S KIM 0905689 bibliography
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Alwi, H. (2007). Kamus besar bahasa indonesia . Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Edisi Pertama. Bandung: Rosda.
Arifin. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Jakarta : Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan
Islam.
Barker, V. (1995). A longitudinal study of 16-18 year olds’ understanding of basic
chemical ideas, unpublished Ph.D. (Tesis). Department of Educational
Studies, University of York.
Bayrak, B.K. (2013). “Using two-tier test to identify primary student’s conceptual
understanding and alternative conceptions in acid base”. Mevlana
International Journal of Education, 3 (2), 19 – 26.
Berg, E. V. D. (1991). Miskonsespsi fisika dan remediasi. Salatiga: Universitas
Kristen Satya Wacana.
Bodner, G. M. (1991). “I have found you an argument: the conceptual knowledge
of beginning chemistry graduate students”. Journal of Chemical
Education, 68 (5), 385-388.
Boo, H. K. (1998). “Students’ understandings of chemical bonds and the
energetics of chemical reactions”. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 35, 569 – 581.
Brady, J. E..(1990). General chemistry. Edisi kelima. New York: John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.
Brueckner, L.J., & Melby, E.O. (1981). Diagnostic and remedial teaching.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Cachapuz, A.F., and Martins, I.P. (1987). High school students' ideas about
energy of chemical reactions. Dalam Novak, J., & Helm, H.,
(Penyunting), Proceedings of the International Seminar on
Misconceptions in Science and Mechanics, 3, 60-68.
Chandrasegaran, Treagust, D. F and Mocerino, M. “The development of a two-tier
multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school
students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using
multiple levels of representation”. Chemistry Education Research and
Practice, 8 (3), 293-307.
Agustini, Nurlaela. 2014
PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN TES DIAGNOSTIK PILIHAN GANDA DUA TINGKAT UNTUK
MENGIDENTIFIKASI MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI IKATAN KIMIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
105
Chang, R. (2003). Kimia dasar : Konsep-konsep inti. Penerjemah : Martoprawiro,
M. A., dkk. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga.
Depdiknas. (2003). Pedoman khusus pengembangan silabus dan penilaian.
Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Depdiknas. (2007). Tes diagnostik. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Lanjutan
Pertama, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Ditjen PMPTK. (2008). Pendekatan, jenis, dan metode penelitian pendidikan.
Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Duit, R. and Treagust, D.F. (2003). Conceptual change: a powerful framework for
improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of
Science Education, 25 (6), 671–688.
Fensham, P. (1975). Concept formation. Dalam D. J. Daniels (Penyunting), New
movements in the study and teaching of chemistry (hlm. 199-217).
London: Temple Smith.
Fini. (2011). Definisi Konsep. Tersedia online: http://id.shvoong.com/writing-andspeaking/2164730-defenisi-konsep/#ixzz2mVCGwsyN [Tanggal akses 4
Desember 2013].
Firman, H. (2000). Penilaian Hasil belajar Dalam pengajaran Kimia . Bandung:
Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia FMIPA UPI.
Fisher, K. M. (1985). “A misconception in biology: Amino acids and translation”.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 53-62.
Gillespie, R. J. (1997). “The great ideas of chemistry”. Journal of Chemical
Education, 74 (7), 862-864.
Gronlund, N.E.. (1982). Constructing Achievement Tests. Englewood Cliffs:
Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Harnanto, A. dan Ruminten. (2009). Kimia Untuk SMA/MA Kelas X. Jakarta:
Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Hurst, O. (2002). “How we teach molecular structure to freshmen”. Journal of
Chemical Education, 79 (6), 763-764.
Kahveci, A.(2008). “Exploring chemistry teacher candidates’ profile
characteristic, teaching attitudes and beliefs, and chemistry conceptions”.
Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10, 109 – 120.
106
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel
Psychology, 28, 563 – 575.
Lewis, R. & Evans W. (2006). Chemistry. Edisi ketiga. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Mehrens, W.A. & Lehmann, I.J. (1973). Measurement and evaluation in
education and psychology. New York: Holt, Rinechart and Winston.
Moore, J. dan Langley, R. (2007). Chemistry for the utterly confused. USA:
McGraw-Hill.
Novak, J. D. (Ed.) (1987). Proceeding of the second international seminar
misconception and educational strategies in science and mathematics. 1,
2, 3. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.
Osborne, R. J. & Wittrock, M. (1983). “Learning science : A generative process”.
Science Education, 67 (4), 489 – 508.
Pabuçcu, A & Geban, O. (2006). “Remediating misconceptions concerning
chemical bonding through conceptual change text”. H.U. Journal of
Education. H.U. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 184-192.
Prihantoro, A. (2012). Perihal tes diagnostik. [Online]. Tersedia di:
http://agungprihantoro.wordpress.com/2012/04/03/perihal-tes-diagnostik/
Diakses 7 Maret 2014.
Purnamasari, R. (2012). Pengembangan tes diagnostik two-tier multiple choice
untuk mengukur pemahaman konsep pada materi kelarutan dan hasil kali
kelarutan. (Skripsi). FPMIPA UPI, Bandung.
Sari, N.K.E. (2013). Pengembangan tes diagnostik two-tier sebagai instrumen
alternatif untuk mendeteksi miskonsespsi siswa sma pada materi laju
reaksi. (Skripsi). FPMIPA UPI, Bandung.
Sugiyono.(2012). Metode penelitian administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukardi. (2010). Evaluasi pendidikan : Prinsip dan operasionalnya. Jakarta: Bumi
Aksara.
Suparno, P. (2005). Miskonsepsi dan perubahan konsep dalam pendidikan fisika.
Jakarta: Grasindo.
Suwarto dan Afghohani, A.(2011)Pengembangan tes diagnostik dalam program
komputer . Sukoharjo: LPPM Univet Bantara.
107
Taber, K.S. (1997). “Student understanding of ionic bonding: Molecular versus
electrostatic framework?”. School Science Review, 78, 85-95.
Taber, K. S. (1998a). “An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry
education”. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (5), 597-608.
Taber K. (2002a). Chemical misconceptions - prevention, diagnosis and cure
(Volume I: theoretical background). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Takeuchi, Y. (2006). Pengantar Kimia (Terjemahan). Tokyo: Iwanami Publishing
Company.
Tan, D.K-C. dan Treagust, D.F. (1999). “Evaluating students’ understanding of
chemical bonding”. School Science Review, 81, 75–83.
Tarakchi, M., dkk. (1999). “A cross-age study of high school student’s
understanding of diffusion and osmosis”. H.U. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,
15, 84 – 93.
Tinambunan, W. (1988). Evaluation of student achievement. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Treagust, D.F. (1995). “Diagnostic assessment of students’ science knowledge”.
Dalam Glynn, S.M & Duit, R. (Penyunting), Learning science in the
schools: Research reforming practice (hlm. 327-346). Mahwah, New
Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Treagust, D. F. (2006). Diagnostic assessment in science as a means to improving
teaching, learning and retention. UniServe Science Assessment
Symposium Proceedings.
Tuysuz, Chengiz. (2009). Development of two-tier diagnostic instrument and
assess students’ understanding in chemistry. Academic Journals.
Whitten. (2004). General chemistry. Edisi ketujuh. Philadelphia: Saunders
College Publishing.
Winkel, W. S. (1991). Psikologi pengajaran. Jakarta : PT Grasindo.
Woolfolk, A.E., & McCune-Nicolich, L. (1984). Educational psychology for
teachers. Edisi kedua. New Jersey : Prentice Hall Inc.
Alwi, H. (2007). Kamus besar bahasa indonesia . Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Edisi Pertama. Bandung: Rosda.
Arifin. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Jakarta : Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan
Islam.
Barker, V. (1995). A longitudinal study of 16-18 year olds’ understanding of basic
chemical ideas, unpublished Ph.D. (Tesis). Department of Educational
Studies, University of York.
Bayrak, B.K. (2013). “Using two-tier test to identify primary student’s conceptual
understanding and alternative conceptions in acid base”. Mevlana
International Journal of Education, 3 (2), 19 – 26.
Berg, E. V. D. (1991). Miskonsespsi fisika dan remediasi. Salatiga: Universitas
Kristen Satya Wacana.
Bodner, G. M. (1991). “I have found you an argument: the conceptual knowledge
of beginning chemistry graduate students”. Journal of Chemical
Education, 68 (5), 385-388.
Boo, H. K. (1998). “Students’ understandings of chemical bonds and the
energetics of chemical reactions”. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 35, 569 – 581.
Brady, J. E..(1990). General chemistry. Edisi kelima. New York: John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.
Brueckner, L.J., & Melby, E.O. (1981). Diagnostic and remedial teaching.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Cachapuz, A.F., and Martins, I.P. (1987). High school students' ideas about
energy of chemical reactions. Dalam Novak, J., & Helm, H.,
(Penyunting), Proceedings of the International Seminar on
Misconceptions in Science and Mechanics, 3, 60-68.
Chandrasegaran, Treagust, D. F and Mocerino, M. “The development of a two-tier
multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school
students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using
multiple levels of representation”. Chemistry Education Research and
Practice, 8 (3), 293-307.
Agustini, Nurlaela. 2014
PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN TES DIAGNOSTIK PILIHAN GANDA DUA TINGKAT UNTUK
MENGIDENTIFIKASI MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI IKATAN KIMIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
105
Chang, R. (2003). Kimia dasar : Konsep-konsep inti. Penerjemah : Martoprawiro,
M. A., dkk. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga.
Depdiknas. (2003). Pedoman khusus pengembangan silabus dan penilaian.
Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Depdiknas. (2007). Tes diagnostik. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Lanjutan
Pertama, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Ditjen PMPTK. (2008). Pendekatan, jenis, dan metode penelitian pendidikan.
Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Duit, R. and Treagust, D.F. (2003). Conceptual change: a powerful framework for
improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of
Science Education, 25 (6), 671–688.
Fensham, P. (1975). Concept formation. Dalam D. J. Daniels (Penyunting), New
movements in the study and teaching of chemistry (hlm. 199-217).
London: Temple Smith.
Fini. (2011). Definisi Konsep. Tersedia online: http://id.shvoong.com/writing-andspeaking/2164730-defenisi-konsep/#ixzz2mVCGwsyN [Tanggal akses 4
Desember 2013].
Firman, H. (2000). Penilaian Hasil belajar Dalam pengajaran Kimia . Bandung:
Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia FMIPA UPI.
Fisher, K. M. (1985). “A misconception in biology: Amino acids and translation”.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 53-62.
Gillespie, R. J. (1997). “The great ideas of chemistry”. Journal of Chemical
Education, 74 (7), 862-864.
Gronlund, N.E.. (1982). Constructing Achievement Tests. Englewood Cliffs:
Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Harnanto, A. dan Ruminten. (2009). Kimia Untuk SMA/MA Kelas X. Jakarta:
Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Hurst, O. (2002). “How we teach molecular structure to freshmen”. Journal of
Chemical Education, 79 (6), 763-764.
Kahveci, A.(2008). “Exploring chemistry teacher candidates’ profile
characteristic, teaching attitudes and beliefs, and chemistry conceptions”.
Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10, 109 – 120.
106
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel
Psychology, 28, 563 – 575.
Lewis, R. & Evans W. (2006). Chemistry. Edisi ketiga. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Mehrens, W.A. & Lehmann, I.J. (1973). Measurement and evaluation in
education and psychology. New York: Holt, Rinechart and Winston.
Moore, J. dan Langley, R. (2007). Chemistry for the utterly confused. USA:
McGraw-Hill.
Novak, J. D. (Ed.) (1987). Proceeding of the second international seminar
misconception and educational strategies in science and mathematics. 1,
2, 3. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.
Osborne, R. J. & Wittrock, M. (1983). “Learning science : A generative process”.
Science Education, 67 (4), 489 – 508.
Pabuçcu, A & Geban, O. (2006). “Remediating misconceptions concerning
chemical bonding through conceptual change text”. H.U. Journal of
Education. H.U. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 184-192.
Prihantoro, A. (2012). Perihal tes diagnostik. [Online]. Tersedia di:
http://agungprihantoro.wordpress.com/2012/04/03/perihal-tes-diagnostik/
Diakses 7 Maret 2014.
Purnamasari, R. (2012). Pengembangan tes diagnostik two-tier multiple choice
untuk mengukur pemahaman konsep pada materi kelarutan dan hasil kali
kelarutan. (Skripsi). FPMIPA UPI, Bandung.
Sari, N.K.E. (2013). Pengembangan tes diagnostik two-tier sebagai instrumen
alternatif untuk mendeteksi miskonsespsi siswa sma pada materi laju
reaksi. (Skripsi). FPMIPA UPI, Bandung.
Sugiyono.(2012). Metode penelitian administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukardi. (2010). Evaluasi pendidikan : Prinsip dan operasionalnya. Jakarta: Bumi
Aksara.
Suparno, P. (2005). Miskonsepsi dan perubahan konsep dalam pendidikan fisika.
Jakarta: Grasindo.
Suwarto dan Afghohani, A.(2011)Pengembangan tes diagnostik dalam program
komputer . Sukoharjo: LPPM Univet Bantara.
107
Taber, K.S. (1997). “Student understanding of ionic bonding: Molecular versus
electrostatic framework?”. School Science Review, 78, 85-95.
Taber, K. S. (1998a). “An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry
education”. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (5), 597-608.
Taber K. (2002a). Chemical misconceptions - prevention, diagnosis and cure
(Volume I: theoretical background). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Takeuchi, Y. (2006). Pengantar Kimia (Terjemahan). Tokyo: Iwanami Publishing
Company.
Tan, D.K-C. dan Treagust, D.F. (1999). “Evaluating students’ understanding of
chemical bonding”. School Science Review, 81, 75–83.
Tarakchi, M., dkk. (1999). “A cross-age study of high school student’s
understanding of diffusion and osmosis”. H.U. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,
15, 84 – 93.
Tinambunan, W. (1988). Evaluation of student achievement. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Treagust, D.F. (1995). “Diagnostic assessment of students’ science knowledge”.
Dalam Glynn, S.M & Duit, R. (Penyunting), Learning science in the
schools: Research reforming practice (hlm. 327-346). Mahwah, New
Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Treagust, D. F. (2006). Diagnostic assessment in science as a means to improving
teaching, learning and retention. UniServe Science Assessment
Symposium Proceedings.
Tuysuz, Chengiz. (2009). Development of two-tier diagnostic instrument and
assess students’ understanding in chemistry. Academic Journals.
Whitten. (2004). General chemistry. Edisi ketujuh. Philadelphia: Saunders
College Publishing.
Winkel, W. S. (1991). Psikologi pengajaran. Jakarta : PT Grasindo.
Woolfolk, A.E., & McCune-Nicolich, L. (1984). Educational psychology for
teachers. Edisi kedua. New Jersey : Prentice Hall Inc.