Perilaku Dewasa Muda Terhadap Pencegahan Hipertensi Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Kartini Kota Pematangsiantar Tahun 2015

Lampiran 1
PERNYATAAN KESEDIAAN MENJADI RESPONDEN

yang bertanda tangan dibawah ini;
Nama

:

Janis kelamin

:

Tanggal lahir/umur

;…………………../………………tahun

Alamat

: ………………..

Setelah mendapat penjelasan, dengan ini saya menyatakan bersedia dan mau

berpartisipasi menjadi responden penelitian yang akan dilakukan oleh Dor Mutiara
Hutabarat dari minat studi Administrasi Kesehatan Komunitas / Epidemiologi
Program Studi Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat Pada Pasca Sarjana Fakultas Kesehatan
Masyarakat Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Saya tidak mempunyai ikatan apapun dengan penelitian ini. Keikut sertaan
saya dalam penelitian ini tidak dibebani biaya pemeriksaan, tidak ada tekanan dan
konsekwensi lain. Bentuk kesediaan saya dalam penelitian ini adalah bersedia
diperiksa dan memberikan keterangan yang diperlukan dalam penelitian ini.
Demikian surat pernyataan ini saya buat dengan keadaan sadar dan tanpa
paksaan. Saya memahami bahwa keikut sertaan saya memberikan manfaat dan akan
terjaga kerahasiaannya.
Pematangsiantar, ……………….

Responden

Lampiran 2

KUESIONER PENELITIAN

PERILAKU DEWASA MUDA TERHADAP PENCEGAHAN HIPERTENSI DI WILAYAH

KERJA PUSKESMAS KARTINI
KOTA PEMATANGSIANTAR
I.Identitas Responden
1.

Nomor

:

2.

Nama

:

3.

Umur

:

4.

Jenis kelamin

:

a. Laki-laki
b. Perempuan

5.

Pekerjaan

:

a.Pelajar
b. Mahasiswa
c.PNS h.
d.POLRI/TNI

e.Pegawai Swasta/Wiraswasta

6.

Pendidikan

:

a.
b.
c.
d.
e.

f. Pedagang
g. Petani
Buruh
i. Lain-lain

Tidak Pernah Sekolah

SD
SLTP/Sederajat
SLTA/Sederajat
Perguruan Tinggi/Akademi

Petunjuk: Pilihlah salah satu jawaban
II. Peran Media Massa dan keluarga/teman
a.

Majalah
No
Pertanyaan
1
Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari majalah?
2
Apakah Bapak/Ibu merasa informasi yang diperoleh dari majalah
tersebut akurat?
3
Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari majalah?
4
Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan
penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi, apakah Bapak/Ibu akan mencari dari
majalah?

b. Koran
No
Pertanyaan
1
Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari koran?
2
Apakah Bapak/Ibu merasa informasi yang diperoleh dari koran
tersebut akurat?
3
Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari koran?
4
Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi, apakah Bapak/Ibu akan mencari dari
koran?

Ya

Tidak

Ya

Tidak

c.

Poster
No
Pertanyaan
1
Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang
pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari poster?

2
Apakah Bapak/Ibu merasa informasi yang diperoleh dari poster
tersebut akurat?
3
Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari poster?
4
Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan
penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi, apakah Bapak/Ibu akan mencari dari
poster?

d. Liflet
No
Pertanyaan
1
Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari liflet?
2
Apakah Bapak/Ibu merasa informasi yang diperoleh dari liflet
tersebut akurat?

3
Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari liflet?
4
Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan
penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi, apakah Bapak/Ibu akan mencari
dari liflet?
e.

f.

Keluarga/teman
No
Pertanyaan
1
Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang
pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari keluarga/teman?
2
Apakah Bapak/Ibu merasa informasi yang diperoleh dari

keluarga/teman tersebut akurat?
3
Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari keluarga/teman?
4
Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan
penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi, apakah Bapak/Ibu akan mencari dari
keluarga/teman?
Televisi
No
Pertanyaan
1
Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari televisi?
2
Apakah Bapak/Ibu merasa informasi yang diperoleh dari televisi
tersebut akurat?
3
Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari televisi?

4
Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan
penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi, apakah Bapak/Ibu akan mencari dari
televisi?

Ya

Tidak

Ya

Tidak

Ya

Tidak

Ya

Tidak

g.

Radio
No
Pertanyaan
1
Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari radio?
2
Apakah Bapak/Ibu merasa informasi yang diperoleh dari radio
tersebut akurat?
3
Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari radio?
4
Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan
penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi, apakah Bapak/Ibu akan mencari dari
radio?

h. Internet
No
Pertanyaan
1
Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari internet?
2
Apakah Bapak/Ibu merasa informasi yang diperoleh dari internet
tersebut akurat?
3
Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari internet?
4
Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan
penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi, apakah Bapak/Ibu akan mencari dari
internet?
III. Informasi dari Puskesmas
No
Pertanyaan
1
Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang
pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari internet?
2
Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah menerima informasi tentang pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari petugas puskesmas?
3
Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan
hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari petugas puskesmas?
4
Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan
penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi, apakah Bapak/Ibu akan mencari ke
puskesmas?
5
Apakah Bapak/Ibu menginginkan agar puskesmas memberikan
informasi/penyuluhan tentang pencegahan hipertensi/darah tinggi?
6
Apakah Bapak/Ibu menginginkan agar puskesmas mengadakan
kegiatan untuk mencegah terjadinya hipertensi/darah tinggi?

Ya

Tidak

Ya

Tidak

Ya

Tidak

IV. Pengetahuan
1. Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui apa yang dimaksud dengan hipertensi/darah tinggi?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
2. Apakah menurut Bapak/Ibu hipertensi/darah tinggi dapat dicegah?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
3. Apakah menurut Bapak/Ibu hipertensi/darah tinggi merupakan penyakit yang berbahaya?
a. Ya
b. Tidak

4.

5.

6.

7.

Apakah menurut Bapak/Ibu bahwa Bapak/Ibu mempunyai resiko terkena penyakit
hipertensi/darah tinggi?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
Apakah kegunaan pemeriksaan tekanan darah?
a. Untuk mengetahui apakah kita menderita penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi sehingga cepat
ditanggulangi
b. Untuk mencegah penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi
c. Tidak tahu
Berapa kali dalam 1 tahun tekanan darah diperiksa?
a. 2 kali
b. 1 kali
c. Tidak tahu
Berapakah tekanan darah yang disebut dengan hipertensi/tekanan darah tinggi?
a.
b.
c.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

Bagaimanakah cara mencegah hipertensi/darah tinggi?
a. Kurangi makan makanan yang asin, tidak merokok, berolah raga, mengendalikan stres dan
mengukur tekanan darah secara teratur
b. Banyak makan makanan berlemak
c. Tidak tahu
Tanda-tanda dari hipertensi/darah tinggi adalah
a. Pusing, nyeri dada dan sesak
b. Banyak kencing, banyak minum dan lapar
c. Tidak tahu
Penyebab hipertensi/darah tinggi adalah
a. Kurang olah raga, makan makanan berlemak dan banyak menggunakan minyak jelantah
b. Banyak makan
c. Tidak tahu
Makanan yang dapat mencegah terjadinya hipertensi/darah tinggi adalah
a. Makan sayuran, ikan dan buah
b. Makan jeroan, daging dan udang
c. Tidak tahu
Apakah penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi merupakan penyakit keturunan
a. Ya
b. Tidak
c. Tidak tahu
Komplikasi hipertensi/darah tinggi adalah
a. Stroke, gagal jantung dan kebutaan
b. Kencing manis/DM
c. Tidak tahu
Hipertensi/darah tinggi biasanya dapat terjadi pada usia……..
tahun
a.
b.
tahun
c.
tahun

15. Stres dapat menyebabkan hipertensi/darah tinggi
a. Ya
b. Tiak
c. Tidak tahu
16. Hipertensi/darah tinggi dapat menyebabkan kematian
a. Ya
b. Tidak
c. Tidak tahu
V. Sikap
No
Pertanyaan
Tidak
setuju
1
2

3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

Kurang
setuju

Bapak/Ibu senang mendapatkan nformasi
tentang penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi
Bapak/Ibu dapat mencegah penyakit
hipertensi dengan mengurangi konsumsi
makanan yang terlalu asin
Bapak/Ibu dapat terkena penyakit
hipertensi/darah tinggi apabila terlalu
banyak memakan makanan berlemak
Bapak/Ibu merasa takut terkena penyakit
hipertensi/darah tinggi karena dapat
menimbulkan penyakit stroke dan
jantung
Bapak/Ibu
bersedia
melakukan
pemeriksaan tekanan darah secara teratur
minimal 6 bulan sekali
Dengan berolah raga teratur dapat
mencegah hipertensi/darah tinggi
Jika Bapak/Ibu sering merasa pusing dan
pegal di tengkuk maka Bapak/Ibu akan
segera memeriksakan diri ke fasilitas
kesehatan
Merokok dapat menimbulkan penyakit
hipertensi/darah tinggi
Minum alkohol terlalu banyak dapat
menimbulkan penyakit hipertensi/darah
tinggi
Stress harus dikendalikan karena dapat
menimbulkan hipertensi/darah tinggi

VI. Tindakan
1. Apakah Bapak/Ibu melakukan pemeriksaan tekanan darah secara teratur?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
2. Berapa kali Bapak/Ibu memeriksakan tekanan darah dalam setahun?
a. 2 kali
b. 1 kali
c. Tidak pernah

Setuju

Sangat
setuju

Sangat
setuju
sekali

3. Apakah Bapak/Ibu berolah raga?
a. ≥ 3 kali seminggu
b. 1- 2 kali seminggu
c. Tidak pernah
4. Jika Ya, Jenis olah raga apa yang sering dilakukan?
a. Olah raga yang menggerakkan tubuh sehingga menghasilkan keringat
b. Olah raga yang duduk saja (Bermain catur, domino dll)
5. Apakah Bapak/ibu sedang mengalami masalah yang menimbulkan stres?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
6. Bagaimanakah cara Bapak/Ibu mengatasi stress?
a. Dikendalikan agar tidak jadi pikiran
b. Dicari kesibukan lain agar terlupakan
7. Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah merasa jantung berdebar, pusing dan tengkuk terasa pegal?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
8. Jika ya, apakah Bapak/Ibu segera memeriksakan diri ke fasilitas kesehatan?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
9. Apakah Bapak/Ibu sering memakan makanan asin?
a. Tidak
b. Kadang-kadang
c. Ya
10. Apakah Bapak/Ibu sering memakan makanan berlemak?
a. Tidak
b. Kadang-kadang
c. Ya
11. Apakah Bapak/Ibu sering makan daging?
a. Tidak
b. Kadang-kadang
c. Ya
12. Apakah Bapak/Ibu merokok?
a. Tidak
b. Kadang-kadang
c. Ya
13. Apakah Bapak/Ibu minum alkohol?
a. Tidak
b. Kadang-kadang
c. Ya
14. Apakah Bapak/Ibu sering memakai minyak jelantah?
a. Tidak
b. Kadang-kadang
c. Ya
15. Apakah Bapak/Ibu sering makan makanan bersantan?
a. Tidak
b. Kadang-kadang
c. Ya

TERIMA KASIH

Lampiran 3
Hasil Uji Reabilitas dan Validitas
Berdasarkan tabel nilai r dengan taraf signifikansi 5% diperoleh nilai r tabel 0,361
Reliability
Scale: majalah
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

.532

4
Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item
Deleted

Scale Variance if
Item Deleted

Corrected ItemTotal Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted

p1

2.20

3.959

.364

.422

p2

2.87

4.326

.219

.545

p3

2.73

3.444

.460

.324

p4

3.00

4.345

.248

.517

Reliability
Scale: koran
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

.757

4
Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item
Deleted

Scale Variance if
Item Deleted

Corrected ItemTotal Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted

p1

1.27

3.720

.603

.675

p2

1.53

4.326

.506

.727

p3

1.73

4.340

.670

.648

p4

1.67

4.713

.469

.743

Scale: poster
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

.706

4

Scale Mean if Item
Deleted

Scale Variance if
Item Deleted

Corrected ItemTotal Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted

p1

.60

1.972

.512

.671

p2

.93

2.133

.706

.491

p3

1.13

2.947

.612

.608

p4

1.13

3.499

.271

.749

Scale: leaflet
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
.885

N of Items
4

Scale Mean if Item
Deleted

Scale Variance if
Item Deleted

Corrected ItemTotal Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted

p1

.90

3.882

.643

.898

p2

.90

3.310

.887

.795

p3

1.03

3.892

.818

.828

p4

1.10

4.453

.693

.876

Scale: keluarga/teman
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

.732

4

Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item
Deleted

Scale Variance if
Item Deleted

Corrected ItemTotal Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted

p1

4.13

4.947

.505

.711

p2

4.80

3.476

.505

.694

p3

4.47

4.051

.449

.715

p4

4.60

3.076

.734

.529

Scale: televisi
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

.835

4
Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item
Deleted

Scale Variance if
Item Deleted

Corrected ItemTotal Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted

p1

2.13

6.051

.624

.809

p2

2.60

5.559

.702

.774

p3

2.73

5.926

.634

.805

p4

2.93

5.995

.706

.775

Scale: radio
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases

Valid
Excluded

a

Total

%
30

100.0

0

.0

30

100.0

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

.790

4
Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item
Deleted

Scale Variance if
Item Deleted

Corrected ItemTotal Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted

p1

.80

2.648

.673

.708

p2

1.13

3.775

.486

.789

p3

1.00

2.966

.689

.688

p4

1.27

3.995

.644

.746

Scale: internet
Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

.887

4

Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item
Deleted

Scale Variance if
Item Deleted

Corrected ItemTotal Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted

p1

3.13

7.085

.739

.860

p2

3.20

6.786

.789

.841

p3

3.53

7.085

.677

.884

p4

3.53

6.533

.812

.832

Scale: puskesmas
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

.887

6
Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item
Deleted

Scale Variance if
Item Deleted

Corrected ItemTotal Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted

p1

7.20

12.855

.722

.864

p2

7.27

12.823

.706

.867

p3

7.33

12.230

.792

.852

p4

7.13

13.982

.558

.890

p5

6.87

13.982

.738

.864

p6

6.87

13.982

.738

.864

Scale: pengetahuan
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

.908

16

Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item
Deleted

Scale Variance if
Item Deleted

Corrected ItemTotal Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted

p1

21.47

42.878

.658

.903

p2

21.43

43.564

.567

.905

p3

21.47

42.878

.658

.903

p4

21.43

43.220

.639

.904

p5

20.47

41.361

.689

.900

p6

21.17

39.109

.543

.907

p7

20.53

42.740

.455

.907

p8

20.47

43.223

.417

.908

p9

20.73

37.926

.744

.897

p10

20.60

40.938

.561

.904

p11

20.53

41.499

.563

.904

p12

21.10

39.059

.694

.899

p13

20.87

36.326

.832

.893

p14

20.60

43.628

.363

.909

p15

20.63

38.930

.737

.897

p16

20.50

41.293

.604

.902

Scale: sikap
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

.905

10
Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item
Deleted

Scale Variance if
Item Deleted

Corrected ItemTotal Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted

p1

20.23

22.392

.465

.915

p2

20.67

22.023

.738

.891

p3

20.63

21.964

.788

.888

p4

20.43

22.116

.803

.887

p5

20.43

23.082

.703

.894

p6

20.63

24.792

.481

.905

p7

20.50

22.190

.745

.890

p8

20.73

21.857

.700

.893

p9

20.50

23.293

.565

.901

p10

20.43

22.323

.767

.889

Scale: tindakan
Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

.836

15

Scale Mean if Item
Deleted

Scale Variance if
Item Deleted

Corrected ItemTotal Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted

p1

13.37

19.206

.407

.829

p2

12.77

16.047

.577

.823

p3

12.87

17.499

.522

.823

p4

12.83

19.937

.391

.830

p5

13.40

19.834

.341

.832

p6

13.33

19.471

.338

.833

p7

13.13

18.533

.598

.818

p8

13.13

18.533

.598

.818

p9

12.60

19.834

.341

.832

p10

12.83

19.937

.391

.830

p11

12.13

18.257

.666

.815

p12

12.10

18.714

.379

.833

p13

12.00

19.241

.459

.826

p14

12.17

18.006

.727

.811

p15

12.67

19.885

.323

.833

Lampiran 5
Hasil Pengolahan Data
5.1 Uji Univariat
Frequency Table
Umur
Frequency
Valid

18-25

Percent

23

Cumulative
Percent

Valid Percent

23.0

23.0

23.0
100.0

26-40

77

77.0

77.0

Total

100

100.0

100.0

j kelamin
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Valid Percent

Laki-laki

32

32.0

32.0

32.0

Perempuan

68

68.0

68.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

Total

100

Pkerjaan
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Valid Percent

Pelajar

2

2.0

2.0

2.0

Mahasiswa

9

9.0

9.0

11.0

PNS

13

13.0

13.0

24.0

Peg swasta/wiraswasta

20

20.0

20.0

44.0

Pedagang

17

17.0

17.0

61.0

5

5.0

5.0

66.0
100.0

Buruh
lain-lain
Total

34

34.0

34.0

100

100.0

100.0

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Phasilan
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Tidak ada

26

26.0

26.0

26.0

=UMP

49

49.0

49.0

100.0

100

100.0

100.0

Total

Pendidik
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

SLTP/Sederajat

5

5.0

5.0

SLTA/sederajat

35

35.0

35.0

40.0

perguruan tinggi/Akademi

60

60.0

60.0

100.0

100

100.0

100.0

Total

5.0

Majalah
Frequency
Valid

kurang

Percent

71

71.0

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

71.0

71.0
100.0

Baik

29

29.0

29.0

Total

100

100.0

100.0

Koran
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

kurang

89

89.0

89.0

89.0

Baik

11

11.0

11.0

100.0

Total

100

100.0

100.0

Poster
Frequency
Valid

kurang

Percent

93

93.0

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

93.0

93.0
100.0

Baik

7

7.0

7.0

Total

100

100.0

100.0

Leaflet
Frequency
Valid

kurang

90

Percent
90.0

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

90.0

90.0
100.0

Baik

10

10.0

10.0

Total

100

100.0

100.0

Televisi
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

kurang

67

67.0

67.0

67.0

Baik

33

33.0

33.0

100.0

Total

100

100.0

100.0

Radio
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

kurang

89

89.0

89.0

89.0

Baik

11

11.0

11.0

100.0

Total

100

100.0

100.0

Internet
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

kurang

37

37.0

37.0

37.0

Baik

63

63.0

63.0

100.0

Umur
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

18-25

23

23.0

23.0

23.0

26-40

77

77.0

77.0

100.0

Total

100

100.0

100.0

kel/teman
Frequency
Valid

kurang

39

Percent
39.0

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

39.0

39.0
100.0

Baik

61

61.0

61.0

Total

100

100.0

100.0

Puskesmas
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

kurang

44

44.0

44.0

44.0

baik

56

56.0

56.0

100.0

Total

100

100.0

100.0

Ptahuan
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

kurang

21

21.0

21.0

21.0

baik

79

79.0

79.0

100.0

Total

100

100.0

100.0

Sikap
Frequency
Valid

kurang

78

Percent
78.0

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

78.0

78.0
100.0

baik

22

22.0

22.0

Total

100

100.0

100.0

Tindakan
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

kurang

80

80.0

80.0

80.0

baik

20

20.0

20.0

100.0

Total

100

100.0

100.0

Tindakan
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative
Percent

kurang

80

80.0

80.0

80.0

Baik

20

20.0

20.0

100.0

Total

100

100.0

100.0

Tindakan
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Valid Percent

kurang

80

80.0

80.0

80.0

Baik

20

20.0

20.0

100.0

Total

100

100.0

100.0

5.2 Uji Bivariat (chi-square)
1.

Hubungan karakteristik responden terhadap tindakan

Crosstab
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
umur * tindakan

Missing
Percent

100

N

Total

Percent

100.0%

0

N

.0%

Percent
100

100.0%

umur * tindakan Crosstabulation
Chi-Square Tests
Value

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df
a

1

.722

.004

1

.953

.130

1

.718

Linear-by-Linear Association

.126

1

.723

N of Valid Cases

100

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

.127
b

Likelihood Ratio

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Fisher's Exact Test

Exact Sig. (1sided)

1.000

.490

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,60.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for umur (1 / 2)

1.246

.371

4.181

For cohort tindakan = 1

1.043

.837

1.299

For cohort tindakan = 2

.837

.310

2.256

N of Valid Cases

100

Crosstab
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
j kelamin * tindakan

Missing
Percent

100

100.0%

N

Total

Percent
0

.0%

N

Percent
100

100.0%

j kelamin * tindakan Crosstabulation
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

a

1

.054

2.760

1

.097

3.541

1

.060

3.685

1

.055

3.722
b

Likelihood Ratio

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Fisher's Exact Test

.065

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.051

100

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,40.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for j kelamin (1 / 2)

.379

.139

1.036

For cohort tindakan = 1

.806

.625

1.039

For cohort tindakan = 2

2.125

.985

4.586

N of Valid Cases

100

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
pkrj * tindakan

Missing
Percent

100

N

100.0%

Total

Percent
0

N

Percent

.0%

100

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

a

1

.040

2.760

1

.097

3.541

1

.060

3.685

1

.055

3.722
b

Likelihood Ratio

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Fisher's Exact Test

.065

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

100

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,40.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for pkrj (1 / 2)

2.636

.965

7.199

For cohort tindakan = 1

1.241

.963

1.599

For cohort tindakan = 2

.471

.218

1.016

N of Valid Cases

100

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.051

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
pddk 2 * tindakan

Missing
Percent

100

N

Total

Percent

100.0%

0

N

.0%

Percent
100

100.0%

pddk 2 * tindakan Crosstabulation
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

a

1

.029

2.110

1

.146

2.981

1

.084

2.871

1

.090

2.900
b

Likelihood Ratio

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Fisher's Exact Test

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.132

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

.072

100

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,40.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for pddk 2 (1 / 2)

2.453

.857

7.024

For cohort tindakan = 1

1.185

.976

1.441

For cohort tindakan = 2

.483

.202

1.156

N of Valid Cases

100

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
phsl 2 * tindakan

Missing
Percent

100

N

Total

Percent

100.0%

0

N

.0%

Percent
100

100.0%

phsl 2 * tindakan Crosstabulation
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

a

1

.046

3.063

1

.080

4.093

1

.043

3.960

1

.047

4.000
b

Likelihood Ratio

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

.078
100

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.039

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for phsl 2 (1 / 2)

2.852

.995

8.173

For cohort tindakan = 1

1.222

1.000

1.494

For cohort tindakan = 2

.429

.179

1.025

N of Valid Cases

100

2. Hubungan peran media massa, peran keluarga/teman dan peran puskesmas
Crosstab
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
majalah * tindakan

Missing
Percent

100

N

Total

Percent

100.0%

0

N

.0%

Percent
100

100.0%

majalah * tindakan Crosstabulation
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

a

1

.225

.877

1

.349

1.405

1

.236

1.454

1

.228

1.469
b

Likelihood Ratio

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Fisher's Exact Test

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.273

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

100

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,80.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for majalah (1 / 2)

1.873

.673

5.214

For cohort tindakan = 1

1.148

.896

1.470

For cohort tindakan = 2

.613

.280

1.341

N of Valid Cases

100

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
koran * tindakan

Missing
Percent

100

100.0%

N

Total

Percent
0

.0%

N

Percent
100

100.0%

.174

koran * tindakan Crosstabulation
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

a

1

.150

1.079

1

.299

1.813

1

.178

2.048

1

.152

2.068
b

Likelihood Ratio

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Fisher's Exact Test

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.223

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

.149

100

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,20.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for koran (1 / 2)

2.607

.681

9.980

For cohort tindakan = 1

1.289

.816

2.036

For cohort tindakan = 2

.494

.201

1.215

N of Valid Cases

100

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
poster * tindakan

Missing
Percent

100

N

Total

Percent

100.0%

0

N

.0%

Percent
100

100.0%

poster * tindakan Crosstabulation
Chi-Square Tests
Value

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df
a

1

.557

.010

1

.922

.318

1

.573

Linear-by-Linear Association

.342

1

.559

N of Valid Cases

100

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

.346
b

Likelihood Ratio

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Fisher's Exact Test

.625

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,40.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.426

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for poster (1 / 2)

1.667

.299

9.295

For cohort tindakan = 1

1.129

.699

1.823

For cohort tindakan = 2

.677

.196

2.347

N of Valid Cases

100

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
liflet * tindakan

Missing
Percent

100

N

Total

Percent

100.0%

0

N

.0%

Percent
100

100.0%

liflet * tindakan Crosstabulation
Chi-Square Tests
Value

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df
a

1

.405

.174

1

.677

.634

1

.426

Linear-by-Linear Association

.688

1

.407

N of Valid Cases

100

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

.694
b

Likelihood Ratio

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Fisher's Exact Test

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.414

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for liflet (1 / 2)

1.840

.431

7.860

For cohort tindakan = 1

1.159

.763

1.760

For cohort tindakan = 2

.630

.223

1.780

N of Valid Cases

100

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
televisi * tindakan

Missing
Percent

100

100.0%

N

Total

Percent
0

.0%

N

Percent
100

100.0%

.319

televisi * tindakan Crosstabulation
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

a

1

.167

1.247

1

.264

2.045

1

.153

1.892

1

.169

1.911
b

Likelihood Ratio

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Fisher's Exact Test

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.195

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

.131

100

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,60.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for televisi (1 / 2)

.440

.134

1.440

For cohort tindakan = 1

.866

.720

1.042

For cohort tindakan = 2

1.970

.715

5.427

N of Valid Cases

100

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
radio * tindakan

Missing
Percent

100

N

Total

Percent

100.0%

0

N

.0%

Percent
100

100.0%

radio * tindakan Crosstabulation
Chi-Square Tests
Value

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df
a

1

.873

.000

1

1.000

.026

1

.872

Linear-by-Linear Association

.025

1

.874

N of Valid Cases

100

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

.026
b

Likelihood Ratio

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Fisher's Exact Test

1.000

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,20.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.618

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for radio (1 / 2)

Lower

Upper

.877

.174

4.417

For cohort tindakan = 1

.975

.724

1.313

For cohort tindakan = 2

1.112

.297

4.163

N of Valid Cases

100

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
internet * tindakan

Missing
Percent

100

N

Total

Percent

100.0%

0

N

.0%

Percent
100

100.0%

internet * tindakan Crosstabulation
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

1.544
b

Likelihood Ratio

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df
a

1

.214

.968

1

.325

1.616

1

.204

1.529

1

.216

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Fisher's Exact Test

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.302

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

.163

100

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,40.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for internet (1 / 2)

2.000

.661

6.048

For cohort tindakan = 1

1.135

.941

1.370

For cohort tindakan = 2

.568

.225

1.434

N of Valid Cases

100

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
kel/teman * tindakan

Missing
Percent

100

100.0%

N

Total

Percent
0

.0%

N

Percent
100

100.0%

kel/teman * tindakan Crosstabulation
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

a

1

.101

1.915

1

.166

2.633

1

.105

2.663

1

.103

2.690
b

Likelihood Ratio

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Fisher's Exact Test

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.127

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

.084

100

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,80.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for kel/teman (1 / 2)

.441

.163

1.190

For cohort tindakan = 1

.842

.674

1.052

For cohort tindakan = 2

1.912

.873

4.187

N of Valid Cases

100

CROSSTABS /TABLES=Puskesmas BY tindakan /FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES /STATISTICS=CHISQ RISK /CELLS=COUNT ROW
COLUMN TOTAL /COUNT ROUND CELL.
Crosstabs
[DataSet1]
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
Puskesmas * tindakan

Missing
Percent

100

N

100.0%

Total

Percent
0

N

.0%

Percent
100

100.0%

Puskesmas * tindakan Crosstabulation
Chi-Square Tests
Value

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df
a

1

.365

.429

1

.513

.835

1

.361

Linear-by-Linear Association

.814

1

.367

N of Valid Cases

100

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

.822
b

Likelihood Ratio

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Fisher's Exact Test

.454

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,80.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.258

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for Puskesmas (1 / 2)

1.598

.577

4.425

For cohort tindakan = 1

1.095

.903

1.328

For cohort tindakan = 2

.685

.299

1.571

N of Valid Cases

100

2.

Hubungan pengetahuan dengan tindakan

Crosstabs
[DataSet1] D:\pengolahan data\data spss.sav
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
ptahuan * tindakan

Missing
Percent

100

N

Total

Percent

100.0%

0

N

.0%

Percent
100

100.0%

ptahuan * tindakan Crosstabulation
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

a

1

.010

5.157

1

.023

10.686

1

.001

6.579

1

.010

6.646
b

Likelihood Ratio

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Fisher's Exact Test

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.006

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

100

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,20.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
For cohort tindakan = kurang

1.339

N of Valid Cases

3.

Lower

Upper

1.178

1.522

100

Hubungan sikap dengan tindakan

Crosstabs[DataSet1] D:\pengolahan data\data spss.sav
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
sikap * tindakan

Missing
Percent

100

N

100.0%

sikap * tindakan Crosstabulation

Total

Percent
0

.0%

N

Percent
100

100.0%

.005

Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction
Likelihood Ratio

Exact Sig. (2sided)

a

1

.000

62.504

1

.000

60.616

1

.000

66.692

1

.000

67.366
b

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Df

Fisher's Exact Test

.000

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

100

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,40.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for sikap (kurang /
baik)

Lower

Upper

171.000

29.027

1007.365

For cohort tindakan = kurang

5.359

2.207

13.013

For cohort tindakan = baik

.031

.008

.125

N of Valid Cases

100

5.3. Uji Multivariat (Regresi Logistik)
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases

a

Selected Cases

N

Percent

Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
Total
Unselected Cases
Total

100

100.0

0

.0

100

100.0

0

.0

100

100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Block 0: Beginning Block
a,b
Classification Table
Predicted
tindakan
Observed
Step 0

tindakan

1

2

Percentage Correct

1

80

0

100.0

2

20

0

.0

Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is ,500
Variables in the Equation

80.0

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.000

B
Step 0

Constant

S.E.

-1.386

Wald
.250

df

Sig.

30.749

1

Exp(B)
.000

Variables not in the Equation
Score
Step 0

Variables

df

Sig.

pddk2

2.900

1

.089

phsl2

4.000

1

.046

majalah

1.469

1

.225

koran

2.068

1

.150

televisi

1.911

1

.167

internet

1.544

1

.214

kelteman

2.690

1

.101

ptahuan

6.646

1

.010

sikap

67.366

1

.000

Overall Statistics

71.720

9

.000

Block 1: Method = Ente
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square
Step 1

df

Sig.

Step

75.979

9

.000

Block

75.979

9

.000

Model

75.979

9

.000

Model Summary
Step

Cox & Snell R
Square

-2 Log likelihood

1

24.101

a

Nagelkerke R
Square

.532

.842

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 20 because maximum
iterations has been reached. Final solution cannot be found.
Classification Table

a

Predicted
tindakan
Observed
Step 1

tindakan

1

Percentage Correct

78

2

97.5

2

3

17

85.0

Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is ,500

2

1

95.0

.250

Variables in the Equation
B
Step 1

a

pddk2
phsl2
majalah

S.E.

Wald

df

Sig.

Exp(B)

-2.383

1.663

2.054

1

.152

.092

.764

1.257

.369

1

.543

2.147

.420

1.334

.099

1

.753

1.522

koran

2.719

1.716

2.510

1

.113

15.170

televisi

-3.044

1.702

3.200

1

.074

.048

internet

1.750

1.510

1.343

1

.246

5.753

kelteman

1.240

1.664

.555

1

.456

3.456

ptahuan

18.580

7842.806

.000

1

.998

1.172E8

7.866

2.401

10.737

1

.001

2607.877

-51.868

15685.613

.000

1

.997

.000

sikap
Constant

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, phsl2, majalah, koran, televisi, internet, kelteman, ptahuan, sikap.
Variables in the Equation
95% C.I.for EXP(B)
Lower
Step 1

a

Upper

pddk2

.004

2.401

phsl2

.183

25.234

majalah

.111

20.770

koran

.525

438.406

televisi

.002

1.338

internet

.298

110.915

kelteman

.132

90.224

ptahuan

.000

.

23.595

288241.296

sikap

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, phsl2, majalah,
koran, televisi, internet, kelteman, ptahuan, sikap.
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases
Selected Cases

a

N
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
Total
Unselected Cases
Total

Percent
100

100.0

0

.0

100

100.0

0

.0

100

100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Table

a,b

Predicted
tindakan
Observed
Step 0

1

tindakan

2

Percentage Correct

1

80

0

100.0

2

20

0

.0

Overall Percentage

80.0

a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is ,500
Variables in the Equation
B
Step 0

Constant

S.E.

-1.386

Wald
.250

df

30.749

Sig.
1

Variables not in the Equation
Score
Step 0

Variables

df

2.900

1

.089

phsl2

4.000

1

.046

majalah

1.469

1

.225

koran

2.068

1

.150

televisi

1.911

1

.167

internet

1.544

1

.214

2.690

1

.101

sikap

67.366

1

.000

Overall Statistics

71.132

8

.000

Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square
Step 1

df

Sig.

Step

74.150

8

.000

Block

74.150

8

.000

Model

74.150

8

.000

Model Summary
Step
1

Sig.

pddk2

kelteman

Cox & Snell R
Square

-2 Log likelihood
25.931

a

Nagelkerke R
Square

.524

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 8 because parameter
estimates changed by less than ,001.

.828

Exp(B)
.000

.250

Classification Table

a

Predicted
tindakan
Observed
Step 1

tindakan

1

2

Percentage Correct

1

78

2

97.5

2

3

17

85.0

Overall Percentage

95.0

a. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation
B
Step 1

a

S.E.

Wald

df

Sig.

Exp(B)

pddk2

-2.781

1.677

2.749

1

.097

.062

phsl2

1.410

1.178

1.433

1

.231

4.096

majalah

.667

1.305

.261

1

.609

1.949

koran

2.963

1.741

2.895

1

.089

19.352

televisi

-3.135

1.674

3.506

1

.061

.043

internet

2.521

1.378

3.347

1

.067

12.435

kelteman

1.727

1.614

1.145

1

.285

5.623

sikap

8.677

2.632

10.866

1

.001

5865.578

-19.196

6.842

7.872

1

.005

.000

Constant

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, phsl2, majalah, koran, televisi, internet, kelteman, sikap.
Variables in the Equation
95% C.I.for EXP(B)
Lower
Step 1

a

Upper

pddk2

.002

1.659

phsl2

.407

41.206

majalah

.151

25.178

koran

.638

587.348

televisi

.002

1.158

internet

.835

185.110

kelteman

.238

132.965

33.706

1020726.773

sikap

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, phsl2, majalah,
koran, televisi, internet, kelteman, sikap.

Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases

a

Selected Cases

N

Percent

Included in Analysis

100

100.0

0

.0

100

100.0

Missing Cases
Total
Unselected Cases
Total

0

.0

100

100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Block 0: Beginning Block
a,b
Classification Table
Predicted
tindakan
Observed
Step 0

1

tindakan

2

Percentage Correct

1

80

0

100.0

2

20

0

.0

Overall Percentage

80.0

a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is ,500
Variables in the Equation
B
Step 0

Constant

S.E.

-1.386

Wald
.250

df

30.749

Sig.
1

Variables not in the Equation
Score
Step 0

Variables

df

2.900

1

.089

phsl2

4.000

1

.046

koran

2.068

1

.150

televisi

1.911

1

.167

internet

1.544

1

.214

kelteman

2.690

1

.101

sikap

67.366

1

.000

Overall Statistics

71.132

7

.000

Chi-square
Step 1

df

Sig.

Step

73.882

7

.000

Block

73.882

7

.000

Model

73.882

7

.000

Model Summary
Step
1

Sig.

pddk2

Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Cox & Snell R
Square

-2 Log likelihood
26.198

a

.522

Nagelkerke R
Square
.826

Exp(B)
.000

.250

Model Summary
Step

Cox & Snell R
Square

-2 Log likelihood

1

26.198

a

Nagelkerke R
Square

.522

.826

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 8 because parameter
estimates changed by less than ,001.
Classification Table

a

Predicted
tindakan
Observed
Step 1

tindakan

1

2

Percentage Correct

1

78

2

97.5

2

3

17

85.0

Overall Percentage

95.0

a. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation
B
Step 1

a

S.E.

Wald

df

Sig.

pddk2

-2.740

1.666

2.703

1

.100

.065

phsl2

1.615

1.134

2.030

1

.154

5.030

koran

3.066

1.661

3.408

1

.065

21.448

televisi

-2.873

1.534

3.506

1

.061

.057

internet

2.503

1.386

3.260

1

.071

12.215

kelteman

1.818

1.654

1.208

1

.272

6.160

sikap

8.676

2.636

10.833

1

.001

5860.355

-19.167

6.935

7.639

1

.006

.000

Constant

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, phsl2, koran, televisi, internet, kelteman, sikap.
Variables in the Equation
95% C.I.for EXP(B)
Lower
Step 1

a

Exp(B)

Upper

pddk2

.002

1.692

phsl2

.545

46.417

koran

.828

555.713

televisi

.003

1.144

internet

.807

184.781

kelteman

.241

157.583

33.435

1027180.189

sikap

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, phsl2, koran,
televisi, internet, kelteman, sikap.

Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases

a

Selected Cases

N

Percent

Included in Analysis

100

100.0

0

.0

100

100.0

Missing Cases
Total
Unselected Cases
Total

0

.0

100

100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Block 0: Beginning Block
a,b
Classification Table
Predicted
tindakan
Observed
Step 0

1

tindakan

2

Percentage Correct

1

80

0

100.0

2

20

0

.0

Overall Percentage

80.0

a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is ,500
Variables in the Equation
B
Step 0

Constant

S.E.

-1.386

Wald
.250

df

30.749

Sig.
1

Variables not in the Equation
Score
Step 0

Variables

df

2.900

1

.089

phsl2

4.000

1

.046

koran

2.068

1

.150

televisi

1.911

1

.167

1.544

1

.214

sikap

67.366

1

.000

Overall Statistics

71.075

6

.000

Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square
Step 1

df

Sig.

Step

72.348

6

.000

Block

72.348

6

.000

Model

72.348

6

.000

Model Summary
Step
1

Sig.

pddk2

internet

Cox & Snell R
Square

-2 Log likelihood
27.732

a

.515

Nagelkerke R
Square
.814

Exp(B)
.000

.250

Model Summary
Step

Cox & Snell R
Square

-2 Log likelihood

1

27.732

a

Nagelkerke R
Square

.515

.814

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 8 because parameter
estimates changed by less than ,001.
Classification Table

a

Predicted
tindakan
Observed
Step 1

tindakan

1

2

Percentage Correct

1

79

1

98.8

2

3

17

85.0

Overall Percentage

96.0

a. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation
B
Step 1

a

S.E.

Wald

df

-2.144

1.412

2.306

1

.129

.117

phsl2

1.529

1.110

1.897

1

.168

4.612

koran

3.158

1.590

3.946

1

.047

23.522

televisi

-2.114

1.208

3.062

1

.080

.121

internet

1.965

1.247

2.484

1

.115

7.137

7.264

1.778

16.684

1

.000

1428.388

-15.077

5.108

8.711

1

.003

.000

Constant

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, phsl2, koran, televisi, internet, sikap.
Variables in the Equation
95% C.I.for EXP(B)
Lower
Step 1

Exp(B)

pddk2

sikap

a

Sig.

pddk2

.007

Upper
1.865

phsl2

.524

40.604

koran

1.043

530.432

televisi

.011

1.289

internet

.620

82.214

43.752

46632.610

sikap

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, phsl2, koran,
televisi, internet, sikap.

Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases

a

Selected Cases

N

Percent

Included in Analysis

100

100.0

0

.0

100

100.0

Missing Cases
Total
Unselected Cases
Total

0

.0

100

100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Table

a,b

Predicted
tindakan
Observed
Step 0

1

tindakan

2

Percentage Correct

1

80

0

100.0

2

20

0

.0

Overall Percentage

80.0

a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is ,500
Variables in the Equation
B
Step 0

Constant

S.E.

-1.386

Wald
.250

df

30.749

Sig.
1

.000

Variables not in the Equation
Score
Step 0

Variables

df

2.900

1

.089

koran

2.068

1

.150

televisi

1.911

1

.167

internet

1.544

1

.214

sikap

67.366

1

.000

Overall Statistics

70.408

5

.000

Chi-square
Step 1

df

Sig.

Step

70.329

5

.000

Block

70.329

5

.000

Model

70.329

5

.000

Model Summary
Step
1

Sig.

pddk2

Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Cox & Snell R
Square

-2 Log likelihood
29.751

a

Nagelkerke R
Square

.505

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter
estimates changed by less than ,001.

.799

Exp(B)
.250

Classification Table

a

Predicted
tindakan
Observed
Step 1

1

tindakan

2

Percentage Correct

1

77

3

96.3

2

3

17

85.0

Overall Percentage

94.0

a. The cut value is ,500
Variables in the Equation
B
Step 1

a

S.E.

Wald

df

-1.631

1.337

1.489

1

.222

.196

koran

3.096

1.534

4.073

1

.044

22.114

televisi

-1.899

1.151

2.725

1

.099

.150

internet

1.645

1.102

2.227

1

.136

5.182

7.045

1.682

17.541

1

.000

1146.716

-12.921

4.249

9.247

1

.002

.000

Constant

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, koran, televisi, internet, sikap.
Variables in the Equation
95% C.I.for EXP(B)
Lower
a

Exp(B)

pddk2

sikap

Step 1

Sig.

Upper

pddk2

.014

2.689

koran

1.093

447.216

televisi

.016

1.427

internet
sikap

.597

44.962

42.432

30989.634

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, koran, televisi,
internet, sikap.
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases
Selected Cases

a

N
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
Total
Unselected Cases
Total

Percent
100

100.0

0

.0

100

100.0

0

.0

100

100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Table

a,b

Predicted
tindakan
Observed
Step 0

1

tindakan

2

Percentage Correct

1

80

0

2

20

0

100.0
.0

Overall Percentage

80.0

a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is ,500
Variables in the Equation
B
Step 0

Constant

S.E.

-1.386

Wald
.250

df

30.749

Sig.
1

Variables not in the Equation
Score
Step 0

Variables

df

2.068

1

.150

Televisi

1.911

1

.167

Internet

1.544

1

.214

Sikap

67.366

1

.000

Overall Statistics

70.057

4

.000

Chi-square
Step 1

df

Sig.

Step

68.498

4

.000

Block

68.498

4

.000

Model

68.498

4

.000

Model Summary
Step
1

Sig.

Koran

Block 1: Method = Ente
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Cox & Snell R
Square

-2 Log likelihood
31.583

a

Nagelkerke R
Square

.496

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter
estimates changed by less than ,001.

.784

Exp(B)
.000

.250

Classification Table

a

Predicted
tindakan
Observed
Step 1

1

tindakan

2

Percentage Correct

1

77

3

96.3

2

4

16

80.0

Overall Percentage

93.0

a. The cut value is ,500
Variables in the Equation
B
Step 1

a

S.E.

Wald

df

1.467

3.975

1

.046

televisi

-1.629

1.053

2.392

1

.122

.196

internet

1.257

1.024

1.507

1

.220

3.516

6.113

1.284

22.680

1

.000

451.600

-13.567

4.050

11.220

1

.001

.000

Constant

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: koran, televisi, internet, sikap.
Variables in the Equation
95% C.I.for EXP(B)
Lower
a

Exp(B)

2.926

sikap

Step 1

Sig.

koran

Upper

koran

1.051

330.825

televisi

.025

1.545

internet
sikap

.472

26.170

36.491

5588.841

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: koran, televisi,
internet, sikap.
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases
Selected Cases

a

N
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
Total
Unselected Cases
Total

Percent
100

100.0

0

.0

100

100.0

0

.0

100

100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

18.646

Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Table

a,b

Predicted
tindakan
Observed
Step 0

1

tindakan

2

Percentage Correct

1

80

0

100.0

2

20

0

.0

Overall Percentage

80.0

a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is ,500
Variables in the Equation
B
Step 0

Constant

S.E.

-1.386

Wald
.250

df

Sig.

30.749

1

Exp(B)
.000

Variables not in the Equation
Score
Step 0

Variables

koran
televisi

df

Sig.

2.068

1

.150

1.911

1

.167

sikap

67.366

1

.000

Overall Statistics

69.439

3

.000

Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square
Step 1

df

Sig.

Step

66.882

3

.000

Block

66.882

3

.000

Model

66.882

3

.000

Model Summary
Step

Cox & Snell R
Square

-2 Log likelihood

1

33.199

a

Nagelkerke R
Square

.488

.771

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter
estimates changed by less than ,001.
Classification Table

a

Predicted
tindakan
Observed
Step 1

tindakan

1

Percentage Correct

76

4

95.0

2

2

18

90.0

Overall Percentage
a. The cut value is ,500

2

1

94.0

.250

Variables in the Equation
B
Step 1

a

S.E.

Wald

df

Sig.

Exp(B)

koran

2.719

1.410

3.720

1

.054

15.167

televisi

-1.737

1.052

2.728

1

.099

.176

5.953

1.224

23.655

1

.000

384.956

-10.921

3.224

11.478

1

.001

.000

sikap
Constant

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: koran, televisi, sikap.
Variables in the Equation
95% C.I.for EXP(B)
Lower
Step 1

a

koran

Upper

.957

televisi
sikap

240.419

.022

1.383

34.958

4239.160

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: koran, televisi,
sikap.
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases

a

Selected Cases

N

Percent

Included in Analysis

100

Missing Cases
Total
Unselected Cases
Total

100.0

0

.0

100

100.0

0

.0

100

100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Block 0: Beginning Block
a,b
Classification Table
Predicted
tindakan
Observed
Step 0

tindakan

1

2

Percentage Correct

1

80

0

2

20

0

100.0
.0

Overall Percentage

80.0

a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is ,500
Variables in the Equation
B
Step 0

Constant

-1.386

S.E.

Wald
.250

30.749

df

Sig.
1

Exp(B)
.000

.250

Variables not in the Equation
Score
Step 0

Variables

df

Sig.

koran

2.068

1

.150

sikap

67.366

1

.000

Overall Statistics

68.515

2

.000

Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square
Step 1

df

Sig.

Step

63.866

2

.000

Block

63.866

2

.000

Model

63.866

2

.000

Model Summary
Step

Cox & Snell R
Square

-2 Log likelihood

1

36.215

a

Nagelkerke R
Square

.472

.746

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter
estimates changed by less than ,001.
Classification Table

a

Pr