PENCAPAIAN INDONESIA DALAM GHSA
PENCAPAIAN INDONESIA
DALAM GHSA
Dr. Jane Soepardi
Direktur Surveilans dan Karantina Kesehatan
Ditjen Pencegahan dan Pengendalian Penyakit
Kementerian Kesehatan
Disampaikan pada Seminar Sehari
Ketahanan Kesehatan Global dalam Prespektif Pertahanan Negara
Jakarta, 9 November 2017
OUTLINE
Overview GHSA
Implementasi
Pencapaian
Rencana Tindak Lanjut
Ancaman Kesehatan
Masyarakat
EBOLA
POLIO
ANTHRAX
MDR TB
FOOD
SUPPLY
AVIAN FLU
Globalization
of travel, food
and medicines
MERS COV
Emergence &
spread of
new
pathogens
Rise of
drug
resistance
Intentional
Release
and/or
Engineering
Reemergence
of known
pathogens
Why Global Health Security?
• In today’s increasingly interconnected world we remain
vulnerable.
• No one nation can achieve Global Health Security on its own.
• The vitality of the global economy is only as secure as the
collective health of our people.
• 11 years ago SARS cost $30 billion in only 4
months.
• The anthrax attacks of 2001 infected 22 people,
killed 5, and cost more than $1 billion to clean up.
• The 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic killed
284,000 people in its first year alone.
• AIDS spread silently for decades.
GHSA Accelerate the implementation of WHO’s
International Health Regulations (2005), OIE’s
Performance Veterinary Services (PVS), and other
global health security frameworks.
6
Global Health Security Agenda Objectives
Prevent Avoidable Epidemics
1. Prevent the emergence and spread of antimicrobial drug resistant organisms
and emerging zoonotic diseases and strengthen international regulatory
frameworks governing food safety.
2. Promote national biosafety and biosecurity systems.
3. Reduce the number and magnitude of infectious disease outbreaks.
Detect Threats Early
4. Launch, strengthen and link global networks for real-time biosurveillance.
5. Strengthen the global norm of rapid, transparent reporting and sample sharing
in the event of health emergencies of international concern.
6. Develop and deploy novel diagnostics and strengthen laboratory systems.
7. Train and deploy an effective biosurveillance workforce.
Respond Rapidly and Effectively
8. Develop an interconnected global network of Emergency Operations Centers
and multi-sectoral response to biological incidents.
9. Improve global access to medical and non-medical countermeasures during
health emergencies.
7
Overlap Between GHSA and IHR
IHR
GHSA
• Legislation, Policy &
Financing
• Risk communication
• Coordination and NFP
Communication
• Points of Entry
• Food Safety
• Chemical Events
• Radiological
Emergencies
• Surveillance
• Laboratory
• Preparedness
• Response
• Zoonotic diseases
• Human Resources
• Prevent AMR
• Vaccination
Programs
• Nosocomial infection
control
• Regional bio
surveillance hubs
• Sample sharing
• Novel diagnostics
• Sharing medical
countermeasures
and personnel
Joint External Evaluation
Pencapaian Indonesia
1.Ketua Troika tahun 2016
2.Lead Country untuk Zoonosis Action
Package
3.Mendukung Pelaksanaan Joint External
Evaluation (JEE)
4.Mengupayahan Agenda Ketahanan
Kesehatan di semua fora
5.Menguatkan Koordinasi Antar Action
Package
6.Meningkatkan Jumlah Negara Anggota
GHSA
Pernyataan Bersama
Presiden RI dan Presiden AS
Kedua presiden memahami
pentingnya memperluas
kerjasama di bidang kesehatan
dan membangun kapasitas guna
mencegah, mendeteksi dan
menindaklanjuti tantangan
kesehatan global, termasuk
ancaman epidemi.
Melihat peningkatan kerjasama di bidang ini, kedua negara memiliki komitmen
untuk membuat perjanjian pada bidang kesehatan yang akan mampu memberikan
landasan dan arah di masa mendatang.
AS menyambut baik kepemimpinan Indonesia pada inisiatif lima tahunan agenda
keamanan kesehatan dunia (GHSA) yang bertujuan untuk mencapai target yang telah
disepakati bersama, termasuk memimpin Steering Group GHSA pada tahun 2016.
JEJARING GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY
KEMKES
KEMENKO
POLHUKAM
KEMENKO
PMK
KEMTAN
GHS
KEMENRIS
DIKTI
BNPB
KEMHAN
K/L
KEMLU
Indonesia Future Commitments
1.Tetap sebagai Anggota Troika
dalam GHSA
2.Melaksanakan Penilaian JEE
pada 20-24 November 2017
3.Host 5th GHSA Ministerial
Meeting in 2018.
1. Pendahuluan..1
A. Latar Belakang
• SK Menkes No: HK.02.02/MENKES/273/2016 Tentang
Kelompok Kerja Ketahanan Kesehatan Global di Lingkungan
Kemenkes, maka terdapat 19 technical areas / bidang
• Pertimbangan:
– Indonesia sebagai anggota PBB telah menyepakati untuk
melaksanakan IHR 2005.
– Untuk bisa melaksanakan IHR harus memiliki kemampuan
dalam pencegahan, deteksi dini, dan respon cepat
terhadap munculnya penyakit atau kejadian kegawat
daruratan kesehatan yang meresahkan dunia (PHEIC).
– Penilaian IHR 2005 dan GHSA menggunakan JEE tool yang
menggabungkan sebelas Action Packages dalam GHSA dan
8 kapasitas inti IHR 2005
1. Pendahuluan..2
B. Tujuan JEE
• Untuk melakukan penilaian kemampuan suatu
negara untuk mencegah, mendeteksi, dan
melakukan respon secara cepat secara
independen terhadap ancaman kedaruratan
kesehatan masyarakat yang meresahkan dunia
(Public Health Emergency of International
Concern) yang dapat berupa kejadian penyakit
(biologis), kimia maupun radionuklir.
PREVENT
DETECT
RESPOND
1. National Legislation,
Policy and Financing
(Kapus ADK).
1. National Laboratory System
(Dir. Fasyankes/Dir SKK)
2. Real Time Surveillance
(Dir. P2MPL/Dir SKK)
3. Reporting
(Kapusdatin)
4. Workforce Development
(Kapus PSDMK/Dir SKK)
1. Preparedness
(Dir P2ML/Dir. SKK)
2. IHR Coordination,
Communication and
Advocacy
(Dir. SKK)
3. Anti-microbial
Resistance (AMR)
(Dir. Yanfar/Dir BUKR)
4. Zoonotic Disease
(Dir. P2PTVZ)
5. Food Safety
(Dr. Kesling/Dir SKK)
6. Biosafety and
Biosecurity
(Kapus. BDTK)
7. Immunization
(Dir. SKK)
JEE
Technical Area
INTRODUCTION
1.Health System
Kapus ADK
2.JEE Preparation
Dir SKK)
2. Emergency Operation Centres
(Ka PPKK/Dir SKK)
3. Linking PH and Security
Authorities
(Karo Hukor/Dir SKK)
4. Medical Countermeasures and
Personnel Deployment
(Dir. BUKR)
5. Risk Communication
(Karokoyanmas)
Other IHR related HAZARDs and
PoEs
1. Point of Entries (PoEs)
(Dirjen P2P/Dir SKK)
2. Chemical Events
(Dir. Kesling/KesjaOR)
3. Radiation Emergencies
(Dir. KesjaOR/Kesling)
Real time surveillance
PREVENT
Capacity Element
Label
Score
Legislation, laws, regulations, administrative requirements,
policies or other government instruments in place are
sufficient for implementation of IHR.
P.1.1
3
The state can demonstrate that it has adjusted and aligned its
domestic legislation, policies and administrative arrangements
to enable compliance with the IHR (2005)
P.1.2
3
P.2.1 A functional mechanism is established for the
coordination and integration of relevant sectors in the
implementation of IHR
P.2.1
4
P.3
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) detection
P.3.1
3
Antimicrobial Resistance
(AMR)
Surveillance of infections caused by AMR pathogens
P.3.2
3
Healthcare associated infection (HCAI) prevention and control
programs
P.3.3
4
Antimicrobial stewardship activities
P.3.4
4
Surveillance systems in place for priority zoonotic diseases
/pathogens
P.4.1
3
Veterinary or Animal Health Workforce
P.4.2
3
Mechanisms for responding to infectious zoonoses and
potential zoonoses are established and functional
P.4.3
3
Mechanisms are established and functioning for detecting and
responding to foodborne disease and food contamination.
P.5.1
4
Whole-of-government biosafety and biosecurity system is in
place for human, animal, and agriculture facilities
P.6.1
3
Biosafety and biosecurity training and practices
P.6.2
3
P.7
Vaccine coverage (measles) as part of national program
P.7.1
4
Immunization
National vaccine access and delivery
P.7.2
4
P.1
National Legislation,
Policy, and Financing
P.2
IHR Coordination,
Communication and
Advocacy
P.4
Zoonotic Disease
P.5
Food Safety
P.6
Biosafety and
Biosecurity
Indicator
DETECT
Capacity Element
D.1
National Laboratory
System
D.2
Real Time Surveillance
D.3
Reporting
D.4
Workforce
development
Indicator
Laboratory testing for detection of priority diseases
Specimen referral and transport system
Effective modern point of care and laboratory based
diagnostics
Laboratory Quality System
Indicator and event based surveillance systems
Interoperable, interconnected, electronic real-time
reporting system
Analysis of surveillance data
Syndromic surveillance systems
System for efficient reporting to WHO, FAO and OIE
Reporting network and protocols in country
Human resources are available to implement IHR core
capacity requirements
Applied epidemiology training program in place such as
FETP
Workforce strategy
Label
D.1.1
D.1.2
Score
4
5
D.1.3
4
D.1.4
D.2.1
3
4
D.2.2
3
D.2.3
D.2.4
D.3.1
D.3.2
4
4
3
4
D.4.1
4
D.4.2
4
D.4.3
4
RESPOND
Capacity Element
R.1
Preparedness
R.2
Emergency Response
Operations
R.3
Linking Public Health
and Security Authorities
R.4
Medical
countermeasures and
Personnel Deployment
R.5
Risk Communication
Indicator
Multi-hazard national public health emergency
preparedness and response plan is developed and
implemented
Priority public health risks and resources are mapped and
utilized
Capacity to Activate Emergency Operations
Emergency Operations Centre Operating Procedures and
Plans
Emergency Operations Program
Case management procedures are implemented for IHR
relevant hazards
Public Health and Security Authorities, (e.g. Law
Enforcement, Border Control, Customs) are linked during a
suspect or confirmed biological event
System is in place for sending and receiving medical
countermeasures during a public health emergency
System is in place for sending and receiving health
personnel during a public health emergency
Risk Communication Systems (plans, mechanisms, etc.)
Internal and Partner Communication and Coordination
Public Communication
Communication Engagement with Affected Communities
Dynamic Listening and Rumour Management
Label
Score
R.1.1
4
R.1.2
4
R.2.1
3
R.2.2
2
R.2.3
3
R.2.4
4
R.3.1
4
R.4.1
5
R.4.2
5
R.5.1
R.5.2
R.5.3
R.5.4
R.5.5
4
4
4
4
4
RESPOND
(Other IHR-related Hazards and PoE)
Capacity Element
PoE
Points of Entry
CE
Chemical Events
RE
Radiation Emergencies
Indicator
Routine capacities are established at PoE.
Effective Public Health Response at Points of Entry
Mechanisms are established and functioning for detecting
and responding to chemical events or emergencies.
Enabling environment is in place for management of
chemical Events
Mechanisms are established and functioning for detecting
and responding to radiological and nuclear emergencies.
Enabling environment is in place for management of
Radiation Emergencies
Label
PoE.1
PoE.2
Score
4
4
CE.1
3
CE.2
3
RE.1
3
RE.2
3
7. Tim Assessor…2
Daftar Tim Assessor
NAME
Dr Karen Sliter
FROM
AREA TO ASSESS
C0-LEAD
DONE MISSION
BEFORE
APHIS,
(US) Govt.
Team Lead
Linking PH & Security
Rajesh
yes
FAO
(Netherlands)
WHO, SEARO
(Nepal)
PH Sweden
(Sweden)
Team Co-Lead
Food safety
Immunization
Zhanat
Bibek
yes
yes
Laboratory System
Biosafety & Biosecurity
OIE
John
yes
Dr John Ridderhof
CDC
(US)
AMR
Emergency Response
Henk
Christophe
Dr Rajesh
Sreedharan
Zhanat Carr
WHO, HQ
(India)
WHO, HQ
(Kazakhstan)
Legislation
Karen
yes
Radiation Emergencies
Chemical Events
John
Daren
yes
Dr Henk Ormel
Dr Bardan J Rana
Dr Thomas
Tolfvenstam
yes
7. Tim Assessor…2
Daftar Tim Assessor
NAME
Dr Christophe
Bayer
FROM
(Germany)
AREA TO ASSESS
C0-LEAD
DONE MISSION
BEFORE
Michael
Maria
yes
Rajesh
Yes
Michael Adjabeng
(Ghana)
Med
Countermeasure
Workforce
Develop
PoE
Dr Daren Hunt
(New Zealand)
Sr. PH Admin
EDCD, (Nepal)
Preparedness
Risk Com
Coordination
Michael
Christophe
Bardan
yes
Dr Bibek Lal
Zoonotic
Diseases
Henk
yes
Real Time
Surveillance
Reporting
Report writing
OIE
Thomas
no
Ana Isabel Batalha OIE
( -)
Maria Consorcia
Quizon
Mark Nunn
SEAFTYNET
(Philippines)
(UK)
no
Yes
Thank You
Contact
Website :
ghsagenda.org
Email GHSA Secretariat :
ghsa.indonesia@gmail.com
ghsa.indonesia.org
DALAM GHSA
Dr. Jane Soepardi
Direktur Surveilans dan Karantina Kesehatan
Ditjen Pencegahan dan Pengendalian Penyakit
Kementerian Kesehatan
Disampaikan pada Seminar Sehari
Ketahanan Kesehatan Global dalam Prespektif Pertahanan Negara
Jakarta, 9 November 2017
OUTLINE
Overview GHSA
Implementasi
Pencapaian
Rencana Tindak Lanjut
Ancaman Kesehatan
Masyarakat
EBOLA
POLIO
ANTHRAX
MDR TB
FOOD
SUPPLY
AVIAN FLU
Globalization
of travel, food
and medicines
MERS COV
Emergence &
spread of
new
pathogens
Rise of
drug
resistance
Intentional
Release
and/or
Engineering
Reemergence
of known
pathogens
Why Global Health Security?
• In today’s increasingly interconnected world we remain
vulnerable.
• No one nation can achieve Global Health Security on its own.
• The vitality of the global economy is only as secure as the
collective health of our people.
• 11 years ago SARS cost $30 billion in only 4
months.
• The anthrax attacks of 2001 infected 22 people,
killed 5, and cost more than $1 billion to clean up.
• The 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic killed
284,000 people in its first year alone.
• AIDS spread silently for decades.
GHSA Accelerate the implementation of WHO’s
International Health Regulations (2005), OIE’s
Performance Veterinary Services (PVS), and other
global health security frameworks.
6
Global Health Security Agenda Objectives
Prevent Avoidable Epidemics
1. Prevent the emergence and spread of antimicrobial drug resistant organisms
and emerging zoonotic diseases and strengthen international regulatory
frameworks governing food safety.
2. Promote national biosafety and biosecurity systems.
3. Reduce the number and magnitude of infectious disease outbreaks.
Detect Threats Early
4. Launch, strengthen and link global networks for real-time biosurveillance.
5. Strengthen the global norm of rapid, transparent reporting and sample sharing
in the event of health emergencies of international concern.
6. Develop and deploy novel diagnostics and strengthen laboratory systems.
7. Train and deploy an effective biosurveillance workforce.
Respond Rapidly and Effectively
8. Develop an interconnected global network of Emergency Operations Centers
and multi-sectoral response to biological incidents.
9. Improve global access to medical and non-medical countermeasures during
health emergencies.
7
Overlap Between GHSA and IHR
IHR
GHSA
• Legislation, Policy &
Financing
• Risk communication
• Coordination and NFP
Communication
• Points of Entry
• Food Safety
• Chemical Events
• Radiological
Emergencies
• Surveillance
• Laboratory
• Preparedness
• Response
• Zoonotic diseases
• Human Resources
• Prevent AMR
• Vaccination
Programs
• Nosocomial infection
control
• Regional bio
surveillance hubs
• Sample sharing
• Novel diagnostics
• Sharing medical
countermeasures
and personnel
Joint External Evaluation
Pencapaian Indonesia
1.Ketua Troika tahun 2016
2.Lead Country untuk Zoonosis Action
Package
3.Mendukung Pelaksanaan Joint External
Evaluation (JEE)
4.Mengupayahan Agenda Ketahanan
Kesehatan di semua fora
5.Menguatkan Koordinasi Antar Action
Package
6.Meningkatkan Jumlah Negara Anggota
GHSA
Pernyataan Bersama
Presiden RI dan Presiden AS
Kedua presiden memahami
pentingnya memperluas
kerjasama di bidang kesehatan
dan membangun kapasitas guna
mencegah, mendeteksi dan
menindaklanjuti tantangan
kesehatan global, termasuk
ancaman epidemi.
Melihat peningkatan kerjasama di bidang ini, kedua negara memiliki komitmen
untuk membuat perjanjian pada bidang kesehatan yang akan mampu memberikan
landasan dan arah di masa mendatang.
AS menyambut baik kepemimpinan Indonesia pada inisiatif lima tahunan agenda
keamanan kesehatan dunia (GHSA) yang bertujuan untuk mencapai target yang telah
disepakati bersama, termasuk memimpin Steering Group GHSA pada tahun 2016.
JEJARING GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY
KEMKES
KEMENKO
POLHUKAM
KEMENKO
PMK
KEMTAN
GHS
KEMENRIS
DIKTI
BNPB
KEMHAN
K/L
KEMLU
Indonesia Future Commitments
1.Tetap sebagai Anggota Troika
dalam GHSA
2.Melaksanakan Penilaian JEE
pada 20-24 November 2017
3.Host 5th GHSA Ministerial
Meeting in 2018.
1. Pendahuluan..1
A. Latar Belakang
• SK Menkes No: HK.02.02/MENKES/273/2016 Tentang
Kelompok Kerja Ketahanan Kesehatan Global di Lingkungan
Kemenkes, maka terdapat 19 technical areas / bidang
• Pertimbangan:
– Indonesia sebagai anggota PBB telah menyepakati untuk
melaksanakan IHR 2005.
– Untuk bisa melaksanakan IHR harus memiliki kemampuan
dalam pencegahan, deteksi dini, dan respon cepat
terhadap munculnya penyakit atau kejadian kegawat
daruratan kesehatan yang meresahkan dunia (PHEIC).
– Penilaian IHR 2005 dan GHSA menggunakan JEE tool yang
menggabungkan sebelas Action Packages dalam GHSA dan
8 kapasitas inti IHR 2005
1. Pendahuluan..2
B. Tujuan JEE
• Untuk melakukan penilaian kemampuan suatu
negara untuk mencegah, mendeteksi, dan
melakukan respon secara cepat secara
independen terhadap ancaman kedaruratan
kesehatan masyarakat yang meresahkan dunia
(Public Health Emergency of International
Concern) yang dapat berupa kejadian penyakit
(biologis), kimia maupun radionuklir.
PREVENT
DETECT
RESPOND
1. National Legislation,
Policy and Financing
(Kapus ADK).
1. National Laboratory System
(Dir. Fasyankes/Dir SKK)
2. Real Time Surveillance
(Dir. P2MPL/Dir SKK)
3. Reporting
(Kapusdatin)
4. Workforce Development
(Kapus PSDMK/Dir SKK)
1. Preparedness
(Dir P2ML/Dir. SKK)
2. IHR Coordination,
Communication and
Advocacy
(Dir. SKK)
3. Anti-microbial
Resistance (AMR)
(Dir. Yanfar/Dir BUKR)
4. Zoonotic Disease
(Dir. P2PTVZ)
5. Food Safety
(Dr. Kesling/Dir SKK)
6. Biosafety and
Biosecurity
(Kapus. BDTK)
7. Immunization
(Dir. SKK)
JEE
Technical Area
INTRODUCTION
1.Health System
Kapus ADK
2.JEE Preparation
Dir SKK)
2. Emergency Operation Centres
(Ka PPKK/Dir SKK)
3. Linking PH and Security
Authorities
(Karo Hukor/Dir SKK)
4. Medical Countermeasures and
Personnel Deployment
(Dir. BUKR)
5. Risk Communication
(Karokoyanmas)
Other IHR related HAZARDs and
PoEs
1. Point of Entries (PoEs)
(Dirjen P2P/Dir SKK)
2. Chemical Events
(Dir. Kesling/KesjaOR)
3. Radiation Emergencies
(Dir. KesjaOR/Kesling)
Real time surveillance
PREVENT
Capacity Element
Label
Score
Legislation, laws, regulations, administrative requirements,
policies or other government instruments in place are
sufficient for implementation of IHR.
P.1.1
3
The state can demonstrate that it has adjusted and aligned its
domestic legislation, policies and administrative arrangements
to enable compliance with the IHR (2005)
P.1.2
3
P.2.1 A functional mechanism is established for the
coordination and integration of relevant sectors in the
implementation of IHR
P.2.1
4
P.3
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) detection
P.3.1
3
Antimicrobial Resistance
(AMR)
Surveillance of infections caused by AMR pathogens
P.3.2
3
Healthcare associated infection (HCAI) prevention and control
programs
P.3.3
4
Antimicrobial stewardship activities
P.3.4
4
Surveillance systems in place for priority zoonotic diseases
/pathogens
P.4.1
3
Veterinary or Animal Health Workforce
P.4.2
3
Mechanisms for responding to infectious zoonoses and
potential zoonoses are established and functional
P.4.3
3
Mechanisms are established and functioning for detecting and
responding to foodborne disease and food contamination.
P.5.1
4
Whole-of-government biosafety and biosecurity system is in
place for human, animal, and agriculture facilities
P.6.1
3
Biosafety and biosecurity training and practices
P.6.2
3
P.7
Vaccine coverage (measles) as part of national program
P.7.1
4
Immunization
National vaccine access and delivery
P.7.2
4
P.1
National Legislation,
Policy, and Financing
P.2
IHR Coordination,
Communication and
Advocacy
P.4
Zoonotic Disease
P.5
Food Safety
P.6
Biosafety and
Biosecurity
Indicator
DETECT
Capacity Element
D.1
National Laboratory
System
D.2
Real Time Surveillance
D.3
Reporting
D.4
Workforce
development
Indicator
Laboratory testing for detection of priority diseases
Specimen referral and transport system
Effective modern point of care and laboratory based
diagnostics
Laboratory Quality System
Indicator and event based surveillance systems
Interoperable, interconnected, electronic real-time
reporting system
Analysis of surveillance data
Syndromic surveillance systems
System for efficient reporting to WHO, FAO and OIE
Reporting network and protocols in country
Human resources are available to implement IHR core
capacity requirements
Applied epidemiology training program in place such as
FETP
Workforce strategy
Label
D.1.1
D.1.2
Score
4
5
D.1.3
4
D.1.4
D.2.1
3
4
D.2.2
3
D.2.3
D.2.4
D.3.1
D.3.2
4
4
3
4
D.4.1
4
D.4.2
4
D.4.3
4
RESPOND
Capacity Element
R.1
Preparedness
R.2
Emergency Response
Operations
R.3
Linking Public Health
and Security Authorities
R.4
Medical
countermeasures and
Personnel Deployment
R.5
Risk Communication
Indicator
Multi-hazard national public health emergency
preparedness and response plan is developed and
implemented
Priority public health risks and resources are mapped and
utilized
Capacity to Activate Emergency Operations
Emergency Operations Centre Operating Procedures and
Plans
Emergency Operations Program
Case management procedures are implemented for IHR
relevant hazards
Public Health and Security Authorities, (e.g. Law
Enforcement, Border Control, Customs) are linked during a
suspect or confirmed biological event
System is in place for sending and receiving medical
countermeasures during a public health emergency
System is in place for sending and receiving health
personnel during a public health emergency
Risk Communication Systems (plans, mechanisms, etc.)
Internal and Partner Communication and Coordination
Public Communication
Communication Engagement with Affected Communities
Dynamic Listening and Rumour Management
Label
Score
R.1.1
4
R.1.2
4
R.2.1
3
R.2.2
2
R.2.3
3
R.2.4
4
R.3.1
4
R.4.1
5
R.4.2
5
R.5.1
R.5.2
R.5.3
R.5.4
R.5.5
4
4
4
4
4
RESPOND
(Other IHR-related Hazards and PoE)
Capacity Element
PoE
Points of Entry
CE
Chemical Events
RE
Radiation Emergencies
Indicator
Routine capacities are established at PoE.
Effective Public Health Response at Points of Entry
Mechanisms are established and functioning for detecting
and responding to chemical events or emergencies.
Enabling environment is in place for management of
chemical Events
Mechanisms are established and functioning for detecting
and responding to radiological and nuclear emergencies.
Enabling environment is in place for management of
Radiation Emergencies
Label
PoE.1
PoE.2
Score
4
4
CE.1
3
CE.2
3
RE.1
3
RE.2
3
7. Tim Assessor…2
Daftar Tim Assessor
NAME
Dr Karen Sliter
FROM
AREA TO ASSESS
C0-LEAD
DONE MISSION
BEFORE
APHIS,
(US) Govt.
Team Lead
Linking PH & Security
Rajesh
yes
FAO
(Netherlands)
WHO, SEARO
(Nepal)
PH Sweden
(Sweden)
Team Co-Lead
Food safety
Immunization
Zhanat
Bibek
yes
yes
Laboratory System
Biosafety & Biosecurity
OIE
John
yes
Dr John Ridderhof
CDC
(US)
AMR
Emergency Response
Henk
Christophe
Dr Rajesh
Sreedharan
Zhanat Carr
WHO, HQ
(India)
WHO, HQ
(Kazakhstan)
Legislation
Karen
yes
Radiation Emergencies
Chemical Events
John
Daren
yes
Dr Henk Ormel
Dr Bardan J Rana
Dr Thomas
Tolfvenstam
yes
7. Tim Assessor…2
Daftar Tim Assessor
NAME
Dr Christophe
Bayer
FROM
(Germany)
AREA TO ASSESS
C0-LEAD
DONE MISSION
BEFORE
Michael
Maria
yes
Rajesh
Yes
Michael Adjabeng
(Ghana)
Med
Countermeasure
Workforce
Develop
PoE
Dr Daren Hunt
(New Zealand)
Sr. PH Admin
EDCD, (Nepal)
Preparedness
Risk Com
Coordination
Michael
Christophe
Bardan
yes
Dr Bibek Lal
Zoonotic
Diseases
Henk
yes
Real Time
Surveillance
Reporting
Report writing
OIE
Thomas
no
Ana Isabel Batalha OIE
( -)
Maria Consorcia
Quizon
Mark Nunn
SEAFTYNET
(Philippines)
(UK)
no
Yes
Thank You
Contact
Website :
ghsagenda.org
Email GHSA Secretariat :
ghsa.indonesia@gmail.com
ghsa.indonesia.org