Welcome to Repositori Universitas Muria Kudus - Repositori Universitas Muria Kudus

  

HE PRODUCTIVE VOCABULARY BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE

STUDENTS OF THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP 2 BAE

  

By

ERNA WAHYU. S

NIM 200932006

ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY

MURIA KUDUS UNIVERSITY

  

2013

  

THE PRODUCTIVE VOCABULARY BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE

STUDENTS OF THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP 2 BAE

  

SKRIPSI

  Presented to the University of Muria Kudus in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Completing the Sarjana Program in the Department of English Education

  

By :

ERNA WAHYU. S

NIM 200932006

ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY

MURIA KUDUSUNIVERSITY

  

2013

  

MOTTO AND DEDICATION

MOTTO:

   Set your mind and your heart with the world “I can”, so you can overcome all the problems you had.

   Think BIG, Start SMALL-Think GLOBALY, Act LOCALY!

  It is not a big mistake when you make a mistake doing the big job. But, it is a BIG MISTAKE when you NEVER DO the big job.

  This skripsi is dedicated to:

• Allah SWT the Almightly 

  My beloved Mother (Rumini) and Father (Sarni).

• My beloved sister (Heni Fitrianingrum)
• Three my best friends in SAR (Yakop

  Supriyadi, Herlinda Diashinta, Dani Hermawan) who always support and help to finish my skripsi.

• My dearest Hilal Abdul Wakhid who

  always help and support me

  

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

  Bismillhirrahmanirrahim Alhamdulillahirobbil’alamin, the writer would like to express her high gratitude to Allah SWT for blessing and guidance, so that the writer can finish her skripsi entitle “The Productive Vocabulary between Male and Female Students of the Eighth Grade Students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013”.

  The writer also wishes to express her deepest gratitude to those who are directly or indirectly involved in:

  1. Dr. Drs.Slamet Utomo, M.Pd, as the Dean of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Muria Kudus University.

  2. Diah Kurniati, S.Pd, M.Pd, as the Head of English Education Department and the writer’s second advisor who has patiently and kindly given valuable and continuous guidance, advice, as well as encouragement in making and completing this Skripsi.

  3. Nuraeningsih, S.Pd, M.Pd, as the writer’s first advisor who has already approved this research and given a lot of guidance and suggestion in the completion of this study.

  4. All of lecturers and students of English Education Department Teacher Training and Education Faculty and who help writer in finishing this research

  5. Drs. Moh Akhsanulkhaq, as the head master of SMP 2 Bae Kudus who has given the opportunity to conduct the research there.

  6. Sri Lestari, S.Pd as the English teacher of SMP 2 Bae Kudus who allows her to do this research in her class.

  7. All VIIIH class students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in academic year 2012/2013 for their cooperative as the subject of writer’s research.

  8. Writer’s beloved parents, Mr. Sarni and Mrs. Rumini, who always give love, pray, support and do the best for writer.

  9. Writer’s close friends; Yakop Supriyadi, Herlinda Diashinta, Dani Hermawan,

Lailatus Sa’idah, Ria Rizky, who have always given writer care, support, motivation, suggestion, advises, spirit and inspiration in all

  the whole time in the compiling this skripsi. The last, there is nothing perfect in this world and this final project is not exception. The writer realized that there are many weaknesses in this final project. Therefore, suggestion and criticism are always needed for betterment. Hopefully, this final project will be useful for all the readers, especially for the students at English Education Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Muria Kudus University.

  Kudus, July 2013 The Writer

  Erna Wahyu. S

  

ABSTRACT

Setianingsih, Erna Wahyu. 2013.

  “The Productive Vocabulary between Male and Female Students of The Eighth Grade Students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in The Academic Year 2012/2013”.Skripsi.English Education

  Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Muria Kudus University. Advisor: (i) Nuraeningsih, S.Pd, M.Pd, (ii) DiahKurniati, S.Pd, M.Pd,

  Key words: Productive Vocabulary, Male Students, Female Students

  The writer had an inspiration when she got PPL Program in SMP 2 Bae Kudus from her faculty. She had an interesting problem to be observed, when taught eighth grade students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus. Male and female students are students who study in SMP 2 Bae Kudus in the academic year 2012/2013. The writer found attitude of male students go out from classroom when lessons are over or when the teacher leave to the office, the students always make noise in the class, often forget to bring worksheet, sleep in the class when they are bored with the lesson or asking permission to go to toilet. While female students have good attitude such as more polite than male, bring the lesson book, diligent, active in class when they do not understand about the materials. When teacher gives a test to students, the average score of their score is 7, 5 to male and 7, 8 to female, so the score is not far different. The writer wants to recheck whether there is any significance difference of productive vocabulary between male and female students of the Eighth Grade Students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in the academic year 2012/2013.

  The objective of this research is to find out the significant different of productive vocabulary between male and female students of the Eighth Grade Students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in the academic year 2012/2013.

  The design of this research is ex post facto research. The population of this research is all of eighth grade students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in the academic year 2012/2013 and the sample is VIII H by using cluster random sampling. The writer constructs two tests in this research, they are; writing and speaking test. The result of those tests was used to know the significant difference of productive vocabulary between male and female students of the eighth grade students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in the academic year 2012/2013.

  The result shows that in level of significance 0.05 and degree of freedom 22, there is a difference but not significant of productive vocabulary between male and female students of the eighth grade students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in the academic year 2012/2013. It is shown from the calculation result t-obtained is 2.092, meanwhile t-table is 2.074. It means that the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted ( = 2.092 > t-table = 2.074). The productive vocabulary of female students is sufficient (Mean = 72.83 and SD = 6.05) and the productive vocabulary of female students is good (Mean = 78.27 and SD = 4.72). Based on the fact above, it proves that the productive vocabulary between male and female students of the eighth grade students of SMP 2 Bae kudus in the academic year 2012/2013 is different. The conclusion is that the productive vocabulary of female students is better than the productive vocabulary of male students of the eighth grade students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in Academic Year 2012/2013.

  Based on the result above, the writer would like to give suggestion as;(1)

  

before measuring the students’ vocabulary ability, a teacher has to know how students

interested in English, especially for vocabulary, (2)

  students should write what students like and try to speak English with English teacher to increase their vocabulary mastery. , (3) the further researcher are suggested to develop this research to be more specific or increase this research in other field of the research.

  

ABSTRAK

Setianingsih, Erna Wahyu. 2013.

  “Kosakata Produktif antara Siswa Laki-laki dan Siswa Perempuan dari Siswa Kelas Delapan SMP 2 Bae Kudus pada Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013”.Skripsi.Program Studi Pendidikan

  Bahasa Inggris, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Muria Kudus. Pembimbing: (i) Nuraeningsih, S.Pd, M.Pd, (ii) DiahKurniati, S.Pd, M.Pd,

  Key words: Kosakata Produktif, Siswa Laki-laki, Siswa Perempuan

  Penulis mendapatkan inspirasi ketika ia melakukan Program PPL di SMP

  2 Bae Kudus dari fakultasnya. Dia memiliki masalah yang menarik untuk diamati, ketika mengajar siswa kelas delapan SMP 2 Bae Kudus. Siswa laki-laki dan perempuan adalah siswa yang belajar di SMP 2 Bae pada tahun akademik 2012/2013. Penulis mendapatkan sikap dari siswa laki-laki keluar dari kelas ketika pelajaran selesai atau ketika guru meninggalkan kelas untuk ke kantor, siswa-siswa selalu membuat gaduh di kelas, sering lupa membawa LKS, tidur di kelas ketika mereka bosan dengan pelajaran atau meminta izin pergi ke kamar mandi. Sedangkan siswa perempuan memiliki sikap yang baik seperti; lebih sopan dari pada siswa laki-laki, selalu membawa LKS, rajin, aktif di kelas ketika mereka tidak paham tentang materi pelajaran. Ketika guru memberi test untuk siswa,nilai rata-rata mereka adalah 7.5 untuk siswa laki-laki dan 7.8 untuk siswa perempuan, jadi nilainya tidak berbeda jauh. Penulis ingin memeriksa kembali apakah ada perbedaan yang signifikan dari kosakata produktif antara siswa laki- laki dan siswa perempuan dari siswa kelas delapan SMP 2 Bae Kudus pada tahun akademik 2012/2013.

  Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan yang signifikan dari kosakata produktif antara siswa laki-laki dan siswa perempuan dari siswa kelas delapan SMP 2 Bae Kudus pada tahun akademik 2012/2013.

  Desain penelitian ini adalah penelitian ex post facto . Populasi dari penelitian ini

adalah semua siswa kelas delapan SMP 2 Bae Kudus tahun akademik 2012/2013 dan

sampelnya adalah kelas VIII H dengan menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling.

  Penulis menyusun dua tes dalam penelitian ini, yaitu; tes menulis dan tes berbicara. Hasil tes tersebut digunakan untuk mengetahui perbedaan kosakata produktif antara siswa laki-laki dan siswa perempuan dari kelas delapan SMP 2 Bae Kudus pada tahun akademik 2012/2013.

  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada tingkat signifikan 0.05 dan derajat

kebebasan 22 ada perbedaan tetapi tidak signifikan pada kosakata produktif antara siswa

laki-laki dan siswa perempuan dari siswa kelas delapan SMP 2 Bae pada tahun akademik

2012/2013. Hal ini terlihat dari hasil perhitungan t-obtained adalah , sementara

  2.092

  

itu,t-table adalah 2.074 . Itu artinya, hipotesis null ditolak dan hipotesis alternative

diterima. (t-obtained = 2.092> t-table =2.074). Kosakata produktif dari siswa laki-laki

hasilnya termasuk cukup ( ) dan kosakata produktif dari

  Mean = 72.83 and SD = 6.05

  siswa perempuan hasilnya termasuk bagus (Mean = 78.27 and SD = 4.72).

Berdasarkan hasil di atas, ini membuktikan bahwa kosakata produktif antara siswa laki-

  

laki dan siswa perempuan dari kelas delapan SMP 2 Bae Kudus pada tahun akademik

2012/2013 berbeda. Kesimpulannya adalah kosakata produktif dari siswa perempuan

lebih baik dari pada kosakata siawa laki-laki dari kelas delapan SMP 2 Bae Kudus pada

tahun akademik 2012/2013.

  Berdasarkan hasil diatas, penulis ingin memberikan saran sebagai berikut; (1)sebelum mengukur kemampuan kosakata siswa, seorang guru harus mengetahui minat belajar bahasa Inggris pada siswa terutama pada kosakata, (2) para siswa harus menulis apa yang disukai dan mencoba berbicara bahasa inggris

  (3) dengan guru bahasa inggris untuk meningkatkan penguasaan vocabularynya.

  peneliti selanjutnya disarankan untuk mengembangkan penelitian ini menjadi lebih spesifik atau meningkatkan penelitian di bidang lain dari penelitian.

  

TABLE OF CONTENT

COVER ......................................................................................................... i

LOGO ............................................................................................................ ii

TITLE ........................................................................................................... iii

MOTTO AND DEDICATION .................................................................... iv

  v ADVISORS’ APPROVAL ..........................................................................

  

EXAMINERS’ APPROVAL ....................................................................... vi

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ........................................................................... vii

ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................

  ix

  

ABSTRAK .................................................................................................... xi

TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................. xiii

LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................... xvi

LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................... xvii

LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................ xviii

  CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

  1.1 Background of the Research ................................................................... 1

  1.2 Statement of the Problem ........................................................................ 4

  1.3 Objective of the Research ....................................................................... 4

  1.4 Significance of the Research ................................................................... 4

  1.5 Limitation of the Research ...................................................................... 5

  1.6 Operational Definition ............................................................................ 5

  CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND HYPOTHESIS

  2.1 Vocabulary ............................................................................................. 7

  2.1.1 Definition of Vocabulary ..................................................................... 7

  2.1.2 Kind of Vocabulary............................................................................... 8

  2.2 Definition of Descriptive Text ................................................................ 11

  2.3 Gender ..................................................................................................... 13

  2.4 Students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus ................................................................ 15

  2.4.1 Character of Students in SMP 2 Bae Kudus ...................................... 16

  2.4.2Productive Vocabulary Mastery of Students SMP 2 Bae Kudus ......... 16

  2.4.3 Teaching Learning Process in SMP 2 Bae Kudus .............................. 17

  2.4.4 Material of Teaching English for English Grade Students of SMP

  2 Bae Kudus ....................................................................................... 17

  2.5 Review of Previous Research.................................................................. 18

  2.6 Theoretical Framework ........................................................................... 19

  2.7 Hypothesis ............................................................................................... 19

  CHAPTER III METHOD OF THE RESEARCH

  3.1 Design of the Research............................................................................ 20

  3.2 Population and Sample ............................................................................ 21

  3.2.1 Population .......................................................................................... 21

  3.2.2 Sample ............................................................................................ 21

  3.3 Instrument of the Research ...................................................................... 23

  3.4 Data Collection ........................................................................................ 24

  3.5 Data Analysis .......................................................................................... 25

  CHAPTER IV FINDING OF THE RESEARCH

  4.1 The Productive Vocabulary of Female Students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 .................................................................. 29

  4.2 The Productive Vocabulary of Male Students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 ................................................................... 31

  4.3 Hypothesis Testing ..................................................................................... 33

  CHAPTER V DISCUSSION

  5.1 Discussion ................................................................................................... 36

  CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

  6.1 Conclusion ................................................................................................. 40

  6.2 Suggestion .................................................................................................. 41

  

REFERENCES ................................................................................................. 42

APPENDICES ...................................................................................................44

STATEMENT ....................................................................................................54

CURRICULUM VITAE ...................................................................................55

  

LIST OF TABLES

  4.1 The Eighth Female Graders Score of Productive Vocabulary of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 ..................................

  4.4 The Frequency Distribution of the Productive Vocabulary of Male Students of the Eighth Grade Students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 ..................................................................

  32

  4.3 The Eighth Male Graders Score of Productive Vocabulary of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 .....................................

  30

  4.2 The Frequency Distribution of the Productive Vocabulary of Female Students of the Eighth Grade Students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 ..................................................................

  30

  25

  Table Page 1.1 Characteristic of Gender ......................................................................

  24 3.3 The Criteria of English Vocabulary ....................................................

  3.2 The Criteria of Scoring productive Vocabulary between Male and Female Students adopted from Brown and Bailey (1984:39) .............

  22

  14 3.1 The Population of the Research ..........................................................

  14 2.2 According to K. Tobin (1987) the Characters of Gender ....................

  2.1 According to Bonny and Aneta Pavlenko (2002) the Characters of Gender .................................................................................................

  2

  32

  

LIST OF FIGURES

  Figure Page

  4.1 The Graph of the Productive Vocabulary of Female Students of the Eighth Grade Students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus .....................................

  31

  4.2 The Graph of the Productive Vocabulary of Male Students of the Eighth Grade Students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus .....................................

  33

  

LIST OF APPENDICES

  Appendix Page 1.

  The Eighth Female Graders Score of Productive Vocabulary of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 .........................................

  44 2. The Eighth Male Graders Score of Productive Vocabulary of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in the Academic Year 2012/2013 ........................................

  45 3. The Calculation of Mean and Standard Deviation of the Productive

  Vocabulary Score of Female Students of the Eighth Grade Students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in Academic Year 2012/2013 ...................................

  46 4. The Calculation of Mean and Standard Deviation of the Productive

  Vocabulary Score of Female Students of the Eighth Grade Students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in Academic Year 2012/2013 ...................................

  48 5. The T-test Calculation of Mean of Productive Vocabulary between

  Male and Female Students of the Eighth Grade Students of SMP 2 Bae Kudus in Academic Year 2012/2013The ................................................

  50 6. The T-Table for Two Tail and One Tail .................................................

  53