An 05 report 26th ACCSQ

(1)

DOC. NO. AGENDA ITEM

04 4

H

IGHLIGHTS FROM THE

26

TH

ACCSQ

M

EETING

THE 3rd

ACCSQ-WB PWG MEETING Bangkok, Thailand, 15-16 December 2005


(2)

15-16 December 2005, Bangkok, Thailand

Agenda Item 4

FOLLOW UP FROM THE 26TH ACCSQ MEETING

1. This paper highlights the main outcomes of the 26th ACCSQ Meetings held on 4-5 August 2005 in Manila, Philippines, respectively. Following are decisions which are of relevance or interest to the WB PWG Meeting:

ƒ ASEAN Policy on Standards and Conformance

2. ACCSQ adopted the ASEAN Policy Guideline on Standards and Conformance and

submitted it for consideration and endorsement by SEOM and subsequent endorsement by AEM. The Policy Guideline was developed based on the WTO TBT Agreement, APEC Guideline on Good Regulatory Practice and APEC Guideline on Transparency. The Guideline aims to provide the guiding principles for the implementation of joint efforts of ASEAN Member Countries in the area of standards and conformance both in the regulated and non- regulated sectors as one of the measures for accelerating economic integration towards establishing the AEC. The Guideline focuses on harmonization of standards and the implementation of the relevant conformity assessment schemes as well as their adoption and use in technical regulations.

ƒ Review of the TOR of ACCSQ

3. ACCSQ is in the process of reviewing its TOR in order to enhance the involvement of regulators and stakeholders in the ACCSQ’s activities and to support the realization of the AEC.

ƒ Facilitation of the implementation of sectoral MRAs

4. As per follow-up to the decision of ACCSQ and SEOM that the ASEAN MRAs are

developed to facilitate intra ASEAN trade for AFTA, ACCSQ agreed to adopt definition on ASEAN Manufactured Products as follows: “A manufacturer incorporated and operating within the boundary of ASEAN that carry out manufacturing activities and are responsible for the quality of the product concerned. An “ASEAN Manufactured Product” is a product manufactured by the said ASEAN Manufacturer.

ƒ Progress made by Wood Based PWG

5. ACCSQ requested the WB PWG to look into solutions to facilitate wood-bsed industry in its exportation to the different markets such as EU, USA, CER and Japan

6. ACCSQ noted the progress made by AB PWG and endorsed the Report of the 2nd

WBPWG Meeting, Terms of Reference and Work Programme.

The Meeting may wish to take note of the above. The Report of the 26th ACCSQ Meeting is attached for reference


(3)

DOC. NO. AGENDA ITEM

04 4

A

TTACHMENT

1:

R

EPORT OF THE

26

TH

ACCSQ

M

EETING

THE 3rd

ACCSQ-WB PWG MEETING Bangkok, Thailand, 15-16 December 2005


(4)

REPORT OF THE TWENTY-SIXTH MEETING OF

THE ASEAN CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDS AND QUALITY (ACCSQ)

4 – 5 August 2005, Manila, Philippines

INTRODUCTION

1. The Twenty Sixth Meeting of the ASEAN Consultative Committee for Standards and Quality (ACCSQ) was held on 4 – 5 August 2005 in Manila, Philippines. The Meeting was preceded by the Special Meeting on 3 August 2005 in the same venue.

2. The Meeting was chaired by Mr. Nheune Sisavad, Director-General, Department of Intellectual Property, Standardization and Metrology, Sciences, Technology and Environment Agency, Prime Minister's Office, Lao PDR and co-chaired by Ms. Mariani Mohammad, Director General, Department of Standards Malaysia, Malaysia.

3. The Meeting was attended by representatives from Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Viet Nam. Staff members of the ASEAN Secretariat were also in attendance. The list of delegates appears as ANNEX 1.

AGENDA ITEM 1 : ADOPTION OF AGENDA

4. The Meeting adopted the Agenda, which appears as ANNEX 2.

AGENDA ITEM 2 : BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS

5. The Meeting was held in Plenary.

AGENDA ITEM 3: ELECTION OF CO-CHAIRMAN

6. The Meeting agreed on the nomination of Ms. Mariani Mohammad from Malaysia as Madam Co-Chair of ACCSQ.

7. The Meeting expressed its appreciation to Mr. Iman Sudarwo, Director General, National Standards Agency, Indonesia for his valuable contribution as Co-Chairman to the ACCSQ activities.


(5)

8. The ASEAN Secretariat briefed the Meeting on the outcomes of the ASEAN Economic Ministers (AEM) Retreat held on 26 April 2005 in Ha Long, Viet Nam; SEOM 2/36 held on 13-16 March 2005 in Manila, Philippines and SEOM 3/36 held on 16-18 June 2005 in Brunei Darussalam. The ASEAN Secretariat’s information paper appears as ANNEX 3.

9. The Meeting noted among others the following: (i) AEM Retreat

- AEM noted that progress in the horizontal measures was more advanced than the sector-specific measures.

- AEM agreed that Member Countries presently not coordinating any sector be made co-chair of some of the priority sectors. - AEM noted the interest of Viet Nam and Lao PDR to co-chair the

sectors of agro-based and wood-based products, respectively. (ii) SEOM

- SEOM endorsed ACCSQ’s decision on the following implementation issues, i.e. use of latest edition of international standards and scope of the implementation of ASEAN EE MRA. - SEOM agreed that considering the growing importance of

standards and quality conformance as tariffs, the structure of the product working groups under the ACCSQ would not be streamlined at this moment.

- SEOM requested that all ACCSQ product working groups meet before the ACCSQ meetings so that any outstanding issues could be resolved as soon as possible.

10. The Meeting further noted the decision made by SEOM to encourage ACCSQ Chairman to attend future SEOM to facilitate the interaction between SEOM and ACCSQ.

(iii) Outcomes of the Consultative Meeting for the Priority Integration Sectors

11. Indonesia also briefed the Meeting on the outcomes of the Consultative Meeting for the Priority Integration Sectors (COPS) that was held on 8 – 9 July 2005 in Jakarta, Indonesia. The information paper of ACCSQ to COPS appears as

ANNEX 4.

12. The Meeting exchanged views on the following matters:

- to provide comments to SEOM on ACCSQ’s capacity to undertake activities in the Roadmaps where ACCSQ has been identified as the


(6)

implementing body for specific measures such as in the areas of e-ASEAN and standards for tourism;

- to disseminate information to private sectors and other organizations on the activities undertaken by the ACCSQ.

- to coordinate with the related ASEAN bodies to ensure the successful implementation of the roadmaps for the integration.

13. While waiting for the final report of the COPS in order to discuss the follow-up actions in details, the Meeting agreed on the following course of actions:

- Philippines to inform the ASEAN Electrical Forum (AEF) of the on-going activity of the JSC EE MRA in particular the progress in the implementation of the ASEAN EE MRA and Harmonization of Electrical and Electronic Regulatory Regimes.

- Singapore to discuss with its SEOM Leader and representative from TELSOM to define the scope of activities to be covered by the ACCSQ under the e-ASEAN roadmap and to submit the recommendations to ACCSQ for its consideration at the next Meeting. Measures XIX (47) “Align Conformity assessment procedures for ICT products” and (48) “Establish MRAs for ICT Products” should also be considered.

- In the area of Tourism, the Meeting noted the proposal to develop standards for tourism. The Meeting also noted that there is currently a working group under ASEAN National Tourism Organisations (NTOs) that has been working in this field. In this regard, the Meeting agreed to further discuss this matter upon receiving the final report of the COPS. In the meantime, Thailand will coordinate with the Working Group on Standards for Tourism to see how ACCSQ can provide its support in this area.

14. The Meeting also agreed on the proposal of Philippine that SEOM should look into the development of clear guidance on how relevant bodies in ASEAN can coordinate and support each other to ensure the successful implementation of the roadmaps.

AGENDA ITEM 5: FACILITATION OF THE REALIZATION OF THE ASEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY

5.1. ASEAN Policy on Standards and Conformance

15. The Meeting discussed and adopted the final ASEAN Policy Guideline on Standards and Conformance, which appears as ANNEX 5. The Meeting also agreed to submit the Guideline to SEOM for its consideration and endorsement and subsequently to submit for consideration and endorsement by the ASEAN Economic Ministers during the 37th AEM.


(7)

16. The ASEAN Secretariat presented to the Meeting the revised TOR of ACCSQ, which appears as ANNEX 6.

17. The Meeting recalled the basis for revising the TOR, which include, amongst others, the following:

i) to take into account the emergence of new issues, challenges and tasks to be undertaken by ACCSQ.

ii) to enhance the role of all relevant stakeholders in ACCSQ activities. iii) to strengthen the networking between ACCSQ and other ASEAN

relevant bodies.

18. The Meeting considered the revised TOR and suggested the following should be included in the TOR:

(i) The role of the Secretary.

(ii) The necessary participation of the Chairs and Co- Chairs of the WGs and PWGs in the ACCSQ Meetings.

19. Viet Nam suggested considering the renaming of the Committee to reflect the full activities that ACCSQ has been undertaking.

20. In view of the above, the Meeting requested the ASEAN Secretariat to revise the TOR taking into account the views and comments expressed by Member Countries in the Meeting and to circulate the revised TOR to Member Countries for their consideration prior to the next Meeting. The current TOR will also be circulated for reference and comparison by Member Countries.

5.3. Progress in harmonization of standards and MRAs

21. The Chair of WG1 briefed the Meeting on the outcome of the 16th Meeting of the ACCSQ WG1 on Standards and MRAs held on 9 – 10 May 2005 in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The Chair’s paper appears as ANNEX 7.

22. The Meeting noted the progress made by the WG1 and endorsed the Report of 16th WG1 Meeting and its Work Programme, which appears as ANNEX 8.

5.4. Progress in accreditation and conformity assessment

23. The Chair of WG2 briefed the Meeting on the outcome of the 11th Meeting of the ACCSQ WG2 on Accreditation and Conformity Assessment held on 30 - 31 July 2005 in Manila, Philippines. The Chair’s paper appears in ANNEX 9.

24. The Meeting considered and endorsed the decision of WG2 not to establish a peer evaluation scheme at this time due to the discrepancy of readiness among Member Countries in technical infrastructure. The Meeting was of the view that such system can be considered in future if there is a need.


(8)

25. The Meeting also agreed that Malaysia and Viet Nam will be the next Chair and Co-Chair of the WG2, respectively. The Meeting expressed its appreciation to Indonesia and Thailand for their contribution to the WG2 activities as the Chair and Co- Chair.

26. The Meeting endorsed the Report of the 11th Meeting of the ACCSQ WG on Accreditation and Conformity Assessment and its work programme, which appears

as ANNEX 10.

5.5. Progress in Electrical and Electronic Sector

27. The Co- Chair of JSC EE MRA on behalf of the Chair briefed the Meeting on the progress made in the implementation of the ASEAN EE MRA and the draft Agreement on ASEAN Harmonized Electrical and Electronic Equipment Regulatory Regime. The Chair’s paper appears as ANNEX 11.

28. The Meeting noted the progress in the implementation of the ASEAN EE MRA particularly the listing of Designated CABs. The Meeting further noted with the appreciation the progress made by the Taskforce on Harmonization of Electrical and Electronic Regulatory Regimes in developing an Agreement on ASEAN Harmonized Electrical Electronic Equipment Regulatory Regime.

ASEAN Harmonized EEE Regulatory Regime

29. Indonesia proposed that the following issues need to be further considered to ensure the smooth implementation of the Agreement:

(i) The idea to establish the essential requirements is reasonable. However, there is a need to work out on the listed standards and harmonized technical regulatory requirements as soon as possible to facilitate Member Countries in transposing the requirements of the Agreement into national technical regulations.

(ii) There is a need to work out in more detail the procedures for ASEAN Conformity Mark, particularly on its ownership, liability, administration and management. The ASEAN Conformity Mark should be used for various sectors and not only for electrical and electronic equipment.

30. The Meeting discussed and made the following decisions:

(i) To drop the ASEAN Conformity Mark from the Agreement on ASEAN Harmonized EEE Regulatory Regime. In this regard, the Meeting requested the Taskforce on Harmonization of EEE Regulatory Regime to revise the Agreement and submit for consideration by the ACCSQ as soon as possible. The Meeting also reiterated its desire to get the Agreement ready for signing by end of 2005.

(ii) To establish a Taskforce on ASEAN Conformity Mark led by Indonesia with participation of Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand to look into all issues related to the Mark and submit the recommendations for


(9)

consideration by the ACCSQ. The Meeting also agreed that Indonesia to come up with the draft paper on this matter and circulate for consideration by the Members of the Taskforce as soon as possible. 31. Indonesia also proposed that the Article 4 of the Agreement should be further considered by the Taskforce in terms of legal aspect to ensure that there is no contradiction between sub-articles.

ASEAN EE MRA

32. The Meeting considered and endorsed the recommendation of the JSC EE MRA on the definition of the ASEAN Manufactured Product as follows:

“A manufacturer incorporated and operating within the boundary of ASEAN that carry out manufacturing activities and are responsible for the quality of the product concerned. An “ASEAN Manufactured Product” is a product manufactured by the said ASEAN Manufacturer”.

33. The Meeting considered and endorsed the Report of the 7th Meeting of the JSC EE MRA, and the report of the 6th Task Force EE Regulatory Regime subject to decisions in paragraph 30.i. The reports appear together as ANNEX 12.

5.6. Progress in implementation of ASEAN Harmonized Cosmetic Regulatory Scheme

34. The ASEAN Secretariat on behalf of the Chair and Co-Chair of the ASEAN Cosmetic Committee (ACC) briefed the Meeting on the status of the implementation of the ASEAN Harmonized Cosmetic Regulatory Scheme. The Chair’s paper appears as ANNEX 13.

35. Indonesia sought clarification why the decision had been made to eliminate the GMP Certification by 1 January 2008 while the survey on the GMP compliance by industry will only be conducted in January 2007. The clarification was made that the compliance with the ASEAN Cosmetic GMP Guideline is a must by 1 January 2008. Instead of conducting inspection and granting the GMP Certification by Regulatory Authorities, the manufacturers will be allowed to self regulate their system and declare to the Regulatory Authorities their compliance with the GMP Guideline. The intention of survey is to identify the readiness as well as the difficulties in compliance with GMP requirements by industry especially the SMEs so that additional and appropriate assistance can be provided to assist them in implementing the Guideline as per schedule.

36. In noting the concern of GMP compliance by the Cosmetic SMEs in ASEAN, the Meeting requested the ACC to work out an appropriate programme to assist industry in this matter. The Meeting also extended its continued support for the ACC by exploring possible funding from its Dialogue Partners especially PTB Germany to assist ACC activities.

37. The Meeting endorsed the Report of the 4th ACC Meeting and its Work Programme, which appears as ANNEX 14.


(10)

38. The Co-Chair of the PPWG briefed the Meeting on the status of the implementation of the ACTD and possible development of MRA for Pharmaceuticals in ASEAN. The Co-Chair’s paper appears as ANNEX 15.

39. The Meeting noted the progress made by the PPWG and its efforts to look into MRA for GMP inspection in ASEAN by end of 2007. The Meeting also noted that the next PPWG Meeting will be held on 23 – 26 August 2005 in Singapore. The Meeting acknowledged the assistance of the EC- ASEAN Regional Economic Cooperation Programme on Standards, Quality and Conformity Assessment.

5.8. Progress in Prepared Foodstuff

40. The Secretary of the PFPWG highlighted the Meeting on the progress of consultative network amongst ASEAN Food Committee to facilitate the implementation of roadmap for agro-based sector integration. The paper appears as

ANNEX 16.

41. The Meeting noted the progress of the PFPWG.

5.9. Progress in Traditional Medicines and Health Supplement

42. The Chair of the TMHSPWG briefed the Meeting on the outcomes of the 3rd Meeting of the TMHSPWG held on 7 – 8 July 2005 in Bali, Indonesia. The Chair’s report appears as ANNEX 17.

43. The Meeting noted the progress made by the TMHSPWG and endorsed the Report of the 3rd Meeting of the ACCSQ TMHSPWG and its revised Work Programme of the TMHSPWG, which appear together as ANNEX 18. The Meeting agreed to support the TMHSPWG to explore assistance from its Dialogue Partners and the WHO for the activities of the PWG.

5.10. Progress in Medical Device

44. The Chair of the ACCSQ Medical Device Product Working Group (MDPWG) briefed the Meeting on the outcome of the 2nd Meeting of the ACCSQ MDPWG held on 11 – 12 July 2005 in Jakarta, Indonesia. The Chair’s paper appears as ANNEX 19.

45. The Chair of MDPWG informed the Meeting of the proposed establishment of a Trust Fund to conduct activities of the PWG and to facilitate the participation of Member Countries in the PWG Meetings and the funding would be mobilized in the following ways:

(i) The host country of the MDPWG Meetings or Workshops are allowed to charge a registration fee for participants and any surplus funds will be deposited in Trust Fund.


(11)

46. The Meeting welcomed this initiative by the MDPWG. However, the Meeting requested the MDPWG to work out the detail on the mechanism to administer the fund and submit it for consideration by the ACCSQ as soon as possible. The Meeting also agreed to the suggestion of Indonesia to seek the point of view from the SEOM on this matter.

47. The Meeting endorsed the nomination of Datuk Ir. Dr. M.S. Pillay, Director of Engineering Services of the Ministry of Health, Malaysia as the new Chair of the MDPWG. The Meeting also encouraged Lao PDR and Philippines to nominate the representatives at the MDPWG as soon as possible.

48. The Meeting endorsed the Report of the 2nd ACCSQ MDPWG, its Terms of Reference and Work Programme subject to decision in paragraph 46. The report, TOR and the Work Programme appears together as ANNEX 20.

5.11. Progress in Automotive

49. The Chair of the Automotive PWG briefed the Meeting on the outcome of the 2nd Meeting of the ACCSQ Automotive PWG held on 13 – 14 July 2005 in Jakarta, Indonesia. The Chair’s paper appears as ANNEX 21.

50. The Meeting was informed that the APWG would focus on harmonization of technical regulations and conformity assessment in the following areas:

i. Fuel Properties & Emission Regulations (Environment) ii. Certification Procedures; and

iii. Safety Regulations (i.e. safety belt, tyre and safety glass)

51. The Meeting took note of the proposal of Philippines to assist the local industry in capacity building activities to enable them to meet the international standards and technical regulations and agreed that such proposal be submitted in detail to the ACCSQ for consideration.

52. The Meeting considered and endorsed the Report of the 2nd Meeting of the ACCSQ Automotive PWG, the Terms of Reference and Work Programme which appear as ANNEX 22.

5.12. Progress in Wood-Based

53. Indonesia on behalf of the Chair of the ACCSQ Wood-based PWG briefed the Meeting on the outcome of the 2nd Meeting of the ACCSQ Wood-based PWG held on 28 – 29 June 2005, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The Chair’s paper appears as

ANNEX 23.

54. The Meeting requested the WBPWG to look into solutions to facilitate wood-based industry in its exportation to the different markets such as EU, USA, CER and Japan.


(12)

55. The Meeting noted the progress made by the WBPWG and endorsed the Report of its 2nd Meeting, Terms of Reference and Work Programme, which appears

as ANNEX 24.

5.13. Progress in Rubber-Based

56. The Secretary of the Rubber-Based PWG (RBPWG) briefed the Meeting on the outcome of the 2nd Meeting of the ACCSQ Rubber-Based PWG held on 30 – 31 July 2005 in Manila. Philippines. The paper appears as ANNEX 25.

57. The Meeting reiterated that with regard to the product coverage, the MDPWG will handle rubber-based products classified and identified as medical devices in particular rubber gloves and condoms.

58. The Meeting noted the progress made by the RBPWG and endorsed the Report of its 2nd Meeting, TOR and Work Programme, which appear together as

ANNEX 26.

5.14. Progress in Metrology

5.14.1. Legal Metrology

59. Indonesia on behalf of the Chair of Sub Working Group on Legal Metrology briefed the Meeting on the latest development on Legal Metrology. The Chair’s paper appears as ANNEX 27.

60. The Meeting was briefed by Viet Nam on the survey on the technical regulation concerning Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments (NAWI). A draft format had been developed by Viet Nam and circulated to Member Countries for their consideration and response.

61. Brunei Darussalam informed the Meeting of its willingness to organise the workshop on the Importance of Accreditation in Legal Metrology tentatively on 22-23 November 2005 and requested the ASEAN Secretariat to work with the PTB to send the programme of the workshop to Brunei Darussalam as soon as possible for its necessary preparation.

5.14.2. Scientific/ Industrial Metrology

62. The Meeting considered the proposal to establish a working group on Scientific/Industrial Metrology.

63. The Meeting noted the agreement by the Philippines to chair this sub-working group. The Meeting, however, was of the view that Member Countries have been putting a lot of efforts to participate in Global Measurement MRAs and activities of APMP. Hence, there is a need to define the clear objective and scope of activities for the sub-working group prior to its creation in order to avoid duplication of efforts. In this regard, the Meeting requested Philippines to come up with the draft Terms of Reference for the sub-working group for ACCSQ to consider and make decision.

AGENDA ITEM 6: COOPERATION WITH DIALOGUE PARTNERS AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS


(13)

6.1. ASEAN- Korea Cooperation on Standards and Conformance

64. Thailand updated the Meeting on the progress of the ASEAN – Korea Cooperation on Standards and Conformance, including the preparation for the 2nd ACCSQ-KATS (ROK) Meeting to be held on 6 August 2005 in Manila, Philippines. Thailand’s paper appears as ANNEX 28.

65. With regard to the activities to cooperate with Korea, the Meeting agreed to discuss further with Korea during the forthcoming consultation on 6 August 2005 including the Article 15 (Cooperation on Standards and Conformance) under the ASEAN- Korea Framework Agreement. The Meeting also agreed to seek the confirmation from KATS whether it is an agency appointed by Korea Government to cooperate with ACCSQ to undertake cooperation on standards and conformance. 66. The Meeting considered and agreed to amend the draft agenda of the 2nd ACCSQ-Korea Meeting, which appears as ANNEX 29.

6.2 ASEAN – Japan Cooperation on Standards and Conformance

67. Malaysia briefed the Meeting on the progress of the ASEAN-Japan Cooperation on Standards and Conformance Malaysia’s paper appears as ANNEX 30.

68. The Meeting discussed and agreed on the following:

i) Member Countries are encouraged to submit proposals to cooperate with Japan in the four sectors of automotive, electronics, rubber-based, and textile and apparels to Malaysia not later than December 2005 so that Malaysia can compile and submit the proposals for Japan to consider funding support in 2007.

ii) Upon the request of Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia will contact Japan to identify the contact person responsible for TQM programme in Japan and procedures for application of additional assistance on this matter.

iii) The Meeting took note that the proposed session on exchange of information between Japan and the ASEAN Joint Sectoral Committee on EE MRA (JSC) has not taken place and no response from Japan has been received regarding this activity. In this regard, the Meeting agreed to drop this activity at this time. Malaysia will inform Japan of this decision accordingly.

6.3 ASEAN – EC Cooperation on Standards and Conformance

69. Indonesia reported to the Meeting on the status of the implementation of the EC-ASEAN Regional Economic Cooperation Programme on Standards, Quality and Conformity Assessment, Indonesia’s paper appears as ANNEX 31.


(14)

70. The Meeting noted with appreciation the efforts taken by the Programme Team in Jakarta, WGs and PWGs in moving forward the successful implementation of the Programme by end of 2005. The Meeting, however, noted the concern on the delay of the implementation of some activities especially in cosmetic sector that may cause the delay in the work programme of the ASEAN Cosmetic Committee. In this regard, the Meeting requested Indonesia to discuss with the Team Leader of the Programme to keep to the original schedules of activities as much as possible.

71. The Meeting also noted concerns raised by Member Countries with regard to the administrative issues. The Meeting requested Member Countries to put up their concerns in writing and submit to Indonesia for compilation and follow-up actions. The Meeting also agreed that all concerns raised by Member Countries if not resolved would be discussed at the next PSC Meeting to be held tentatively on 17-18 September 2005. The Meeting also requested the Programme Team to send out the invitation and draft agenda of the Meeting to Member Countries as soon as possible.

6.4. ASEAN – US Cooperation on Standards and Conformance

72. Vietnam briefed the Meeting on the latest development on ASEAN-US Cooperation on Trade-related Standards and Conformance Issues. Vietnam’s paper appears as ANNEX 32.

73. Member Countries expressed concerns over the delay in implementing the 3 Years ACCSQ- US Action Plan. In this regard, the Meeting agreed on the suggestion of the Madam Co-Chair that ACCSQ conducts an informal meeting with trade officer of the US back to back with the ISO GA Meeting in Singapore in order to discuss all pending issues and decide on the up actions. Viet Nam is requested to follow-up on this matter and inform Member Countries accordingly.

6.5. ASEAN- CER Cooperation

74. The Meeting noted the update on the ASEAN- CER Cooperation by Singapore. The Meeting also noted that the next ACCSQ- CER Meeting will be held in March 2006 back to back with the 27th ACCSQ Meeting.

6.6. ASEAN – China Cooperation on Standards and Conformance

75. The ASEAN Secretariat briefed the Meeting on the Chinese Proposal to cooperate with ASEAN in the area of standards and conformance. The Chinese Proposal appears as ANNEX 33.

76. The Meeting discussed the proposal and made the following decisions:

(i) The Workshop can be considered as a kick-off meeting to discuss cooperation between ASEAN and China in the areas of standards and conformance.

(ii) ACCSQ Leaders are encouraged to attend the workshop.

(iii) Member Countries to put up in writing and submit to the ASEAN Secretariat any proposals that they may wish to cooperate with China including in the area of technical regulations and conformity


(15)

assessment so that it can compile and circulate for the consideration by Member Countries prior to the Workshop.

(iv) With regard to the date, the Meeting agreed that the workshop should be held on 9-11 November 2005.

6.7. AADCP Programme

77. The Meeting noted the progress of the implementation of the AADCP Programme presented by Indonesia which appears as ANNEX 34.

6.8. Cooperation with PTB

78. The ASEAN Secretariat informed the Meeting on the progress of the ACCSQ-PTB Cooperation. The Meeting noted the following:

(i) the training on ISO/ IEC 17011 to be held in October 2005 in Ha Noi, Viet Nam.

(ii) the training on ISO/ IEC 17025 to be held in Philippines. Detailed information will be communicated in due course.

(iii) the Workshop on the Importance of Accreditation in Legal Metrology to be held in Brunei Darussalam on 22-23 November 2005.

(iv) on-going discussion for cosmetics and proficiency testing.

AGENDA ITEM 7: DEVELOPMENTS OF OTHER RELEVANT REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

7.1. WTO TBT Matters

79. The Meeting noted the outcomes of the 36th and 37th Meetings of the WTO/TBT Committee were held on 22-23 March and 16-17 June 2005, respectively. The information paper prepared by Thailand appears as ANNEX 35.

7.2. ISO Matters

80. Philippines updated the Meeting on the latest development in ISO. Philippines’ paper appears as ANNEX 36.

81. The Meeting was informed that an ISO/SIS Workshop on Increasing the Impact of Developing Country Participation in International Standardisation in Social Responsibility and the 2nd Meeting of the ISO Working Group on Social Responsibility will be held on 26 – 30 September 2005 in Bangkok. The Letter of Invitation has been distributed to Member Countries at this Meeting and appears as

ANNEX 37. The Meeting was also informed that the funding is available to support

Members and Non- Members of ISO to attend the Workshop, subject to the submission of application for funding support to ISO.

82. The Meeting took note of the proposal by Indonesia to host a public awareness workshop on ISO 22000 on Food Safety Requirements for ASEAN Member Countries, back to back with the 28th Meeting of the ACCSQ in Indonesia. Recognising the importance of food safety and potential trade in the region, efforts


(16)

must be taken to promote awareness on this new standard in Member Countries. In accordance to ISO procedure, Indonesia will submit the proposal to ISO for its consideration. Mr. Jesus Motoomull as the ISO Regional Liaison Officer will assist Indonesia in this matter.

83. The Meeting was also informed that the term of DEVCO Chair is going to end in 2006 and interested Member Countries are encouraged to nominate a candidate for this position.

84. The Meeting expressed its appreciation to the Philippines for successfully conducting the Regional Workshop on Conformity Assessment on 1-2 August 2005 and in promoting the cooperation between ACCSQ and ISO.

7.2 IEC Matters

85. Singapore updated the Meeting on the activities of the IEC. Singapore’s paper appears as ANNEX 38.

7.3. APEC Development on Standards and Conformity Assessment

86. Brunei Darussalam briefed the Meeting on the activities within APEC Development on Standards and Conformity Assessment. Brunei Darussalam’s paper appears as ANNEX 39. The Meeting noted that the APEC EE MRA Seminar will be held on 10-11 August 2005 in Bali, Indonesia.

7.4. Member Countries’ Latest Development on Standards and

Conformity Assessment by Member Countries.

87. The Meeting noted the latest developments on Standards and Conformity Assessment submitted by Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, and Viet Nam, which appear together as ANNEX 40.

AGENDA ITEM 8: OTHER MATTERS

88. The Meeting reiterated the necessary participation of the Chairs and Co- Chairs of the WGs and PWGs in the ACCSQ Meetings. In this regard, the Meeting requested Member Countries to provide support to the Chairs and Co-Chairs to enable their participation.

AGENDA ITEM 9: DATE AND VENUE OF THE NEXT MEETING

89. The Meeting agreed to convene the 27th ACCSQ and its related Meetings in March 2006 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The date and venue will be informed in due course.


(17)

90. The Meeting considered and adopted the Report of the 26th Meeting of the ASEAN Consultative Committee for Standards and Quality held on 4 – 5 August 2005 in Manila, Philippines.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The delegates from Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Viet Nam and the ASEAN Secretariat expressed their appreciation to the Bureau of Product Standards, Department of Trade and Industry, the Philippines, for the warm hospitality extended and the excellent arrangements made for the Meeting. The Meeting thanked the ASEAN Secretariat for the assistance provided.


(1)

55. The Meeting noted the progress made by the WBPWG and endorsed the Report of its 2nd Meeting, Terms of Reference and Work Programme, which appears

as ANNEX 24.

5.13. Progress in Rubber-Based

56. The Secretary of the Rubber-Based PWG (RBPWG) briefed the Meeting on

the outcome of the 2nd Meeting of the ACCSQ Rubber-Based PWG held on 30 – 31

July 2005 in Manila. Philippines. The paper appears as ANNEX 25.

57. The Meeting reiterated that with regard to the product coverage, the MDPWG

will handle rubber-based products classified and identified as medical devices in particular rubber gloves and condoms.

58. The Meeting noted the progress made by the RBPWG and endorsed the

Report of its 2nd Meeting, TOR and Work Programme, which appear together as

ANNEX 26.

5.14. Progress in Metrology

5.14.1. Legal Metrology

59. Indonesia on behalf of the Chair of Sub Working Group on Legal Metrology

briefed the Meeting on the latest development on Legal Metrology. The Chair’s paper

appears as ANNEX 27.

60. The Meeting was briefed by Viet Nam on the survey on the technical

regulation concerning Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments (NAWI). A draft format had been developed by Viet Nam and circulated to Member Countries for their consideration and response.

61. Brunei Darussalam informed the Meeting of its willingness to organise the

workshop on the Importance of Accreditation in Legal Metrology tentatively on 22-23 November 2005 and requested the ASEAN Secretariat to work with the PTB to send the programme of the workshop to Brunei Darussalam as soon as possible for its necessary preparation.

5.14.2. Scientific/ Industrial Metrology

62. The Meeting considered the proposal to establish a working group on Scientific/Industrial Metrology.

63. The Meeting noted the agreement by the Philippines to chair this sub-working group. The Meeting, however, was of the view that Member Countries have been putting a lot of efforts to participate in Global Measurement MRAs and activities of APMP. Hence, there is a need to define the clear objective and scope of activities for the sub-working group prior to its creation in order to avoid duplication of efforts. In this regard, the Meeting requested Philippines to come up with the draft Terms of Reference for the sub-working group for ACCSQ to consider and make decision.

AGENDA ITEM 6: COOPERATION WITH DIALOGUE PARTNERS AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS


(2)

6.1. ASEAN- Korea Cooperation on Standards and Conformance

64. Thailand updated the Meeting on the progress of the ASEAN – Korea

Cooperation on Standards and Conformance, including the preparation for the 2nd

ACCSQ-KATS (ROK) Meeting to be held on 6 August 2005 in Manila, Philippines.

Thailand’s paper appears as ANNEX 28.

65. With regard to the activities to cooperate with Korea, the Meeting agreed to discuss further with Korea during the forthcoming consultation on 6 August 2005 including the Article 15 (Cooperation on Standards and Conformance) under the ASEAN- Korea Framework Agreement. The Meeting also agreed to seek the confirmation from KATS whether it is an agency appointed by Korea Government to cooperate with ACCSQ to undertake cooperation on standards and conformance.

66. The Meeting considered and agreed to amend the draft agenda of the 2nd

ACCSQ-Korea Meeting, which appears as ANNEX 29.

6.2 ASEAN – Japan Cooperation on Standards and Conformance

67. Malaysia briefed the Meeting on the progress of the ASEAN-Japan

Cooperation on Standards and Conformance Malaysia’s paper appears as ANNEX

30.

68. The Meeting discussed and agreed on the following:

i) Member Countries are encouraged to submit proposals to cooperate

with Japan in the four sectors of automotive, electronics, rubber-based, and textile and apparels to Malaysia not later than December 2005 so that Malaysia can compile and submit the proposals for Japan to consider funding support in 2007.

ii) Upon the request of Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia will contact Japan

to identify the contact person responsible for TQM programme in Japan and procedures for application of additional assistance on this matter.

iii) The Meeting took note that the proposed session on exchange of

information between Japan and the ASEAN Joint Sectoral Committee on EE MRA (JSC) has not taken place and no response from Japan has been received regarding this activity. In this regard, the Meeting agreed to drop this activity at this time. Malaysia will inform Japan of this decision accordingly.

6.3 ASEAN – EC Cooperation on Standards and Conformance

69. Indonesia reported to the Meeting on the status of the implementation of the EC-ASEAN Regional Economic Cooperation Programme on Standards, Quality and


(3)

70. The Meeting noted with appreciation the efforts taken by the Programme Team in Jakarta, WGs and PWGs in moving forward the successful implementation of the Programme by end of 2005. The Meeting, however, noted the concern on the delay of the implementation of some activities especially in cosmetic sector that may cause the delay in the work programme of the ASEAN Cosmetic Committee. In this regard, the Meeting requested Indonesia to discuss with the Team Leader of the Programme to keep to the original schedules of activities as much as possible.

71. The Meeting also noted concerns raised by Member Countries with regard to

the administrative issues. The Meeting requested Member Countries to put up their concerns in writing and submit to Indonesia for compilation and follow-up actions. The Meeting also agreed that all concerns raised by Member Countries if not resolved would be discussed at the next PSC Meeting to be held tentatively on 17-18 September 2005. The Meeting also requested the Programme Team to send out the invitation and draft agenda of the Meeting to Member Countries as soon as possible.

6.4. ASEAN – US Cooperation on Standards and Conformance

72. Vietnam briefed the Meeting on the latest development on ASEAN-US Cooperation on Trade-related Standards and Conformance Issues. Vietnam’s paper

appears as ANNEX 32.

73. Member Countries expressed concerns over the delay in implementing the 3

Years ACCSQ- US Action Plan. In this regard, the Meeting agreed on the suggestion of the Madam Co-Chair that ACCSQ conducts an informal meeting with trade officer of the US back to back with the ISO GA Meeting in Singapore in order to discuss all pending issues and decide on the up actions. Viet Nam is requested to follow-up on this matter and inform Member Countries accordingly.

6.5. ASEAN- CER Cooperation

74. The Meeting noted the update on the ASEAN- CER Cooperation by Singapore. The Meeting also noted that the next ACCSQ- CER Meeting will be held in March 2006 back to back with the 27th ACCSQ Meeting.

6.6. ASEAN – China Cooperation on Standards and Conformance

75. The ASEAN Secretariat briefed the Meeting on the Chinese Proposal to

cooperate with ASEAN in the area of standards and conformance. The Chinese

Proposal appears as ANNEX 33.

76. The Meeting discussed the proposal and made the following decisions:

(i) The Workshop can be considered as a kick-off meeting to discuss

cooperation between ASEAN and China in the areas of standards and conformance.

(ii) ACCSQ Leaders are encouraged to attend the workshop.

(iii) Member Countries to put up in writing and submit to the ASEAN

Secretariat any proposals that they may wish to cooperate with China including in the area of technical regulations and conformity


(4)

assessment so that it can compile and circulate for the consideration by Member Countries prior to the Workshop.

(iv) With regard to the date, the Meeting agreed that the workshop should be held on 9-11 November 2005.

6.7. AADCP Programme

77. The Meeting noted the progress of the implementation of the AADCP

Programme presented by Indonesia which appears as ANNEX 34.

6.8. Cooperation with PTB

78. The ASEAN Secretariat informed the Meeting on the progress of the

ACCSQ-PTB Cooperation. The Meeting noted the following:

(i) the training on ISO/ IEC 17011 to be held in October 2005 in Ha Noi, Viet Nam.

(ii) the training on ISO/ IEC 17025 to be held in Philippines. Detailed

information will be communicated in due course.

(iii) the Workshop on the Importance of Accreditation in Legal Metrology to be held in Brunei Darussalam on 22-23 November 2005.

(iv) on-going discussion for cosmetics and proficiency testing.

AGENDA ITEM 7: DEVELOPMENTS OF OTHER RELEVANT REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

7.1. WTO TBT Matters

79. The Meeting noted the outcomes of the 36th and 37th Meetings of the

WTO/TBT Committee were held on 22-23 March and 16-17 June 2005, respectively.

The information paper prepared by Thailand appears as ANNEX 35.

7.2. ISO Matters

80. Philippines updated the Meeting on the latest development in ISO. Philippines’ paper appears as ANNEX 36.

81. The Meeting was informed that an ISO/SIS Workshop on Increasing the

Impact of Developing Country Participation in International Standardisation in Social

Responsibility and the 2nd Meeting of the ISO Working Group on Social

Responsibility will be held on 26 – 30 September 2005 in Bangkok. The Letter of Invitation has been distributed to Member Countries at this Meeting and appears as

ANNEX 37. The Meeting was also informed that the funding is available to support

Members and Non- Members of ISO to attend the Workshop, subject to the submission of application for funding support to ISO.

82. The Meeting took note of the proposal by Indonesia to host a public awareness workshop on ISO 22000 on Food Safety Requirements for ASEAN Member Countries, back to back with the 28th Meeting of the ACCSQ in Indonesia. Recognising the importance of food safety and potential trade in the region, efforts


(5)

must be taken to promote awareness on this new standard in Member Countries. In accordance to ISO procedure, Indonesia will submit the proposal to ISO for its consideration. Mr. Jesus Motoomull as the ISO Regional Liaison Officer will assist Indonesia in this matter.

83. The Meeting was also informed that the term of DEVCO Chair is going to end

in 2006 and interested Member Countries are encouraged to nominate a candidate for this position.

84. The Meeting expressed its appreciation to the Philippines for successfully

conducting the Regional Workshop on Conformity Assessment on 1-2 August 2005 and in promoting the cooperation between ACCSQ and ISO.

7.2 IEC Matters

85. Singapore updated the Meeting on the activities of the IEC. Singapore’s

paper appears as ANNEX 38.

7.3. APEC Development on Standards and Conformity Assessment

86. Brunei Darussalam briefed the Meeting on the activities within APEC Development on Standards and Conformity Assessment. Brunei Darussalam’s

paper appears as ANNEX 39. The Meeting noted that the APEC EE MRA Seminar

will be held on 10-11 August 2005 in Bali, Indonesia.

7.4. Member Countries’ Latest Development on Standards and

Conformity Assessment by Member Countries.

87. The Meeting noted the latest developments on Standards and Conformity

Assessment submitted by Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, and

Viet Nam, which appear together as ANNEX 40.

AGENDA ITEM 8: OTHER MATTERS

88. The Meeting reiterated the necessary participation of the Chairs and Co- Chairs of the WGs and PWGs in the ACCSQ Meetings. In this regard, the Meeting requested Member Countries to provide support to the Chairs and Co-Chairs to enable their participation.

AGENDA ITEM 9: DATE AND VENUE OF THE NEXT MEETING

89. The Meeting agreed to convene the 27th ACCSQ and its related Meetings in

March 2006 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The date and venue will be informed in due course.


(6)

90. The Meeting considered and adopted the Report of the 26th Meeting of the ASEAN Consultative Committee for Standards and Quality held on 4 – 5 August 2005 in Manila, Philippines.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The delegates from Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Viet Nam and the ASEAN Secretariat expressed their appreciation to the Bureau of Product Standards, Department of Trade and Industry, the Philippines, for the warm hospitality extended and the excellent arrangements made for the Meeting. The Meeting thanked the ASEAN Secretariat for the assistance provided.