KLASIFIKASI PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 30 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG ARBITRASE DAN ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DITINJAU DARI HUKUM INTERNASIONAL.

KLASIFIKASI PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL DALAM
UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 30 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG ARBITRASE DAN
ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DITINJAU DARI HUKUM
INTERNASIONAL
Pembentukan Undang-Undang No. 30 tahun 1999 tentang
Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa ( UU Arbitrase dan APS
1999) merupakan angin segar bagi para pihak yang menggunakan
arbitrase dalam menjamin kepastian hukum dalam menyelenggarakan
arbitrase di Indonesia. UU Arbitrase dan APS 1999 mengatur mengenai
putusan arbitrase internasional dalam rangka mengakomodir arbitrase
internasional. Permasalahan timbul terhadap klasifikasi putusan arbitrase
internasional karena rumusan definisi putusan arbitrase internasional
dalam UU Arbitrase dan APS 1999 berbeda dengan definisi Arbitrase
internasional dalam Hukum Internasional yakni
United Nations
Commission On Interational Trade Law : Model Law on International
Commercial Arbitration 1985 with Amendments as Adopted in 2006
(UNCITRAL Model Law). Implikasi penerapan klasifikasi menurut hukum
Indonesia terhadap kewenangan pengadilan domestik terhadap kasus
yang memiliki unsur internasional dari penerapan klasifikasi yang diatur
dalam UU Arbitrase dan APS 1999 juga perlu dikaji lebih mendalam.

Penulis menggunakan metode penilitian yuridis normatif dan
analisa kasus dalam menjawab permasalahan dalam skripsi ini dengan
menitikberatkan pada penelitian kepustakaan dan data sekunder yang
berkaitan dengan hukum arbitrase internasional. Termasuk didalamnya
asas dan kaidah yang terkandung dalam UU Arbitrase dan APS 1999.
Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh menunjukkan bahwa terdapat
ketidakseuaian dalam penerapan klasifikasi Putusan Arbitrase
Internasional menurut UU Arbitrase dan APS 1999 dan Hukum
Internasional dan praktik-praktik negara lain (Brunei Darussalam,
Singapura dan Hong Kong). Implikasi dari penerapan klasifikasi Putusan
Arbitrase Internasional menurut UU Arbitrase dan APS 1999 terhadap
kewenangan pengadilan domestik adalah meluasnya kewenangan
pengadilan domestik terhadap kasus arbitrase yang memiliki unsur asing.

CLASSIFICATION OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION AWARD
UNDER THE LAW NO. 30 OF 1999 CONCERNING THE ARBITRATION
AND ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ACCORDING TO
INTERNATIONAL LAW
Recently, parties are tend to choose arbitration as dispute
settlement method to settle their disputes. In light ofthis fact, the

government of Indonesia issued Law No. 30 of 1999 Concerning The
Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Settlement (Law No. 30 of 1999).
Issuance of Law No.30 of 1999 is a breath of fresh air for parties using
arbitration to have legal certainty when conducting arbitration process in
Indonesia. Law No. 30 of 1999 regulates international arbitration award in
order to accomodates international arbitration. The problem arises in
regards with the classification of international arbitration award since the
definition of international arbitration award under Law No. 30 of 1999 is
different with international arbitration in International Law espescially
United Nations Commission On Interational Trade Law : Model Law on
International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with Amendments as Adopted
in 2006 (UNCITRAL Model Law). Beside of that, the question arises on
how the implication towards the authority of domestic court in arbitration
with foreign elements cases.
The author used juridical normative and case-analysing approach
to further examine the problems in this thesis by researching on literary
data and secondary data that are related to international commercial
arbitration law.Including the norms embodied under Law No. 30 of 1999.
The result of this research shows that there is incompatibility
between Indonesian Law and International Law including the parctices of

other countries (Brunei darussalam, Singapore and Hong Kong) in regards
with the factor to determine the classification of international arbitration
award. The implication of the Law No. 30 of 1999 implementation towards
authority of domestic court is the authority of domestic court broadened in
arbitration with foreign element cases.