T BING 1302387 Bibliography

REFERENCES
Abdul, Z. (1995). An investigation of cohesion and coherence in Iranian EFL college
students’. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 15, 4-27
Abdurahman, N. H., Wijaya, B., & Salam, U. (2013). Grammatical cohesion analysis
of students' thesis writing. Retrieved November 8, 2015, from
http://download.portalgaruda.org/article.php?article=130009&val=2338&tittle=
GRAMMATICAL%2COHESION%20ANALYSIS%20OF%20STUDENTS%20THESIS%20WRITI
NG
Ahmed, A. H. (2010). Students’ problem with cohesion and coherence in EFL essay
writing in Egypt: Different Perspectives. Literacy Information and Computer
Educational Journal, 1, 211-221.
Alarcon, J. B., & Morales, K. N. (2011). Grammatical cohesion in students’
argumentative essay. Journal of English and Literature, 2, 114-127.
Al-Jarf, R. S. (2001). Processing of cohesive ties by EFL Arab college students.
Foreign Language Annals, 34, 141-151.
Allison, D. (1989). Sentence sequence and coherence: In search of readers’ problems
in academic discourse. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language
Teaching, 12, 29–38.
Alwasilah, A. C. (2009). Pokoknya Kualitatif: Dasar-dasar Merancang dan
Melakukan Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta, Indonesia: PT Dunia Pustaka Jaya.
Asikin, N. A. (2013). The Contribution of Cohesive Ties to the Cohesion of EFL

Students’ Expository Writing. Bandung, Indonesia: UPI (Unpublished Paper).
Bamberg B. (1984). Assessing coherence: A reanalysis of essays written for the
national assessment of educational progress. Research in the Teaching of
English, 18, 305-319.
Bayraktar, H. (2011). The use of lexical networks in EFL vocabulary teaching.
International Journal on Trends in Education and Their Implications, 7, 45-55.
Berzlanovich, I; Egg, M; & Redeker, G. (2008). Coherence structure and lexical
cohesion in expository and persuasive text. Proceeding of the Workshop
Constraints in Discourse, 3, 19-26.
Blum-Kulka, S. (2000). Shifts of cohesion and coherence in translation. London,
England: Routledge.
Brostoff, A. (1981). Coherence: “Next to” is not “connected to.” College Composition
and Communication, 32 (2), 278–294.

Hanif Nurcholish Adiantika, 2016
THE USE OF COHESIVE DEVICES IN EFL STUDENTS’ EXPOSITORY TEXTS
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge
University Press.

Bussmann, H. (1998). Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics. London,
England: Routledge.
Butt, D; Fahey, R; Feez, Spinks, S; & Yallon, C. (2006). Using Functional Grammar:
An Explorer’s guide. Sydney, Australia: National Centre for English Language
Teaching and Research.
Buttler, C. S. (1985). Systemic Linguistics: Theory and Applications. London, England:
Bats ford Academic and Educational.
Carroll, D. (2000). Psychology of language. Beijing, China: Foreign Language
Teaching and Research Press.
Carter, R. (1997). Investigating English Discourse: Language, Literacy, and
Literature. London, England: Routledge.
Castro C. (2004). Cohesion and the social construction of meaning in the essays of
Filipino college students writing in L2 English. Asia Pacific Education, 5, 215225.
Chan, S. W. K.; Thou, B. K.; & Choy, C. F. (2000). Textual Information Segmentation
by Cohesive Ties. [Online]. Available: http://aclweb.org/anthology/Y/Y00/Y001006.pdf. Retrieved on June 9 2015.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement
in the accuracy and fluency of L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing,
12 (3), 267-296.
Chen, J. L. (2008). An investigation of EFL students’ use of cohesive devices. Journal
of Second Language Writing, 9 (4), 167-196.

Communication, 33, 148-156.
Connor U. (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language
students’ writing. Papers in Linguistics, 17, 301-316.
Cook, G. (1992). Discourse. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Corston-Oliver, M. (2012). A Cognitive account of the English meronymic by phrase.
Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.
65-76.
Cox B. E., Shanahan T., Sulzby E. (1990). Good and poor elementary readers’ use of
cohesion in writing. Research Quarterly, 15, 47-65.
Crane, P. (2008). Texture in Text: A Discourse Analysis of a News Article Using
Halliday and Hasan’s Model of Cohesion. (Online). Available:

Hanif Nurcholish Adiantika, 2016
THE USE OF COHESIVE DEVICES IN EFL STUDENTS’ EXPOSITORY TEXTS
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

http://www.library.nakanishi.ac.jp./kiyou/gaidai(30)/08.pdf.
Retrieved
on
November 19 2013.

Crewe, W. J. (1990). The illogic of logical connection. ELT Journal, 44 (4), 316-325.
Crossley, S. A; & McNamara, D. S. (2010). Cohesion, coherence, and expert
evaluations of writing proficiency. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference
of the Cognitive Science Society, pp.984-989.
Crowhurst, M. (1987). Cohesion in argument and narration at 3 grade levels. Research
in the Teaching of English, 21 (2), l85-201.
Cruse, A. (2006). A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh, Scotland:
University of Edinburgh Press.
De Beaugrande, R.-A. & Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to Text Linguistics. New
York, NY: Longman.
Denzin N. K., Lincoln Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of
qualitative research. In Denzin N. K., Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of
qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1-29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Derewianka, B. (2004). Exploring How Texts Work. Sydney, Australia: Primary
English Teaching Association.
Dong, Y. P. (2005). Xinli yuyanxue yu waiyu jiaoxue (Psycholinguistics in foreign
language teaching). Beijing, China: Foreign Language Teaching and Research
Press.
Dunne M., Pryor J., Yates P. (2005). Becoming a researcher: A companion to the
research process. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.

Eggins, S. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London,
England: Pinter Publisher.
Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (2nd edn).
London, England: Continuum.
Emilia, E. (2012). Pendekatan Genre-Based dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris:
Petunjuk Umum Guru. Bandung, Indonesia: Rizqi Press.
Fan, Y.S., Hsu, A.Y., & Yang, Y.C. (2006) Topical structure analysis of doctoral
students’ writing by means of general English proficiency writing test. Selected
Papers from the Fifteenth International Symposium on English Teaching, 371377. Taipei, Taiwan: The Crane Publishing Co.
Feez, S., & Joyce, H. (1998a). Text Based Syllabus Design. Sydney, Australia: National
Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
Feez, S., & Joyce, H. (2002). Text-Based Syllabus Design. Sydney, Australia:
NCELTR, Macquarie University.
Hanif Nurcholish Adiantika, 2016
THE USE OF COHESIVE DEVICES IN EFL STUDENTS’ EXPOSITORY TEXTS
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Ferris D. R. (1994). Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by students at
different levels of L2 proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 414-420.
Field, Y. & Yip, L.M.O. (1992). A comparison of internal conjunctive cohesion in the

English essay writing of Cantonese speakers and native speakers of English.
RELC Journal, 23 (1), 15-28.
Fitzgerald J., Spiegel D. L. (1986). Textual cohesion and coherence in children’s
writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 263-280.
Frantzen, D. (1995). The effects of grammar supplementation on written accuracy in
an intermediate Spanish content area. The Modern Language Journal, 79 (3),
329– 355.
Fulcher, G. (1989). Cohesion and coherence in theory and reading research. Journal of
Research in Reading, 12 (2), 146–163.
Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1994). Resolving sentences in a discourse context:
How discourse representation affects language understanding. In M. A.
Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 675-698). London,
England: Academic Press.
Gerot, L and Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney,
Australia: Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
Gersbacher M. A., Varner K. R., Faust M. (1990). Investigating differences in general
comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
and Cognition, 16, 430-445.
Ghasemi, M. (2013). An investigation into the use of cohesive devices in second
language writings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3 (9), 1615-1623.

Granger, S. & Tyson, S. (1996). Connector usage in the English essay writing of native
and non-native EFL speakers of English. In World English, 15 (1), 17-27.
Gutwinski, W. (1976). Cohesion in literary texts. The Hague, Holland: Mouton.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London, England:
Longman.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to
Functional Grammar. 3rd, revised edition. London, England: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional
Grammar (3rd. ed.). London, England: Hodder Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1989). Spoken and Written Language. Oxford, England: Oxford
University Press.
Hanif Nurcholish Adiantika, 2016
THE USE OF COHESIVE DEVICES IN EFL STUDENTS’ EXPOSITORY TEXTS
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Halliday, M.AK. (1991). An Introduction Functional Grammar. London, England:
Edward Arnold.
Haratyan, F. (2011). Halliday’s SFL and social meaning. 2nd International Conference
on Humanities, Historical and Social Sciences IPEDR, 17, 260-264.
Hartnett, C. G. (1980). Cohesion and Mental Processes in Writing Competence. Paper

presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English
(70th, Cincinnati. OH, November. 21-26.)
Hatim, B., & Mason, I. (1990). Discourse and the translator. London, England:
Longman.
Hatim, B., & Mason, I. (1997). The translator as communicator. London, England:
Routledge.
Hatim, B., & Munday, J. (2004). Translation: An advanced resource book. London,
England: Routledge.
Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Holloway, D. W. (1981). Semantic Grammars: How they can help us teach writing.
College Composition and Communication, 32 (2), 205–218.
Hyland, K. (2005). Teaching and researching writing. Beijing, China: Foreign
Language Teaching and Research Press.
Jin W. (2000). A quantitative study of cohesion in Chinese graduate students’ writing:
Variations across genres and proficiency levels. Paper presented at the
Symposium on Second Language Writing at Purdue University, West Lafayette,
Indiana.
Johnson, P. (1992).Cohesion and coherence in compositions in Malay and English
language. RELC Journal, 23 (2), 1-17.
Kanno, Y., & Yasuko (1989). The use of connectives in English academic papers

written by Japanese students. Psycholinguistics, 2, 41-54.
Kepner, C.G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to
the development of second-language writing skills. The Modern Language
Journal, 75 (3), 305-313.
Khalil A. (1989). A study of cohesion and coherence in Arab EFL college students’
writing. System, 17, 359-371.

Hanif Nurcholish Adiantika, 2016
THE USE OF COHESIVE DEVICES IN EFL STUDENTS’ EXPOSITORY TEXTS
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Koshik I. (1999). A preliminary investigation into the effect of grammatical cohesive
devices: Their absence and their misuse on the comprehension of non-native
speaker speech and writing. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 10, 3-26.
Kunz K., Maksymski, K. & Steiner, E. (2009). Cohesion - conceptualizations and
systemic features of English and. Retrieved on April 4, 2012 from
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/21696177/ [Accessed: January 24,
2015].
Lee, I. (2002) Teaching coherence to ESL students: A classroom inquiry. Journal of
Second Language Writing, 11, 135-159.

Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level
Liu M., Braine G. (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by
Chinese undergraduates. System, 33, 623-636.
Lovejoy, K.B. & Lance, D.M. (1991). Information management and cohesion in the
study of written discourse. Linguistics and Education, 3 (3), 251–273.
Malmkjaer, K. (2005). Linguistics and the language of translation. Edinburgh,
Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
Mardhatillah, W. (2013). Coherence and Cohesion in the Background Section od
Theses Written by Undergraduate Students of English Education Program at One
State of University in Bandung. Bandung, Indonesia: UPI (Unpublish Paper).
Martin, J. R. (1985). Factual writing: exploring and challenging social reality. Sydney,
Australia: Deakin University press.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam, Holland: John
Benjamins Publishing Company.
Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. (2008). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause.
New York, NY: Continuum.
McArthur, T. (1996). Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford, England:
Oxford University Press.
Mojica L. A. (2006). Reiterations in ESL learners’ academic papers: Do they contribute
to lexical cohesiveness? The Asia-Pacific Education Research December, 15,

105-125.
Murphy, T. (2001). The Emergence of Texture: An Analysis of the Functions of the
Nominal Demonstratives in an English Interlangauge Corpse. Language
Learning & Technology, 3, 152-173.

Hanif Nurcholish Adiantika, 2016
THE USE OF COHESIVE DEVICES IN EFL STUDENTS’ EXPOSITORY TEXTS
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Normant N. (2002). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of textural cohesion in
African American students writing in narrative, argumentative, and expository
modes. CLA Journal, 46, 1-98.
Norment, N. (1994). Contrastive analyses of cohesive devices in Chinese and Chinese
ESL in written texts. Chinese Language Teaching association journal, 19 (1),
49-81.
Oh, S. (2009). Korean College Students’ Use of English Demonstratives in
Argumentative Essays. English Teaching, 64 (1), 51-78.
Olateju, M. (2006). Cohesion in ESL Classroom Written Texts. Nordic Journal of
African Studies, 15, 314-331.
Palmer, J.C. (1999). Coherence and cohesion in the English language classroom: the
use of lexical reiteration and pronominalisation. RELC Journal, 30, 61-85.
Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. London, England:
Continuum.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar
of the English language. London, England: Longman.
Rahman, Z.A.A.A. (2013). The use of cohesive devices writing by Omani studentteachers. SAGE Open, 3, 1-10.
Robb, T., Ross, S., and Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its
effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20 (1), 83-93.
Rydin, S. (2002). Building a hyponymy lexicon with hierarchial structure.
Unsupervised Lexical Acquisition: Proceedings of the Workshop of the ACL
Special Interest Group on the Lexicon (SIGLEX), Philadelphia, pp. 26-33.
Sadighi, F. (2012) Cohesion analysis of L2 writing: The case of Iranian undergraduate
EFL learners. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3 (2), 557-573.
Sainton, R. J. (2006). Words and Thoughts: Subsentences, Ellipsis, and the Philosophy
of Language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Saito, H. (1994). Teachers’ practices and students’ preferences for feedback on
Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1994). Selective processing in text understanding. In
M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 699-720).
London, England: Academic Press.
Saudin, H. (2013). The Realization of Cohesion in Students Argumentative Writing
Performance. Bandung, Indonesia: UPI (Unpublish Paper).

Hanif Nurcholish Adiantika, 2016
THE USE OF COHESIVE DEVICES IN EFL STUDENTS’ EXPOSITORY TEXTS
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Schulz, R. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students’ and
second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada
Journal, 11 (2), 46–67.
second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada
Journal, 11 (2), 46–67. Salkie R. (1995). Text and discourse analysis. New York,
NY: Routledge.
Seken, A., Suarnajaya, K., & Suarnajaya, W. (2013). An Analysis of the Cohesion and
Coherence of Students' English Writing at the Second Grade of SMA N 1
Labuapi West Lombok. e-journal program pasca sarjana universitas pendidikan
ganesha program study pendidikan bahasa inggris, 1.
Sommers, N. (1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and
Communication, 33, 148-156.
Tanskanen, S.-K. (2006). Collaborating towards Coherence: Lexical Cohesion in
English Discourse. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Thompson, G. (1996). Introducing Functional Grammar. London, England: Arnold.
Traugott, E. C., & Pratt, M. L. (1980). Linguistics for students of literature. New York,
NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing class. Language
Learning, 46 (2), 327-369.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics
and Pragmatics of Discourse. London & New York, NY: Longman.
Ventola, E. (Ed.). (1987). The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to
the Semiotics of service encounters. London, England: Pinter.
Wang, D. F. (1998). Yupian lianguan yu fanyi chutan (A preliminary exploration of
discourse coherence in translation). Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 6,
39-42.
Wang, D. F. (2005). Xiaoshuo fanyi de yuyi lianguan chonggou. (Reconstructing
semantic coherence in the translation of fiction). Chinese Translators’ Journal,
3, 37-43.
Wikborg, E. (1990). Types of coherence breaks in Swedish student writing: Misleading
paragraph division. In: U. Connor and A.M. Johns, Editors, Coherence in
writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives, TESOL, Alexandria, VA, pp.
131–148.
writing classes. Foreign Language Annual, 24, 203-218.
Xu, Y. C. (1996). Yinghan yuyan zhuyao xianjie shouduan de duibi fenxi (A
contrastive analysis of major cohesive devices in English and Chinese).
Shandong Foreign Language Teaching Journal, 4, 1-6.
Xuefan C. (2007). Lexical cohesion in Chinese college EFL writing. CELEA Journal,
30, 46-57.
Hanif Nurcholish Adiantika, 2016
THE USE OF COHESIVE DEVICES IN EFL STUDENTS’ EXPOSITORY TEXTS
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Yang W., Sun Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by
Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education,
23, 31-48.
Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to students’ writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19 (1), 79-101.

Hanif Nurcholish Adiantika, 2016
THE USE OF COHESIVE DEVICES IN EFL STUDENTS’ EXPOSITORY TEXTS
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu