THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CIRCLE GAME IN TEACHING ENGLISH VOCABULARY (An Experimental Research at Seventh Grade Students of SMP Negeri 4 Purbalingga in Academic Year 2012/2013) - repository perpustakaan

  APPENDICES

  APPENDIX 1

  Table 1.1 Students‟ Achievement of Experimental Class

  20. Muhammad Adhika Pratama

  23. Selvi Priyatin

  93.3 Very Good

  86.7 Very Good

  22. Riska Karunia Utami

  43.3 Fair 100 Very Good

  21. Oktafia Foni Lisnaeni

  93.3 Very Good 100 Very Good

  86.7 Very Good 100 Very Good

  96.7 Very Good

  19. Lupita Setiyorini

  73.3 Good

  43.3 Fair

  18. Lilis Setianingrum

  46.7 Fair

  13.3 Very Bad

  17. Khadiki

  96.7 Very Good

  90 Very Good

  24. Shellanie Kaliewu

  90 Very Good 16. Ira Marfu‟ah

  28. Wahcyu Setyani

  73.3 Good Table 2.1

  23.3 Very Bad

  30. Roidah Hasna Khoirunnisa

  90 Very Good

  70 Good

  90 Very Good 29. Yuan Petangga B.

  70 Good

  90 Very Good

  76.7 Good 100 Very Good

  83.3 Very Good

  27. Veny Rahmatia Putri

  83.3 Very Good

  50 Fair

  26. Tilar Dwi Hanafi

  90 Very Good

  20 Very Bad

  25. Siti Sofi Yanti

  76.7 Good

  73.3 Good

  No. Name Pre-test Post-test

  36.7 Bad

  83.3 Very Good

  53.3 Fair

  6. Arizal Sidiq

  80 Good

  73.3 Good

  5. Anugrah Gesang

  80 Good

  83.3 Very Good 100 Very Good 4. Ananta Bagus A.

  53.3 Fair

  3. Aldes Syah Fira R

  96.7 Very Good

  36.7 Bad

  2. Aida Nur Oktaningsih

  96.7 Very Good

  33.3 Bad

  1. Adelia Putri

  Score Category Score Category

  7. Dwi Yan Agista

  96.7 Very Good

  15. Juju Mei Saroh

  16.7 Very Bad

  80 Good 100 Very Good

  14. Ikhsan Nur Fadli

  93.3 Very Good

  46.7 Fair

  13. Hardiyanto Ashari

  80 Good

  56.7 Fair

  40 Bad 12. Handika Imam M.

  11. Hana Widatasari

  8. Falenia Widya Utami

  76.7 Good

  43.3 Fair

  10. Fery Sulistyanto

  86.7 Very Good

  46.7 Fair

  9. Farhan Imron Maulana

  96.7 Very Good

  90 Very Good

  Students‟ Achievement of Control Class No. Name Pre-test Post-test

  Score Category Score Category

  63.3 Good

  70 Good

  50 Fair

  24. Saeful Anwar

  73.3 Good

  63.3 Good

  23. Rhisma Juniandri

  73.3 Good

  66.7 Good

  22. Puput Widianing

  50 Fair

  60 Fair

  21. Priyogo Jatmiko

  80 Good

  66.7 Good

  20. Lisa Agustina

  90 Very Good

  86.7 Very Good

  19. Lia Edistyaaningsih

  83.3 Very Good

  70 Good

  18. Ilham Dwi Saputra

  25. Sahlan Nufron

  66.7 Good

  60 Fair

  30. Yusuf Naufal Haidar

  70

  1

  96.7 63.4 4019.6

  33.3

  X X² Pre- test Post- test Y Y² 1.

  Subject Experimental Class Subject Control Class Pre- test Post- test

  Students‟ Achievement of Experimental Class and Control Class

  76.7 Good Table 3.1

  60 Fair

  70 Good

  26. Sandi Wahyu Pratama

  43.3 Good

  29. Tiara Cahya Gilfani

  63.3 Good

  56.7 Fair

  28. Soleh Setiawan

  76.7 Good

  66.7 Good

  27. Sandra Novarinda

  73.3 Good

  60 Fair

  70 Good

  17. Handini Inten Maharani

  1. Abdulah Fariz Makarim

  5. Annisa Nur Hikmah

  8. Dimas Panggih Hermanda

  66.7 Good

  60 Fair

  7. Piki Nur Wahyudianto

  73.3 Good

  63.3 Good

  6. Arjun Fadilah Nurrohman

  83.3 Very Good

  70 Good

  63.3 Good

  60 Fair

  50 Fair

  4. Akbar Fitrian

  50 Fair

  40 Bad

  3. Aji Sebastian

  80 Good

  73.4 Good

  2. Adi Firmansyah

  80 Good

  70 Good

  50 Fair

  9. Dwie Nurul Firdaus

  80 Good

  63.3 Good

  63.3 Good

  16. Fisilmi Haefah Hakiki

  70 Good

  60 Fair

  15. Fieki Nur Fauzi

  76.7 Good

  63.3 Good

  14. Feri Maulana

  73.3 Good

  13. Ferdiansyah Manulang

  60 Fair

  76.7 Good

  60 Fair

  12. Febriana Valentin

  60 Fair

  50 Fair

  11. Fajar Nur Sidiq

  70 Good

  53.3 Fair

  10. Eti Asriadi

  66.7 Good

  80 10 100

  2.

  50

  24

  50

  70 20 400 25.

  20

  90 70 4900

  25

  60

  66.7 16.7 278.9 26.

  83.3 33.3 1108.9

  63.3

  26

  60

  73.3 13.3 176.9 27.

  83.3

  90

  6.7

  44.9

  27

  66.7

  73.3 10 100 24. 76.7 100 23.3 542.9

  23

  70

  93.3

  6.7

  44.9

  20

  66.7

  80 13.3 176.9 21. 43.3 100 56.7 3214.9

  21

  50

  63.3 13.3 176.9 22.

  86.7

  6.6

  44.9

  43.6

  22

  66.7

  73.3

  6.6

  43.6 23.

  90

  96.7

  6.7

  76.7 10 100 28.

  90 20 400

  3.3

  36.7 Bad

  30

  33.3 Bad

  1

  29

  30

  96.7 Very Good

  2

  11

  30

  2

  1

  29

  30

  96.7 Very Good

  3

  25

  30

  83.3 Very Good

  3

  30 30 100 Very Good

  10

  No. Pre-test No. Post-test F N P% Category F N P% Category

  28

  23.3

  56.7

  63.3

  6.6

  43.6 29.

  70

  90 20 400

  29

  43.3

  70 26.7 712.9 30.

  73.3 50 2500

  Student s‟ Score in Experimental Class

  30

  60

  76.7 16.7 278.9 1749.9 2620.1 870.2 35136.2 1810 2159.9 359.9 5101

  Mean

  58.30

  87.30 29 1171.2 Mean

  60.33

  72 12 170.03 Improvement

  11.67 Table 4.1

  10.9 20. 93.3 100

  90

  36.7

  44.9 8.

  63.3

  73.3 10 100 7.

  53.3

  96.7 43.4 1883.6

  7

  60

  66.7

  6.7

  90

  83.3 30 900

  96.7

  6.7

  44.9

  8

  50

  60 10 100 9.

  46.7

  86.7 40 1600

  9

  6

  53.3

  66.7

  36.7

  96.7 60 3600

  2

  73.4

  80

  6.6

  43.6 3. 83.3 100 16.7 278.9

  3

  40

  50 10 100 4.

  80 43.3 1874.9

  83.3 13.3 176.9 6.

  4

  50

  63.3 13.3 176.9 5.

  73.3

  80

  6.7

  44.9

  5

  70

  60

  6.7

  86.7

  13.3

  90 16.7 278.9

  15

  60

  70 10 100 16.

  76.7

  96.7 20 400

  16

  63.3

  80 16.7 278.9 17.

  46.7 33.4 1115.6

  76.7 13.4 179.6 15.

  17

  60

  70 10 100 18.

  43.3

  73.3 30 900

  18

  70

  83.3 13.3 176.9 19. 86.7 100 13.3 176.9

  19

  73.3

  63.3

  44.9 10.

  60 10 100 12.

  43.3

  76.7 33.4 1115.6

  10

  53.3

  70 16.7 400 11.

  16.7

  40 23.3 542.9

  11

  50

  56.7

  14

  80 23.3 542.9

  12

  60

  76.7 16.7 278.9 13.

  46.7

  93.3 46.6 2171.6

  13

  63.3

  73.3 10 100 14. 80 100 20 400

29 Improvement

  4

  30

  27

  30

  90 Very Good

  26

  15

  30

  50 Fair

  26

  25

  30

  83.3 Very Good

  27

  25

  83.3 Very Good

  20 Very Bad

  27

  27

  30

  90 Very Good

  28

  21

  30

  70 Good

  28

  27

  30

  90 Very Good

  29

  25

  30

  30

  23

  13

  30

  43.3 Fair

  21

  30 30 100 Very Good

  22

  26

  30

  86.7 Very Good

  22

  28

  30

  93.3 Very Good

  27

  6

  30

  90 Very Good

  23

  29

  30

  96.7 Very Good

  24

  23

  30

  76.7 Good

  24

  30 30 100 Very Good

  25

  21

  70 Good

  30 30 100 Very Good

  5

  40 Bad

  

3

  15

  30

  50 Fair

  4

  15

  30

  50 Fair

  

4

  19

  30

  63.3 Good

  21

  12

  30

  70 Good

  

5

  25

  30

  83.3 Very Good

  6

  19

  30

  63.3 Good

  

6

  22

  30

  30

  3

  29

  1

  27

  30

  90 Very Good

  30

  7

  30

  23.3 Very Bad

  30

  22

  30

  73.3 Good Table 5.1

  Students‟ Score in Control Class No.

  Pre-test

No.

Post-test

F N P% Category F N P% Category

  21

  80 Good

  30

  70 Good

  

1

  24

  30

  80 Good

  2

  22

  30

  73.4 Good

  

2

  24

  30

  21

  20

  11

  86.7 Very Good

  30

  90 Very Good

  8

  29

  30

  96.7 Very Good

  9

  14

  30

  46.7 Fair

  9

  26

  30

  10

  8

  13

  30

  43.3 Fair

  10

  23

  30

  76.7 Good

  11

  5

  30

  16.7 Very Bad

  11

  12

  27

  96.7 Very Good

  40 Bad

  80 Good

  30

  36.7 Bad

  4

  24

  30

  80 Good

  5

  22

  30

  73.3 Good

  5

  24

  30

  6

  30

  16

  30

  53.3 Fair

  6

  25

  30

  83.3 Very Good

  7

  16

  30

  53.3 Fair

  7

  29

  30

  12

  93.3 Very Good

  30

  29

  30

  96.7 Very Good

  17

  4

  30

  13.3 Very Bad

  17

  14

  30

  46.7 Fair

  18

  13

  43.3 Fair

  76.7 Good

  18

  22

  30

  73.3 Good

  19

  26

  30

  86.7 Very Good

  19

  30 30 100 Very Good

  20

  28

  30

  16

  30

  17

  93.3 Very Good

  30

  56.7 Fair

  12

  24

  30

  80 Good

  13

  14

  30

  46.7 Fair

  13

  28

  30

  14

  23

  24

  30

  80 Good

  14

  30 30 100 Very Good

  15

  22

  30

  73.3 Good

  15

  27

  30

  90 Very Good

  16

  73.3 Good Table 7.1

  Very Bad

  30

  19

  30

  63.3 Good

  23

  22

  30

  73.3 Good

  24

  15

  50 Fair

  73.3 Good

  24

  21

  30

  70 Good

  25

  18

  30

  60 Fair

  25

  20

  23

  30

  66.7 Good

  15

  90 Very Good

  20

  20

  30

  66.7 Good

  20

  24

  30

  80 Good

  21

  30

  22

  50 Fair

  21

  19

  30

  63.3 Good

  22

  20

  30

  66.7 Good

  22

  30

  26

  27

  22

  29

  21

  30

  70 Good

  30

  18

  30

  60 Fair

  30

  30

  30

  76.7 Good Table 6.1

  The Frequency Distribution Score in Pre-test (Experimental Class)

  Category Percentage Number of Students Percentage Score Very Good

  81

  Good

  61

  Fair

  41

  Bad

  21

  43.3 Good

  13

  18

  27

  30

  60 Fair

  26

  22

  30

  73.3 Good

  27

  20

  30

  66.7 Good

  23

  29

  30

  76.7 Good

  28

  17

  30

  56.7 Fair

  28

  19

  30

  63.3 Good

  30

  19

  7

  11

  53.3 Fair

  10

  21

  30

  70 Good

  11

  15

  30

  50 Fair

  18

  16

  30

  60 Fair

  12

  18

  30

  60 Fair

  12

  23

  30

  76.7 Good

  30

  10

  19

  50 Fair

  18

  30

  60 Fair

  7

  20

  30

  66.7 Good

  8

  15

  30

  8

  66.7 Good

  18

  30

  60 Fair

  9

  18

  30

  60 Fair

  9

  20

  30

  13

  30

  86.7 Very Good

  70 Good

  30

  80 Good

  17

  18

  30

  60 Fair

  17

  21

  30

  18

  16

  21

  30

  70 Good

  18

  25

  30

  83.3 Very Good

  19

  26

  30

  24

  63.3 Good

  63.3 Good

  30

  13

  22

  30

  73.3 Good

  14

  20

  30

  63.3 Good

  14

  23

  76.7 Good

  30

  15

  18

  30

  60 Fair

  15

  21

  30

  70 Good

  16

  19

  • – 100% 7 23.33 %
  • – 80% 7 23.33 %
  • – 60% 9 30 %
  • – 40% 3 10 %
  • – 20% 4 13.33 %
  • – 100% 22 73.33 %

  • – 80% 6 20 %
  • – 60% 1 3.33%
  • – 40% 1 3.33%
    • Table 8.1

  • – 20%
  • – 100% 1 3.33 %
  • – 80% 13 43.33 %
  • – 60% 15 50 %
  • – 40% 1 3.33 %
    • Table 9.1

  • – 20%
The Frequency Distribution Score in Pre-test (Control Class)

  The Frequency Distribution Score in Pre-test (Control Class)

  21

  Bad

  41

  Fair

  61

  Good

  81

  Category Percentage Number of Students Percentage Score Very Good

  Very Bad

  The Frequency Distribution Score in Post-test (Experimental Class)

  21

  Bad

  41

  Fair

  61

  Good

  81

  Category Percentage Number of Students Percentage Score Very Good

  Very Bad

  Category Percentage Number of Students Percentage Score Very Good

  81 3 10 %

  • – 100% Good

  61 24 80 %

  • – 80% Fair

  41 3 10 %

  • – 60 %

  21

  • Bad – 40%

  Very Bad

    • – 20%

  Table 10.1 The Result of Questionnaire

  

No. Statement Score Percentage

  1 A.

   Proses Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris

  Model pembelajaran yang dilakukan oleh guru 104

  86.67 membuat saya lebih tertarik untuk belajar bahasa inggris.

  2 Model pembelajaran yang dilakukan oleh guru membuat saya lebih tertarik untuk mengikuti 107 89.16 pembelajaran.

  3 B.

   Keaktifan Siswa

  102

  85 Model pembelajaran yang dilakukan oleh guru membuat saya lebih memahami materi.

  4 Model pembelajaran yang dilakukan oleh guru 101

  83.16 meningkatkan penguasaan kosakata saya.

  5 Model pembelajaran yang dilakukan oleh guru 100

  83.33 membuat saya lebih memahami kosakata.

  6 Model pembelajaran yang dilakukan oleh guru

  99

  82.5 mempercepat saya dalam mengingat kosakata.

  7 Model pembelajaran yang dilakukan oleh guru membuat saya lebih berani untuk bertanya jika ada

  94

  78.33 kata atau penjelasan yang kurang jelas.

  8 C.

   Proses Belajar Bahasa Inggris

  Model pembelajaran yang dilakukan oleh guru dapat 100

  83.33 meningkatkan prestasi belajar saya.

  9 Model pembelajaran yang dilakukan oleh guru membuat proses pembelajaran menjadi tidak 103 85.83 membosankan.

  10 Model pembelajaran yang dilakukan oleh guru sudah cukup efektif membantu kesulitan belajar bahasa

  97

  80.83 inggris saya selama ini.

  Average 100.7

  83.81

  APPENDIX 2

  1

  1

  1

  1

  17

  1

  1

  1

  1

  18

  1

  1

  1

  19

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  15

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  16

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  14

  24

  23

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  25

  1

  1

  20

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  21

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  22

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  Validity, Reliability and Item Difficulty of Pre-test

  1

  1

  1

  1

  4

  1

  1

  1

  5

  1

  

1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  6

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  9

  Respondent Item Of Question

  1

  2

  3

  4

  

5

  6

  7

  8

  10

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  2

  1

  1

  1

  3

  1

  1

  1

  12

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  11

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  13

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  10

  1

  7

  8

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  9

  1

  1

  26

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  X

  29

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  30

  1

  1 V ali dit y

  17

  1

  20

  21

  17

  

18

  20

  19

  19

  19

  21 X 2

  17

  20

  1

  1

  17

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  27

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  28

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  21

  

18

  1

  19

  0,433 0,333 0,300 0,433 0,400 0,333 0,367 0,367 0,367 0,300 pq 0,246 0,222 0,210 0,246 0,240 0,222 0,232 0,232 0,232 0,210 pq 6,741 Vt 56,183 k

  30 r11 0,910 r table 0,361 Result Reliable

  Item Of Question

  11

  12

  13

  14

  15

  

16

  17

  18

  20

  30 FN 0,567 0,667 0,700 0,567 0,600 0,667 0,633 0,633 0,633 0,700 F.N 0,567 0,667 0,700 0,567 0,600 0,667 0,633 0,633 0,633 0,700 Criteria Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  R eli ab ilit y p 0,567 0,667 0,700 0,567 0,600 0,667 0,633 0,633 0,633 0,700 q

  30

  20

  

18

  19

  19

  19

  21 Y 2 13093 13093 13093 13093 13093 13093 13093 13093 13093 13093

  XY 411 431 448 381 428 460 421 443 435 458 r XY 0,713 0,928 0,984 0,759 0,757 0,870 0,857 0,815 0,830 0,963 r table 0,361 0,361 0,361 0,361 0,361 0,361 0,361 0,361 0,361 0,361

  Result Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Ite m D iff ic ult y

  F

  17

  20

  21

  17

  20

  30

  19

  19

  19

  21 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  

30

  30

  30

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  29

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  29

  1

  1

  1

  1

  14

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  13

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  25

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  11

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  22

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  16

  1

  1

  12

  1

  14

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  29

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  13

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  17

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  14

  1

  1

  1

  1

  22

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  30

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  24

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 0,733 0,633 0,700 0,533 0,700 0,700 0,567 0,633 0,600 0,633 0,733 0,633 0,700 0,533 0,700 0,700 0,567 0,633 0,600 0,633 Easy Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium 0,733 0,633 0,700 0,533 0,700 0,700 0,567 0,633 0,600 0,633 0,267 0,367 0,300 0,467 0,300 0,300 0,433 0,367 0,400 0,367 0,196 0,232 0,210 0,249 0,210 0,210 0,246 0,232 0,240 0,232

  Item Of Question Y

  21

  22

  23

  25

  19

  26

  27

  28

  29

  30

  1

  1

  10

  1

  1

  1

  1

  11

  1

  30

  18

  1

  21

  1

  1

  22

  19

  21

  16

  21

  21

  17

  19

  18

  19

  22

  19

  16

  19

  21

  21

  17

  19

  18

  19 13093 13093 13093 13093 13093 13093 13093 13093 13093 13093 468 422 449 373 453 470 403 427 420 418 1,034 0,855 0,982 0,686 0,974 0,938 0,717 0,845 0,771 0,864

  0,361 0,361 0,361 0,361 0,361 0,361 0,361 0,361 0,361 0,361 Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid

  22

  19

  21

  16

  21

  21

  17

  30

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  12

  11

  13

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  10

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  15

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  14

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  6

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  5

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  9

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  8

  1

  1

  1

  7

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  22

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  23

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  24

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  21

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  18

  1

  17

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  16

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  20

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  19

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  25

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  25

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  6

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  21

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  21

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  23

  21

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  13

  1

  1

  1

  30

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

  

1

  1

  1

  1

Dokumen yang terkait

IMPROVING STUDENTSÂ’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH WORD CLAP GAME (An Experimental Research of the Seventh Grade Students of SMP Muhamadiyah 06 DAU)

11 95 19

USING GAMES IN TEACHING VOCABULARY (An Experimental Study at Seventh Grade of MTs. Darussalam, Ulujami Jakarta Selatan

0 39 81

THE USE OF MEME COMIC AS MEDIA TO TEACH SPOOF TEXT An Experimental Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Kutowinangun, Kebumen in the Academic Year of 20152016

1 40 127

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PRE-QUESTIONING TECHNIQUE TO TEACH READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXT (An Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Student at SMP N 2 Mejobo Kudus in the Academic Year 20172018) By: AGHITA OKTAVIANA

0 1 14

THE USE OF ENGLISH GRAMMAR ¬¬TEST OF ANDROID GAME TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ GRAMMAR COMPETENCE ON PHRASAL VERBS (An Experimental Research of the Fourth Semester Students of English Education Department of IAIN Salatiga in the Academic Year of 2015/2016) -

0 0 165

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING IN TEACHING SPEAKING VIEWED FROM STUDENTS‘ SELF-ESTEEM (An Experimental Research in the Second Semester Students of English Department–Siliwangi University Tasikmalaya in the Academic Year of 2011/2012

0 0 15

A THESIS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING INDUCTIVE METHOD IN TEACHING ENGLISH GRAMMAR ( An Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade of SMP Negeri 16 Surakarta in the Academic Year of 20172018 )

0 0 15

Effectiveness of using Mind Mapping Technique in developing Students’ Vocabulary Mastery (An Experimental Research at the Seventh Grade Of SMPN 1 Kelumpang Hilir, Serongga, Kotabaru Academic Year 2014/2015) - IDR UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

0 0 75

1 THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING VOCABRA GAMES IN TEACHING VOCABULARY VIEWED FROM STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION (An Experimental Study at the Fifth Grade Students of SDIT Sabilul Huda Cirebon in the Academic Year of 20182019) THESIS

1 8 238

MISSING GAME (A Classroom Action Research at the First Grade of SMP Negeri 3 Sidoharjo in Academic Year 20162017)

0 1 16