T FIS 1303280 Bibliography
89
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Acar, O. & Patton, B.R. (2012). Argumentation and Formal Reasoning Skills in
An Argumentation-Based Guided Inquiry Course. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences Journal 46 (2012) 4756-4760.
Akpinar, Y., Ardac, D., & Er-Amuce, N. (2014). Development and Validation of
an Argumentation Based Multimedia Science Learning Environment:
Preliminary Findings. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences Journal
116 (2014) 3848-3853.
Anderson W.L. & Krathwohl R. D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching
and Assessing. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives. USA: Addison Wesley Longman.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2013). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 2 Cetakan
Ketiga. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek
Edisi Revisi IV. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Aydeniz, M. & Ozdilek, Z. (2015). Assessing Pre-Service Science Teacher’s
Understanding of Scientific Argumentation: What do They Know About
Argumentation After Four Years of College Science? Science Education
International Journal Vol. 26, Issue 2, 217-239.
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2006). Kurikulum 2006 Mata Pelajaran
Fisika SMA/MA. Jakarta.
Celik P., Onder F., & Silay, I. (2011). The Effects of Problem Based Learning on
the Student’s Success in Physics Course. Procedia-Social and Behavioral
Sciences Journal 28 (2013) 656-660.
Dahar, R. W. (2011). Teori-teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Penerbit
Erlangga.
Demirbag, M. & Gunel, M. (2014). Integrating Argument-Based Science Inquiry
with Modal Representations: Impact on Science Achievement,
Argumentation, and Writing Skills. Educational Sciences: Theory and
Practice 14(1) 386-391.
Demircioglu, T & Ucar, S. (2012). The Effect of Argument-Driven Inquiry on PreService Science Teacher’s Attitudes and Argumentation Skills. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences Journal 46 (2012) 5035-5039.
Andi Nuryandi, 2016
PENERAPAN DIALOGICAL ARGUMENTATION INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL (DAIM) UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MEMAHAMI DAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMA
PADA MATERI LISTRIK STATIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
90
Diwu, C. & Ogunniyi, M. (2010). Effects of Dialogical Argumentation
Instructional Model on Grade 10 Learner’s Conception of Fermentation.
Project for the Study of Alternative Education in South Africa
(PRAESA) Occasional Papers 36, University of Cape Town, Republik of
South Africa.
Erduran, S., Ardac, D. & Guzel B.Y. (2006). Learning to Teach Argumentation:
Case Studies of Pre-Service Secondary Science Teachers. Eurasia Journal
of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education Volume 2 Number 2
(1-13).
Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y. & Jee-Young, Park. (2015). Research Trends on
Argumentation in Science Education: A Journal Content Analysis From
1998-2014. International Journal of STEM Education. DOI 10.1186/s
40594-015-0020-1.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2007). How to Design and Evaluate Research in
Education with PowerWeb (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Hake, R. R. (1997). Interactive-Engagement Versus Tradisional Methods : A SixThousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data For Introductory
Physics Courses: Journal American Association of Physic Teacher. 66, 1,
64-74.
Hlazo, N & Ogunniyi, M.B. (2014). Effects of A Dialogical Argumentation
Instructional Model on Grade 10 Learner’s Conceptions of Lightning.
Thesis, School of Science and Mathematics Education, The University of
the Western Cape, Republik of South Africa.
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P. & Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in Science
Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Dodrech:
Springer.
Kaya, E., Erduran, S., & Cetin P.S. (2010). High School Student’s Perceptions of
Argumentation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences Journal 2 (2010)
3971-3975.
Knight, A.M., & McNeill, K.L. (2015). Comparing Students’ Individual Written
and Collaborative Oral Socioscientific Arguments. International Journal of
Environmental & Science Education. 10(5). 623-647.
Kostelnikova, M. & Ozvoldova, M. (2013). Inquiry in Physics Classes by Means
of Remote Experiments. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences Journal
89 (2013) 133-138.
Andi Nuryandi, 2016
PENERAPAN DIALOGICAL ARGUMENTATION INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL (DAIM) UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MEMAHAMI DAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMA
PADA MATERI LISTRIK STATIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
91
Kuswana, W. S. (2013). Taksonomi Kognitif Perkembangan Ragam Berpikir
(Cetakan Kedua). Bandung: Penerbit PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muslim, & Suhandi, A. (2012). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika
Sekolah untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan
Berargumentasi calon Guru Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia 8
(2012) 174-183.
Ogunniyi, M. B. (2007a). Teachers’ Stance and Practical Arguments Regarding A
Science Indigenous Knowledge Curriculum, paper 1. International
Journal of Science Education, 29 (8). 963-985.
Ogunniyi, M. B. (2007b). Teachers’ Stance and Practical Arguments Regarding A
Science Indigenous Knowledge Curriculum, paper 2. International
Journal of Science Education, 29 (10). 1189-1207.
Ogunniyi, M. B. (2008). Effect Of An Argumentation-Based Course on Teacher’s
Disposition Towards A Science-Indigenous Knowledge Curriculum.
International Journal of Environmental & Science Education Vol. 3, No.
4, 159-177.
Okumus, S., & Unal, S. (2012). The Effects of Argumentation Model on Student’s
Achievement and Argumentation Skills in Science. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences Journal 46 (2012) 457-461.
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative,
Critical Discourse. American Association for the Advancement of
Science, 1200 New York Avenue, Washington, DC 20005.
Passmore, C.M., & Svoboda, J. (2012). Exploring Opportunities for
Argumentation in Modelling Classrooms. International Journal of Science
Education Vol. 34 No. 10, 1535-1554.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Permendikbud Nomor 54
Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan. Jakarta: Kementerian
Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Robertshaw, B. & Campbell, T. (2013). Constructing Arguments: Investigating
Pre-Service Science Teacher’s Argumentation Skills in a Socio-Scientific
Context. Science Education International Journal Vol. 24, Issue 2, 195211.
Andi Nuryandi, 2016
PENERAPAN DIALOGICAL ARGUMENTATION INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL (DAIM) UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MEMAHAMI DAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMA
PADA MATERI LISTRIK STATIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
92
Sadler, Troy D. (2006). Promoting Discourse and Argumentation in Science
Teacher Education. Journal of Science Teacher Education (17) 323-346.
DOI: 10.1007/s10972-006-9025-4.
Sampson, V. & Grooms, J. (2009). Promoting and Supporting Scientific
Argumentation in the Classroom: The Evaluate-Alternatives Instructional
Model. Science Education: 66-73.
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning To Teach Argumentation:
Research and Development in the Science Classroom. International
Journal of Science Education. Vol. 28 Nos 2-3, pp 235-260.
Skoumios, M. (2009). The Effect of Sociocognitive Conflict on Students’ Dialogic
Argumentation about Floating and Sinking. International Journal of
Environmental & Science Education. Vol. 4. No. 4. 381-399.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Penelitian Kuantitatif,
Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : Penerbit Alfabeta.
Andi Nuryandi, 2016
PENERAPAN DIALOGICAL ARGUMENTATION INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL (DAIM) UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MEMAHAMI DAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMA
PADA MATERI LISTRIK STATIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
93
LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN
Andi Nuryandi, 2016
PENERAPAN DIALOGICAL ARGUMENTATION INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL (DAIM) UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MEMAHAMI DAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMA
PADA MATERI LISTRIK STATIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Acar, O. & Patton, B.R. (2012). Argumentation and Formal Reasoning Skills in
An Argumentation-Based Guided Inquiry Course. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences Journal 46 (2012) 4756-4760.
Akpinar, Y., Ardac, D., & Er-Amuce, N. (2014). Development and Validation of
an Argumentation Based Multimedia Science Learning Environment:
Preliminary Findings. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences Journal
116 (2014) 3848-3853.
Anderson W.L. & Krathwohl R. D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching
and Assessing. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives. USA: Addison Wesley Longman.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2013). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 2 Cetakan
Ketiga. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek
Edisi Revisi IV. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Aydeniz, M. & Ozdilek, Z. (2015). Assessing Pre-Service Science Teacher’s
Understanding of Scientific Argumentation: What do They Know About
Argumentation After Four Years of College Science? Science Education
International Journal Vol. 26, Issue 2, 217-239.
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2006). Kurikulum 2006 Mata Pelajaran
Fisika SMA/MA. Jakarta.
Celik P., Onder F., & Silay, I. (2011). The Effects of Problem Based Learning on
the Student’s Success in Physics Course. Procedia-Social and Behavioral
Sciences Journal 28 (2013) 656-660.
Dahar, R. W. (2011). Teori-teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Penerbit
Erlangga.
Demirbag, M. & Gunel, M. (2014). Integrating Argument-Based Science Inquiry
with Modal Representations: Impact on Science Achievement,
Argumentation, and Writing Skills. Educational Sciences: Theory and
Practice 14(1) 386-391.
Demircioglu, T & Ucar, S. (2012). The Effect of Argument-Driven Inquiry on PreService Science Teacher’s Attitudes and Argumentation Skills. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences Journal 46 (2012) 5035-5039.
Andi Nuryandi, 2016
PENERAPAN DIALOGICAL ARGUMENTATION INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL (DAIM) UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MEMAHAMI DAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMA
PADA MATERI LISTRIK STATIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
90
Diwu, C. & Ogunniyi, M. (2010). Effects of Dialogical Argumentation
Instructional Model on Grade 10 Learner’s Conception of Fermentation.
Project for the Study of Alternative Education in South Africa
(PRAESA) Occasional Papers 36, University of Cape Town, Republik of
South Africa.
Erduran, S., Ardac, D. & Guzel B.Y. (2006). Learning to Teach Argumentation:
Case Studies of Pre-Service Secondary Science Teachers. Eurasia Journal
of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education Volume 2 Number 2
(1-13).
Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y. & Jee-Young, Park. (2015). Research Trends on
Argumentation in Science Education: A Journal Content Analysis From
1998-2014. International Journal of STEM Education. DOI 10.1186/s
40594-015-0020-1.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2007). How to Design and Evaluate Research in
Education with PowerWeb (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Hake, R. R. (1997). Interactive-Engagement Versus Tradisional Methods : A SixThousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data For Introductory
Physics Courses: Journal American Association of Physic Teacher. 66, 1,
64-74.
Hlazo, N & Ogunniyi, M.B. (2014). Effects of A Dialogical Argumentation
Instructional Model on Grade 10 Learner’s Conceptions of Lightning.
Thesis, School of Science and Mathematics Education, The University of
the Western Cape, Republik of South Africa.
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P. & Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in Science
Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Dodrech:
Springer.
Kaya, E., Erduran, S., & Cetin P.S. (2010). High School Student’s Perceptions of
Argumentation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences Journal 2 (2010)
3971-3975.
Knight, A.M., & McNeill, K.L. (2015). Comparing Students’ Individual Written
and Collaborative Oral Socioscientific Arguments. International Journal of
Environmental & Science Education. 10(5). 623-647.
Kostelnikova, M. & Ozvoldova, M. (2013). Inquiry in Physics Classes by Means
of Remote Experiments. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences Journal
89 (2013) 133-138.
Andi Nuryandi, 2016
PENERAPAN DIALOGICAL ARGUMENTATION INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL (DAIM) UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MEMAHAMI DAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMA
PADA MATERI LISTRIK STATIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
91
Kuswana, W. S. (2013). Taksonomi Kognitif Perkembangan Ragam Berpikir
(Cetakan Kedua). Bandung: Penerbit PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muslim, & Suhandi, A. (2012). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika
Sekolah untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan
Berargumentasi calon Guru Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia 8
(2012) 174-183.
Ogunniyi, M. B. (2007a). Teachers’ Stance and Practical Arguments Regarding A
Science Indigenous Knowledge Curriculum, paper 1. International
Journal of Science Education, 29 (8). 963-985.
Ogunniyi, M. B. (2007b). Teachers’ Stance and Practical Arguments Regarding A
Science Indigenous Knowledge Curriculum, paper 2. International
Journal of Science Education, 29 (10). 1189-1207.
Ogunniyi, M. B. (2008). Effect Of An Argumentation-Based Course on Teacher’s
Disposition Towards A Science-Indigenous Knowledge Curriculum.
International Journal of Environmental & Science Education Vol. 3, No.
4, 159-177.
Okumus, S., & Unal, S. (2012). The Effects of Argumentation Model on Student’s
Achievement and Argumentation Skills in Science. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences Journal 46 (2012) 457-461.
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative,
Critical Discourse. American Association for the Advancement of
Science, 1200 New York Avenue, Washington, DC 20005.
Passmore, C.M., & Svoboda, J. (2012). Exploring Opportunities for
Argumentation in Modelling Classrooms. International Journal of Science
Education Vol. 34 No. 10, 1535-1554.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Permendikbud Nomor 54
Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan. Jakarta: Kementerian
Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Robertshaw, B. & Campbell, T. (2013). Constructing Arguments: Investigating
Pre-Service Science Teacher’s Argumentation Skills in a Socio-Scientific
Context. Science Education International Journal Vol. 24, Issue 2, 195211.
Andi Nuryandi, 2016
PENERAPAN DIALOGICAL ARGUMENTATION INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL (DAIM) UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MEMAHAMI DAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMA
PADA MATERI LISTRIK STATIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
92
Sadler, Troy D. (2006). Promoting Discourse and Argumentation in Science
Teacher Education. Journal of Science Teacher Education (17) 323-346.
DOI: 10.1007/s10972-006-9025-4.
Sampson, V. & Grooms, J. (2009). Promoting and Supporting Scientific
Argumentation in the Classroom: The Evaluate-Alternatives Instructional
Model. Science Education: 66-73.
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning To Teach Argumentation:
Research and Development in the Science Classroom. International
Journal of Science Education. Vol. 28 Nos 2-3, pp 235-260.
Skoumios, M. (2009). The Effect of Sociocognitive Conflict on Students’ Dialogic
Argumentation about Floating and Sinking. International Journal of
Environmental & Science Education. Vol. 4. No. 4. 381-399.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Penelitian Kuantitatif,
Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : Penerbit Alfabeta.
Andi Nuryandi, 2016
PENERAPAN DIALOGICAL ARGUMENTATION INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL (DAIM) UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MEMAHAMI DAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMA
PADA MATERI LISTRIK STATIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
93
LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN
Andi Nuryandi, 2016
PENERAPAN DIALOGICAL ARGUMENTATION INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL (DAIM) UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MEMAHAMI DAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMA
PADA MATERI LISTRIK STATIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu