouldn't leavethd room in these
hours.and he shouldn't/oo
I didn't know that shewas there. and
either didtherr
Fionawon't cometo this competition,
and so will l,adv
Fionawon't cometo this competition,
andeither wlll Lady
Total.

shouldn't

3
139

The correct pro-form
so

Frequencyof
occurrence
56

so

4l

either

40

so

38

either

35

either

)q

either

l8

neither

l0

neither

6

nerther

3
276

ERROR Abccnce of
No.

Enoneous s€nt€nces
Fiona won't cometo this compefition,
and - won't l:dv
Total:

I

The missing pro.form
neither

Frequencyof
occrxTenoe
I

I

ERROR: Absenceof
No.

Erroneouss€nt€nces

I am readyto fac€ the exarn,and my
friends - too
2. Your brothersare very kind, and so YOr[ mother
3 . Beni was absen! and so - Charlie and
Donv
4 . Becriwas absenl urd - neither Chrlie
I

The missingCopula
are

Frequencyof
occurenoe
44

ls

2l

were

l9

were

l3

and Dony

Total:

97

Misuseo
No.

Erroneoussenteng

I

We must finistr task four, and Susanais
t(x)
We mu* finish task four, and Susana

)

The conect C.opula

must

Frequencyof
o@uTenoe
ll

must

l0

hadn't

l0

can't

8

did

5

did

4

shouldn't

I

does

I

lral too
5.

I had nener flown Morg
was too

and Gcorge

We can't handlethis caseany longer,
and they or? too
5 . I didn't know that shewas there"and
neither are thev
6. I didnl know that she was therei and
neither werz thery
t . You shouldn't leara tha room in these
hours. and he is either
E. Charlesalways comeslde to school,
and his friend is too
Total:

4.

ERROR IVfiscellaneous
No.
Erroneoussentences
I

2.
3.
^
5.
6,

8.
9.

We mustfinish taskfour, and Susana
musl does too
Charlesalwayscomeslateto school,
and his friend com6 too
Charlesalways comeslate to school,
and his friend a/naw too
CharlesalwErs comeslate to school,
and his friend late too
We mustfinish task four, and Susana
rpill finish too
I had never flown before, and George
either movv a flown before

We must finish task four, and Susana
willwu
Your brothersare very kind, and so
/rke vour mother
Your brothersarevery kind, andeither
rrili vour mother

50

The correct response

must

Frequencyof
occurTen@
I

does

l

does
does

I

must

I

hadn't either

2

must too

2

ls

I

so ls

6

1 0 . Beni was absent,arrdneither with
ll

Chrlie and Donv
Fionawon't conp to fiis competitioq
and rreitls nrar Ladv

t2. Wemug finish r-

Dokumen yang terkait

The effect of pocket chart on e\writing achievement of the first year students of SLTP Negeri I Gondanglegi-Malang in the 2000/2001 academic year

0 3 100

Error analysis of the use of english articles in writing compositions made by the first year students of SMU Bakti Ponorogo in the 2000/2001 academic year

0 5 63

Grammatical error analysis of text translatiom from Indonesian into English by the students of ABA "Bhakti Pertiwi" Jember in the 2000/2000 academic year

0 3 78

The influence of language error correction on writing achievement of the first year studends of SMU 5 Jember in the 2002/2003 academic year

0 6 65

An analysis on the content validity of the summative test for the first year students of junior high school (a case study of SMP n 87 Jakarta)

0 4 67

An analysis on the content validity of english summative test items for first grade of Junior High School in even semester 2012/2013 (An analytical study at the first year students of SMP Dua Mei)

0 4 98

An analysis of content validity of english summative test in the odd semester academic year 2008-2009

0 3 54

An Analysis of the students error in writing compound sentence : a case study with third year students of MA al-hikmah Jakrta academic year 2006/2007

0 7 51

An error analysis in making wh-questions: a case study of the second year students of SMP Islam Al-Syukro Universal

11 122 176

Analysis of Academic Application Acceptance Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya Using Method Unified Theory Of Acceptance And Use Of Technology (UTAUT)

0 1 6