A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS RELATED TO POWER RELATION IN FILM “THE JUDGE” SKRIPSI

  A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS RELATED TO POWER RELATION

  IN FILM “THE JUDGE” SKRIPSI AHMAD CHOLILIR ROZZAQ NIM : 20111111052 PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURABAYA JUNI 2015

  A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS RELATED TO POWER RELATION

  IN FILM “THE JUDGE” SKRIPSI Diajukan Untuk Memenuhi Salah Satu Syarat Memperoleh Gelar Sarjana Pendidikan AHMAD CHOLILIR ROZZAQ NIM : 20111111052 PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya JUNI 2015 Saya yang bertanda tangan dibawah ini : Nama : Ahmad Cholilir Rozzaq NIM : 2011 1111 052 Fakultas : Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Program Studi : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

  Menyatakan bahwa skripsi yang saya tulis ini benar-benar tulisan karya sendiri bukan hasil plagiasi baik sebagian maupun keseluruhan. Bila dikemudian hari ditemukan hasil plagiasi, maka saya bersedia menerima sanksi akademik sesuai ketentuan yang berlaku di Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya.

  Surabaya, 25 Juni 2015 Yang membuat pernyataan, Ahmad Cholilir Rozzaq

  NIM 2011 1111 052 iv Halaman Persetujuan Pembimbing

  Skripsi yang ditulis oleh Ahmad Cholilir Rozzaq ini telah disetujui oleh dosen pembimbing untuk diujikan tanggal 25 Juni 2015 Dosen Pembimbing Tanda Tangan Tanggal I.

  Dr. Dwijani Ratnadewi, M.Pd. ……………… ………..

II. Waode Hamsia, S.Pd. M.Pd. ……………… ……….

  Mengetahui Ketua Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

  Linda Mayasari, S.Pd. M.Pd v

  

HALAMAN PENGESAHAN PANITIA UJIAN

  Skripsi ini telah diuji dan dinyatakan sah oleh Panitia Ujian Tingkat Sarjana (S-1) Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya sebagai salah satu syarat memperoleh gelar Sarjana Pendidikan, pada tanggal 25 Juni 2015.

  Dosen Penguji Tanda Tangan 1.

  1 Dr. Dwijani Ratnadewi, M.Pd.

  2.

  2. Pramudana Ihsan, S.Hum., M.Pd.

  3.

  3. Armeria Wijaya, S.S., M.Pd.

  Mengetahui Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

  Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya Dekan,

  Dr. Ridlwan, M.Pd vi

  

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

  Firstly, I would like to thank to Allah SWT, God the Almighty for the love, for giving me blesses and guidance so I can finish my research in this thesis entitled “A Critical Discourse Analysis related to Power Relation in film “The Judge”.

  Secondly, I would like to thank to people who have contributed and supported in my thesis. They are:

  1. Dr. Dwijani Ratnadewi, M.Pd as my first great advisor who has helped, guided, motivated and suggested me during this thesis.

  2. Waode Hamsia, S.Pd, M.Pd as my second great advisor who always taught me not only in analyzing the research but also checking, correcting and explaining the grammar.

  3. Dr. M. Ridwan, M.Pd as the Dean of Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya.

  4. Linda Mayasari, M.Pd as the head of English Department Program.

  5. All lectures in Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, especially in English Department Program.

  6. My parent and sisters for their support both spiritually and financially, and their patience to pray for me daily.

  7. My best friends in linguistics guidance for their support in finishing my thesis.

  8. All my best friend “vocal class” in English Department viii Finally, I would like to thank to all people who have helped and prayed me in finishing my thesis.

  Surabaya, 25 Juni 2015 Ahmad Cholilir Rozzaq

  TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER ………………………………………………………………………….. i LOGO PAGE ……………………………………………………………………. ii TITLE PAGE ………………………………………………………………......... iii PERNYATAAN TIDAK MELAKUKAN PLAGIAT

  ………………………… iv LEMBAR PERSETUJUAN PEMBIMBING …………………………………… v HALAMAN PENGESAHAN ………………………………………………….... vi ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………………… vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ……………………………………………………….. viii TABLE OF CONTEN

  TS ……………………………………………………….... x

  CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION

  1.1 Background of The Research ………………………………………………… 1

  1.2 Questions of The Research ……………………………………………………. 7

  1.3 Purposes of The Research ……………………………………………………... 7

  1.4 Significance of The Research …………………..…………………………….. 7

  1.5 Scope and Limitation of The Research ……………………………………….. 8

  1.6 Definition of Key Terms ……………………………………………………… 8

  1.7 Organization of The Research ………………………………………………… 9

  CHAPTER II: THEORETICAL REVIEW

  2.1 Discourse ……………………………………………………………………... 10

  2.2 Critical Discourse Analysis ………………………………………………........ 11

  2.3 Steps in analyzing CDA ……..………………………………………… ………15

  2.3.1 Context ………………………………………………………………….. 15

  2.3.1.1 Law in Context ……………………………………………………. 17

  2.3.1.2 Power within Law ………………………………………………… 19 x

  2.3.2 Topics: Semantics Macrostructures …………………………………..... 21

  2.3.3 Local Meanings ……. …………………………………………….......... 21

  2.3.4 Social Cognition ………………………………………………………… 22

  2.3.5 Actors …………………………………………………………………… 23

  2.3.6 Societal Structures ………………………………………………………. 23

  2.4 Power ……. ……………………………………………………….................... 23

  2.4.1 P ower as Control ………………………………………………………… 23

  2.4.2 Power as Threat …………………………………………………………. 25

  2.5 Illocutionary Act ………………………………….………………………….. 26

  2.6 Previous Research …… ………………………….…………………………... 27

  CHAPTER III: METHOD OF THE RESEARCH

  3.1 Research Design ……………………………………………………………… 29

  3.2 Approaches ………………... ………………………………………………… 30

  3.3 Data Sources ...………………………………………………………………... 30

  3.4 Data …………………………………………………………………………… 31

  3.5 Data Collection ……. ………………………………………………………… 31

  3.6 Data Analysis ……….………………………………………………………… 31

  CHAPTER IV: FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS

  4.1 Findings ……………………………………. …….………………………….. 32

  4.1.1 Power as Threat …………………………………………………. 32

  4.

  1.2 Power as Control ….. …………………………………………….. 42

  CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

  5.1 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………. 57

  5.2 Suggestion ……………………………………………………………………. 58 xi

  BIBLIOGRAPHY ………………………………………………………………... 59

  APPENDIX I Selected Data ……………………………………………………… 63 APP

  ENDIX II The Judge Short Story ……………………………………………. 66 APPENDIX III Film Review …...…………………………………………………. 67 xii

  BIBLIOGRAPHY Adler, M., Longhurst, B 2002. Discourse, Power and Justice: Towards a new Sociology of Imprisonment. Taylor & Francis e-Library.

  Barnes, B. 1988 The Nature of Power, Cambridge: Polity. Blackledge, A. 2005. Discourse and Power in a Multilingual World. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam / Philadelphia.

  Blommaert, J. 2005. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press, New York.

  Box Office Mojo - The Judge

• – International Box Office. 2014 (online). Retrieved from: http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=judge.htm. June 13, 2015.

  Brown, G. Yule, G. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Byers, M. 2003. Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and

  Customary International Law . Cambridge University Press, New York.

  Chowdhry, G., Nair, S. 2004 Power, Post colonialism and International Relations: reading race, gender and class. Taylor & Francis e-Library.

  Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. 2007. Research Methods In education, 6

  th edition. Taylor & Francis e-Library.

  Coulthard, M, Coulthard, C.R.C. 2003. Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis . Taylor & Francis e-Library.

  Creswell, J.W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating

  Quantitative & Qualitative Research , 4 th edition. Pearson Education, Inc.

  Boston Cruse, A. 2006. A Glossary of Semantic and Pragmatics. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press. Davies, P. 2001. The National Front in France: Ideology, Discourse and Power.

  Taylor & Francis e-Library. Dembour, M.B. 2006. Who Believes in Human Rights? Cambridge University Press, New York.

  Devkota, R.R. 2010. Interests and Power as Drivers of Community Forestry.

  Universitatsdrucke Gottingen. Duchene, A. 2008. Ideologies Across Nations: The Construction of Linguistic

  Minorities at the United Nations. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, D- 10785 Berlin.

  Entertainment Weekly. October 11, 2014. Box office update: Dracula, The Judge, Alexander (online). Retrieved from: insidemovies.ew.com/2014/10/11/box- office-update-dracula-the-judge-alexander. June 13, 2015.

  Gee, J.P. 2005. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis Theory and method, 2

  nd edition.

  London: Taylor & Francis. Goldman, D.B. 2007. Globalisation and the Western Legal Tradition: Recurring

Patterns of Law and Authority. Cambridge University Press, New York.

  Grace, W, McHoul, Alec. 2002. A Foucault Primer: Discourse, power and the subject.

  Taylor & Francis e-Library. Hamilton, V. 2003. Exclopedia of Murder and Violent Crime: Types of Homicide and Degrees of Murder. Sage Publications, Inc.

  Harmon, M.R., Wilson, M.J. 2006. Beyond Grammar: Language, Power and the

  classroom. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers, Mahwah, New Jersey.

  Harris, P. 2007. An Introduction to Law, 7

  

th

  edition. Cambridge University Press, New York.

  IMDB.com

• – The Judge – Awards. 2014 (online). Retrieved from: www.imdb.com/title/tt1872194/awards?ref_m_tt_awd&mode=desktop. June 14, 2015.

  Lewis, S. 1995. The Art and Science of Smalltalk. Prentice Hall International (UK) Limited Campus 400, Maylands Avenue.

  Likosky, M.B. 2006. Law, Infrastructure, and Human Rights. Cambridge University Press, New York.

  Mayr, A. 2008. Language and Power: An Introduction to Institutional Discourse.

  Continuum International Publishing Group. McCarthy, M. 1991. Discourse Analysis for Language teachers. Edinburg: Cambridge

  University Press Paltridge, B. 2006. Discourse Analysis. Continuum International Publishing Group.

  Rogers, Rebecca. 2004. An introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education.

  Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers, Mahwah, New Jersey. Searle, J.R. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts.

  Cambridge University Press, New York. Searle, J.R. 2007. Austin on Locutionary and Illocutionary acts. The Philosophical Review . IV (3):405-424.

  Silberman, C.E. 1978. Criminal Violence, Criminal Justice Canada, Toronto Subscene.com

• – subtitles – The Judge. 2014 (online). Retrieved from: http://subscene.com/subtitles/the-judge/english/1046792. February 14, 2015.

  The International Bill of Human Rights. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Right. p. 1 Van Dijk, T.A. 2008. Discourse and Power. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

  Van Dijk, T.A. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge University Press, New York.

  Van Dijk, T.A. 2009. Critical Discourse Studies: A Socio cognitive Approach, in: R.

  Wodak and M. Meyer, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage Vine, B. 2004. Getting Things Done at Work. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam / Philadelphia.

  Wagner, A., Cheng, L. 2011. Exploring Courtroom Discourse: The Language of Power and Control. Ashgate Publishing Company, USA.

  Walford, B. 1985. Government of Canada.: Homicide in Canada. Canada Law Book Inc.

  Wareing, S. 2004. Language, Society, and Power: An Introduction, 2

  nd

  edition. Taylor & Francis e-Library.

  Wodak, R, Chilton, P 2005. A New Agenda In (Critical) Discourse Analysis. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam / Philadelphia.

  Wodak, R, Meyer, M 2001. Methods of Critical Discouse Analysis. Sage Publication Ltd, London

  Wooffitt, R. 2005. Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and

  Critical introduction , 1 st

  edition. Sage Publication Ltd, London