T BIO 1402417 Bibliography
106
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Acar, O. & Patton, B. R., (2012). Argumentation and formal reasoning skills in an
argumentation basedguided inquiry course. Procedia Social and Behavioral
Sciences. 46. 4756 – 4760
Ahmadi, A & Supriyono, W. (2004). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta
Albanese, P. J., (2015). The unconscious processing information. Marketing
Theory. 15. 59–78
Albe, V., & Gombert, M. J., (2012). Students communication, argumentation and
knowledge in a citizens’ conference on global warming. Culture Study of
Science Education. 7. 659-681
Alexaindre, M. P. J., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A., (1999). “Doing the
Lesson” or “Doing Science”: Argument in High School Genetics. Science
Education. 757 – 792
Aleixandre, M. P. J., (2012). Determinism and Undetermination in Genetics:
Implications for Students’ Engagement in Argumentation and Epistemic
Practices. Science & Education. 23. 465-484
Arikunto, S. (2011). Prosedur Penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta:
Penerbit Rhineka Cipta
Arvola, A. O., & Lundegard, I., (2011). It’s Her Body. When Students’
Argumentation Shows Displacement of Content in a Science Classroom.
Research Science Education. 42. 1121-1145.
Astirin, O. P., (2000). Permasalahan Pengelolaan Keanekaragaman Hayati di
Indonesia (Problems of Biodiversity Management in Indonesia).
Biodiversitas. 1. 36 – 40
Atkinson, R.L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., & Bem. D. J., (2010). Pengantar
Psikologi jilid Satu. Tangerang: Penerbit Interaksara (Karisma Publishing
Group)
Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2009). Using A Learning Progression to Inform
Scientific Argumentation in Talk and Writing. Learning Progresion in
Science. Iowa City
Blanchard, M. R, Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L.
A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is Inquiry Possible in Light of
Accountability?: A Quantitative Comparison of the Relative Effectiveness
of Guided Inquiry and Verification Laboratory Instruction. Science
Education. 577 – 616
Annisa Setya Rini, 2016
HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN PEMROSESAN INFORMASI DENGAN ARGUMENTASI TERHADAP ISU
KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI INDONESIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
107
Bulgren, J. A., Ellis, J. D., & Marquis, J. G., (2013). The Use and Effectiveness of
an Argumentation and Evaluations Intervention in Science Classes. Journal
Science Education Technology. 23. 82-97
Burtschen, M.J. & Meyer, B., (2014). Promoting good decisions: How regulatory
focus affects group information processing and decision-making. Group
Processes & Intergroup Relations. 17. 663–681
Caldwell, R., (2012). Systems Thinking, Organizational Change And Agency: A
Practice Theory Critique Of Senge’s Learning Organization. Journal of
Change Management. 1-20
Campbell, Reece, et.al. (2008). Biologi. Edisi Kedelapan Jilid 1. Jakarta : Penerbit
Erlangga
Cetin, P. S., Dogan, N., & Kutlua, A. Y., (2014). The Quality of Pre-service
Science Teachers’ Argumentation: Influence of Content Knowledge.
Journal Science Teacher Education. 25. 309-331.
Chin, C. Yang, W & Tuan, H., (2015). Arguemntation in a Socioscientific
Context and its Influence on Fundamental and Derived Science Literacies.
International Journal of Science and Math Education. 1 – 15
Christenson, N., Rundgren, S. N., & Zeidler., (2014). The Relationship of
Discipline Background to Upper Secondary Students’ Argumentation on
Socioscientific Issues. Research Science Education. 44. 581-601.
Clifton, C., Ferreira F., Henderson, J., Inhoff, A. Liversedge, S., Reichle, E., &
Schotter. E., (2015). Eye Movements in Reading and information
processing: Keith Rayner’s 40 year legacy. Journal of Memory and
Language. 1 - 19
Coker, D. L., Erwin, E., (2011). Teaching Academic Argument in an Urban
Middle School: A Case Study of Two Approaches. Urban Education. 42.
120 – 140
Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2008). Teaching Strategies for Developing
Students’ Argumentation Skills about Socioscientific Issues in High School
Genetics. Research Science Education. 40. 133 - 148
Desmita. (2012). Psikologi perkembangan peserta didik. Bandung: PT. Remaja
Rosdakarya
Dunggio, I., & Gunawan, H., (2009). Telaah Sejarah Kebijakan Pengelolaan
Taman Nasional di Indonesia (An Overview on The History of National
Park Management Policy in Indonesia). Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan
Kehutanan. 6. 43 – 56
Annisa Setya Rini, 2016
HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN PEMROSESAN INFORMASI DENGAN ARGUMENTASI TERHADAP ISU
KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI INDONESIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
108
Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J., (2002). Supproting and Promoting Argumentation
Discourse in Science Education. Studies in Science Education. 39 – 72
Gregory, A., Miller. S., (2014). Using Systems Thinking to Educate for
Sustainability in a Business School. Systems. 2. 313-327.
Ekanara, B. (2014). Keterampilan argumentasi siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas
(studi tentang keterampilan pembentukan klaim mengenai isu sosiosaintifik
siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas pada kelompok budaya sunda). (Tesis).
Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Erduran, S., (2014). Beyond Nature of Science: The Case for Reconceptualising
Science for Science Education. Science Education International. 93 – 111
Fraenkel, J.R ., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H., (2012). How to Design and
Evaluate Research in Education Eight Edition . New York: The McGrawHill Companies Inc
Hefter, M. H., Berthold, K., Renkl, A., Riess, W., Shmid, S., & Fries, S., (2014).
Effect of a training intervention to foster argumentation skills while
processing conflicting scientific positions. Instructional Science 42. 929947.
Iskandar, Tb. Z., (2012). Psikologi Lingkungan Teori dan Konsep. Bandung: PT.
Refika Aditama
Ito, A., Coley, M., Pickering, M., Martin, A., & Nieuwland, M. (2016). Predicting
form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials. Journal of Memory and
Language. 157 – 171
Jensen, E., (2011). Pembelajaran berbasis otak paradigma pengajaran baru edisi
kedua. Jakarta: PT. Indeks
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. (2012). Determinism and Undertermination in Genetics:
Implications for Students’ Engagement in Argumentation and Epistemic
Practices. Science and Education. 23. 465 – 484
Jun, S. H., &Holland, S., (2012). Information Processing Strategies a Focus on
pictorial information Roles. Journal of Travel Research. 51. 205–218
Kadayifci, H., Atasoy, B., &Akkus, H., (2012) The Correlation between the flaws
students define in an argument and their creative and critical thinking
abilities. Procedia Social and Behaviour Sciences. 47. 802 – 806
Kalyuga, S., (2011). Informing: A Cognitive Load Perspective. Informing
Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline. 14. 1–13
Annisa Setya Rini, 2016
HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN PEMROSESAN INFORMASI DENGAN ARGUMENTASI TERHADAP ISU
KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI INDONESIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
109
Karmilasanti & Supartini (2011). Keanekaragaman jenis tumbuhan obat dan
pemanfaatannya di kawasan Tane' Olen desa Setulang Malinau, Kalimantan
Timur. Jurnal Penelitian Dipterokarpa . 23 – 38
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup Republik Indonesia (2010). Status Lingkungan
Hidup Indonesia 2010. Jakarta: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup Republik
Indonesia
Kuhn, D., (2009). Teaching and Learning Science as Argument. Science
Education. 810 – 824
Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., &Khait, V., (2016). Tracing the Development of
Argumentive Writing in a Discourse-Rich Context. Written Communication.
33. 92 – 121
Kusmana, C. &Hikmat, A. (2015).Keanekaragaman Hayati Flora di Indonesia.
Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan. 5. 187 – 198
Koeneman, M., Goedhart, M., & Ossevoort, M., (2013). Introducing Preuniversity Students to Primary Scientific Literature Through Argumentation
Analysis. Research Science Education. 43. 2009–2034
Larrain, A., Howe, C., Cerda, J., (2014). Argumentation in Whole-Class
Teaching and Science Learning. PSYKHE. 23. 1-15
Lemerise, E. A., Thorn, A., & Costello, J. M., (2016). Affectiveties and social
information processing. Science Education. 1 – 14
Lunenburg, F.C., (2011). Systems Thinking and the Learning Organization: The
Path to School Improvement. Schooling Volume 2, Number 1. 1-6.
Marois, R., Ivanoff, J., (2005). Capacity limits of information processing in the
brain. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences. 9. 296 – 305
Matsumoto, D. (2008). Pengantar psikologi Lintas Budaya Buku teks utama
dalam kelas psikologi lintas budaya tingkat awal. Yogyakarta: Pustaka
Pelajar
Mayer, R., (2009). Multimedia Learning Prinsip-Prinsip dan Aplikasi. Surabaya:
ITS Press
Mehr, N., (2010). An Analysis of the use of Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation in
Preliminary Rulings. Departement of Language and Business
Communication, Aarhus School of Bussiness, Aarhus University
Annisa Setya Rini, 2016
HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN PEMROSESAN INFORMASI DENGAN ARGUMENTASI TERHADAP ISU
KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI INDONESIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
110
Mei, W. S., (2013).Certainty Judgements and the Status of Propositions in
Undergraduate Essays. RELC Journal. 44.279 –302
Mendenhall & Beaver.(1994). Introduction to probability and statistic. New York
Mohanty, A., (2015). Information Processing and Creative Thinking Abilities of
Residential and Non-Residential School Children: A Pilot Study. Sage open.
1-12
Moleong, L, A. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi . Bandung:
Penerbit Remaja Rosda Karya
Munir. (2012). Multimedia Konsep & Aplikasi dalam Pendidikan . Bandung:
Alfabeta
Nahdi, M. (2008). Konservasi Ekosistem dan Keanekaragaman Hayati Hutan
Tropis Berbasis Masyarakat. Kaunia . 159 – 172
Nasir, M. et.al. (1994). PenuntunPraktikum Biologi Umum. Jakarta: Departemen
Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jendaral Pendidikan Tinggi
Nichols, K., Gillies, R., & Hedberg, J. (2015). Argumentation-Based
Collaborative Inquiry in Science Through Representational Work: Impact
on Primary Students’ Representational Fluency. Res Science Education. 1 –
22
Nurbayani, S. (2010). Program Percepatan Kelas (Akselerasi) bagi Siswa yang
memiliki Kemampuan Unggul (Sebuah Inovasi dalam pelaksanaan
pendidikan di persekolahan). Jurnal Psikologi. 1-24
Nursani, Z. (2014). Analisis Argumentasi dan Penguasaan Konsep dalam
Menggambarkan Keterampilan Berpikir Sistem pada Pembelajaran
Fisiologi Manusia . (Tesis). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia, Bandung.
Nursani, Z. (2014). Analisis Argumentasi dan Penguasaan Konsep dalam
menggambarkan Keterampilan Berpikir Sistem pada Pembelajaran Fisiologi
Manusia. Prosiding Mathematics And Science Forum. 1 – 12
Ostroff, W, L. (2013). Memahami cara anak-anak belajar membawa ilmu
perkembangan anak ke dalam kelas. Jakarta: PT. Indeks
Piaget, J. (1953). The Origin of Intelligence in the Child . London: Routledge &
Kegan Paul LTD
Annisa Setya Rini, 2016
HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN PEMROSESAN INFORMASI DENGAN ARGUMENTASI TERHADAP ISU
KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI INDONESIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
111
Rahmat, A., & Hindriana, A. F., (2014). Beban kognitif mahasiswa dalam
pembelajaran fungsi terintegrasi struktur tumbuhan berbasis dimensi belajar.
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 66-74
Rahmat, A., Soesilawaty, S, A., Fachrunnisa, R., Wulandari, S., Suryati, Y., &
Rohaeni, H., (2014). Beban kognitif siswa sma pada pembelajaran biologi
interdisiplin berbasis dimensi belajar. Prosiding Mathematics and Sciences
Forum. 475 – 480
Rahmat, A., Nuraeni, E., Soesilawaty, S. A., Hernita, Alawiyah, D., Garnasih, T.,
& Noorwahidah. (2015). Beban Kognitif dan Kemampuan penalaran siswa
SMA, MA dan SMA berbasis pesantren pada pembelajaran Biologi.
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains & Enterpreneurship II. 240 – 245
Riyadi, S. (2011). Pemrosesan Informasi dalam belajar gerak. Jurnal Ilmiah
SPIRIT. 11. 1 – 12
Reiser, B. J., Berland, L. K., & Kenyon, L., (2012). Engaging Students in the
Scientific Practices of Explanation and Argumentation Understanding A
Framework for K–12 Science Education. NSTA’s K-12 Journals. 1-6
Roshayanti, F., Rustaman, N., Barlian, A., & Lukmana, I. (2010). Argumentation
Skill of Prospective Biology Teachers on the Concept of Neural System.
Prosiding. Development of Science Curiculum in 21st Century. Bandung:
4th International Seminar of Science Education
Roshayanti, F. (2012). Pengembangan Model Asesmen Argumentatif untuk
mengukur Keterampilan Argumentasi Mahasiswa pada Konsep Fisiolgi
Manusia . (Disertasi). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia, Bandung.
Sadiman, A., Rahardjo., Haryono, A., Rahardjito., (1986). Media Pendidikan
Pengertian, Pengembangan dan Pemanfaatannya. Jakarta: PT. Raja
Grafindo Persada
Sampson, V., & Schleigh, S. (2013). Scientific Argumentation in Biology 30
classroom activities. Virginia: NSTA press
Santrock, J., W. (2007). Remaja Edisi 11 Jilid 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga
Santrock, J., W. (2011). Life-Span Development Perkembangan Masa Hidup Edisi
Ketigabelas Jilid 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga
Sarwono, S., W. (1992). Psikologi Lingkungan. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia
Widiasarana Indonesia
Annisa Setya Rini, 2016
HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN PEMROSESAN INFORMASI DENGAN ARGUMENTASI TERHADAP ISU
KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI INDONESIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
112
Setyawan, A. & SGM, I. (2015). Belajar dengan otak kanan cara belajar asyik
dan keren. Jakarta : PT. Eensi Erlangga Group
Sheil, D., Van Heist, M., Liswanti, N., Basuki, I., & Wan, M. (2009).
Keanekaragaman Hayati, Lansekap dan Sumber Penghidupan: Sebuah
perspektif lokal. 57 – 83
Simosi, M. (2003). Using Toulmin’s Framework for the Analysis of Everyday
Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations. Kluwer Academic
Publishers. 185 – 202
Skrzypek, W., Potyrala, K., & Walosik, A. (2011). Formation of biology students
social skills with use of ICT tools. Western Anatolia Journal of Education
Science. 219 – 224
Smyrnaiou, Z., Petropoulou, E., & Sotiriou, M. (2015). Appling Argumentation
Approach in STEM Education: A Case Study of the European Student
Parliaments Project in Greece. American Journal of Educational Research.
1618-1628
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantatif, Kualitatif
dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta
Sutarno, E. (2014). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran IPA berbasis
Multimedia Interaktif untuk Meningkatkan Kemandirian dan Hasil Belajar
Siswa SMP di Kota Bandung (Disertasi). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas
Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Tavares, M., Aleixandre, M. & Mortimer, E. F., (2009). Articulation of
Conceptual Knowledge and Argumentation Practices by High School
Students in Evolution Problems. Science and Education. 19. 573 – 598
Triyono, K. (2013). Keanekaragaman hayati dalam menunjang ketahanan pangan.
Innofarm: Jurnal Inovasi Pertanian. 11. 1-11
VanDerHeide, J., Newell, G, E., (2013). Instructional Chains as a Method for
Examining the Teaching and Learning of Argumentative Writing in
Classrooms. Written Communication. 30. 300 – 329
Wolfe, C., (2011). Argumentation
Communication. 28. 193 – 219
Across
the
Curriculum.
Written
Winarni, E. (2016). Paradigma Pembelajaran Abad 21 Inovatif, Kreatif, Produktif
dan Afektif. Prosiding. Palembang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang
Annisa Setya Rini, 2016
HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN PEMROSESAN INFORMASI DENGAN ARGUMENTASI TERHADAP ISU
KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI INDONESIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
113
Yahaya, A. (2009). Information processing and its implications to teaching and
learning. Kuala Lumpur: Faculty of Education, University Technology
Malaysia
Yu, S., & Yore, L. D., (2012). Quality, Evolution, And Positional Change Of
University Students’ Argumentation Patterns About Organic Agriculture
During An Argument–Critique–Argument Experience. International
Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 11. 1233 – 1254
Yudhistira., Hidayat, W. K., & Hadiyarto, A., (2011). Kajian Dampak Kerusakan
Lingkungan akibat Kegiatan Penambangan Pasir di desa Keningar daerah
kawasan Gunung Merapi. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan volume 9. 76-84
Yusuf, S. (2005). Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. Bandung: Penerbit
Remaja Rosdakarya Bandung
Annisa Setya Rini, 2016
HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN PEMROSESAN INFORMASI DENGAN ARGUMENTASI TERHADAP ISU
KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI INDONESIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Acar, O. & Patton, B. R., (2012). Argumentation and formal reasoning skills in an
argumentation basedguided inquiry course. Procedia Social and Behavioral
Sciences. 46. 4756 – 4760
Ahmadi, A & Supriyono, W. (2004). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta
Albanese, P. J., (2015). The unconscious processing information. Marketing
Theory. 15. 59–78
Albe, V., & Gombert, M. J., (2012). Students communication, argumentation and
knowledge in a citizens’ conference on global warming. Culture Study of
Science Education. 7. 659-681
Alexaindre, M. P. J., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A., (1999). “Doing the
Lesson” or “Doing Science”: Argument in High School Genetics. Science
Education. 757 – 792
Aleixandre, M. P. J., (2012). Determinism and Undetermination in Genetics:
Implications for Students’ Engagement in Argumentation and Epistemic
Practices. Science & Education. 23. 465-484
Arikunto, S. (2011). Prosedur Penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta:
Penerbit Rhineka Cipta
Arvola, A. O., & Lundegard, I., (2011). It’s Her Body. When Students’
Argumentation Shows Displacement of Content in a Science Classroom.
Research Science Education. 42. 1121-1145.
Astirin, O. P., (2000). Permasalahan Pengelolaan Keanekaragaman Hayati di
Indonesia (Problems of Biodiversity Management in Indonesia).
Biodiversitas. 1. 36 – 40
Atkinson, R.L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., & Bem. D. J., (2010). Pengantar
Psikologi jilid Satu. Tangerang: Penerbit Interaksara (Karisma Publishing
Group)
Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2009). Using A Learning Progression to Inform
Scientific Argumentation in Talk and Writing. Learning Progresion in
Science. Iowa City
Blanchard, M. R, Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L.
A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is Inquiry Possible in Light of
Accountability?: A Quantitative Comparison of the Relative Effectiveness
of Guided Inquiry and Verification Laboratory Instruction. Science
Education. 577 – 616
Annisa Setya Rini, 2016
HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN PEMROSESAN INFORMASI DENGAN ARGUMENTASI TERHADAP ISU
KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI INDONESIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
107
Bulgren, J. A., Ellis, J. D., & Marquis, J. G., (2013). The Use and Effectiveness of
an Argumentation and Evaluations Intervention in Science Classes. Journal
Science Education Technology. 23. 82-97
Burtschen, M.J. & Meyer, B., (2014). Promoting good decisions: How regulatory
focus affects group information processing and decision-making. Group
Processes & Intergroup Relations. 17. 663–681
Caldwell, R., (2012). Systems Thinking, Organizational Change And Agency: A
Practice Theory Critique Of Senge’s Learning Organization. Journal of
Change Management. 1-20
Campbell, Reece, et.al. (2008). Biologi. Edisi Kedelapan Jilid 1. Jakarta : Penerbit
Erlangga
Cetin, P. S., Dogan, N., & Kutlua, A. Y., (2014). The Quality of Pre-service
Science Teachers’ Argumentation: Influence of Content Knowledge.
Journal Science Teacher Education. 25. 309-331.
Chin, C. Yang, W & Tuan, H., (2015). Arguemntation in a Socioscientific
Context and its Influence on Fundamental and Derived Science Literacies.
International Journal of Science and Math Education. 1 – 15
Christenson, N., Rundgren, S. N., & Zeidler., (2014). The Relationship of
Discipline Background to Upper Secondary Students’ Argumentation on
Socioscientific Issues. Research Science Education. 44. 581-601.
Clifton, C., Ferreira F., Henderson, J., Inhoff, A. Liversedge, S., Reichle, E., &
Schotter. E., (2015). Eye Movements in Reading and information
processing: Keith Rayner’s 40 year legacy. Journal of Memory and
Language. 1 - 19
Coker, D. L., Erwin, E., (2011). Teaching Academic Argument in an Urban
Middle School: A Case Study of Two Approaches. Urban Education. 42.
120 – 140
Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2008). Teaching Strategies for Developing
Students’ Argumentation Skills about Socioscientific Issues in High School
Genetics. Research Science Education. 40. 133 - 148
Desmita. (2012). Psikologi perkembangan peserta didik. Bandung: PT. Remaja
Rosdakarya
Dunggio, I., & Gunawan, H., (2009). Telaah Sejarah Kebijakan Pengelolaan
Taman Nasional di Indonesia (An Overview on The History of National
Park Management Policy in Indonesia). Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan
Kehutanan. 6. 43 – 56
Annisa Setya Rini, 2016
HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN PEMROSESAN INFORMASI DENGAN ARGUMENTASI TERHADAP ISU
KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI INDONESIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
108
Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J., (2002). Supproting and Promoting Argumentation
Discourse in Science Education. Studies in Science Education. 39 – 72
Gregory, A., Miller. S., (2014). Using Systems Thinking to Educate for
Sustainability in a Business School. Systems. 2. 313-327.
Ekanara, B. (2014). Keterampilan argumentasi siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas
(studi tentang keterampilan pembentukan klaim mengenai isu sosiosaintifik
siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas pada kelompok budaya sunda). (Tesis).
Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Erduran, S., (2014). Beyond Nature of Science: The Case for Reconceptualising
Science for Science Education. Science Education International. 93 – 111
Fraenkel, J.R ., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H., (2012). How to Design and
Evaluate Research in Education Eight Edition . New York: The McGrawHill Companies Inc
Hefter, M. H., Berthold, K., Renkl, A., Riess, W., Shmid, S., & Fries, S., (2014).
Effect of a training intervention to foster argumentation skills while
processing conflicting scientific positions. Instructional Science 42. 929947.
Iskandar, Tb. Z., (2012). Psikologi Lingkungan Teori dan Konsep. Bandung: PT.
Refika Aditama
Ito, A., Coley, M., Pickering, M., Martin, A., & Nieuwland, M. (2016). Predicting
form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials. Journal of Memory and
Language. 157 – 171
Jensen, E., (2011). Pembelajaran berbasis otak paradigma pengajaran baru edisi
kedua. Jakarta: PT. Indeks
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. (2012). Determinism and Undertermination in Genetics:
Implications for Students’ Engagement in Argumentation and Epistemic
Practices. Science and Education. 23. 465 – 484
Jun, S. H., &Holland, S., (2012). Information Processing Strategies a Focus on
pictorial information Roles. Journal of Travel Research. 51. 205–218
Kadayifci, H., Atasoy, B., &Akkus, H., (2012) The Correlation between the flaws
students define in an argument and their creative and critical thinking
abilities. Procedia Social and Behaviour Sciences. 47. 802 – 806
Kalyuga, S., (2011). Informing: A Cognitive Load Perspective. Informing
Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline. 14. 1–13
Annisa Setya Rini, 2016
HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN PEMROSESAN INFORMASI DENGAN ARGUMENTASI TERHADAP ISU
KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI INDONESIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
109
Karmilasanti & Supartini (2011). Keanekaragaman jenis tumbuhan obat dan
pemanfaatannya di kawasan Tane' Olen desa Setulang Malinau, Kalimantan
Timur. Jurnal Penelitian Dipterokarpa . 23 – 38
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup Republik Indonesia (2010). Status Lingkungan
Hidup Indonesia 2010. Jakarta: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup Republik
Indonesia
Kuhn, D., (2009). Teaching and Learning Science as Argument. Science
Education. 810 – 824
Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., &Khait, V., (2016). Tracing the Development of
Argumentive Writing in a Discourse-Rich Context. Written Communication.
33. 92 – 121
Kusmana, C. &Hikmat, A. (2015).Keanekaragaman Hayati Flora di Indonesia.
Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan. 5. 187 – 198
Koeneman, M., Goedhart, M., & Ossevoort, M., (2013). Introducing Preuniversity Students to Primary Scientific Literature Through Argumentation
Analysis. Research Science Education. 43. 2009–2034
Larrain, A., Howe, C., Cerda, J., (2014). Argumentation in Whole-Class
Teaching and Science Learning. PSYKHE. 23. 1-15
Lemerise, E. A., Thorn, A., & Costello, J. M., (2016). Affectiveties and social
information processing. Science Education. 1 – 14
Lunenburg, F.C., (2011). Systems Thinking and the Learning Organization: The
Path to School Improvement. Schooling Volume 2, Number 1. 1-6.
Marois, R., Ivanoff, J., (2005). Capacity limits of information processing in the
brain. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences. 9. 296 – 305
Matsumoto, D. (2008). Pengantar psikologi Lintas Budaya Buku teks utama
dalam kelas psikologi lintas budaya tingkat awal. Yogyakarta: Pustaka
Pelajar
Mayer, R., (2009). Multimedia Learning Prinsip-Prinsip dan Aplikasi. Surabaya:
ITS Press
Mehr, N., (2010). An Analysis of the use of Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation in
Preliminary Rulings. Departement of Language and Business
Communication, Aarhus School of Bussiness, Aarhus University
Annisa Setya Rini, 2016
HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN PEMROSESAN INFORMASI DENGAN ARGUMENTASI TERHADAP ISU
KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI INDONESIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
110
Mei, W. S., (2013).Certainty Judgements and the Status of Propositions in
Undergraduate Essays. RELC Journal. 44.279 –302
Mendenhall & Beaver.(1994). Introduction to probability and statistic. New York
Mohanty, A., (2015). Information Processing and Creative Thinking Abilities of
Residential and Non-Residential School Children: A Pilot Study. Sage open.
1-12
Moleong, L, A. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi . Bandung:
Penerbit Remaja Rosda Karya
Munir. (2012). Multimedia Konsep & Aplikasi dalam Pendidikan . Bandung:
Alfabeta
Nahdi, M. (2008). Konservasi Ekosistem dan Keanekaragaman Hayati Hutan
Tropis Berbasis Masyarakat. Kaunia . 159 – 172
Nasir, M. et.al. (1994). PenuntunPraktikum Biologi Umum. Jakarta: Departemen
Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jendaral Pendidikan Tinggi
Nichols, K., Gillies, R., & Hedberg, J. (2015). Argumentation-Based
Collaborative Inquiry in Science Through Representational Work: Impact
on Primary Students’ Representational Fluency. Res Science Education. 1 –
22
Nurbayani, S. (2010). Program Percepatan Kelas (Akselerasi) bagi Siswa yang
memiliki Kemampuan Unggul (Sebuah Inovasi dalam pelaksanaan
pendidikan di persekolahan). Jurnal Psikologi. 1-24
Nursani, Z. (2014). Analisis Argumentasi dan Penguasaan Konsep dalam
Menggambarkan Keterampilan Berpikir Sistem pada Pembelajaran
Fisiologi Manusia . (Tesis). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia, Bandung.
Nursani, Z. (2014). Analisis Argumentasi dan Penguasaan Konsep dalam
menggambarkan Keterampilan Berpikir Sistem pada Pembelajaran Fisiologi
Manusia. Prosiding Mathematics And Science Forum. 1 – 12
Ostroff, W, L. (2013). Memahami cara anak-anak belajar membawa ilmu
perkembangan anak ke dalam kelas. Jakarta: PT. Indeks
Piaget, J. (1953). The Origin of Intelligence in the Child . London: Routledge &
Kegan Paul LTD
Annisa Setya Rini, 2016
HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN PEMROSESAN INFORMASI DENGAN ARGUMENTASI TERHADAP ISU
KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI INDONESIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
111
Rahmat, A., & Hindriana, A. F., (2014). Beban kognitif mahasiswa dalam
pembelajaran fungsi terintegrasi struktur tumbuhan berbasis dimensi belajar.
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 66-74
Rahmat, A., Soesilawaty, S, A., Fachrunnisa, R., Wulandari, S., Suryati, Y., &
Rohaeni, H., (2014). Beban kognitif siswa sma pada pembelajaran biologi
interdisiplin berbasis dimensi belajar. Prosiding Mathematics and Sciences
Forum. 475 – 480
Rahmat, A., Nuraeni, E., Soesilawaty, S. A., Hernita, Alawiyah, D., Garnasih, T.,
& Noorwahidah. (2015). Beban Kognitif dan Kemampuan penalaran siswa
SMA, MA dan SMA berbasis pesantren pada pembelajaran Biologi.
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains & Enterpreneurship II. 240 – 245
Riyadi, S. (2011). Pemrosesan Informasi dalam belajar gerak. Jurnal Ilmiah
SPIRIT. 11. 1 – 12
Reiser, B. J., Berland, L. K., & Kenyon, L., (2012). Engaging Students in the
Scientific Practices of Explanation and Argumentation Understanding A
Framework for K–12 Science Education. NSTA’s K-12 Journals. 1-6
Roshayanti, F., Rustaman, N., Barlian, A., & Lukmana, I. (2010). Argumentation
Skill of Prospective Biology Teachers on the Concept of Neural System.
Prosiding. Development of Science Curiculum in 21st Century. Bandung:
4th International Seminar of Science Education
Roshayanti, F. (2012). Pengembangan Model Asesmen Argumentatif untuk
mengukur Keterampilan Argumentasi Mahasiswa pada Konsep Fisiolgi
Manusia . (Disertasi). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia, Bandung.
Sadiman, A., Rahardjo., Haryono, A., Rahardjito., (1986). Media Pendidikan
Pengertian, Pengembangan dan Pemanfaatannya. Jakarta: PT. Raja
Grafindo Persada
Sampson, V., & Schleigh, S. (2013). Scientific Argumentation in Biology 30
classroom activities. Virginia: NSTA press
Santrock, J., W. (2007). Remaja Edisi 11 Jilid 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga
Santrock, J., W. (2011). Life-Span Development Perkembangan Masa Hidup Edisi
Ketigabelas Jilid 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga
Sarwono, S., W. (1992). Psikologi Lingkungan. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia
Widiasarana Indonesia
Annisa Setya Rini, 2016
HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN PEMROSESAN INFORMASI DENGAN ARGUMENTASI TERHADAP ISU
KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI INDONESIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
112
Setyawan, A. & SGM, I. (2015). Belajar dengan otak kanan cara belajar asyik
dan keren. Jakarta : PT. Eensi Erlangga Group
Sheil, D., Van Heist, M., Liswanti, N., Basuki, I., & Wan, M. (2009).
Keanekaragaman Hayati, Lansekap dan Sumber Penghidupan: Sebuah
perspektif lokal. 57 – 83
Simosi, M. (2003). Using Toulmin’s Framework for the Analysis of Everyday
Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations. Kluwer Academic
Publishers. 185 – 202
Skrzypek, W., Potyrala, K., & Walosik, A. (2011). Formation of biology students
social skills with use of ICT tools. Western Anatolia Journal of Education
Science. 219 – 224
Smyrnaiou, Z., Petropoulou, E., & Sotiriou, M. (2015). Appling Argumentation
Approach in STEM Education: A Case Study of the European Student
Parliaments Project in Greece. American Journal of Educational Research.
1618-1628
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantatif, Kualitatif
dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta
Sutarno, E. (2014). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran IPA berbasis
Multimedia Interaktif untuk Meningkatkan Kemandirian dan Hasil Belajar
Siswa SMP di Kota Bandung (Disertasi). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas
Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Tavares, M., Aleixandre, M. & Mortimer, E. F., (2009). Articulation of
Conceptual Knowledge and Argumentation Practices by High School
Students in Evolution Problems. Science and Education. 19. 573 – 598
Triyono, K. (2013). Keanekaragaman hayati dalam menunjang ketahanan pangan.
Innofarm: Jurnal Inovasi Pertanian. 11. 1-11
VanDerHeide, J., Newell, G, E., (2013). Instructional Chains as a Method for
Examining the Teaching and Learning of Argumentative Writing in
Classrooms. Written Communication. 30. 300 – 329
Wolfe, C., (2011). Argumentation
Communication. 28. 193 – 219
Across
the
Curriculum.
Written
Winarni, E. (2016). Paradigma Pembelajaran Abad 21 Inovatif, Kreatif, Produktif
dan Afektif. Prosiding. Palembang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang
Annisa Setya Rini, 2016
HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN PEMROSESAN INFORMASI DENGAN ARGUMENTASI TERHADAP ISU
KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI INDONESIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
113
Yahaya, A. (2009). Information processing and its implications to teaching and
learning. Kuala Lumpur: Faculty of Education, University Technology
Malaysia
Yu, S., & Yore, L. D., (2012). Quality, Evolution, And Positional Change Of
University Students’ Argumentation Patterns About Organic Agriculture
During An Argument–Critique–Argument Experience. International
Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 11. 1233 – 1254
Yudhistira., Hidayat, W. K., & Hadiyarto, A., (2011). Kajian Dampak Kerusakan
Lingkungan akibat Kegiatan Penambangan Pasir di desa Keningar daerah
kawasan Gunung Merapi. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan volume 9. 76-84
Yusuf, S. (2005). Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. Bandung: Penerbit
Remaja Rosdakarya Bandung
Annisa Setya Rini, 2016
HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN PEMROSESAN INFORMASI DENGAN ARGUMENTASI TERHADAP ISU
KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI INDONESIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu