decimal fraction separator specification
All Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Change Request 130
#:
Assigned OGC 11-003
Document #:
Name: *JW Lokin
Organization: *private
Email: *[email protected]
Document
Name/Version:
*KML / 2.2.0
OGC Project
Document:
*07-147r2
If this is a revision of a previous submission and you have a Change Request Number, then check here:
Enter the CR number here:
Enter the Revsion Number that you are revising here:
Title:
Source:
*decimal fraction separator speciļ¬cation
*KML 2.2 SWG
Work item code:
Category:
* D (Editorial modiļ¬cation)
Reason for *
change:
Ongoing complaints about problems in locales where the decimal
fraction separator is a comma, which interferes with the separator
specified for .
Summary of *
change:
In all places where this is relevant, it should be explicitly stated
1 of 2
the for the purpose of this specification, only the dot (.), ASCII
code 0x2E, is allowed.
I agree that this is obvious, but it is always a good thing to be
able to refer to an explicit clause in the specification, when
complaints occur.
Consequences if Misunderstanding wil not diminish.
not approved:
Clauses affected: *
8.30.3 Point,
8.16.3 LinearRing,
8.17.3 LineString
Additional
Documents
affected:
Supporting
Documentation:
Comments:
Status:
Assigned
Assigned To:
KML SWG
Disposition:
Referred and Posted
2 of 2
Change Request 130
#:
Assigned OGC 11-003
Document #:
Name: *JW Lokin
Organization: *private
Email: *[email protected]
Document
Name/Version:
*KML / 2.2.0
OGC Project
Document:
*07-147r2
If this is a revision of a previous submission and you have a Change Request Number, then check here:
Enter the CR number here:
Enter the Revsion Number that you are revising here:
Title:
Source:
*decimal fraction separator speciļ¬cation
*KML 2.2 SWG
Work item code:
Category:
* D (Editorial modiļ¬cation)
Reason for *
change:
Ongoing complaints about problems in locales where the decimal
fraction separator is a comma, which interferes with the separator
specified for .
Summary of *
change:
In all places where this is relevant, it should be explicitly stated
1 of 2
the for the purpose of this specification, only the dot (.), ASCII
code 0x2E, is allowed.
I agree that this is obvious, but it is always a good thing to be
able to refer to an explicit clause in the specification, when
complaints occur.
Consequences if Misunderstanding wil not diminish.
not approved:
Clauses affected: *
8.30.3 Point,
8.16.3 LinearRing,
8.17.3 LineString
Additional
Documents
affected:
Supporting
Documentation:
Comments:
Status:
Assigned
Assigned To:
KML SWG
Disposition:
Referred and Posted
2 of 2